From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Apr 28 20:14:29 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D3037B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:14:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF58443F3F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h3T3ERA7085692;
	Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:14:28 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:14:23 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <20030428.211423.67343139.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: chancedj@yahoo.com
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20030428204619.76247.qmail@web9608.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20030428204619.76247.qmail@web9608.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: dc0: failed to force tx and rx to idle state
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:14:30 -0000

In message: <20030428204619.76247.qmail@web9608.mail.yahoo.com>
            Daryl Chance <chancedj@yahoo.com> writes:
: I assume, from the little bit of research I've done on
: this, that it's harmless, but annoying.  Is this
: something that you're wanting to fix before 5.1R?  If
: so, I won't mind helping locate it.

Yes.  Harmless yet annoying.

Warner