Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:04:06 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Webcam recommendations Message-ID: <20110321120406.GA9296@sh4-5.1blu.de> In-Reply-To: <201103211227.55677.hselasky@c2i.net> References: <20110321112141.GA23421@sh4-5.1blu.de> <201103211227.55677.hselasky@c2i.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El día Monday, March 21, 2011 a las 12:27:55PM +0100, Hans Petter Selasky escribió:
> On Monday 21 March 2011 12:21:41 Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > A side note: Hans, the above mentioned Philips SPC900NC shows up on
> > plug-in as:
> >
> > Feb 2 08:11:07 current root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x0471 product
> > 0x0329 bus uhub2
This line from /var/log/messages is from a system which does not run
webcamd nor hald;
> >
> > but in pwc.4 as 0471:0320; the source itself
> > v4l-dvb-abd3aac6644e/linux/drivers/media/video/pwc/pwc-if.c
> > contains the correct value:
> >
> > $ fgrep 0329 v4l-dvb-abd3aac6644e/linux/drivers/media/video/pwc/pwc-if.c
> > { USB_DEVICE(0x0471, 0x0329) }, /* Philips SPC 900NC PC Camera
> > */
>
> I think this printout comes from somewhere else, like hald. Try starting
> webcamd without the -H option.
The above line from /var/log/messages (0x0471:0x0329) is exactly what
you source has and what as well is in
$ fgrep 0x0329 /usr/ports/multimedia/pwcbsd/work/pwcbsd/pwc.c
{USB_VPI(0x0471, 0x0329, 740)}, /* Philips SPC900NC */
i.e. the deviceID of SPC900NC is 0x0329 and not 0x0320 as your man page
says, it's just a typo in the man page, I think.
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz
t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211
e <guru@unixarea.de> - w http://www.unixarea.de/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110321120406.GA9296>