From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 00:03:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13C01065670 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F818FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBFBA7.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.251.167]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q1Q03TrG094075; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:30 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1Q03Iaw080906; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:03:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1Q035OW083472; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:03:11 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201202260003.q1Q035OW083472@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Artifex Maximus From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 25 Feb 2012 07:33:39 +0100." Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:03:05 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clang vs gcc linking problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:03:32 -0000 Artifex Maximus wrote: > Hello! > > Absolutely not a flame war but would like to switch to clang in a > project. Project uses ncurses. gcc works well but the executable fails > when compiled other than -O0. Then I think I should change to clang > which will becomes the default compiler in FreeBSD. With clang at > linking time I got the following error: > > /usr/local/bin/ld: display/libsub_display.a(canvas.o): undefined > reference to symbol 'keypad' > /usr/local/bin/ld: note: 'keypad' is defined in DSO > /usr/local/lib/libtinfow.so.6.0 so try adding it to the linker command > line > /usr/local/lib/libtinfow.so.6.0: could not read symbols: Invalid operation > clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) > *** Error code 1 > > With exactly the same flags gcc links successful. Any idea where is > the problem and what is the solution? > > Thanks, There have been quite a number of discussions on Gcc & Clang of various lists since efforts to transition started, I don't see a specific list here, http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo but this may interest http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 00:13:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4650A106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:13:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76008FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326075C28 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:27:15 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE6FB5C22 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:27:14 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:08:52 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:13:48 -0000 On 02/26/12 08:14, Polytropon wrote: > On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:07:36 +0100, C. P. Ghost wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Polytropon wrote: >>> I have a problem installing a Samsung CLX-2160 color >>> laser printer using CUPS. In the http://localhost:631 >>> web-based configuration, none of the methods that are >>> supposed to be used for installing a printer works. >> (... snip ...) >> >>> What am I doing wrong? :-) >> Have you heeded *all* the advices here? >> /usr/ports/print/cups-base/pkg-message >> >> Permissions are usually the culprit when CUPS doesn't work. > Done (even with the variation of 0660 vs. 0770 as suggested > in that file): > > [system=10] > add path 'unlpt*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'ulpt*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'lpt*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'usb/4.2.*' mode 0660 group cups > add path 'usb*' mode 0770 group cups > > Same result == no result. :-) I don't know that I can add anything to the cups discussion here, but I understand you'd rather use lpr anyway. You are aware that the printer will only speak splix the samsung universal driver language? So any config would have to be based on that. Once you have that working maybe you can manually add the printer in cups using lpd. JIC you haven't considered this yet... HIH :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 01:42:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1210106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:42:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D39B8FC17 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:42:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [109.190.13.180]) (Authenticated sender: kha@dichotomia.fr) by sslmail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBD003DD07C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:41:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:42:08 +0100 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (sslmail.dichotomia.fr); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:41:44 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:42:13 -0000 On 25/02/2012 22:14, Polytropon wrote: > I have a problem installing a Samsung CLX-2160 color > laser printer using CUPS. In the http://localhost:631 > web-based configuration, none of the methods that are > supposed to be used for installing a printer works. > > The "Add Printer" button leads to this: > > > > Add Printer > ----------- > Local Printers: > Discovered Network Printers: > Other Network Printers: o Internet Printing Protocol (http) > o Internet Printing Protocol (ipp) > o LPD/LPR Host or Printer > o AppSocket/HP JetDirect > [ Continue ] > > No local printers can be selected (even though the > printer is connected, switched on and woken up). > > > > And "Find New Printers" shows this: > > > > Available Printers > ------------------ > No printers found. > > > > Excellent auto detection. :-) > > > > The corresponding device for the printer is this: > > ulpt0: class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2> on usbus4 > ulpt0: using bi-directional mode > > ugen4.2: > at usbus4, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON > > crw-rw---- 1 root cups 0, 142 Feb 25 21:42 /dev/ulpt0 > > I have installed all packages I can imagine: > > cups-1.4.6 > cups-base-1.4.6_6 > cups-client-1.4.6 > cups-image-1.4.6 > cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_6 > gutenprint-cups-5.2.4_2 > foo2zjs-20110609 > foomatic-db-20090530_2 > foomatic-db-engine-4.0.7,2 > gutenprint-foomatic-5.2.4_2 > foo2zjs-20110609 > > I also have the CLX-216xsplc.ppd PPD file available > which I think I'd like to hand over to CUPS somewhere. > > ALTERNATIVE: If someone could explain how it's easier > to make a lpr filter (for the system's printer service), > I'd also appreciate this. > > I've already tried this: > > # foo2xqx-wrapper cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > It causes the LED of the printer to blink, but nothing is > printed, even though the printer startes to make sounds > (involving the print mechanism, but not the sheet feeder). > > If I use > > # foo2qpdl-wrapper cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > the CUPS test page is printed, but not in color (only b/w). > After looking into the manpage, > > # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > makes the printer print properly. > > Okay, it works. > > How am I supposed to use a PPD file with CUPS when no > local printer is shown? > > I "need" CUPS (or at least my programs seem to think > that), how should it be done? > > Okay, I could make a simple printer filter. I could then > integrate that with /etc/printcap (as I do with my PCL > HP Laserjet 4000d). I think it should be possible to code > that similar to a parallel printer (with ulpt instead > of lpt device specification for the lp= parameter... > > What am I doing wrong? :-) You did nothing wrong, on the contrary. You now have a prefectly working printer. You just need to tell cups it exists. Since # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 works, you should be able to create a new printer using a direct device. So go on as if you wanted to create a network printer, choose HPJetDirect (for example) when asked about the connection. Then when you have to input the uri remove the socket:// and type usb:///dev/ulpt0. (Yes triple / before dev) The you can process as usual for name, options and PPD. If it doesn't work try parallel:///dev/ulpt0 Normally one should work. Basically in cups choosing "network connection" allows you to input any URI you want, including file and raw (now defunct I think - it was mainly for debug anyway). I never tried this specific printer, but this trick worked well on a few HP and Canon. Tell us how it went. Jerome Herman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 04:09:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886C11065674 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D65F8FC14 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1Q49Eo8030029; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 21:09:16 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:09:13 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201202241432.29069.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202261109.13748.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: "C. P. Ghost" Subject: Re: Why is this Symbol in the front of your website. A humble request. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 04:09:19 -0000 Hi, On Sunday 26 February 2012 03:26:48 C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: > > On Friday 24 February 2012 14:14:32 Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> On 24/02/2012 06:59, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >> > I live in Asia and they really have these things here. Just without the horns. > >> > >> That would be what most people call a "ball." They have them in the > >> west too... > > > > do they vibrate when they get moved? > > Yes, but only if they run FreeBSD, and only if they have the > hw.balls.vibrating sysctl(8) set to 1. always these complicated things. This is why life here is so much more exiting. We do not need sysctl. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 06:58:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA76106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:58:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4252D8FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:58:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1Q6wPCq077595 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:26 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1Q6wPYT002349 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1Q6wPxA002348; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:25 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: kpneal@pobox.com Message-ID: <20120226065824.GE59682@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20120226053817.GA19203@neutralgood.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120226053817.GA19203@neutralgood.org> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.2 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (email2.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:58:26 -0600 (CST) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.68 on 199.67.51.78 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mapping back gptid -> device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:58:28 -0000 In the last episode (Feb 26), kpneal@pobox.com said: > If I have this: > > [root@gunsight1 /etc]# ls -la /dev/gptid/ > total 1 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 1 12:44 . > dr-xr-xr-x 9 root wheel 512 Feb 1 12:44 .. > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 118 Feb 1 12:44 7050cab7-4add-11e1-8919-d4bed9aca1e9 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 122 Feb 1 12:44 d78fd637-4a40-11e1-ab9b-d4bed9aca1e9 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 106 Feb 1 12:44 e1ec4071-4cfb-11e1-b4ca-d4bed9aca1e9 > crw-r----- 1 root operator 0, 112 Feb 1 12:44 f96b3a2c-4cfb-11e1-b4ca-d4bed9aca1e9 > [root@gunsight1 /etc]# > > How do I determine which of those /gptid/ entries corresponds to which > listed in kernel messages printed at boot. > > I have tried "gpart show -r", but it doesn't give the gptid of the entire > drive -- only the partitions: > > => 34 877920189 mfid0 GPT (419G) > 34 256 1 83bd6b9d-7f41-11dc-be0b-001560b84f0f (128K) > 290 44041950 2 516e7cb5-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b (21G) > 44042240 817889280 3 516e7cba-6ecf-11d6-8ff8-00022d09712b (390G) > 861931520 15988703 - free - (7.6G) Try "gpart list" instead, and look at the "rawuuid" field. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 07:20:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0BD106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913018FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (c80-217-70-175.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.70.175]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1Q7KbaS098343; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:20:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:20:14 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111229 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 07:20:44 -0000 2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev: > Hi Brent > > Yes the system we are calling X, is jailed by another system. > > Here is the jailer system: > > zs1# netstat -aptcp | grep smtp > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp 10.156.31.20.45081 > SYN_RCVD > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 rt3.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 npims.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 wiki.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 localhost.smtp *.* LISTEN Here is about jails; http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 What does it say? Can you connect? There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem You can look at your routing table with netstat -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 08:22:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91892106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:22:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c_longfoot@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s44.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s44.snt0.hotmail.com [65.54.51.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A818FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT121-W54 ([65.55.90.200]) by snt0-omc4-s44.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 00:10:16 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [77.3.154.63] From: Carolyn Longfoot To: Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:10:16 +0000 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2012 08:10:16.0060 (UTC) FILETIME=[12740BC0:01CCF45E] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:22:22 -0000 When I start cd /usr/src make buildkernel KERNELCONF=3DMYKERNEL then the process start and gives -------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Feb 25 10:59:25 EST 2012 -------------------------------------------------------------- Even though my config file has ident MYKERNEL I checked and there are no rogue versions of MYKERNEL (like a straight copy= from GENERIC) and it exists in /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf I'm probably missing something really simple here=2C why would 'make' go fo= r GENERIC instead of my custom config? This is 9.0 RELEASE. Thanks=2C Caro = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 08:27:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E76E106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:27:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E80B88FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:27:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B065C28 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:06 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AFFB5C22 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:06 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F49EBD3.7070805@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:22:43 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 08:27:39 -0000 On 02/26/12 18:10, Carolyn Longfoot wrote: > > When I start > cd /usr/src > make buildkernel KERNELCONF=MYKERNEL > > then the process start and gives > -------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Feb 25 10:59:25 EST 2012 > -------------------------------------------------------------- > Even though my config file has > ident MYKERNEL > > I checked and there are no rogue versions of MYKERNEL (like a straight copy from GENERIC) and it exists in > /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf > > I'm probably missing something really simple here, why would 'make' go for GENERIC instead of my custom config? > This is 9.0 RELEASE. Try `make KERNCONF=MYKERNEL buildkernel` From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 09:26:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75842106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBDD8FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1Q9PrL0005428; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:26:02 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:25:51 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: Carolyn Longfoot Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:26:10 -0000 Hi, On Sunday 26 February 2012 15:10:16 Carolyn Longfoot wrote: > > When I start > cd /usr/src > make buildkernel KERNELCONF=MYKERNEL > > then the process start and gives > -------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sat Feb 25 10:59:25 EST 2012 I do not know where the word GENERIC is taken from. Maybe from you configuration file? > Even though my config file has > ident MYKERNEL > Ok, excluded then. > I checked and there are no rogue versions of MYKERNEL (like a straight copy from GENERIC) and it exists in > /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf > > I'm probably missing something really simple here, why would 'make' go for GENERIC instead of my custom config? > This is 9.0 RELEASE. > make buildkernel KERNCONF=AsusAMD620 is what I do. