From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 15 11:37:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521C11065673 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:37:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dennylin93@hs.ntnu.edu.tw) Received: from mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw (mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw [140.131.149.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2218C8FC18 for ; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:36:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EB11C4B787D; Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:36:50 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:36:50 +0800 From: Denny Lin To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100715113650.GA43559@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> References: <20100715064103.487fa639@scorpio> <20100715111339.GF24935@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20100715111339.GF24935@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: pkg_version notification and perl X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 11:37:00 -0000 On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:13:39PM +0800, Denny Lin wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 06:41:03AM -0400, Jerry wrote: > > I just ran 'portsnap' to update my port tree, followed > > by "/usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL=" which produced this output: > > > > These ports need updating: > > perl-5.10.1_1 > succeeds index (index has 5.10.1) > > startup-notification-0.10 < needs updating (index has 0.10_1) > > > > You will notice the discrepancy with perl. This never occurred before. > > Is there something wrong on my system or does the problem exist > > elsewhere? > > > > -- > > Jerry ✌ > > Try updating index: > # cd /usr/ports/ && make fetchindex > > -- > Denny Lin Sorry, I didn't see the previous reply. It is indeed a typo in the Makefile. -- Denny Lin