From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Apr  1 03:36:34 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023DF16A4CE
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 03:36:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.uk.psi.com (mail.uk.psi.com [154.8.2.142])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17B243D58
	for <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Apr 2004 03:36:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from alan.barrow@psineteurope.com)
Received: from camdev-01.ops.uk.psi.com ([154.8.22.17])
	by mail.uk.psi.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1B90Un-0005Pz-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 12:36:29 +0100
From: alan barrow <alan.barrow@psineteurope.com>
To: "James R. Van Artsalen" <james@jrv.org>
In-Reply-To: <406BFD89.1010905@jrv.org>
References: <1080786978.406b80221fd5f@webmail2.infowest.com>
	<406B9C6F.5070803@jrv.org>
	<1080818179.2843.47.camel@camdev-01.ops.uk.psi.com> 
	<406BFD89.1010905@jrv.org>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-9.7x.1) 
Date: 01 Apr 2004 12:36:29 +0100
Message-Id: <1080819389.2845.62.camel@camdev-01.ops.uk.psi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
cc: "freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org" <freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: SMP issues on K8S Pro S2882G3NR
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
	<mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Apr 2004 11:36:34 -0000

I know...

So have you tried the 2.0 bios ?

On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 12:31, James R. Van Artsalen wrote:
> alan barrow wrote:
> 
> >Is this a problem ? turn off APIC ?
> >
> >  
> >
> The APIC is needed for SMP.  The fact that the other system shows no 
> APIC is probably related to the SMP problem.
>