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 09:41:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD67E106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidianwalker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961988FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaeo4 with SMTP id o4so6442995iae.13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:41:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.50.155.202 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.155.202; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.50.155.202 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=davidianwalker@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=davidianwalker@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.155.202]) by 10.50.155.202 with SMTP id vy10mr11564514igb.8.1330249262171 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:41:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dx25eTof4D8UsQ0WaDqhOwj4nGfCrl81K2RYxNL+sSo=; b=x9aKr43LCtuDhNOwqCR/a4LwiClb9YEfx4w47dp/JO4bSFn6ccr90oR3BYWi40RjJY nITcSxYbek9JHBUPC7Ok67jcidcD+JLcrSBpEB+V0CZeh8NqU/tFaQ+8gO/S3lLOmYo+ int+2Cc16bUGwAhVKnrEaeTWz2Uz0uJKnXDpY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.155.202 with SMTP id vy10mr9253923igb.8.1330247620115; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:13:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.85.133 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 01:13:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 19:43:40 +1030 Message-ID: From: David Walker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: kern/94369: [bktr] [patch] Patch to support Leadtek WinFast Tv2000 XP bktr card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:41:02 -0000 Hi. I have one of these cards. I notice the PR is open - does this mean the patch was not committed? Is there anything I can do to get eyeballs on this? I've never compiled from source or applied a diff but if it needs testng and someone's willing to give me a basic outline of the procedure I'll see if I can avago. Learning this stuff is on my todo list for this decade but time is short. Best wishes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 14:37:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA9C106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c_longfoot@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s27.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s27.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.230]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E6F8FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT121-W59 ([65.55.90.200]) by snt0-omc4-s27.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 06:37:32 -0800 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [77.3.154.63] From: Carolyn Longfoot To: , Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:32 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> References: , <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Feb 2012 14:37:32.0809 (UTC) FILETIME=[2CA28F90:01CCF494] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: RE: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:37:33 -0000 > >=20 > make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DAsusAMD620 >=20 > is what I do. >=20 > Erich ARGHHH... KERNCONF not KERNELCONF... scuse my blindness... = From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 16:05:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A20106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF30D8FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1QG50fv015387; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:05:02 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: Carolyn Longfoot Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:04:59 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202262304.59170.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 16:05:16 -0000 Hi, On Sunday 26 February 2012 21:37:32 Carolyn Longfoot wrote: > > > > > > make buildkernel KERNCONF=AsusAMD620 > > > > is what I do. > > > > Erich > > ARGHHH... KERNCONF not KERNELCONF... scuse my blindness... > this is what we are for. The simplest things are very often the most difficult to solve. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 17:46:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727A1106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FC38FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859953DB7F; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:46:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1QHkrWe002783; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:46:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:46:53 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jerome Herman Message-Id: <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:46:56 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:42:08 +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: > You did nothing wrong, on the contrary. You now have a prefectly working > printer. You just need to tell cups it exists. > Since > > # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx > # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 > > works, you should be able to create a new printer using a direct device. > So go on as if you wanted to create a network printer, choose > HPJetDirect (for example) when asked about the connection. Then when you > have to input the uri remove the socket:// and type usb:///dev/ulpt0. > (Yes triple / before dev) > The you can process as usual for name, options and PPD. > If it doesn't work try parallel:///dev/ulpt0 Interesting approach. Fully "unimaginable" from the CUPS "guide to things" (i. e. how normal users _assume_ things should be done!), but interesting. I'll try that. The option to enter such kind of data ("parallel://" and "usb://" isn't mentioned): Add Printer ----------- Connection: _________________________________ Examples: http://hostname:631/ipp/ http://hostname:631/ipp/port1 ipp://hostname/ipp/ ipp://hostname/ipp/port1 lpd://hostname/queue socket://hostname socket://hostname:9100 See "Network Printers" for the correct URI to use with your print [ Continue ] See? Nothing for parallel or USB to enter manually. It's like going to a car salesman, buying a car, but before driving home from his yard, quickly exchanging the car you bought for the car you initially wanted. :-) > Normally one should work. Today, I tried to add the printer again. Unlike yesterday, it got detected! (Note: System shut down during night.) It also accepts print jobs, but they are stuck somewhere. % lpq -PSamsung_CLX-216x_Series Samsung_CLX-216x_Series is ready Rank Owner Job File(s) Total Size 1st poly 202 Unbenannt1 7563264 bytes This is from an OpenOffice session. The printer doesn't print anything. No action. > Basically in cups choosing "network connection" allows you to input any > URI you want, including file and raw (now defunct I think - it was > mainly for debug anyway). Why haven't the CUPS people thought of a kind of "know what you want mode" where you can simply enter what you think is correct, no matter if any auto-detection magic did work (or not)? > I never tried this specific printer, but this trick worked well on a few > HP and Canon. > Tell us how it went. I tried both of your suggestions for specifying the connection and chose the PPD file for the printer CLX-216xsplc.ppd (size 12208 bytes). Jobs get queued, printer "is ready", but no action on the printer. However, when I issue a command like this: % foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c /tmp/testpage.ps > /dev/ulpt0 pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' The printer works. The result is _very_ dark. But hey, it's stupid commodity hardware, and RGB and CMY are "a little bit" different, and nothing of the cheap crap is calibrated. :-) In the system log, I get those: ugen1.5: at usbus1 ulpt0: on usbus1 ulpt0: using bi-directional mode ulpt0: output error ulpt0: output error ulpt0: output error ulpt0: output error Unlike yesterday, the printer now is on ugen1.5. I'll have to play with the permissions a bit, maybe that's the reason why nothing can be printed, even though the changes I made for device permissions should cover all imaginable cases - all devices /dev/usb/* now are root:cups with crwxrwx--- permissions, the /dev/u(n)lpt0 devices are also root:cups with crw-rw---- permissions. Really, I _need_ to dump CUPS relapse to _standard_ system tools that seem to be easily capable of what the web-driven autodetected elastic-legged program magic of CUPS can't. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 17:51:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0761C106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71398FC13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC9343DD7B; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:51:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1QHpm5r002793; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:51:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:51:48 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120226185148.34d9b63c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Da Rock Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 17:51:51 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:08:52 +1000, Da Rock wrote: > I don't know that I can add anything to the cups discussion here, but I > understand you'd rather use lpr anyway. You are aware that the printer > will only speak splix the samsung universal driver language? So any > config would have to be based on that. The foo2qpdl-wrapper program seems to support that fine. > Once you have that working maybe you can manually add the printer in > cups using lpd. Maybe? For sure! It's quite easy to do it (make entry in /etc/printcap, create spool directories, write printer filter one-liner "foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c" which is the essential part). I just hope printing will be possible from applications (Opera, OpenOffice and Gimp are the primary candidates) afterwards. You know, many "modern" programs _expect_ CUPS to be present, some have hardcoded "calls" to CUPS programs, some seem to even _not_ output PS (which should be standard), but instead PCL or whatnot. > JIC you haven't considered this yet... HIH :) Considered - yes, but I thought I would be able to avoid it and use the "modern" CUPS toolkit for something simple like printing. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 18:41:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D43106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1268FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so659469yhg.13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.197.98 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.197.98; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.197.98 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.197.98]) by 10.236.197.98 with SMTP id s62mr14559355yhn.24.1330281660074 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:41:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.197.98 with SMTP id s62mr10841194yhn.24.1330281659989; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q55sm31620332yhi.0.2012.02.26.10.40.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:40:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Tww3Y3JQlz2CG4D for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:40:57 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:40:57 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120226134057.031b11b5@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120225230358.096ceeb9.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225165536.082b0b4e@scorpio> <20120225230358.096ceeb9.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmO1Et5CJDAZnnUUvvuMmjjjwGaINI4YZ0axgIgdBdtRBI2vOAKrnfBOhkRM9PHy+bHZjin Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:41:01 -0000 On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 23:03:58 +0100 Polytropon articulated: > I _never_ would buy a USB printer, and I would also never > buy something that doesn't talk PS (or at least PCL). Both "PS" and to a lesser extent "PCL" are becoming passé. You might want to seriously consider "PDF". The better Brother printers fully support it as do some of the better printers from other manufacturers. You might want to check out for further details. The "PS" format is going to become considerably less important in a relatively short time in my estimation. By the way, have you considered a USB to Ethernet adapter? Totally untested with a printer, but it might work quite well. If it works, you could plug it into a wireless router and print from anywhere sans nasty cables, etcetera. I print wirelessly, and I love it. It "just works" and it makes my life simpler. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 18:50:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41ED106566B for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD588FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1QIotAb010871; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q1QIotd8010868; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20120226185148.34d9b63c.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <20120225231409.fdd67bff.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F497814.9000704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120226185148.34d9b63c.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 11:50:55 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Da Rock Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 18:50:59 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 10:08:52 +1000, Da Rock wrote: >> I don't know that I can add anything to the cups discussion here, but I >> understand you'd rather use lpr anyway. You are aware that the printer >> will only speak splix the samsung universal driver language? So any >> config would have to be based on that. > > The foo2qpdl-wrapper program seems to support that fine. > > > >> Once you have that working maybe you can manually add the printer in >> cups using lpd. > > Maybe? For sure! It's quite easy to do it (make entry in > /etc/printcap, create spool directories, write printer > filter one-liner "foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c" which is the > essential part). I just hope printing will be possible > from applications (Opera, OpenOffice and Gimp are the > primary candidates) afterwards. Opera, I have not tried. OpenOffice and LibreOffice print through lpd fine. Printing through Gutenprint in Gimp also works without CUPS. Something has a probably-unnecessary dependency on cups-client, so it's installed here, but none of the rest of CUPS. PS: using the non-resetting unlpt0 device is often helpful. A network connection is still better. