Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 15:25:17 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lost portupgrade functionality building INDEX Message-ID: <20040420222517.GA68354@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040420210902.GA35257@spamcop.net> References: <20040420210902.GA35257@spamcop.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 05:09:02PM -0400, Jim Trigg wrote: > While I understand the reasoning behind making portsdb -U use "make > index" behind the scenes, it kills a bit of functionality. portsdb -U > no longer honors pkgtools.conf, so options set there will not be > reflected in the dependencies shown in INDEX. If I knew ruby, I'd try > to write a new portsdb -U function, but I don't. Is there any way we > can get this functionality back while maintaining compatibility with > make index in other ways? Set your config options in make.conf instead of pkgtools.conf. Kris --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAhaNNWry0BWjoQKURAkDnAKDzXC7DAUViXtRn6OJyClAYHKFo1gCgszBq SOZRggBnBe9b1PsnmBiEm/o= =BZR2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040420222517.GA68354>