Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 11:32:08 -0800 (PST) From: "f.johan.beisser" <jan@caustic.org> To: Anthony Atkielski <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com> Cc: FreeBSD Chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: UNIX on the Desktop (was: Re: Why no Indians and Arabs?) Message-ID: <20011216112759.U16958-100000@localhost> In-Reply-To: <000401c1865f$fac145f0$0a00000a@atkielski.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > Because I consider UNIX to be useful as a server. I don't see any place for > UNIX on the desktop, except as a geek curosity, and so I don't worry about > that; but its utility as a server is well established, and that is what > interests me. i don't really have a response. i have *several* desktop UNIX workstations, ranging from OpenBSD/sparc to FreeBSD 4.5, and FreeBSD-CURRENT. it's.. enlightening to think that anyone would say that UNIX is not appropriate for the desktop, when it works so well for it - at least, for what i do. i'm curious, why would you say it doesn't work well? no flame intended, i'm just wondering. -------/ f. johan beisser /--------------------------------------+ http://caustic.org/~jan jan@caustic.org "John Ashcroft is really just the reanimated corpse of J. Edgar Hoover." -- Tim Triche To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011216112759.U16958-100000>