Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 02 Nov 1999 13:44:48 +0100
From:      Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
To:        "Daniel M. Eischen" <eischen@vigrid.com>
Cc:        Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Threads models and FreeBSD. (Next Step) 
Message-ID:  <25676.941546688@critter.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Nov 1999 07:40:46 EST." <381EDBCE.FD7FBA68@vigrid.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <381EDBCE.FD7FBA68@vigrid.com>, "Daniel M. Eischen" writes:

>> >Disagree.  I want lightweight processes to have their own quantum
>> >not limited (in total) to the parent process quantum.
>> 
>> That would clearly kill the "lightweight" in "lightweight process"...
>
>That doesn't mean they each have to have the same quantum as a non-MT
>process.

That has nothing to do with it.

There is not much point in making a lightweight process facility
if the resulting processes are not lightweight.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25676.941546688>