From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 12 21:35:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D98D1065695 for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD568FC1C for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.221.2] (remotevpn [192.168.221.2]) by ns1.feral.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9CLYurA031685 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:35:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mj@feral.com) Message-ID: <4CB4D47D.9030008@feral.com> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:34:53 -0700 From: Matthew Jacob Organization: Feral Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20101012081744.GA48485@jh> <4CB4646F.3000703@feral.com> <4CB4CBC1.40301@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <4CB4CBC1.40301@icyb.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (ns1.feral.com [192.168.221.1]); Tue, 12 Oct 2010 14:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: HEADS UP: device name checking on device registration X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:35:06 -0000 I am antisocial. Okay, changed it so my replies are above the quotes. Seems to have attributes here. And I usually hit 'reply list' since multiple copies burns bandwidth. On 10/12/2010 1:57 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > P.S. Matthew, it seems like you have a really unhelpful mail client program: > first, it top-posts :-) > second, it doesn't always attribute quoted text. > > It also doesn't cc in replies the addresses that were in to or cc of original > message, which may or may not be a good thing. > >