Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:22:18 +0200
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Olivier_Cochard=2DLabb=E9?= <olivier@cochard.me>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
Cc:        "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>, Erich Weiler <weiler@soe.ucsc.edu>
Subject:   Re: pf performance?
Message-ID:  <CA%2Bq%2BTcru%2BYRc5JAumHBtWUu8C-WOFiAC3AckMmYthmZK9mT=MQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130426134224.GV76816@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <5176E5C1.9090601@soe.ucsc.edu> <20130426134224.GV76816@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> In FreeBSD 10 pf is no longer under single lock. On your hardware,
> I'd expect a measurable performance gain if you migrate to 10.

Compairing 9.1 and current (249908) on my new test-server (HP ProLiant
DL320 G5, dual-core Xeon 3050, dual Intel NIC).
Like usual: one unidirectional flow of small packets, values in
packet-per-seconds:

x 9.1
+ current
    N           Min           Max        Median           Avg        Stddev
x   5        379991        381508        381229      380892.6     667.69926
+   5        332833        335502        334726      334223.2     1142.8266
Difference at 95.0% confidence
        -46669.4 +/- 1364.98
        -12.2526% +/- 0.358363%
        (Student's t, pooled s = 935.915)

Regards,

Olivier



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bq%2BTcru%2BYRc5JAumHBtWUu8C-WOFiAC3AckMmYthmZK9mT=MQ>