Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 12:03:13 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: "James O'Gorman" <james@netinertia.co.uk> Cc: "freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org" <freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: ports/176334: Fix port: sysutils/boxbackup rc script and OPTIONSng Message-ID: <CADLo83_c2H7CdSKtB88UbQVL3MRQQSx-3KbnKZ8xx9Bv54dt6Q@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130223120130.GK1672@netinertia.co.uk> References: <201302212011.r1LKBJRD020916@freefall.freebsd.org> <20130223111646.GI1672@netinertia.co.uk> <CADLo839wb1JTiBwBntiqNohpFxnm16M6vr9g=97xH9emV2CEgA@mail.gmail.com> <20130223120130.GK1672@netinertia.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23 February 2013 12:01, James O'Gorman <james@netinertia.co.uk> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2013 at 11:44:52AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote: >> On 23 February 2013 11:16, James O'Gorman <james@netinertia.co.uk> wrote: >> > The patch looks fine to me in general. Only thing I noticed is that with >> > the pkg-message the notice about the config files moving seems to have >> > been dropped from the client component. >> > >> > If the patch is updated for this I'll be happy for it to be commented. >> >> Ah-- from my reading of the current pkg-message.client the config >> files movement isn't mentioned? > > Hmm, yes, good point, that is how it reads at the moment, but it should > probably be applied to both. I hadn't noticed that at the last commit. > >> Is it the client or the server that uses the config files? > > Both. Under ETCDIR there's a subdir for bbackupd and bbstored. The > configs are autogenerated when you first install, but the rc script now > looks in the new location so the configs for both client and server need > to be modified. > OK, cool, the new patch keeps the config file message in regardless. http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/boxbackup-fixes2.diff Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83_c2H7CdSKtB88UbQVL3MRQQSx-3KbnKZ8xx9Bv54dt6Q>