From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Oct 10 05:21:51 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0E6B13A
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:21:51 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from lbc@bnrlabs.com)
Received: from mail.bnrlabs.com (did75-5-82-224-61-5.fbx.proxad.net
 [82.224.61.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE2E8FC12
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:21:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [172.20.96.112])
 by mail.bnrlabs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2FD246097
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:21:42 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <507505E6.8010905@bnrlabs.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 07:21:42 +0200
From: "Lucas B. Cohen" <lbc@bnrlabs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: what is an "in-core" disklabel ?
References: <201210081622.q98GMqLH029828@mail.r-bonomi.com>
In-Reply-To: <201210081622.q98GMqLH029828@mail.r-bonomi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:21:51 -0000

On 2012.10.08 18:22, Robert Bonomi wrote:
> 'cached' is not _technically_ exactly accurate, but you have the concept
> basically correct.

Thanks for the detailed explanation, Robert. Maybe "shadowed" would be
have been a more accurate term. But "in-core" also has a nice ring to it!