From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Jun 12 00:09:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA19784 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 00:09:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from softweyr.com ([204.68.178.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA19760 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 00:09:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.com (zaphod.softweyr.com [204.68.178.35]) by softweyr.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA16989; Fri, 12 Jun 1998 01:09:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Message-ID: <358225EE.783ED931@softweyr.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 01:10:38 -0600 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr llc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Du Gaue CC: Doug Russell , "Viren R. Shah" , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS server performance (was: NFS performance benchmarks?) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Robert Du Gaue wrote: > > > Writing the 20 Megabyte file, 'iozone.tmp'...46.320312 seconds > > Reading the file...25.390625 seconds > > > > IOZONE performance measurements: > > 452749 bytes/second for writing the file > > 825955 bytes/second for reading the file > > There's gotta be something screwy somewhere. Here's what I'm getting over > NFS to a PPro-200 System with a SCSI-to-SCSI RAID (16MB cache) from > Artecon: > > Writing the 50 Megabyte file, 'iozone.tmp'...23.679688 seconds > Reading the file...18.742188 seconds > > IOZONE performance measurements: > 2214083 bytes/second for writing the file > 2797368 bytes/second for reading the file I agree. Have you read the FAQs about NFS server with Sun clients? You may want to carefully specify NFS v2, for both clients and servers, at least on the client -> FreeBSD server link. To be fair, you should use whichever protocol version is fastest with the Solaris server, probably V3. If your client is SunOS older than 4.1.4, you probably don't have V3 support. By the way, I expect a Solaris server running on SMP hardware to out- perform a FreeBSD server; their threaded NFS server is quite fast. For the difference in price for the hardware, FreeBSD certainly provides acceptable performance. ;^) -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message