Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 14:28:50 -0400 From: "Matt Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> To: "Andre Oppermann" <andre@freebsd.org>, "Bruce M Simpson" <bms@spc.org> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing T/TCP and replacing it with something simpler Message-ID: <00e901c4b79b$d13e6e40$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> References: <4177C8AD.6060706@freebsd.org><20041021153933.GK13756@empiric.icir.org> <4177E25E.804639E@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 at 04:33:17PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > > > Thus after the removal of T/TCP for the reasons above I want to provide > > > a work-alike replacement for T/TCP's functionality: > > > > I disagree. I think the time spent here would be better spent on working > > on an import of SCTP into the kernel, perhaps the KAME code base would > > be a good starting point. > > Is the SCTP in KAME complete and stable? Are there any other (open source) > implementations of it? The SCTP home page (www.sctp.org) has a list of implementations. Note that I had to use Google's cache of the site -- I believe there was a Slashdot article on SCTP this morning which may have taken down the site. AIX, Solaris, HP and Cisco all support SCTP in their latest OS versions. There are aslo a few different (non-free) implementations for Windows, and at least one open-source implementation for Linux (http://www.openss7.org) -- Matt Emmerton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?00e901c4b79b$d13e6e40$1200a8c0>