From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 2 20:19:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7475E16A4CE for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:19:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0231C43D48 for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 20:19:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.81]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.01 201-2131-118-101-20041129) with SMTP id <20050402201901.UTRD5402.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish> for ; Sat, 2 Apr 2005 15:19:01 -0500 From: To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 15:18:56 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Subject: 5.3 auto starting NFS by error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: bob@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 20:19:02 -0000 I just installed 5.3 production release version and did not select nfs server or nfs client during the install but nfs still gets installed. When I issue the ps -x command I see that nsfiod 0, 1, 2 ,4 is running. Is this still part of a dirty release process? This is consuming unnecessary system resources. I though this was reported as bug during 5.0 development? What gives here??? Am I missing some technical reason for NFS being forced on the default install process. Shouldn't this simple install error have this been corrected before 5.3 left development??