From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Dec 17 05:36:54 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA26903 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 05:36:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au (adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au [129.127.36.247]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA26898 for ; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 05:36:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au) Received: from bragg (bragg [129.127.36.34]) by adelphi.physics.adelaide.edu.au (8.8.8/8.8.8/UofA-1.5) with SMTP id AAA01352 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:06:42 +1030 (CST) Received: from localhost by bragg; (5.65/1.1.8.2/05Aug95-0227PM) id AA01199; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:06:42 +1030 Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 00:06:42 +1030 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway X-Sender: kkennawa@bragg To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Proposal: afterstep/windowmaker categories Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org There are a proliferation of applications being created for the afterstep and windowmaker WMs (most of them "dockable" with the icon bar). Many of these are already ports, and I'm planning to submit ports for some of the others (as well as an update to the afterstep port itself, once I hear back from the maintainer). It would be good if there was some way to identify these from other types of X utilities - how about adding the new virtual categories "afterstep" and "windowmaker" (we already have "kde")? Any thoughts? Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message