Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:44:37 -0700
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        Sean Bruno <sbruno@miralink.com>
Cc:        nate@root.org, freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org, freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: scsi_target witness lock error
Message-ID:  <47605645.70509@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <475F5669.1010800@miralink.com>
References:  <1197420795.2738.6.camel@iago.office.miralink.com>		<86sl28snpe.wl%simokawa@FreeBSD.ORG>		<1197425759.14437.0.camel@home-desk>	<626eb4530712111837y4608e919w845461d36a18118f@mail.gmail.com> <475F5669.1010800@miralink.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sean Bruno wrote:
> Hidetoshi Shimokawa wrote:
>> On 12/12/07, Sean Bruno <sbruno@miralink.com> wrote:
>>  
>>>> --- //depot/vendor/freebsd/src/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_target.c     
>>>> 2007/04/15 08:53:22
>>>> +++ 
>>>> //depot/user/simokawa/firewire_lock/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_target.c    
>>>> 2007/05/21 14:31:55
>>>> @@ -372,10 +372,14 @@
>>>>       int     retval;
>>>>
>>>>       softc = (struct targ_softc *)kn->kn_hook;
>>>> +#if 0
>>>>       cam_periph_lock(softc->periph);
>>>> +#endif
>>>>       retval = !TAILQ_EMPTY(&softc->user_ccb_queue) ||
>>>>                !TAILQ_EMPTY(&softc->abort_queue);
>>>> +#if 0
>>>>       cam_periph_unlock(softc->periph);
>>>> +#endif
>>>>       return (retval);
>>>>  }
>>>>       
>>> Are these two "if 0"'s supposed to be commented out?  I'm leaving this
>>> out of my RELENG_6 test for now unless you say otherwise.
>>>
>>>
>>> Sean
>>>     
>>
>> Yes, it is same as comment out.
>> The patch was for RELENG_7 or current. I'm not sure about RELENG_6.
>>
>>   
> Ok, I merged the patch(RELENG_6) to the best of my ability.  The system 
> now panics and has the same witness error.
> 
> panic/witness/trace --> http://consultcsg.com/scsitarget_witness.txt
> scsi_target.c diff --> http://consultcsg.com/scsi_target.c.diff
> 

CAM locking in RELENG_6 is completely different from locking in
RELENG_7.  I'm not saying that your problems are imaginary, just
pointing out that any problems in 6.x are going to almost certainly
be completely different from problems in 7.x.  I'll look at both.

Scott



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47605645.70509>