Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 30 Oct 2009 18:22:24 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Lawrence Stewart <lstewart@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org, benjsc@freebsd.org, sam@freebsd.org, thompsa@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: WPI panic
Message-ID:  <4AEB9150.1040304@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4AEB8CBC.5050705@freebsd.org>
References:  <4AE77437.4090700@FreeBSD.org> <4AEB8CBC.5050705@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Lawrence Stewart wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>> I cc'ed those who seem to have put the most/recent effort into
>> sys/dev/wpi.
>>
>> Is there any objection to turning off WPI_DEBUG by default? it creates
>> a lot of spam that the average user doesn't need. I use my 3945abg
>> every day and haven't had any problems with it for ages so I think
>> it's safe to say we're out of the period were debug by default is needed?
> 
> Doug, have you ever experienced the issue with your 3945 card that I
> reported here:
> 
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/2009-October/023348.html
> 
> I'm guessing you haven't by your comment about lack of problems.

No, I have not had those problems at all. I routinely associate with
both WPA and WPA2 routers, as well as open routers at coffee shops and
such.

> Do you run with INVARIANTS in your kernel?

Yes, and up till recently I've been running with witness as well.


Wish I could be more help,

Doug

-- 

	Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
	a domain name makeover!    http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AEB9150.1040304>