Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 12 Aug 1999 13:15:52 +0200
From:      Graham Wheeler <gram@cequrux.com>
To:        Aaron Smith <aaron@mutex.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: New tests for test(1)
Message-ID:  <37B2ACE8.D263C8E7@cdsec.com>
References:  <37B2917A.6CBBC950@cdsec.com> <19990812040148.A13484@gelatinous.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Aaron Smith wrote:
> 
> this seems undesirable to me, since using it immediately makes your shell
> scripts nonportable. i liked the ls -t suggestion though.

Portability is a Good Thing, but I write a lot of one-off scripts
in which portability isn't an issue. Also, just because one uses
standard shell commands is no guarantee of portability, as a shell
script can invoke arbitrary programs, which may or may not be present 
or compatible across different hosts.

-- 
Dr Graham Wheeler                        E-mail: gram@cequrux.com
Cequrux Technologies                     Phone:  +27(21)423-6065/6/7
Firewalls/Virtual Private Networks       Fax:    +27(21)24-3656
Data/Network Security Specialists        WWW:    http://www.cequrux.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?37B2ACE8.D263C8E7>