From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 14 11:00:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEB616A4A0 for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@wm-access.no) Received: from lakepoint.domeneshop.no (lakepoint.domeneshop.no [194.63.248.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D971A43D6A for ; Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lists@wm-access.no) Received: from [192.168.9.8] (gw1.arcticwireless.no [194.19.37.70]) (authenticated bits=0) by lakepoint.domeneshop.no (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id k8EAxh7i013118 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:59:43 +0200 Message-ID: <450935FA.3060105@wm-access.no> Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 12:59:06 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sten_Daniel_S=F8rsdal?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luigi Rizzo References: <20060825064627.D6023@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20060825064627.D6023@xorpc.icir.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, Ian FREISLICH Subject: Re: ipfw performance and random musings. X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:00:12 -0000 Luigi Rizzo wrote: > On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 03:27:17PM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: >> Luigi Rizzo wrote: >>> i am basically ok with this except, as i said, that there is >>> no point in replicating the interface name i.e. why re0-re5 >>> instead of just re0-5 ? you just open up to possible mistakes >>> and the need for extra code to check what happens when the user >>> types re2-de5 (by mistake or intentionally). >> Ok, it's just syntactic sugar anyway which doesn't really affect >> implimentation anyway. >> >> So, to recap. You will be fine with although I'm now leaning toward >> "factor" in stead of "delta" but that will be a trivial change and >> I'd like to change "@" to "indirect". >> >> skipto @ via vlan2-264 base 100 delta 100 >> >> or as I'd prefer >> >> skipto indirect via vlan2-264 base 100 factor 100 >=20 > either way is fine with me. >=20 How about; skipto 1000:1000 via vlan2-264 ?? --=20 Sten Daniel S=F8rsdal