From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 11:12:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46495106566C for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:12:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bennett@cs.niu.edu) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (mp.cs.niu.edu [131.156.145.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138448FC14 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mp.cs.niu.edu (bennett@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mp.cs.niu.edu (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8MBBrUt014336 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:11:53 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 06:11:53 -0500 (CDT) From: Scott Bennett Message-Id: <200909221111.n8MBBr07014335@mp.cs.niu.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: /sys/modules/mii/nsgphy.c compilation errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 11:12:48 -0000 An update committed since Friday appears to have broken mii/nsgphy.c in the kernel. When I try to build a kernel now, I get the following errors during the compilations of mii/nsgphy.c. /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/nsgphy.c:104: error: 'MII_MODEL_NATSEMI_DP83865' undeclared here (not in a function) /usr/src/sys/modules/mii/../../dev/mii/nsgphy.c:104: error: 'MII_STR_NATSEMI_DP83865' undeclared here (not in a function) *** Error code 1 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error Having run cvsup just a few minutes ago and then having tried again to build a kernel, I see that the errors persist. Is this something that someone is already fixing? Or should I try to submit a PR? Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * **********************************************************************