From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 20:15:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04A67CBE; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C097B6D7; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-150.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8UKFNku005212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:15:24 -0500 Message-ID: <542B10D2.6040107@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:21:38 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 References: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> <542B00E2.8030609@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:15:26 -0000 On 09/30/14 15:12, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> On 09/30/14 11:37, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> >>>> I will be following the same upgrade path, & as a guaranteed noob, >>>> I have a question about step 1 above. I noticed no >>>> clean/clear/remove entries in /usr/ports/Makefile, what do I do, >>>> just 'rm -fr' the offending directory ? >>> >>> No, never do that. Let pkg manage those files, that is what it does. >>> >>> pkg delete -f linux_base-f10 linux-f10-\* >>> >> >> >> I'm talking about the ports versions, particularly the flash plugin, >> which is handled by ports, not pkg .... > > pkg is responsible for installing and deinstalling ports (which are, > after they have been built, packages). > > If you mean directories like /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10, that > is handled by whatever tool is used to update the ports tree, svn or > portsnap. > Hmmmmm .... OK .... Remember, *noob*, *noob*, *noob* !!!! -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.