From owner-freebsd-bugs  Thu Sep  2  5: 2:31 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73B1215492
	for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  2 Sep 1999 05:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id FAA69713;
	Thu, 2 Sep 1999 05:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 05:00:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199909021200.FAA69713@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
Subject: Re: bin/13535: Finger bug: possible stack overflow 
Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR bin/13535; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
To: Yoshihiro Koya <Yoshihiro.Koya@math.yokohama-cu.ac.jp>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bin/13535: Finger bug: possible stack overflow 
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 1999 13:48:13 +0200

 On Thu, 02 Sep 1999 20:13:13 +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote:
 
 > About the manupulation on bound, you are right. I only paid my
 > attention to the size of buffer.  As you said, the current version of
 > the source code in the CVS repository has no problem. Sorry for my
 > misunderstanding.
 
 No problem. :-)
 
 So are you happy with me closing your PR, or is there a real problem
 that needs to be addressed? (I haven't looked into the problem, I just
 scanned the finger source for its use of the buffer).
 
 Ciao,
 Sheldon.
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message