From owner-freebsd-arch Tue Oct 30 8:50:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from atg.aciworldwide.com (h139-142-180-4.gtcust.grouptelecom.net [139.142.180.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED24B37B405; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 08:50:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from atg.aciworldwide.com (atg.aciworldwide.com [139.142.180.33]) by atg.aciworldwide.com (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id f9UGof0H009849; Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:50:41 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200110301650.f9UGof0H009849@atg.aciworldwide.com> Organization: ACI Worldwide - Advanced Technology Group X-URL: http://www.aciworldwide.com/ X-Notes-Item: Just say NO to Notes! To: Giorgos Keramidas Cc: Robert Watson , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GNU Compiler Symlinks In-Reply-To: Message from Giorgos Keramidas of "Tue, 30 Oct 2001 01:21:43 +0200." <20011030012143.B32738@hades.hell.gr> Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 09:50:41 -0700 From: Lyndon Nerenberg Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Well, Lyndon, this is quickly turning into a flamefest. 64 bit time_t is a flamefest. This, OTOH, is a very reasonable discussion. > It really is not worth it, is it? Without discussion there would never be change. I was curious to discover the rational for keeping the GNU names for the C compiler (but not the other GNU tools). I'm not sure I really received an answer, and maybe that's the answer in itself. But you're right - this horse is dead. --lyndon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message