From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 18:31:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8119737B405 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:31:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kirk.dlee.org (pool-138-88-164-72.res.east.verizon.net [138.88.164.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07FFB43FFD for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 18:31:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: from kirk.dlee.org (dgl@localhost.dlee.org [127.0.0.1]) by kirk.dlee.org (8.12.8/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h5R1UuhI042580; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:30:56 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dgl@kirk.dlee.org) Received: (from dgl@localhost) by kirk.dlee.org (8.12.8/8.12.9/Submit) id h5R1UtgI042579; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:30:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 21:30:54 -0400 From: Doug Lee To: Archie Cobbs Message-ID: <20030627013054.GA42511@kirk.dlee.org> Mail-Followup-To: Doug Lee , Archie Cobbs , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20030624065138.GB478@kirk.dlee.org> <200306251932.h5PJWgUf004385@arch20m.dellroad.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200306251932.h5PJWgUf004385@arch20m.dellroad.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: Bartimaeus Group cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Possible Solution (Re: mpd VPN won't work after upgrade from 4.6-STABLE to 4.8-STABLE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 01:31:01 -0000 Re: the "protocol reject" errors; I left the original messages below this for reference, but I'm not so much following directly onto them... Archie, I'm mildly embarrassed. I just now found something you wrote in November of last year advising the following patch to fix exactly this problem. I am running two 4.8-STABLE boxen, and it is not part of /sys/netgraph/ng_ppp.c in CVS yet, apparently... --- sys/netgraph/ng_ppp.c.orig Thu Nov 21 12:39:06 2002 +++ sys/netgraph/ng_ppp.c Thu Nov 21 12:39:26 2002 @@ -744,7 +744,7 @@ case HOOK_INDEX_VJC_VJIP: if (priv->conf.enableCompression && priv->hooks[HOOK_INDEX_COMPRESS] != NULL) { - if ((m = ng_ppp_addproto(m, proto, 1)) == NULL) { + if ((m = ng_ppp_addproto(m, proto, 0)) == NULL) { NG_FREE_META(meta); return (ENOBUFS); } I patched ng_ppp.c, but I don't know if I can rebuild netgraph without a make world, which takes a good 12 hours on this P166... advice on that welcome. Should one of us submit a PR for this, or did I miss something? Thanks much! On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:32:42PM -0500, Archie Cobbs wrote: > Doug Lee wrote: > > Yes, but it's a good enough idea that I'm doing it again just to be > > totally sure...and you reminded me that I forgot to rm -r work before > > doing it last time :P > > > > ...but I am getting the same results after just having done > > The build compile warnings are "normal" and due to old style > function declarations in OpenSSL. > > If you're getting protocol reject errors -- while trying to use > Microsoft MPPE encryption? Then probably one side is generating > the keys incorrectly. What is the other side? Also, let's see > the log trace. > > -Archie > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Archie Cobbs * Halloo Communications * http://www.halloo.com -- Doug Lee dgl@dlee.org http://www.dlee.org Bartimaeus Group doug@bartsite.com http://www.bartsite.com No one alive is beyond hope; every second of life is a chance. (08/29/02)