Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:36:30 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: /bin and /sbin are now dynamically linked Message-ID: <20031124173630.GA64058@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200311241646.hAOGksoH026368@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <FPEBKMIFGFHCGLLKBLMMCEDCCDAA.ghelmer@palisadesys.com> <3FBE8D92.6080205@acm.org> <20031123012222.GB11523@dragon.nuxi.com> <p06002003bbe5c0f30237@[10.0.1.2]> <20031123042635.GB677@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <3FC16644.7070005@acm.org> <20031124114006.GA60761@dragon.nuxi.com> <200311241646.hAOGksoH026368@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 11:46:54AM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 03:40:06 -0800, "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> said: > > We have made the assumption for the first three options since day one. > > Why should we change the assumptions just because we now have a dynamic > > /? > > Because we are not all masochists. Why wasn't it enough of a problem to bring up until we went to a dynamic /? Not having a usable FTP client if your libs are FUBAR'ed isn't new with dynamic. Now that it is brought up, where does it end what goes into /rescue? Having what goes into /rescue bounded only by what is in /[s]bin, /usr/[s]bin is what worries some of us. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031124173630.GA64058>