From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 27 18:15:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491DA16A55D for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:15:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D405A43D69 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:15:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost.corp.yahoo.com (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6RIFP31078798; Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:15:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: Divacky Roman Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:57:36 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <44C39D7E.30102@mail.web.am> <200607251230.39953.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060727131344.GA81122@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20060727131344.GA81122@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607271357.36839.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:15:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1623/Wed Jul 26 18:35:11 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Gaspar Chilingarov Subject: Re: Are there any beakage of linuxulator (on amd64)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 18:15:46 -0000 On Thursday 27 July 2006 09:13, Divacky Roman wrote: > > > this thursday at work I'll try to provide some more info, what exaclty do you > > > need? is what -DDEBUG prints enough? > > > > Probably. The changes in question were just in the linux semctl function, so you > > really only need printf's for that function to figure out which case it is blowing > > up one and why. > > soooo.... > > I checked the coredump and found this: > > 1) its not acroread what coredumps but bash binary (the binary used for the > script) > when I manually tried running the bash and "exec /bin/ls" etc. it worked > I havent investigated further waht causes the coredump > > 2) I put printf() at the very begining of the linux_semctl() function and > ran the acroread binary. The printf was not printed (ie. it didnt used the > linxu_semctl function) That's odd, because the person who did the binary test claimed it was just the change to this file that caused the breakage. That is, if they reverted linux_ipc.c to the revision before the kern_semctl() changes it worked fine. Can you test that to see if that's true for you? (You'll have to revert last revision of linux_util.h as well.) > 3) here is a outpuit od -DDEBUG compiled linuxolator and running of acroread > (the first 3 lines are output of command line, it might be interesting to see > the VA = 0x0) > > www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/linuxamd64 Unfortunately I really can't see what is failing. Perhaps if you could capture the output from starting acroread on a working system so we can see where the output starts to change that would help. -- John Baldwin