From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 20 17:41:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 888BE106568F for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FAE8FC6E for ; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:41:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (r2bb217.net.upc.cz [62.245.117.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7KHesTB075209; Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:40:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Dmitry Marakasov In-Reply-To: <20090820164036.GA12998@hades.panopticon> References: <20090820023314.GF1295@hades.panopticon> <4A8CCC24.8050605@p6m7g8.com> <6B974976DD234EF08949F6A8@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20090820164036.GA12998@hades.panopticon> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZQnwTDzvZBckU5LQF6N/" Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:40:54 +0200 Message-Id: <1250790054.45433.0.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 62.245.117.217; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: "Philip M. Gollucci" , Paul Schmehl , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Migration to new SourceForge url scheme now inevitable, solution X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:41:04 -0000 --=-ZQnwTDzvZBckU5LQF6N/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dmitry Marakasov p=ED=B9e v =E8t 20. 08. 2009 v 20:40 +0400: > * Paul Schmehl (pschmehl_lists@tx.rr.com) wrote: >=20 > > I've been following this discussion closely since several of my ports f= etch=20 > > from Sourceforge. Is it safe to assume that some global solution will = be=20 > > applied to the ports tree? Or are we maintainers going to need to subm= it PRs=20 > > for affected ports once a solution is agreed upon? >=20 > This should be done globally, or else we'll end up with 90% unfetchable > SF ports for 8.0 release. I'm preparing the patch currently. Once you have a patch, send it over for eyeball-review and approval. Thanks for attacking this! --=20 Pav Lucistnik 42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot. --=-ZQnwTDzvZBckU5LQF6N/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkqNiqMACgkQntdYP8FOsoKh6QCdGsSjsM/YjL21D2zjBFaV0AkZ eKIAn0nJnUS9wcez+0U7BUfDZQ6FdYYs =9yXR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZQnwTDzvZBckU5LQF6N/--