From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 4 12:39:06 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BC816A41B for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:39:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from mx1.netclusive.de (mx1.netclusive.de [89.110.132.131]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A9E13C4CC for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:39:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (sub87-230-112-188.he-dsl.de [87.230.112.188]) (Authenticated sender: ncf1534p2) by mx1.netclusive.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34981DE8109 for ; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:42:53 +0100 (CET) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id A450815217; Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:28:57 +0100 (CET) To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.devel.sparc Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 12:28:57 +0100 (CET) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <200711011822.25884.linimon@lonesome.com> <472DACD7.6040501@FreeBSD.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: sunny.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1194175737 41134 192.168.100.5 (4 Nov 2007 11:28:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2007 11:28:57 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD/6.2-RELEASE-p8 (sparc64)) Subject: Re: Doesn't anything work around here? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:39:06 -0000 On Sun, 04 Nov 2007 12:28:23 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote: > ^^^^^ >> Someone is working on FreeBSD/sparc32? > FreeBSD does not support 32-bit sparc and it is unlikely it ever will. That's why I was a little shocked about the Sun4v. Was that a typo? >> I'm just wondering how two really common apps that have been broken for >> quite a while now could just slip through the grid. > Few people use sparc64 on their desktop. That means that if you want to > do that you are running without the benefit of a large testing > community, and you will have to shoulder part of that burden yourself. That would be fine with me. So I wasn't complaining about the ports themselves being broken or even that noone had noticed Keepassx being broken (although that doesn't even build on my machine). When I couldn't get Firefox and Thunderbird to run I googled around a bit to find a solution. All I found out was that the broken port was known for more than a year now. It wasn't a problem that nobody actually fixed it (I know the sparc64 community on FreeBSD is still quite small) but that nobody had marked the ports as broken. My complaint was actually that just about everybody had to find out by themselves that these ports are broken. I was annoying enough for me with a U60 with 450MHz CPUs. I wonder how long it would have taken someone with a much slower machine to "find out". Regards Chris