Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 27 Jun 2008 11:28:39 +0400
From:      Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Mikhail Teterin <mi+mill@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: .warning directives in Makefile
Message-ID:  <486496A7.1000402@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4863C80E.2010309@aldan.algebra.com>
References:  <4863C0D2.1020804@FreeBSD.org> <4863C80E.2010309@aldan.algebra.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> 
>> But I'd like remind .warning directive pollutes stderr
> Warnings are NOT pollution...
>> and discouraged portupgrade which was designed to catch messages from 
>> stderr and rises errors.
> I'd say, the portupgrade needs fixing, if it does, indeed, choke on 

Well, only imagemagic and ghostscript* use .warning. It is NOT a common 
way to print warnings.
Why do you think portupgrade needs fixing?

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?486496A7.1000402>