Date: Tue, 02 Nov 1999 13:44:48 +0100 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: "Daniel M. Eischen" <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threads models and FreeBSD. (Next Step) Message-ID: <25676.941546688@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Nov 1999 07:40:46 EST." <381EDBCE.FD7FBA68@vigrid.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <381EDBCE.FD7FBA68@vigrid.com>, "Daniel M. Eischen" writes: >> >Disagree. I want lightweight processes to have their own quantum >> >not limited (in total) to the parent process quantum. >> >> That would clearly kill the "lightweight" in "lightweight process"... > >That doesn't mean they each have to have the same quantum as a non-MT >process. That has nothing to do with it. There is not much point in making a lightweight process facility if the resulting processes are not lightweight. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop." FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?25676.941546688>