Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:49:51 +0200 From: Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@des.no>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, Jeremie Le Hen <jeremie@le-hen.org>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: OpenPAM Figwort broke PAM modules from ports Message-ID: <20050629114950.GC49933@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> In-Reply-To: <20050629110805.W74117@fledge.watson.org> References: <20050626211011.GH1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <86d5q8113a.fsf@xps.des.no> <20050627130449.GQ1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <42C0026C.3040000@FreeBSD.org> <20050627191205.GT1283@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <1119900416.27663.15.camel@cream.xbsd.org> <20050629083042.GB48704@obiwan.tataz.chchile.org> <20050629110805.W74117@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Robert, > Could you propose specific text to add to UPDATING, and I'll drop it in? > Perhaps something along the lines of the following: > > Some previous versions of PAM have permitted the use of > non-absolute paths in /etc/pam.conf or /etc/pam.d/* when referring > to third party PAM modules in /usr/local/lib. A change has been > made to require the use of absolute paths in order to avoid > ambiguity and dependence on library path configuration, which may > affect existing configurations. This is perfect. Thank you very much. Best regards, -- Jeremie Le Hen < jeremie at le-hen dot org >< ttz at chchile dot org >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050629114950.GC49933>