Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 14:41:33 +0430 From: takCoder <tak.official@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: difference between cu and putty for serial connections Message-ID: <CAPkyVLwF5_BU4FjZh-6_Bgqd0rWYOFGRrASM=cFNH_EJazSxbQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPkyVLwzg6RkqPN3N7g=stcbd%2B0e3_-8MsbrXtqhgu7xbu3SAA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAPkyVLwzg6RkqPN3N7g=stcbd%2B0e3_-8MsbrXtqhgu7xbu3SAA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
nice to mention, at least for me, that changing putty keyboard settings from ESC[n~ to VT100+ solved my problem temporarily.. :) i'll work on solving my problem permanently, may be via working on keymap differences.. Thank you all :) Best Regards, t.a.k On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:24 PM, takCoder <tak.official@gmail.com> wrote: > hi all, > > i'm trying to activate my custom boot0 on a headless server. i got my > required results while connecting by cu, but not when i use putty to > connect.. > > here's the scenario: > one of my goals in this custom boot0 is to deactivate all keys but F2 for > some reasons.. > i applied required changes to the boot0.S code and applied DONLY_F_KEYS in > the Makefile and changed the flags BOOT_BOOT0_FLAGS to required values and > got required output using cu. > > but when i connect to the mentioned server using putty, my F keys don't > work and i have to remove DONLY_F_KEYS in Makefile so '2' Key become > available (SIO mode activated??) > > i don't know so much things about this sio mode here.. would someone > please explain their difference to me? i have no idea.. is it related to > the keymap differences? > > any suggestions are really appritiated.. Thank you all :) > > Best Regards, > t.a.k >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPkyVLwF5_BU4FjZh-6_Bgqd0rWYOFGRrASM=cFNH_EJazSxbQ>