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 21:29:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEE41065688 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 145308FC1A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:29:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [109.190.13.180]) (Authenticated sender: kha@dichotomia.fr) by sslmail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A3EF3DD034; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:28:47 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:29:12 +0100 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (sslmail.dichotomia.fr); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:28:48 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:29:18 -0000 On 26/02/2012 18:46, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 02:42:08 +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: >> You did nothing wrong, on the contrary. You now have a prefectly working >> printer. You just need to tell cups it exists. >> Since >> >> # foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c cupstest.ps> cupstest.xqx >> # cat cupstest.xqx> /dev/ulpt0 >> >> works, you should be able to create a new printer using a direct device. >> So go on as if you wanted to create a network printer, choose >> HPJetDirect (for example) when asked about the connection. Then when you >> have to input the uri remove the socket:// and type usb:///dev/ulpt0. >> (Yes triple / before dev) >> The you can process as usual for name, options and PPD. >> If it doesn't work try parallel:///dev/ulpt0 > Interesting approach. Fully "unimaginable" from the CUPS > "guide to things" (i. e. how normal users _assume_ things > should be done!), but interesting. I'll try that. > > The option to enter such kind of data ("parallel://" and > "usb://" isn't mentioned): > > > > Add Printer > ----------- > > Connection: _________________________________ > > Examples: > > http://hostname:631/ipp/ > http://hostname:631/ipp/port1 > > ipp://hostname/ipp/ > ipp://hostname/ipp/port1 > > lpd://hostname/queue > > socket://hostname > socket://hostname:9100 > > See "Network Printers" for the correct URI to use with your print > > [ Continue ] > > See? Nothing for parallel or USB to enter manually. > > > > It's like going to a car salesman, buying a car, but before > driving home from his yard, quickly exchanging the car you > bought for the car you initially wanted. :-) Not at all, the web admin for adding a printer is basically an html version of lpadmin. It is just easier with the web site. > > > >> Normally one should work. > Today, I tried to add the printer again. Unlike yesterday, > it got detected! (Note: System shut down during night.) > It also accepts print jobs, but they are stuck somewhere. > > % lpq -PSamsung_CLX-216x_Series > Samsung_CLX-216x_Series is ready > Rank Owner Job File(s) Total Size > 1st poly 202 Unbenannt1 7563264 bytes > > This is from an OpenOffice session. The printer doesn't > print anything. No action. OK this means the ppd does not handle everything. Might get a little complicated. > > > >> Basically in cups choosing "network connection" allows you to input any >> URI you want, including file and raw (now defunct I think - it was >> mainly for debug anyway). > Why haven't the CUPS people thought of a kind of "know what > you want mode" where you can simply enter what you think is > correct, no matter if any auto-detection magic did work (or > not)? They did, then they got bought by Apple... > > > >> I never tried this specific printer, but this trick worked well on a few >> HP and Canon. > > >> Tell us how it went. > I tried both of your suggestions for specifying the connection > and chose the PPD file for the printer CLX-216xsplc.ppd (size > 12208 bytes). Jobs get queued, printer "is ready", but no > action on the printer. > > However, when I issue a command like this: > > % foo2qpdl-wrapper -p 2 -c /tmp/testpage.ps> /dev/ulpt0 > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > pcache: unable to open '/home/poly/.ghostscript/cache/gs_cache' > > The printer works. The result is _very_ dark. But hey, it's > stupid commodity hardware, and RGB and CMY are "a little bit" > different, and nothing of the cheap crap is calibrated. :-) > > In the system log, I get those: > > ugen1.5: at usbus1 > ulpt0: class 0/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 5> on usbus1 > ulpt0: using bi-directional mode > ulpt0: output error > ulpt0: output error > ulpt0: output error > ulpt0: output error > > Unlike yesterday, the printer now is on ugen1.5. I'll have to play > with the permissions a bit, maybe that's the reason why nothing > can be printed, even though the changes I made for device permissions > should cover all imaginable cases - all devices /dev/usb/* now > are root:cups with crwxrwx--- permissions > , the /dev/u(n)lpt0 > devices are also root:cups with crw-rw---- permissions. > > Really, I _need_ to dump CUPS relapse to _standard_ system tools > that seem to be easily capable of what the web-driven autodetected > elastic-legged program magic of CUPS can't. :-) No, please don't blame CUPS, it is earnestly trying to cope with everything thrown at him (stupid printers, gnome DBus autoconfig, Apple Mac OSX and so on), and it is doing a fairly good job at it. I for one do not want to go back to the time where one had to learn 2 lines long LPD command just to print in color, double side, with an ICM profile. Getting back to your problem. Apparently you are using an old version of foo2qpdl, you may want to grab it from the web site directly and compile it by hand (One of the very rare case where using the default package/port is not a good idea at all) You can find the howto here : http://foo2qpdl.rkkda.com/ You will need to download and link the ICM profile to have acceptable print quality. The latest PPD is 24 874 bytes in size. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 21:41:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F359106566C for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy3-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy3.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C5148FC17 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29820 invoked by uid 0); 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy3.bluehost.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2012 21:41:41 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=1u8NWinlFvst+STZgl/WoEOInyw6B0ZSvS++yaTt/NI=; b=h3KuKLmPShm2s7q5JeNUozlzdY/Grq1sn0trWirlUVvWhwT/mbRt04xWHWhVA6UUfes2sS8nkMqz42D+BS/hHmLplqEzCDoTT4X89ipfq8Q++GUyAnIIO8OYcEHDEB3F; Received: from [70.98.65.183] (helo=localhost) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S1lqf-0001io-Er for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:41:41 -0700 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:41:35 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120226214135.GA14375@hemlock.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201202241432.29069.erich@alogreentechnologies.com> <201202261109.13748.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201202261109.13748.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 70.98.65.183 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: Why is this Symbol in the front of your website. A humble request. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 21:41:42 -0000 On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 11:09:13AM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > always these complicated things. This is why life here is so much more > exiting. > > We do not need sysctl. I guess that depends on your definition of sysctl, and I rather like it. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 26 22:20:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19836106564A for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:20:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D368FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so746398wib.13 for ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.78.6 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.78.6; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.78.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.78.6]) by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr13072229wiw.18.1330294827560 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.78.6 with SMTP id x6mr10339079wiw.18.1330294827513; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hb10sm45397861wib.10.2012.02.26.14.20.25 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 26 Feb 2012 14:20:26 -0800 (PST) References: <201202261625.51082.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 23:19:40 +0100 To: Carolyn Longfoot X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmEB7ok+mWjfR7bkW964kz1tJoSKviBR/BFOCKTPzaC7LWn/6wSEONLekjcHNpi0S//APxH Cc: "" , "" Subject: Re: Custom Kernel Target Ignored X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:20:29 -0000 On 26 Feb 2012, at 15:37, Carolyn Longfoot wrote: >=20 >>>=20 >> make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DAsusAMD620 >>=20 >> is what I do. >>=20 >> Erich >=20 > ARGHHH... KERNCONF not KERNELCONF... scuse my blindness... >=20 Pro tip, put it in your /etc/make.conf like so: KERNCONF=3DWHATEVERYOUSAID Then cd /usr/src && make buildkernel You might also want to have a look at MODULES_OVERRIDE, also to be put in ma= ke.conf , saves a huge lot of time.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 01:16:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3878A1065677 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:16:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DStaal@usa.net) Received: from mail.magehandbook.com (173-8-4-45-WashingtonDC.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.8.4.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079F48FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:16:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (Mac-Pro.magehandbook.com [192.168.1.50]) by mail.magehandbook.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3Tx4qT6BSSz1SJ; Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:16:05 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:14:43 -0500 From: Daniel Staal To: Bernt Hansson , "Bender, Chris" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> References: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD Questions List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:16:07 -0000 --As of February 26, 2012 8:20:14 AM +0100, Bernt Hansson is alleged to have said: > http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html > > Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and > ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 > > What does it say? Can you connect? > > There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem > > You can look at your routing table with netstat -r --As for the rest, it is mine. This is my strong suspicion as well. To separate out what the problem is: 'su' to root in the jailed system. Shut down postfix. (`postfix stop`, or `/etc/rc.d/postfix stop`) Then run `nc -l 25`. This will echo anything that comes in on port 25 direct to your terminal. Then try telneting to it. If it works, the problem is postfix. If it doesn't, restart postfix and ignore it: It's not the problem. Daniel T. Staal --------------------------------------------------------------- This email copyright the author. Unless otherwise noted, you are expressly allowed to retransmit, quote, or otherwise use the contents for non-commercial purposes. This copyright will expire 5 years after the author's death, or in 30 years, whichever is longer, unless such a period is in excess of local copyright law. --------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 09:26:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11A931065670 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:26:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ronnyma@volatile.no) Received: from na3sys010aog105.obsmtp.com (na3sys010aog105.obsmtp.com [74.125.245.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A1D48FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com ([209.85.214.175]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys010aob105.postini.com ([74.125.244.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKT0tMXXhG+NlMZi73m8RkaGx+wqoLt+Z0@postini.com; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:55 PST Received: by mail-tul01m020-f175.google.com with SMTP id x4so5421914obh.20 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ronnyma@volatile.no designates 10.60.20.9 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.20.9; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ronnyma@volatile.no designates 10.60.20.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ronnyma@volatile.no; dkim=pass header.i=ronnyma@volatile.no Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.20.9]) by 10.60.20.9 with SMTP id j9mr5532646oee.6.1330334813344 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=volatile.no; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TOnkdgszTlwDkbs9POG7kqWsF1YGlLucg6h2+7jhhdk=; b=ZwFu5oMz/YMgHuUE7eq+AiulDdXlfxDO+VNv3QoCsVQxXZe285kqXb0ebqOv9yDlpU L62b8kmV74tImtAO3iXcjZMzRBaC8zTqKeWBXEbhtaIhq8C1AtYU80Qt54vrfl9MgdVx k574yxZrIj4jpZE3BRtJfyBKqYO7zLy3xnyaE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.20.9 with SMTP id j9mr4849709oee.6.1330334813183; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.20.1 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 01:26:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F47A295.6020200@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F47A295.6020200@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:26:53 +0100 Message-ID: From: Ronny Mandal To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkmVcaE9PaguXJGgiexAJJ6hIGc3yVxNPV8yXbvOoGgp8mTRAyegYkx+UmrYFu6uGYBhgU3 Subject: Re: 9.0, Samba and two NICs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:26:56 -0000 On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Da Rock wrote: > On 02/24/12 21:39, Ronny Mandal wrote: >> >> Hi! >> >> I have been running Samba on FreeBSD 9.0 with a wireless card. A share >> is connected to my W7 computer. To get more speed between the >> computers, I decided to activate the 1GBit- Ethernet on the FreeBSD >> and establish a direct connection (cross-link) to the W7. I gave the >> new connection a static IP/subnet: 10.0.0.2/255.0.0.0 for the FreeBSD >> and 10.0.0.1/255.0.0.0 for the W7. SSH works fine, however Samba is >> utilizing the wireless card. >> >> My smb.conf looks something like this: >> >> .. >> ;The 192-address is the wireless, ath0. 10.0.0.2 is age0 >> interfaces = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.232 10.0.0.2 >> bind interfaces only = yes >> ; the two latter is the IPs of the W7 >> hosts allow = 127.0.0.1 192.168.0.117 10.0.0.1 >> >> >> If I remove the 192* in the hosts allow, my W7 looses access via smb. >> >> netstat tells me that it is listening to both interfaces. >> >> What might be wrong? > > What address is the w7 using? > > If it is using 192.X, that could be the problem. That or some variation... > such as the w7 using wireless and 192.x? Sorry about the late answer and missing info. The W7 is using both, i.e. wireless and wired. Strangely enough, it works now. Here is what I did: The interface parameter; I put the 10.* before the 192.* and stopped and started the samba-service. After that, the wired card were utilized when I copied to and from the share. interfaces = 192.168.0.232 10.0.0.2 127.0.0.1 changed to interfaces = 10.0.0.2 192.168.0.232 127.0.0.1 (I tried this earlier, but it seems that /usr/local/etc/rc.d/samba restart did not properly re-read the configuration.) Regards, Ronny Mandal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 13:49:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD19106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmk.sbor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA4D8FC1E for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so1026611ggn.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:49:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dmk.sbor@gmail.com designates 10.236.72.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.72.170; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dmk.sbor@gmail.com designates 10.236.72.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dmk.sbor@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=dmk.sbor@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.72.170]) by 10.236.72.170 with SMTP id t30mr21353819yhd.101.1330350595060 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:49:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=qwDbbc8fRksUurHBg9m2nK6NAjeR6efMjSD4INUmx/E=; b=PxkENXmD1Hoo4kpTSqOLoUcz2vd7gYTjKbQT7/ZpEH6I07k1trRK5/35Sxksy1AGJv o3hfOMql80ClJ2+4L1JJYAono4NU/ANpEAh7OFcETzIaBTOsqe14db37oyhRkCSDLBiq g3wGKjUImWbKmfuS2skMyREbIgaK+GEpyDHKc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.72.170 with SMTP id t30mr15766837yhd.101.1330348967398; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:22:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.204.2 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 05:22:47 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:22:47 +0300 Message-ID: From: "Dmitry S. Kasterin" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Recurring "rescan already queued" message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:49:56 -0000 Hello! I am trying to install 9.0-RELEASE from standard amd64 memstick image. During the install huge amount of "rescan already queued" messages breaks installer interface. (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued So, I have 2 questions: 1) Are these messages harmless? 2) Messages are a little bit annoying. So, is there any way to suppress them? Some remarks: 1) I am trying to install FreeBSD on HP ProBook 4730s, which seems to be affected by a recent Intel bug: http://ixbtlabs.com/articles3/cpu/intel-6x-chipset-bug-p1.html 2) HDD is ada0 on ata0. 3) The messages are genetared constantly: # dmesg | grep "rescan already queued" | wc -l 98 # uptime ... 14 mins ... 4) I've tried to suppress messages by setting "hint.ata.1.disabled=1", but this had no effect (may be due to my mistake?) 