Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 15:09:22 -0600 From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> To: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS regimen: scrub, scrub, scrub and scrub again. Message-ID: <op.wrdudwx334t2sn@markf.office.supranet.net> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838Rst7wEtV7DpY23XjpcFCsOkrN=axE1AscyO7vYgSKSg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACpH0Mf6sNb8JOsTzC%2BWSfQRB62%2BZn7VtzEnihEKmEV2aO2p%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301211201570.9447@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <20130122073641.GH30633@server.rulingia.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1301232121430.1659@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <CADLo838Rst7wEtV7DpY23XjpcFCsOkrN=axE1AscyO7vYgSKSg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 23 Jan 2013 14:26:43 -0600, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> wrote: > > So we have to take your word for it? > Provide a link if you're going to make assertions, or they're no more > than > your own opinion. I've heard this same thing -- every vdev == 1 drive in performance. I've never seen any proof/papers on it though.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.wrdudwx334t2sn>