From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 12:36:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5537716A4CE for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:36:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87C2A43D1D for ; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:36:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8643E136A9; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:36:02 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 09:36:02 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040105203602.GB5706@grimoire.chen.org.nz> References: <20030909215210.GA5404@grimoire.chen.org.nz> <20040105174125.GB732@andouillette.esil.univ-mrs.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040105174125.GB732@andouillette.esil.univ-mrs.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: ant script annoyances X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 20:36:06 -0000 On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 06:41:25PM +0100, Herve Quiroz wrote: > Hi all! > > I'm back from holyday and after a look at my personal TODO list I found > this issue still opened. Many things have been said on the subject and I > remember we came quite close to a solution. Unfortunately nothing has > been done yet. So I will read this thread again and see if we did agree > on some point in which case I will code it... unless Ernst already > modified apache-ant BSD run script in port version 1.6.0. The apache-ant script is still the same (I still delete the lines off my local /usr/local/bin/ant). My recollection of the thread was that a few of you wanted to keep the original functionality and wanted the option to switch between the vanilla-ant and freebsd-enhanced-ant. My personal preference to is to have a "USE_FREEBSD_EXTENSIONS=no" in the Makefile of the port, where the installer can redefine to "yes" if they wish to use the FreeBSD-enhanced version. It's better to have just one standard (one way or the other) version installed on a box than to have too many features put into what should be just a simple wrapper script. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- If you're right 90% of the time, why quibble about the remaining 3%?