Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:19:38 -0500 From: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> To: <aderyugin@stes.net> Cc: <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: "/ was not properly dismounted" is it good or bad with softupdates on ? Message-ID: <15308.34890.532567.881956@guru.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <GCEALKMBHBPDNICGPNFIAEKECEAA.aderyugin@stes.net> References: <GCEALKMBHBPDNICGPNFIAEKECEAA.aderyugin@stes.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrey Deryugin <aderyugin@stes.net> types: > Hi All, > > I asked before about "/ was not properly dismounted" with softupdates "on" > but nobody answer how to fix it. May be it isn't so badly ? "/ was not properly dismounted" is *always* bad. Avoid it. With softupdates vs. the default mount, you are less likely to have the directory structure on the disk corrupted. You are no less likely to have data in files corrupted. Does that answer your question? <mike -- Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Q: How do you make the gods laugh? A: Tell them your plans. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15308.34890.532567.881956>