5) Verbose kernel log has the following part: (aprobe0:ata1:0:0:0): SOFT_RESET. ACB: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (aprobe0:ata1:0:0:0): CAM status: Selection Timeout (aprobe0:ata1:0:1:0): SOFT_RESET. ACB: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 (aprobe0:ata1:0:1:0): CAM status: Selection Timeout ata1: SATA reset: ports status=0x00 ata1: p0: SATA connect timeout status=00000004 ata1: p1: SATA connect timeout status=00000000 ata1: DISCONNECT requested ata1: SATA reset: ports status=0x00 ata1: p0: SATA connect timeout status=00000004 ata1: p1: SATA connect timeout status=00000000 ata1: DISCONNECT requested ata1: SATA reset: ports status=0x00 ata1: p0: SATA connect timeout status=00000004 ata1: p1: SATA connect timeout status=00000000 (noperiph:ata1:0:-1:-1): rescan already queued ata1: DISCONNECT requested 6) vmstat -i gives the following: interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 653 4 irq9: acpi0 417 2 irq14: ata0 164 1 irq16: ehci0 ehci1 12335 81 cpu0:timer 75201 498 irq256: hdac0 12 0 cpu1:timer 92952 615 cpu2:timer 74159 491 cpu3:timer 97503 645 Total 353396 2340 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 14:46:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F12106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Arindam.Misra@netapp.com) Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B678FC13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:46:48 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,490,1325491200"; d="scan'208,217";a="628844441" Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 27 Feb 2012 06:18:31 -0800 Received: from vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.77.35]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q1REIEpO002569 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:18:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.6.92]) by vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 06:18:27 -0800 From: "Misra, Arindam" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Thread-Topic: NTP Autokey configuration Thread-Index: Acz1Wp4l1w3q9dxxQye9kmkELOdmrw== Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:18:26 +0000 Message-ID: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.106.53.53] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: NTP Autokey configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:46:49 -0000 Hi, I have a two servers both of which are not public, I want to configure one = of them as a server and the other as a client for ntpd. What is the exact c= onfiguration required in both client and servers to get the autokey protoco= l working? I shall be thankful if you could send a ntp.conf file which work= s for a scenario described above. Arindam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 15:20:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ADD1065678 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D09D8FC1C for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.86] (93-97-172-73.zone5.bethere.co.uk [93.97.172.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by ifdnrg30.ifdnrg.com (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1RFK6WP082589 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:08 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4F4B9F26.7060407@ifdnrg.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:06 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Misra, Arindam" References: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> In-Reply-To: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NTP Autokey configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:20:43 -0000 On 27/02/2012 14:18, Misra, Arindam wrote: > Hi, > > > I have a two servers both of which are not public, I want to configure one of them as a server and the other as a client for ntpd. What is the exact configuration required in both client and servers to get the autokey protocol working? I shall be thankful if you could send a ntp.conf file which works for a scenario described above. > > Arindam i presume you've tried: http://support.ntp.org/bin/view/Support/ConfiguringAutokey#Section_6.7.2.2. (you'll likely need to use 'freeBSD' paths for /etc/ i.e /usr/local/etc/ if installed from ports). I particulalrly liked *6.7.1 (How to use this guide*) 1. Perform the server set-up before performing the client set-up 2. Follow each step in this guide > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- ------------------------- Paul Macdonald IFDNRG Ltd Web and video hosting ------------------------- t: 0131 5548070 m: 07970339546< Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE33A106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from axelbsd@ymail.com) Received: from nm22-vm7.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (nm22-vm7.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D64F8FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [217.146.183.209] by nm22.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:05 -0000 Received: from [77.238.184.57] by tm2.bullet.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:05 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp126.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:05 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ymail.com; s=s1024; t=1330356425; bh=3ibngkbZPWDXakDlUWdXgNAqIQlyq/E/zC7csRoCE9o=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:Return-Path:Received-SPF:Authentication-Results:Received:Received:MIME-Version:Received:In-Reply-To:References:From:Date:Message-ID:Subject:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=hIUpXLpxR/5if0GAxhzBQWxNYpFa1Eu212qXPVD2R09HjZjq0BsczNkuTEbwQHz5xUOOHNXjj1eQeQ92UFtOEV71wWWNgjqMPUcr/P8xnzQJe6us3nLvBygbJEr3wSgGCHPZyhoCJdE3xmjHZRIXEn76gHQeIaEnSoNb/VidoRM= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 120078.68089.bm@smtp126.mail.ukl.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 7B_HmxcVM1n.MbpKv0wX5I9QWe1OEmuPpXvw13hG5M94kxE tQ3qjvUjK1s2bL2yHSmGjm5NlKsuh4B1DqKipj7BQeMLtvSwJL6Rb6.ZXtXS LDD16AHH0E78w0tvtZLSwv8IlIBZkQOFJk.s2ZUgjP_rggEv9bMJF_6cLpeD 8Bbh_MnpVwh24u7alRetWfNlzKJ2T48.4QYuRhPw6ACN5TAUnptWwwMg0B5q MKAn64N3Ui6MqmR3t9k7p1l0bQEAqHU8seuZ17Ml4UX_f5Iwk202ftDzcfWv A5K1jjkaWGQBsBX6cYB022jWz3JXmm6zQb6cAC_MSk9CEm0Yt2KalNFQ5U7v ZXuxmw4hGf7RQI.IMJ2Q8jzyM2Wn4CKMX1F8HDw-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: S65s63SswBDjU54Gjqw2GSWlZmfgiEU_X3tN1_9u Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (axelbsd@209.85.210.182 with plain) by smtp126.mail.ukl.yahoo.com with SMTP; 27 Feb 2012 15:27:04 +0000 GMT Received: by iaae16 with SMTP id e16so560994iaa.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:27:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of axelbsd@ymail.com designates 10.42.161.73 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.42.161.73; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of axelbsd@ymail.com designates 10.42.161.73 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=axelbsd@ymail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.42.161.73]) by 10.42.161.73 with SMTP id s9mr14323268icx.16.1330356423730 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:27:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.161.73 with SMTP id s9mr11522410icx.16.1330356034903; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:20:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.147.1 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 07:20:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> References: <4537B3EC79B7CC45B125AB3F585198010C58CF@SACEXCMBX04-PRD.hq.netapp.com> From: Alexandre Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:14 +0100 Message-ID: To: "Misra, Arindam" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: NTP Autokey configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:40:27 -0000 Hi, A good start is the manpage of ntp.conf http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=ntp.conf&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=FreeBSD+9.0-RELEASE+and+Ports&arch=default&format=html The authentification support is described. You have the handbook page for the basics : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-ntp.html Regards, Alexandre On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, Misra, Arindam wrote: > Hi, > > > I have a two servers both of which are not public, I want to configure one > of them as a server and the other as a client for ntpd. What is the exact > configuration required in both client and servers to get the autokey > protocol working? I shall be thankful if you could send a ntp.conf file > which works for a scenario described above. > > Arindam > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:12:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C7E106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:12:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE448FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:12:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id CDA86180DE3; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:11:33 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B3B6C180DE2; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:11:31 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BED18B18E88; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:12:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 11:12:28 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 0FF5CA34002D4D0FF5CB81 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:12:26 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. Thread-Index: Acz0VyuxoJlMif1qRAW3ikXcgENrowBExO3A References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFC23@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Bernt Hansson" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: bah@bananmonarki.se X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33035-51377) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:12:43 -0000 Hello Can anybody assist me with pfctl on freebsd? I have pfctl running as adaptive. It is blocking some smtp mail.=20 I am uncertain about flushing the states or machining some of the=20 TIMEWAITING constraints go away. Which is really blocking my email. Can anyone assist? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Bernt Hansson [mailto:bah@bananmonarki.se]=20 Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:20 AM To: Bender, Chris Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. 2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev: > Hi Brent > > Yes the system we are calling X, is jailed by another system. > > Here is the jailer system: > > zs1# netstat -aptcp | grep smtp > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp 10.156.31.20.45081 > SYN_RCVD > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 rt3.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 npims.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 wiki.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 localhost.smtp *.* LISTEN Here is about jails; http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 What does it say? Can you connect? There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem You can look at your routing table with netstat -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:20:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F271065670 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36658FC13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 0BB59180DE3; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:00 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id A14AD180DD7; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:19:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CBE85B18E84; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 11:20:56 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 0FFD8D92002D4D0FFD8EDF Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:20:55 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. Thread-Index: Acz0VyuxoJlMif1qRAW3ikXcgENrowBFHqDA References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFC23@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F49DD2E.9010406@bananmonarki.se> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Bernt Hansson" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: bah@bananmonarki.se X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33035-51390) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:20:59 -0000 Does anybody have an idea on how to clear the bruteforCE TABLE ON PFCTL ? An adaptive fw or pftcl device is blocking some of my email? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Bernt Hansson [mailto:bah@bananmonarki.se]=20 Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2012 2:20 AM To: Bender, Chris Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure, perhaps Jails is causing it. 2012-02-26 00:54, Bender, Chris skrev: > Hi Brent > > Yes the system we are calling X, is jailed by another system. > > Here is the jailer system: > > zs1# netstat -aptcp | grep smtp > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp 10.156.31.20.45081 > SYN_RCVD > tcp4 0 0 tools2.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 rt3.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 npims.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 wiki.smtp *.* LISTEN > tcp4 0 0 localhost.smtp *.* LISTEN Here is about jails; http://www.uk.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html Have you tried to telnet into the other jailed hostnames and ip-addresses, like telnet rt3.* 25 What does it say? Can you connect? There seems to be either a jail problem or a routing problem You can look at your routing table with netstat -r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:39:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5FA1065672 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600748FC16 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10571382; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:39:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.246] (account jon@radel.com HELO winesap.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10571380; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:38:50 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:38:50 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms000301060109020809020706" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:39:13 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms000301060109020809020706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/25/12 1:39 PM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Thanks. There aren't any firewalls between the devices but they are far= apart. On 2/27/12 11:12 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Can anybody assist me with pfctl on freebsd? > I have pfctl running as adaptive. It is blocking some smtp mail. !!!!! BTW, pfctl is the program for controlling the firewall. The actual=20 firewall is generally referred to as pf. So if you just turn PF off for a bit, does e-mail suddenly flow? --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms000301060109020809020706-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:45:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45704106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092EC8FC15 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id EDCEF180DE3; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:44:36 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BAC74180D7E; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:44:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E74EDB18E84; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:45:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 11:45:32 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 1014126B002D4D101413B8 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:45:31 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure Thread-Index: Acz1bl2zv6wT9KJhRJ2mRT7nxHRm5QAAFWWQ References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Jon Radel" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: jon@radel.com X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33036-51431) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:45:35 -0000 Yes after a few minutes the email in question begins to flow. AT some point in the past some of the postfix boxes behind the firewall Where turned off. This caused the fw, I believe to think it was being Attacked because it had nowhere to push the smtp traffic. I believe that is why on several IPs I see TIME_WAITING for the connections. I was thinking about just reloading the pf.conf but I have never worked with pf so=20 I am worried other things might break. My thought was by doing that the=20 Adaptive part of the pfctl would be restarted? Does that make sense would reloading the rules wash the adaptive behavior away or Would all that still be in some sort of bruteforce file to protect the firewall? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Jon Radel [mailto:jon@radel.com]=20 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 11:39 AM To: Bender, Chris; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure On 2/25/12 1:39 PM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Thanks. There aren't any firewalls between the devices but they are far apart. On 2/27/12 11:12 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > Can anybody assist me with pfctl on freebsd? > I have pfctl running as adaptive. It is blocking some smtp mail. !!!!! BTW, pfctl is the program for controlling the firewall. The actual=20 firewall is generally referred to as pf. So if you just turn PF off for a bit, does e-mail suddenly flow? --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:54:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98B5106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:54:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sclists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607348FC1F for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:54:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so1077564vbm.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sclists@gmail.com designates 10.220.157.83 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.220.157.83; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sclists@gmail.com designates 10.220.157.83 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sclists@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=sclists@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.220.157.83]) by 10.220.157.83 with SMTP id a19mr9746166vcx.54.1330361655714 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cPgc7GyBkEQal7RC1MYSqW16KhT+r8cZb3ktYM6lD9Y=; b=mOgK+oZz6DbNqN/XXsMC73ry3JDMBGNBsRQTfUj8kpwf9mxE/DYsL5TU0EzQC4b/zT bw+vZB9gnnlmSukNXWl+z10/QYF3bOVkc9LRRdvOM05giIFEH/BfNhC95Y9gGuRt6WGX 3ToYyfIWqXgP6xHCQgEipveSUVzV9Gkbn3620= Received: by 10.220.157.83 with SMTP id a19mr7860525vcx.54.1330361655675; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (ool-182c6755.dyn.optonline.net. [24.44.103.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ie6sm11359648vdb.5.2012.02.27.08.54.14 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:54:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:54:17 -0500 From: Stephen Cook User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:54:16 -0000 Hello all! I'm relatively new to FreeBSD but I'm enjoying it so far. I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g. setting up clusters of replicated databases, web server pools, etc). Here's the list of things I need to change on each new clone, am I missing anything obvious? Or are there any gotchas to what I'm trying? 1) I have to change the hostname in rc.conf 2) I have to change the IP address in rc.conf (I'm using static IPs) 2a) I saw (on the internet) some people having problems because VirtualBox generates a new MAC address for cloned "machines", which somehow screws up the naming of the network interfaces (e.g. they get renumbered, thereby ignoring any configuration you have set up). Now I can't find it anymore, at least not for FreeBSD. Some Linux forums have info about "/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules" which doesn't exist in FreeBSD as far as I can tell. Is this a concern? I don't seem to be having a problem but TBH I'd rather understand what is going on than just be lucky. 3) Create new SSH keys 3a) For host keys, I can delete the existing ones in /etc/ssh/ and reboot, is there a better way? 3b) Should I bother changing the SSH keys for any users I have? It is basically one user (I use to log in with) which will be the same across the board anyway. Thanks for any insight! -- Stephen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 16:58:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C83C1065679 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2EA28FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10571415; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:58:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.246] (account jon@radel.com HELO winesap.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10571413; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:58:03 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:58:02 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms080506060205070603050200" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:58:10 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms080506060205070603050200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/27/12 11:45 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > I was thinking about just reloading the pf.conf but I have never worked= > with pf so > I am worried other things might break. My thought was by doing that the= > Adaptive part of the pfctl would be restarted? Any pf.conf file I've ever seen does something sensible after reload.=20 I suspect one could write something perverse that blows up on restart,=20 but that would making rebooting the machine problematic.... > > Does that make sense would reloading the rules wash the adaptive > behavior away or > Would all that still be in some sort of bruteforce file to protect the > firewall? pf can load data from files when it starts or just manage things in a=20 fashion that is transient upon restart. Hard to say what's happening in = your case w/o a clue as to what's in pf.conf. I'd suggest that you at the very least whitelist internal SMTP speakers=20 that you expect to get e-mail from on a regular basis, even if you do=20 throttling of SMTP connections in general. Much less messy.... --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms080506060205070603050200-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:00:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF08F106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:00:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E8B8FC18 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:00:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 9E8A5180DCA; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:59:48 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 651C5180D25; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 11:59:47 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 922ACB1885D; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:00:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 12:00:44 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 1021FDB3002D4D1021FF00 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:00:43 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure Thread-Index: Acz1cP1DAMqrc42YSSCbJ5xM8yHO1gAACQng References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFDA4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Jon Radel" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: jon@radel.com X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33036-51455) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:00:46 -0000 How would I whitelist SMTP speakers? I am thinking it would be ok to reload the rules, would that clear the issue with SMTP users for now? Whats the harm? Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Jon Radel [mailto:jon@radel.com]=20 Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 11:58 AM To: Bender, Chris Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure On 2/27/12 11:45 AM, Bender, Chris wrote: > I was thinking about just reloading the pf.conf but I have never worked > with pf so > I am worried other things might break. My thought was by doing that the > Adaptive part of the pfctl would be restarted? Any pf.conf file I've ever seen does something sensible after reload.=20 I suspect one could write something perverse that blows up on restart,=20 but that would making rebooting the machine problematic.... > > Does that make sense would reloading the rules wash the adaptive > behavior away or > Would all that still be in some sort of bruteforce file to protect the > firewall? pf can load data from files when it starts or just manage things in a=20 fashion that is transient upon restart. Hard to say what's happening= in your case w/o a clue as to what's in pf.conf. I'd suggest that you at the very least whitelist internal SMTP speakers=20 that you expect to get e-mail from on a regular basis, even if you do=20 throttling of SMTP connections in general. Much less messy.... --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:09:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4D71065670 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:09:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E688FC1E for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:09:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10571448; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:24 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.246] (account jon@radel.com HELO winesap.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10571442; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:12 -0500 Message-ID: <4F4BB8B8.509@radel.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:09:12 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Bender, Chris" References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFDA4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms070009010202000007090903" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:09:26 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms070009010202000007090903 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2/27/12 12:00 PM, Bender, Chris wrote: > > How would I whitelist SMTP speakers? You're invited to read the documentation. The Book of PF: A No-Nonsense = Guide to the OpenBSD Firewall, 2nd ed., is also rather informative,=20 although one has to keep in mind that the version of PF in FreeBSD lags=20 that in OpenBSD. > I am thinking it would be ok to reload the rules, would that clear the > issue with SMTP users for now? > Whats the harm? The universe might grind to a halt. This would upset a great many=20 people. This outcome, however, is exceedingly unlikely. Again, with no clue as to what's in pf.conf, I could offer only the=20 vaguest guesses based in part on my judged competence of the author of=20 your pf.conf. Since your pf.conf appears to have possibly destroyed=20 your e-mail infrastructure, the preliminary assessment is a bit shaky. --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms070009010202000007090903-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:36:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1E4106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1C168FC19 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1395787wib.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.96.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.96.8; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.96.8 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.96.8]) by 10.180.96.8 with SMTP id do8mr20926078wib.21.1330364175166 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.96.8 with SMTP id do8mr16501430wib.21.1330364175006; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:36:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bg3sm23246292wib.10.2012.02.27.09.36.13 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:36:14 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4BBF0C.3080206@my.gd> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:36:12 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl4+/IfLstVWbp6EJ+lFIQUtYHmtLnb3vMohrcBsfC8EXEBPDBz8dBf5ibdViZYu8MUo3Yp Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:36:16 -0000 On 2/27/12 5:54 PM, Stephen Cook wrote: > Hello all! > > I'm relatively new to FreeBSD but I'm enjoying it so far. > > I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on > cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g. > setting up clusters of replicated databases, web server pools, etc). [snip] > 3) Create new SSH keys > 3a) For host keys, I can delete the existing ones in /etc/ssh/ and > reboot, is there a better way? > 3b) Should I bother changing the SSH keys for any users I have? It > is basically one user (I use to log in with) which will be the same > across the board anyway. > Why bother changing keys if this is only a "fake network for you to toy with" ? Let them be. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:47:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81162106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@growveg.net) Received: from smtp1.servage.net (smtp1.servage.net [IPv6:2a01:3b0:1:fb:1::2001]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BCF58FC1C for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.60.16.28] (internet-gw-1.demon.net [194.221.40.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.servage.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D83D32541 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:09:35 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F4BC1B3.3050202@growveg.net> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:31 +0000 From: John User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 ThunderBrowse/3.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: odd SDcard behaviour in freebsd-9.0-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:47:36 -0000 Hi list, I recently upgraded from 8.2-R to 9.0-R via freebsd-update and noticed different behaviour when I plug in my Nikon D50 via the usb port. I'm using the generic kernel while I try to sort this. It is the same in all but identity. 8.2 behaviour used to create a device /dev/da(x)s1 depending on what else was also connected to the USB subsystem. Typically the system would see the card whilst it was still in the camera as /dev/da5s1 and I could then mount it with mount_msdosfs. 9.0 behaviour just shows the following in /var/log/messages: Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: ugen4.6: at usbus4 Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2: on usbus4 Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x4100 Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2:5:2:-1: Attached to scbus5 and nothing corresponding to the device in /dev What am I doing wrong? thanks, -- freebsd at growveg dot net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 17:55:12 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3456106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:55:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D57B8FC17 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:55:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so752752obb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:12 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com designates 10.182.121.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.121.101; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com designates 10.182.121.101 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kudzu@tenebras.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.121.101]) by 10.182.121.101 with SMTP id lj5mr5583683obb.39.1330365312056 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.121.101 with SMTP id lj5mr4958974obb.39.1330365311921; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.49.164 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4BC1B3.3050202@growveg.net> References: <4F4BC1B3.3050202@growveg.net> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 09:55:11 -0800 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: John Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnKJPFhTlPwO0gi57Jw+U641/q0KydpMy2qd5YShcvvUfYdMeRT6tOTcSIkuIBAMrglZHH+ Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: odd SDcard behaviour in freebsd-9.0-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 17:55:12 -0000 Forgive the naive question, but on one of my Nikons, it is possible to present the device itself, or the SD card as a USD drive. Which are you doing? No doubt there is no driver for the D50 in the kernel, but the generic umass driver should handle the device. On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 9:47 AM, John wrote: > Hi list, > > I recently upgraded from 8.2-R to 9.0-R via freebsd-update and noticed > different behaviour when I plug in my Nikon D50 via the usb port. I'm > using the generic kernel while I try to sort this. It is the same in all > but identity. > > 8.2 behaviour used to create a device /dev/da(x)s1 depending on what > else was also connected to the USB subsystem. Typically the system would > see the card whilst it was still in the camera as /dev/da5s1 and I could > then mount it with mount_msdosfs. > > 9.0 behaviour just shows the following in /var/log/messages: > > Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: ugen4.6: at usbus4 > Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2: rev 2.00/1.00, addr 6> on usbus4 > Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2: =A0SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks =3D= 0x4100 > Feb 26 09:18:02 potato kernel: umass2:5:2:-1: Attached to scbus5 > > and nothing corresponding to the device in /dev > > What am I doing wrong? > > thanks, > -- > freebsd at growveg dot net > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:05:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8DD0106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770608FC17 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1419916wib.