From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Dec 20 07:14:43 1995
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id HAA22791
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:14:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA22786
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:14:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA01396; Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:14:32 -0800
To: davidg@Root.COM
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: conf.c and USL copyright at top 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:08:30 PST."
             <199512201508.HAA00180@corbin.Root.COM> 
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 1995 07:14:32 -0800
Message-ID: <1393.819472472@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

Are you sure it's genuinely _going away_ or is it just going to become
a repository for miscellaneous stub declarations?

						Jordan

> >OK, so it was a mistake to add code to encumbered files.  No argument
> >from anybody on that point, I'm pretty sure.  However, do we just
> >throw up our hands in defeat?  I surely hope not!  Your analysis below
> >would certainly suggest to me that removing the USL copyright is now
> >an option we can realistically entertain.  It's not even remotely
> >"derived" from now.  In our CVS tree, we're no worse off than before.
> >In our exported tree, it's one less encumbered file, right?
> 
>    conf.c will be going away in the near future, anyway, so why is this an
> issue?
> 
> -DG