From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 30 20:27:14 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1A0D37A; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB6DF8D3; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:27:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kabini1.local (rbn1-216-180-76-150.adsl.hiwaay.net [216.180.76.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id s8UKRCJ6013310 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:27:12 -0500 Message-ID: <542B1397.2050504@hiwaay.net> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:33:27 -0500 From: "William A. Mahaffey III" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update to linux_base-c6 References: <9e6b9502ba9292e68de94878bf405409@dweimer.net> <542ACB7E.4000206@hiwaay.net> <542B00E2.8030609@hiwaay.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 20:27:14 -0000 On 09/30/14 15:12, Warren Block wrote: > On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > >> On 09/30/14 11:37, Warren Block wrote: >>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: >>> >>>> I will be following the same upgrade path, & as a guaranteed noob, >>>> I have a question about step 1 above. I noticed no >>>> clean/clear/remove entries in /usr/ports/Makefile, what do I do, >>>> just 'rm -fr' the offending directory ? >>> >>> No, never do that. Let pkg manage those files, that is what it does. >>> >>> pkg delete -f linux_base-f10 linux-f10-\* >>> >> >> >> I'm talking about the ports versions, particularly the flash plugin, >> which is handled by ports, not pkg .... > > pkg is responsible for installing and deinstalling ports (which are, > after they have been built, packages). > > If you mean directories like /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-f10, that > is handled by whatever tool is used to update the ports tree, svn or > portsnap. > Well .... after a bit of messing around, I determined that I couldn't find any linux-c6 packages for FBSD 9.3, so I went the ports route: [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:30:43pm] 588 % (cd /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-c6; make install clean); cd . ===> linux_base-c6-6.5 compat.linux.osrelease: 2.6.16 is not supported, please use 2.6.18, BEWARE this is highly experimental. *** [install] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base-c6. [root@kabini1, /etc, 3:30:59pm] 589 % .... & didn't get very far :-/ .... Any clues for me ? TIA .... -- William A. Mahaffey III ---------------------------------------------------------------------- "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war ever devised by man." -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr.