Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2000 01:37:20 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com> Cc: Peter Jeremy <peter.jeremy@alcatel.com.au>, Steve Ames <steve@virtual-voodoo.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problems with MAKEDEV. Message-ID: <20000415013720.A9205@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96.1000414183306.87696A-100000@shell-1.enteract.com>; from dscheidt@enteract.com on Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 06:34:13PM -0500 References: <00Apr15.092900est.115218@border.alcanet.com.au> <Pine.NEB.3.96.1000414183306.87696A-100000@shell-1.enteract.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri 2000-04-14 (18:34), David Scheidt wrote: > Sure. What's the point of having both std and all, though? How much does > it hurt to have a few extra device files kicking around? 'std' is standard devices (leaving out exotic ones), and 'all' is at least one of every device out there. Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Hacker In Chief, Sunesi Clinical Systems nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000415013720.A9205>