Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:22:24 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, benjsc@freebsd.org, sam@freebsd.org, thompsa@freebsd.org Subject: Re: WPI panic Message-ID: <4AEB9150.1040304@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4AEB8CBC.5050705@freebsd.org> References: <4AE77437.4090700@FreeBSD.org> <4AEB8CBC.5050705@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lawrence Stewart wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> I cc'ed those who seem to have put the most/recent effort into >> sys/dev/wpi. >> >> Is there any objection to turning off WPI_DEBUG by default? it creates >> a lot of spam that the average user doesn't need. I use my 3945abg >> every day and haven't had any problems with it for ages so I think >> it's safe to say we're out of the period were debug by default is needed? > > Doug, have you ever experienced the issue with your 3945 card that I > reported here: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2009-October/023348.html > > I'm guessing you haven't by your comment about lack of problems. No, I have not had those problems at all. I routinely associate with both WPA and WPA2 routers, as well as open routers at coffee shops and such. > Do you run with INVARIANTS in your kernel? Yes, and up till recently I've been running with witness as well. Wish I could be more help, Doug -- Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with a domain name makeover! http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AEB9150.1040304>