From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Feb 10 22:59:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-questions>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA03875
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 22:59:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gdi.uoregon.edu (gdi.uoregon.edu [128.223.170.30])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA03869
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 22:59:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by gdi.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id WAA00978; Mon, 10 Feb 1997 22:59:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 22:59:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@gdi.uoregon.edu>
X-Sender: dwhite@localhost
Reply-To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To: "Sean J. Schluntz" <schluntz@pinpt.com>
cc: questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD emulation of Linus and SCO question.
In-Reply-To: <Chameleon.855617262.List@journeyman>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.3.94.970210225824.923B-100000@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 10 Feb 1997, Sean J. Schluntz wrote:

> When v2.2R comes out which would be better.  A program written for Linux of 
> SCO Openserver?  (Unfortunatly some of the packages I'm looking at only have 
> these as choices for me.)

I personally think the Linux emulation is better, but it does depend on
the program and how intrusive on the system it is.

> I'm going to be using v2.2R with XInside's excelerated X Server, Motif
> 2.0 and the CDE. 

CDE works with FreeBSD?  Neat!  Now if it was free and not so darn big! :)

Doug White                              | University of Oregon  
Internet:  dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu    | Residence Networking Assistant
http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite    | Computer Science Major