From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 10 21:24:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625E516A47B for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: from syn.atarininja.org (syn.csh.rit.edu [129.21.60.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA8743D45 for ; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:24:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wxs@atarininja.org) Received: by syn.atarininja.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9BE5A5C34; Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:28:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 17:28:55 -0400 From: Wesley Shields To: FreeBSD Ports List Message-ID: <20060910212855.GB35898@atarininja.org> References: <20060910125157.GA29775@teddy.fas.com> <20060910160805.GA30609@atarininja.org> <20060910175253.GA4659@teddy.fas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060910175253.GA4659@teddy.fas.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Subject: Re: Problems with whowatch on AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2006 21:24:45 -0000 On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 01:52:53PM -0400, stan wrote: > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 12:08:05PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 08:51:57AM -0400, stan wrote: > > > whowatch does not seem to work properly on my 6.1 CURRENT > > > amd64 systems. Is this a known problem? Is there a workaround? > > > > I just built and installed it on 6.1-RELEASE-p5 and it appears to run > > fine at first glance. Can you give more information into the exact > > problem you are seeing? > > > When I start it, I get lines that look like this: > > can't access stan ttyp1 r9sbal > > For all users. > > Presing "t" gives me this: > > 3 users: (0 local, 0 telnet, 0 ssh, 3 other) load: 0.00, 0.00, > 0.001 processes > 1 ? - - I get the same thing on AMD64 but not i386. Unfortunately I don't know anything about whowatch or how it works. Have you tried contacting the author regarding this problem? At the very least I would send a PR with a patch to mark it as broken on AMD64. -- WXS