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of amvandemore@gmail.com designates 10.216.133.9 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.216.133.9; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amvandemore@gmail.com designates 10.216.133.9 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=amvandemore@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=amvandemore@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.216.133.9]) by 10.216.133.9 with SMTP id p9mr1487547wei.9.1330365946492 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:05:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=d+aYEBTDnIGZJI5GrVP0RDPcmAPmcR2eSJK7uqY0mRY=; b=HhO5UdhNisIdFDVpb4pP3m5ZtLwGcAvvE8TJq9Ktr0zDShOQNhKenWQA2kmd8CJCXR maxTJHNI5rGCd0WUo7slYrIZvN4rlJTZzaWt/ELkoO+plDrgha/DYc2JKglgU/K1T48I 9gfQseAnofXgV0I07a5pu7m8zepIg59g/W0yw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.133.9 with SMTP id p9mr1168032wei.9.1330365946434; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:05:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.93.138 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:05:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 12:05:46 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Stephen Cook Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:05:48 -0000 On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Stephen Cook wrote: > > 2a) I saw (on the internet) some people having problems because > VirtualBox generates a new MAC address for cloned "machines", which somehow > screws up the naming of the network interfaces (e.g. they get renumbered, > thereby ignoring any configuration you have set up). Now I can't find it > anymore, at least not for FreeBSD. Some Linux forums have info about > "/etc/udev/rules.d/70-**persistent-net.rules" which doesn't exist in > FreeBSD as far as I can tell. Is this a concern? I don't seem to be having > a problem but TBH I'd rather understand what is going on than just be lucky. > You can set the MAC address statically in the VB machine. I don't know if it changes it by cloning a system, but even if it does you can change to what you want even with the GUI tools. FreeBSD doesn't use udev, and you should be thankful for it. What a nightmare when you want to do advanced things with your NIC's. What I'm guessing your reading about are people who have multiple nic's in the Vbox guest, and upon cloning mac addresses are changed for the devices. Since Linux device detection doesn't enumerate things the same way each time they created udev so devices would appear to have this. Well as you've seen evidence of, this doesn't work so well when tryin to script things on unknown devices. All this trouble to save a few seconds of boot time. > 3) Create new SSH keys > 3a) For host keys, I can delete the existing ones in /etc/ssh/ and > reboot, is there a better way? > ssh-keygen(1) is the typical method. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:19:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12CBC106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:19:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from artifexor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79178FC24 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so785965obb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of artifexor@gmail.com designates 10.60.5.231 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.5.231; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of artifexor@gmail.com designates 10.60.5.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=artifexor@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=artifexor@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.5.231]) by 10.60.5.231 with SMTP id v7mr2628436oev.50.1330366741183 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:19:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SainG0breKD+wStPycw8PtryDE/GxMRC8c3E49KFDJI=; b=PmbdgmlBTG8W9IEbu7Yq6aU+aHttyP/PPO5QhnjCQP8KQJDYXW+EGz7+awxf0BS+Vq GLkKDAKh+5mD45+xTt/9g5h2BiFWSIrQ112SH5uaVuoBIfKji1zUPrPh3q8KazS8GIKd Rc0yi4SIpO9cHSjMIPnfr/EAOKRJ0AppFyIUo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.5.231 with SMTP id v7mr2327997oev.50.1330366741117; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:19:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.15.161 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:19:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201202260003.q1Q035OW083472@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201202260003.q1Q035OW083472@fire.js.berklix.net> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:19:00 +0100 Message-ID: From: Artifex Maximus To: "Julian H. Stacey" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: clang vs gcc linking problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:19:02 -0000 On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 1:03 AM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Artifex Maximus wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Absolutely not a flame war but would like to switch to clang in a > > project. Project uses ncurses. gcc works well but the executable fails > > when compiled other than -O0. Then I think I should change to clang > > which will becomes the default compiler in FreeBSD. With clang at > > linking time I got the following error: > > > > /usr/local/bin/ld: display/libsub_display.a(canvas.o): undefined > > reference to symbol 'keypad' > > /usr/local/bin/ld: note: 'keypad' is defined in DSO > > /usr/local/lib/libtinfow.so.6.0 so try adding it to the linker command > > line > > /usr/local/lib/libtinfow.so.6.0: could not read symbols: Invalid > operation > > clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > invocation) > > *** Error code 1 > > > > With exactly the same flags gcc links successful. Any idea where is > > the problem and what is the solution? > > > > Thanks, > > There have been quite a number of discussions on Gcc & Clang > of various lists since efforts to transition started, > I don't see a specific list here, > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo > but this may interest > http://wiki.freebsd.org/BuildingFreeBSDWithClang > Thanks. I did not found any related information on link but finally found a solution. I have to add -ltinfo to LDFLAGS. I still do not know why gcc works without and why clang needs that. Bye, a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:21:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFA911065672 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8C98FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werl4 with SMTP id l4so994081wer.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.107.6 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.107.6; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.107.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.107.6]) by 10.180.107.6 with SMTP id gy6mr12846439wib.16.1330366867187 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.107.6 with SMTP id gy6mr10081482wib.16.1330366867132; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:21:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm8682861wiy.7.2012.02.27.10.21.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:21:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4BC990.7050100@my.gd> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:21:04 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlM7mk0IrMSGC/kF2AloLTksIZedASBWuSUzi/Djc5EA5d0iGJtVpElDkgQKI4fDC/7IV/u Cc: Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:08 -0000 On 2/27/12 7:05 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Stephen Cook wrote: > >> 3) Create new SSH keys >> 3a) For host keys, I can delete the existing ones in /etc/ssh/ and >> reboot, is there a better way? >> > > ssh-keygen(1) is the typical method. > Or just delete the existing keys and sshd will recreate them at first boot ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:24:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96550106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A86B8FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenq7 with SMTP id q7so504909yen.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kraduk@gmail.com designates 10.236.155.6 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.155.6; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kraduk@gmail.com designates 10.236.155.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kraduk@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=kraduk@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.155.6]) by 10.236.155.6 with SMTP id i6mr22688355yhk.87.1330367070672 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:24:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=MCo0W/FHo/k1vHw/00aMy8vYZrT46sXSy+ElO7OM5DQ=; b=CGGbnMsJP0v8apWaWrESatzhUgh45nGv8TINFHCZIqfYg7g3cjmnlcoP4AeYHIir16 Nfn/VwbWDUz71n+oWuptGSc0NTBp1sV/Rc/4i29Y84PhZD+1GNqUpejKI3cMtto+KiB0 UtEVee2YoJ6bxAcZnWkByqd2zVGgtHl+zkE2o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.155.6 with SMTP id i6mr16980418yhk.87.1330367070618; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.179.74 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:24:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20120221223323.a3ccc492.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:24:30 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Polytropon , User Questions Subject: Re: Current way of downloading sources X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:24:31 -0000 csup -h cvsup.your_country.freebsd.org/usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supf= ile works for ports as well 2012/2/21 Fernando Apestegu=EDa > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at -h10:33 PM, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 21:18:41 +0100, Fernando Apestegu=EDa wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > Before 9.0 I used to use sysinstall to download sources for several > > > distributions including kernel and libraries. However, this doesn't > seem > > to > > > work anymore. Whatever source distribution I try to download I get th= e > > > error that it doesn't exist in the server. > > > > > > The handbook[1] still says sysinstall can be used to do the job. Is i= t > > > right? If so, what could be my mistake. > > > > The easiest way to get the RELEASE sources is to download > > them using FTP: > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/9.0-RELEASE/src.txz > > > > (and for amd64 architecture respectively) > > > > Leaving the discussion "old vs. new installer" aside, this > > method should always work. > > > > Thanks for the URL. Should I file a PR about the handbook issue? > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Polytropon > > Magdeburg, Germany > > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 18:25:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37E810656AE for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:25:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8758FC15 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:25:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so795015obb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com designates 10.182.1.104 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.1.104; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kudzu@tenebras.com designates 10.182.1.104 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kudzu@tenebras.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.1.104]) by 10.182.1.104 with SMTP id 8mr5655775obl.19.1330367115024 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.1.104 with SMTP id 8mr5021235obl.19.1330367114958; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.49.164 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4BC990.7050100@my.gd> References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> <4F4BC990.7050100@my.gd> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 10:25:14 -0800 Message-ID: From: Michael Sierchio To: Damien Fleuriot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmC6yPlPwNAweJywJuoIO7fl9ccfveEAGSVTuV+KjPLT+OiHaLPm02d08WsRNMs53NFKcrc Cc: Adam Vande More , "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:25:15 -0000 On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> ssh-keygen(1) is the typical method. >> > > Or just delete the existing keys and sshd will recreate them at first > boot ;) No, sshd will not create the keys. They are created by /etc/rc.d/sshd, which invokes ssh-keygen if it doesn't find the key files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 19:21:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2462B106566C; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:21:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward7.mail.yandex.net (forward7.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 258428FC13; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:21:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp9.mail.yandex.net (smtp9.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.35]) by forward7.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id B80361C1268; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:21:25 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1330370485; bh=KDXtPOSBCz75PQqwvcZrhyc0BhlbFqe0gaNlpyfwff0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CRrOweK595qxU/ZHlDYL1x5qhegP1LwDBJhvdnk/Vrs4KmCk18eszdoZn/7JJ0XZJ +i2uCxxots4NEinmv72hsL7GoE0ARVnj5HyB4louqh95AGVtx5Vw+WfkHuXpjmKnoU mMgV3flqPPCTYNuShiO+VVMVvSikfDRbmleId4hk= Received: from smtp9.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp9.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 92C0515203C8; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:21:25 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1330370485; bh=KDXtPOSBCz75PQqwvcZrhyc0BhlbFqe0gaNlpyfwff0=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CRrOweK595qxU/ZHlDYL1x5qhegP1LwDBJhvdnk/Vrs4KmCk18eszdoZn/7JJ0XZJ +i2uCxxots4NEinmv72hsL7GoE0ARVnj5HyB4louqh95AGVtx5Vw+WfkHuXpjmKnoU mMgV3flqPPCTYNuShiO+VVMVvSikfDRbmleId4hk= Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.20]) by smtp9.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id LOKWwdfL-LPKWMYod; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:21:25 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:21:37 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <292119122.20120228212137@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: netisr traffic bad distribution between CPUs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:21:42 -0000 http://piccy.info/view3/2678766/170dd8875b0a18e00b00445d373e64a6/orig/ http://piccy.info/view3/2678742/4f522bdf95d34e6ddbb3502bb5f5caaf/orig/ abruptly problems 20-00: traffic fall, CPU load raise with no changes at traffice type. but no problems at 17-00 even with more traffice flow problem also abruptly disappears after some time: two or three hours # netstat -Q Configuration: Setting Current Limit Thread count 4 4 Default queue limit 256 10240 Direct dispatch disabled n/a Forced direct dispatch disabled n/a Threads bound to CPUs disabled n/a Protocols: Name Proto QLimit Policy Flags ip 1 1024 flow --- igmp 2 256 source --- rtsock 3 256 source --- arp 7 256 source --- ip6 10 256 flow --- Workstreams: WSID CPU Name Len WMark Disp'd HDisp'd QDrops Queued Handled 0 0 ip 401 1024 0 0 2620979 2131108484 2131107410 0 0 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rtsock 0 162 0 0 0 78610 78610 0 0 arp 0 9 0 0 0 189978 189978 0 0 ip6 0 2 0 0 0 832 832 1 1 ip 0 744 0 0 0 805541655 805541655 1 1 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 rtsock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 arp 0 4 0 0 0 96599 96599 1 1 ip6 0 1 0 0 0 2602 2602 2 2 ip 25 1024 0 0 8173 1817809104 1817809050 2 2 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 rtsock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 arp 0 20 0 0 0 278757 278757 2 2 ip6 0 1 0 0 0 1095 1095 3 3 ip 82 1024 0 0 187757 1551553992 1551553909 3 3 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 rtsock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 arp 0 8 0 0 0 562346 562346 3 3 ip6 0 3 0 0 0 10843 10843 FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #4: Fri Jun 10 01:30:12 UTC 2011 @:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PAE_KES i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 19:52:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D20106566B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:52:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris_bender@cellularatsea.com) Received: from wireless.icgws.com (wireless.icgws.com [198.211.94.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7720A8FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:52:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 1D012180DDE; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:51:42 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on wireless.icgws.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=3.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 Received: from wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (unknown [10.200.250.42]) by wireless.icgws.com (Postfix) with SMTP id EBCD6180DD5; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:51:38 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wmstp.corp.cellularatsea.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 21328B188FF; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:52:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com ([10.200.104.15] helo=wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com) by wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com with SMTP (ASSP 1.9.1.1); 27 Feb 2012 14:52:36 -0500 X-Ninja-PIM: Scanned by Ninja X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-class: urn:content-classes:message x-vipre-scanned: 10BF5651002D4D10BF579E Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:52:35 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F4BB8B8.509@radel.com> Thread-Topic: Email issues, relay failure Thread-Index: Acz1co+dmWcZVccXRjSUitNuLyJvWwAEulWw References: <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBAE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48BAF6.9070204@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBE7@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48EC21.7040805@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBEE@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F48F45F.4080304@ifdnrg.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFBF4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F492262.5090505@radel.com> <7409DAB4-F76A-493B-9A50-A663E6F6802E@cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB19A.8040005@radel.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFDA4@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB61A.1060600@radel.com> <863259E16B6C464DAD1E9DD10BB31154059CFDB1@wmsexg01.corp.cellularatsea.com> <4F4BB8B8.509@radel.com> From: "Bender, Chris" To: "Jon Radel" X-Assp-Whitelisted: Yes () X-Assp-Envelope-From: chris_bender@cellularatsea.com X-Assp-Intended-For: jon@radel.com X-Assp-Passing: 10.200.104.15 in acceptAllMail X-Assp-ID: wmstp.corp.wms.cellularatsea.com (33037-52381) X-Assp-Version: 1.9.1.1(1.0.00) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Email issues, relay failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:52:47 -0000 Hi Joe So from the rules below, I can see my network to and from in tables to . However when pfctl is enabled that traffic fails with .... # tcpdump -ni bge0 host 10.156.81.10 and port 25 =20 tcpdump: listening on bge0, link-type EN10MB 14:26:50.220591 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25: S 3154136673:3154136673(0) win 64240 (DF) [tos 0xb8] 14:26:50.244314 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25: R 3154136674:3154136735(61) ack 1245040067 win 0 (DF) [tos 0xb8] 14:27:11.233494 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25: S 3154136673:3154136673(0) win 64240 (DF) [tos 0xb8] 14:27:11.245057 10.156.81.10.60809 > 172.19.4.41.25: R 0:61(61) ack 1 win 0 (DF) [tos 0xb8] SO from traffic aboveon the inbound interface I can see this failed. OUCH. But I don't know what rule is killing it.=20 Here is table table { 10.200.82.16 , 10.200.104.15 , 172.19.4.41 , 198.211.94.23 } table { 10.13.0.0/21 , 10.13.224.0/21 , 10.13.226.0/23 , 10.150.0.0/16 , 10.156.0.0/16 , 10.158.0.0/16 , 10.166.0.0/16 , 10.196.0.0/16 , 10.198.0 .0/16 , 10.200.104.0/24 , 172.16.0.0/16 , 172.19.4.0/24 , 172.19.11.0/24 , 172.19.20.0/24 , 172.19.50.0/24 , 172.19.51.0/24 , 172.19.52.0/24 , 172.19.53.0/24 , 172.19.100.0/29 , 172.19.231.0/24 , 172.19.232.0/24 , 172.31.0.0/16= } Rest of pf.conf since you asked which I have removed confidential info The key is what is blocking SMTP. I am not sure yet? Thanks # # Prolog script # set loginterface bge0 set state-defaults pflow nat-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" rdr-anchor "ftp-proxy/*" nat-anchor "relayd/*" rdr-anchor "relayd/*" anchor "relayd/*" anchor "ftp-proxy/*" # # End of prolog script # set skip on bridge10 set skip on tun579 set skip on tun138 set skip on tun148 set skip on tun10 set skip on bridge138 set skip on bridge148 # # Scrub rules # match in all scrub (no-df ) match out all scrub (random-id max-mss 1460) # Tables: (26) table persist file "/home/admin/BlackList.txt" table persist file "/home/admin/BlackList-internet.txt" # Rule 0 (global) # BlackList Rule block in log quick inet from to any no state label "RULE 0 -- DROP " block out log quick inet from to any no state label "RULE 0 -- DROP " # # Rule 1 (global) # BlackList Rule block in log quick inet from any to no state label "RULE 1 -- DROP " block out log quick inet from any to no state label "RULE 1 -- DROP " # # Rule 2 (global) # BlackList Servers going to Internet block in log quick inet from to 127.0.0.1 no state label "RULE 2 -- DROP " block out log quick inet from to 127.0.0.1 no state label "RULE 2 -- DROP " # # Rule 3 (bge1) # BlackList Servers going to Internet block out log quick on bge1 inet from to any= no state label "RULE 3 -- DROP " # # Rule 4 (bge1) # BlackList Internet Ports block out log quick on bge1 inet proto tcp from any to any port { 25, 465 } no state label "RULE 4 -- DROP " # # Rule 5 (global) BLOCKED FOR CONFIIDENTIALITY # Rule 6 (bge1,bge0) # FTP Proxy Loopback Pule pass in log quick on { bge0 bge1 } inet proto tcp from any to 127.0.0.1 port 8021 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE 6 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 7 (bge0,vlan579) pass in log quick on { bge0 vlan579 } inet proto tcp from to 127.0.0.1 port 2021 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE= 7 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 8 (bge0,vlan579) pass in log quick on { bge0 vlan579 } inet proto tcp from to 127.0.0.1 port 3128 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE= 8 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 9 (global) pass in log quick inet from any to any tagged FTPPROXY keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 9 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet from any to any tagged FTPPROXY keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 9 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 10 (bge1) # Allow ESP, AH, IKE and NAT-T for IPSEC # # Rule 11 (bge1) # BLOCKED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY # # Rule 12 (bge1) # PPTP Traffic BLOCKED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY # # Rule 13 (bge1) # PPTP Traffic BLOCKED FOR CONFIDENTIALITY# # Rule 14 (bge1) # PPTP Traffic pass out log quick on bge1 inet proto 47 from 172.19.231.128/27 to any label "RULE 14 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 15 (global) Blocked for confidentiality # # Rule 16 (bge0) =20 pass in log quick on bge0 inet proto tcp from to 172.19.231.149 port 1723 flags any modulate state label "RULE 16 -- ACCEPT " pass in log quick on bge0 inet proto 47 from to 172.19.231.149 label "RULE 16 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 17 (global) =20 pass in log quick inet from to 10.10.11.0/24 label "RULE 17 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet from to 10.10.11.0/24 label "RULE 17 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 18 (global) =20 pass in log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 port { 500, 4500 } label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " pass in log quick inet proto 50 from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " pass in log quick inet proto 51 from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 port { 500, 4500 } label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto 50 from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto 51 from 172.19.231.128/27 to 212.9.21.214 label "RULE 18 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 19 (global) # =20 pass in log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.64.0/24 to 10.13.6.125 port 123 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 19 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.64.0/24 to 10.13.6.125 port 123 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 19 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 20 (global) =20 pass in log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.64.0/24 to 172.31.1.6 port 162 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 20 -- ACCEPT " pass in log quick inet proto 115 from 172.19.64.0/24 to 172.31.1.6 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 20 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto udp from 172.19.64.0/24 to 172.31.1.6 port 162 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 20 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto 115 from 172.19.64.0/24 to 172.31.1.6 keep state ( pflow ) label "RULE 20 -- ACCEPT " # =20 # # state ( pflow ) label "RULE 35 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 36 (global) # Allow ME to Any pass out log quick inet from to any keep state ( pflow= ) label "RULE 36 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 37 (global) # SMTP Servers Access to SMTP pass in log quick inet proto tcp from to any port 25 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE 37 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto tcp from to any port 25 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE 37 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 38 (global) # Access to SMTP Servers pass in log quick inet proto tcp from to port 25 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE 38 -- ACCEPT " pass out log quick inet proto tcp from to port 25 flags any modulate state ( pflow ) label "RULE 38 -- ACCEPT " # # Rule 39 (global) # Restrict SMTP To Internal Networks block in log quick inet proto tcp from any to port 25 no state label "RULE 39 -- DROP " block out log quick inet proto tcp from any to port 25 no state label "RULE 39 -- DROP " # =20 =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 21:24:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7904D106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253A58FC19 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:24:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487651E332; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:24:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1RLOW4r002675; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:24:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:24:32 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jerome Herman Message-Id: <20120227222432.8a48a039.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:24:35 -0000 On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:29:12 +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: > Not at all, the web admin for adding a printer is basically an html > version of lpadmin. It is just easier with the web site. Easier as in: It leaves _essential_ options aside so that you can't perform some of the tasks. :-) > OK this means the ppd does not handle everything. Might get a little > complicated. When I use the foo2qpdl-wrapper which I assume does use the same PPD file, it works as intended. > They did, then they got bought by Apple... I should make myself more familiar with the command line tool. Still I hope I won't need CUPS anytime soon. :-) > No, please don't blame CUPS, it is earnestly trying to cope with > everything thrown at him (stupid printers, gnome DBus autoconfig, Apple > Mac OSX and so on), and it is doing a fairly good job at it. I know that printing currently isn't as easy as I (with my simple mind) assume. I've been using CUPS in the _past_ without major trouble, and even "impossible" things (like using parallel dotmatrix printers) were easily configurable even through the web interface. Seems that some parts got disimproved to please a certain audience... > I for one > do not want to go back to the time where one had to learn 2 lines long > LPD command just to print in color, double side, with an ICM profile. I have several printers for varying _how_ to print. However, I like the idea of selecting duplex / no duplex in the printing dialog (which I currently do by selecting a different "virtual" printer: Laserjet = b/w two-sided, Laserjet-nodup = b/w single-sided, Samsung = color single-sided). > Getting back to your problem. Apparently you are using an old version of > foo2qpdl, you may want to grab it from the web site directly and compile > it by hand (One of the very rare case where using the default > package/port is not a good idea at all) > You can find the howto here : http://foo2qpdl.rkkda.com/ > You will need to download and link the ICM profile to have acceptable > print quality. The latest PPD is 24 874 bytes in size. I will try that. I have installed the packages foo2zjs-20110609 foomatic-db-20090530_2 foomatic-db-engine-4.0.7,2 gutenprint-foomatic-5.2.4_2 where foo2qpdl and foo2qpdl-wrapper come from. I'm happy that I now have the "fallback method" of stopping CUPS, starting lpd, and using -PSamsung in order to use the color printer (not often required, it's my _first_ one, I've never needed one, really). Using a Linksys Wireless-G WPS54GU2 print server (WLAN, LAN, USB, parallel) - following Jerry's suggestion - I'll try tp get rid of the USB cable at the next step. Wireless printing isn't urgently needed (as I'm happily wired here), but real networking is much better than this local fiddling with USB (so I can print to the color printer from all of my systems when it's _real_ networked, just as the HP Laserjet 4000d which even runs its own lpd "server"). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 21:59:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927691065678 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:59:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A8B8FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:59:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so1405006ggn.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.197.103 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.197.103; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.197.103 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.197.103]) by 10.236.197.103 with SMTP id s67mr24946039yhn.5.1330379965724 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.197.103 with SMTP id s67mr18773723yhn.5.1330379965661; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:59:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h21sm25275881ann.1.2012.02.27.13.59.24 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:59:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3TxcQ31qqKz2CG4D for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:59:23 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:59:22 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120227165922.523834ec@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120227222432.8a48a039.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> <20120227222432.8a48a039.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlRQIXStgxV0qI4chqarC+o1QqNZw0QCcObDosYcxAAPmrVgqOIjqORImAiHv8GvbMMoE4E Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:59:26 -0000 On Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:24:32 +0100 Polytropon articulated: > Using a Linksys Wireless-G WPS54GU2 print server (WLAN, LAN, > USB, parallel) - following Jerry's suggestion - I'll try tp > get rid of the USB cable at the next step. I spoke to an associate yesterday who claims he used a USB to Ethernet adapter on an older Canon printer and it worked fine. Everything was detected automatically. Obviously, that was on a Windows machine, WinXP to be exact. I still think it should work on FreeBSD although it will undoubtedly need a lot more user intervention. The router was a Netgate wireless model. He did not remember which model. Good luck! -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 22:16:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC716106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:16:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rbanfield@weogeo.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E1AA8FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:16:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by daec6 with SMTP id c6so3752664dae.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:16:43 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.240.135 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.240.135; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.240.135 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rbanfield@weogeo.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.240.135]) by 10.68.240.135 with SMTP id wa7mr45367136pbc.7.1330381003354 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:16:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.240.135 with SMTP id wa7mr38082695pbc.7.1330379532793; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:52:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (pool-72-91-240-41.tampfl.fios.verizon.net. [72.91.240.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id s1sm13718762pbs.21.2012.02.27.13.52.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 13:52:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:52:09 -0500 From: Robert Banfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMY3F3Vsu0yDJh0XD3otVDLgypSqW/k38kBNcLm4EqWX760CfJKh7ZYGNXk1QEi1TwMMq2 Subject: "find" not traversing all directories on a single zfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:16:43 -0000 Summary: I am executing the command "find . > ../file_list" and it is not traversing all the subdirectories it encounters along the way. There is no separate file system mounted along the path. Long version: I'm new to FreeBSD and ZFS (many years of linux experience though), so my apologies if I'm missing something straightforward here. This is a tile server which has tens of millions of mostly small files. I'm logged in as root, and there is no networked file system anywhere in the mix. I'm using the version of find installed with FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE amd64. cd /zfs_mount_point/mydir find . &> ../file_list I would presume that file_list contains a list of every file and directory inside of /zfs_mount_point/mydir, however some directories contain only the directory entry without any of the file and subdirectories it contains. As an example, file_list contains: ./dataset_tiles ./dataset_tiles/token1 ./dataset_tiles/token1/kml ./dataset_tiles/token1/kml/kml.png ./dataset_tiles/token2 ./dataset_tiles/token3 ./dataset_tiles/token3/kml ... The problem is "./dataset_tiles/token2" is a directory, and none of its entries appear anywhere in the file_list. Yet if I do the following: find ./dataset_tiles/token2 I get a list of everything that I would expect to have been in file_list, but did not. "ls -l" shows the entry type character as 'd'. token2 is just a subdirectory of dataset_tiles, not a separate mount point. I should have all the requisite permissions to access the files in that directory, and I can run find successfully if I specify any of the directories which do not seem to be working. Here's an actual 'ls -ld' on one of the directories not working: ls -ld 967c4f32-8a9e-0459-8e94-c911e41be43b/ drwxr-xr-x 10 root wheel 10 Feb 4 21:45 967c4f32-8a9e-0459-8e94-c911e41be43b/ The only other tidbit of information I can think to add is I also tried running "find -d ." with no overall change in output other than the order the directories were searched. Any idea what's going on? Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 22:52:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A92106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:52:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6368FC1B for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [109.190.13.180]) (Authenticated sender: kha@dichotomia.fr) by sslmail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7DC563DD07B; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:52:00 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F4C08F0.90906@dichotomia.fr> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:51:28 +0100 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <20120225221433.cba3d0dd.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F498DF0.5070504@dichotomia.fr> <20120226184653.e695327b.freebsd@edvax.de> <4F4AA428.2010503@dichotomia.fr> <20120227222432.8a48a039.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20120227222432.8a48a039.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (sslmail.dichotomia.fr); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:52:00 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Installing Samsung CLX-2160 color laser printer on USB using CUPS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:52:31 -0000 On 27/02/2012 22:24, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 22:29:12 +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: >> Not at all, the web admin for adding a printer is basically an html >> version of lpadmin. It is just easier with the web site. > Easier as in: It leaves _essential_ options aside so that > you can't perform some of the tasks. :-) Technically speaking, it doesn't leaves essential options aside, it just forgets to mention them. But I get your point. > > > >> OK this means the ppd does not handle everything. Might get a little >> complicated. > When I use the foo2qpdl-wrapper which I assume does use > the same PPD file, it works as intended. Nope, the wrapper is just used to convert ps to QPDL in a plain file. The PPD does a lot more, including a bit of dialog with the printer to make sure it is configured correctly. Most of the time it also helps handling different parameters such as paper size and orientation, color or B&W etc. > > > >> They did, then they got bought by Apple... > I should make myself more familiar with the command line > tool. Still I hope I won't need CUPS anytime soon. :-) > > > >> No, please don't blame CUPS, it is earnestly trying to cope with >> everything thrown at him (stupid printers, gnome DBus autoconfig, Apple >> Mac OSX and so on), and it is doing a fairly good job at it. > I know that printing currently isn't as easy as I (with > my simple mind) assume. I've been using CUPS in the _past_ > without major trouble, and even "impossible" things (like > using parallel dotmatrix printers) were easily configurable > even through the web interface. Seems that some parts got > disimproved to please a certain audience... Well Apple way of handling devices : if it doesn't work the way we want, it doesn't exist. > > > >> I for one >> do not want to go back to the time where one had to learn 2 lines long >> LPD command just to print in color, double side, with an ICM profile. > I have several printers for varying _how_ to print. However, > I like the idea of selecting duplex / no duplex in the > printing dialog (which I currently do by selecting a different > "virtual" printer: Laserjet = b/w two-sided, Laserjet-nodup = > b/w single-sided, Samsung = color single-sided). Normally that is what PPD is for, giving you a bit of control on all those parameters, so you do not have to create dozens of config per printer. (This said quite a lot of my users love to have dozens of configure for one printer, even under windows and mac. They prefer choosing a printer called Graphic_A3_Color_2side than having to choose options themselves) > > >> Getting back to your problem. Apparently you are using an old version of >> foo2qpdl, you may want to grab it from the web site directly and compile >> it by hand (One of the very rare case where using the default >> package/port is not a good idea at all) >> You can find the howto here : http://foo2qpdl.rkkda.com/ >> You will need to download and link the ICM profile to have acceptable >> print quality. The latest PPD is 24 874 bytes in size. > I will try that. I have installed the packages > > foo2zjs-20110609 > foomatic-db-20090530_2 > foomatic-db-engine-4.0.7,2 > gutenprint-foomatic-5.2.4_2 > > where foo2qpdl and foo2qpdl-wrapper come from. > > I'm happy that I now have the "fallback method" of stopping > CUPS, starting lpd, and using -PSamsung in order to use the > color printer (not often required, it's my _first_ one, I've > never needed one, really). > > Using a Linksys Wireless-G WPS54GU2 print server (WLAN, LAN, > USB, parallel) - following Jerry's suggestion - I'll try tp > get rid of the USB cable at the next step. Wireless printing > isn't urgently needed (as I'm happily wired here), but real > networking is much better than this local fiddling with USB > (so I can print to the color printer from all of my systems > when it's _real_ networked, just as the HP Laserjet 4000d > which even runs its own lpd "server"). On small printers, nothing beats socket connections. But the USB to ethernet transform can be quite tricky sometimes. Usually QPDL is well supported, it is after all a real interpreter. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 27 22:53:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E475106564A for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:53:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD3A8FC0C for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:53:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1RMrA4a051576 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:53:10 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q1RMrA4a051576 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330383190; bh=cgGitw8UY0h6q/hcrRb7cNGZdfkgBKGCuRr4dub74Xk=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=FKknQK+hzxGSadGB3ENZVewgFxJ8z/wL5hrjfzyUtqFzT0lc6FKrptOR+UhC9gGLR qZsyKE76yo6TnWItiby+TgjqNWs2bzcqUEriW95j73lsZ13ULZYb5YcgOH00ldtM2H 0DK9YpNPpV2zlcgdCrcRo3hF+yfTCFm3s5+79O/E= Message-ID: <4F4C094C.1010900@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:53:00 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE0BD73882A3371C489855253" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: "find" not traversing all directories on a single zfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:53:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE0BD73882A3371C489855253 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 27/02/2012 21:52, Robert Banfield wrote: > Long version: I'm new to FreeBSD and ZFS (many years of linux > experience though), so my apologies if I'm missing something > straightforward here. This is a tile server which has tens of millions= > of mostly small files. I'm logged in as root, and there is no networke= d > file system anywhere in the mix. I'm using the version of find > installed with FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE amd64. >=20 > cd /zfs_mount_point/mydir > find . &> ../file_list >=20 > I would presume that file_list contains a list of every file and > directory inside of /zfs_mount_point/mydir, however some directories > contain only the directory entry without any of the file and > subdirectories it contains. These are all actual directories -- no symbolic link or anything like that? I assume permissions are not the problem? All directories have at least mode r_x for your user id? (Hmmm... but you are logged in as root -- can't be that then.) How about ACLs? Are you using those at all on your filesystem? The symptoms you are observing are definitely incorrect, and not at all what the vast majority of find(1) users would experience. Something is definitely a bit fubar on your machine. It would be useful to try and establish if it is the find(1) program giving bogus results, or whether it is some other part of the system. Do other methods of printing out the filesystem contents suffer from the same problem -- eg. 'ls -R .' or 'tar -cvf /dev/null .' Is there anything in the system log or printed on the console? (Note: I always find it useful to enable the console.log and all.log by uncommenting the relevant lines in /etc/syslog.conf and following the other instructions there.) Also, is this 9.0-RELEASE straight from the installation media, or did you compile it yourself? If you compiled it yourself, what compiler did you use (gcc or clang)? What optimization and what architecture settings -- trying to tweak such things for maximum optimization frequently leads to dissapointment. If you installed onto ZFS, what procedure did you follow, given that bsdinstall doesn't have that capability yet? Was it by following one of the well-known recipes like http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot = ? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE0BD73882A3371C489855253 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9MCVUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzPGgCfZSsXewibxHTchp4XQDT1b8oA cPYAn01M7J5yTjA7SY3fATaSX4871JmC =eUY7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE0BD73882A3371C489855253-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 01:11:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE00106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:11:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from czsq888@163.com) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790BF8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:11:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2BIu-0005Ge-0H for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:52:32 -0800 Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:52:32 -0800 (PST) From: sw2wolf To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:11:58 -0000 >uname -a FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #3: Fri Sep 30 15:23:56 CST 2011 =20 root@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 I am using 8.2 for a long time. And it works VERY well. Any suggestion is appreciated! ----- e^(=CF=80.i) + 1 =3D 0 -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-wo= rthy-upgrading-to-9-0-tp5520494p5520494.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 01:38:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2927B106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:38:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mikes@siralan.org) Received: from mail.suso.org (mail.suso.org [66.244.94.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03FBF8FC13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:38:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-98-223-201-170.hsd1.in.comcast.net (c-98-223-201-170.hsd1.in.comcast.net [98.223.201.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.suso.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE76138222 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:38:48 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:37:20 -0500 (EST) From: "Michael L. Squires" X-X-Sender: mikes@familysquires.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <292119122.20120228212137@yandex.ru> Message-ID: References: <292119122.20120228212137@yandex.ru> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Installing amanda 3.2 from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 01:38:50 -0000 I'm in the process of installing amanda 3.2 (misc/amanda-server) using ports with an Overland AIT-3 library as the storage medium. So far I haven't had a problem with going through the "Build a Basic Configuration" instructions on wiki.zmanda.com. I did have to create a different "amanda" login entry which allowed for "su - amanda" in order to follow the instructions (using "su - amanda"). The server is running 8.3-PRERELEASE/amd64 at this point; the clients will be a CENTOS 6.2 server, a FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE client, and three XP SP3 PCs. I will eventually try to add a Mac client. If there's anyone who's done this before, especially 3.x, and who has words of wisdom I'd very much appreciate the information. Mike Squires mikes at siralan.org UN*X at home since 1986 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 02:21:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4D5106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:21:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rbanfield@weogeo.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D91C8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:21:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pbcwy7 with SMTP id wy7so538019pbc.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.225.129 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.225.129; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.225.129 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rbanfield@weogeo.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.225.129]) by 10.68.225.129 with SMTP id rk1mr2061926pbc.51.1330395710119 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.225.129 with SMTP id rk1mr1692049pbc.51.1330395709982; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (pool-72-91-240-41.tampfl.fios.verizon.net. [72.91.240.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f9sm14259170pbq.60.2012.02.27.18.21.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:21:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4C3A3A.9080903@weogeo.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:21:46 -0500 From: Robert Banfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> <4F4C094C.1010900@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F4C094C.1010900@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnENfBsD2ARZEwvB47HIRp0YTR6G9JPIMMN4d+JeMEpd+46xHdL4dZWB6BZVINf6gtxg9vW Subject: Re: "find" not traversing all directories on a single zfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 02:21:50 -0000 On 02/27/2012 05:53 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > These are all actual directories -- no symbolic link or anything like > that? I assume permissions are not the problem? All directories have > at least mode r_x for your user id? (Hmmm... but you are logged in as > root -- can't be that then.) How about ACLs? Are you using those at > all on your filesystem? There are no symbolic links, nor any ACLs at all anywhere on the system. All the directories have rwx for root, and permissions are not a problem. > The symptoms you are observing are definitely incorrect, and not at all > what the vast majority of find(1) users would experience. Something is > definitely a bit fubar on your machine. It would be useful to try and > establish if it is the find(1) program giving bogus results, or whether > it is some other part of the system. Do other methods of printing out > the filesystem contents suffer from the same problem -- eg. 'ls -R .' or > 'tar -cvf /dev/null .' ls -R appears to be traversing all subdirectories. > Is there anything in the system log or printed > on the console? (Note: I always find it useful to enable the > console.log and all.log by uncommenting the relevant lines in > /etc/syslog.conf and following the other instructions there.) da0 runs the operating system. da1-12 are set up as a RAIDZ2 with 2 hot spares. # zpool status pool: tank0 state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM tank0 ONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk1 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk2 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk3 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk4 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk5 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk6 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk7 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk8 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk9 ONLINE 0 0 0 label/zfsdisk10 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares label/zfsdisk11 AVAIL label/zfsdisk12 AVAIL # glabel status Name Status Components gptid/d49367f4-5cfc-11e1-be4b-000423b4b110 N/A da0p1 label/zfsdisk1 N/A da1 label/zfsdisk2 N/A da2 label/zfsdisk3 N/A da3 label/zfsdisk4 N/A da4 label/zfsdisk5 N/A da5 label/zfsdisk6 N/A da6 label/zfsdisk7 N/A da7 label/zfsdisk8 N/A da8 label/zfsdisk9 N/A da9 label/zfsdisk10 N/A da10 label/zfsdisk11 N/A da11 label/zfsdisk12 N/A da12 These messages appear in the output of dmesg: GEOM: da1: the primary GPT table is corrupt or invalid. GEOM: da1: using the secondary instead -- recovery strongly advised. (repeat for da2 - da12) GEOM: da1: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. GEOM: da1: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. GEOM: da1: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. GEOM: da1: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. (repeat for da2-da12) GEOM: label/zfsdisk1: corrupt or invalid GPT detected. GEOM: label/zfsdisk1: GPT rejected -- may not be recoverable. Could this be related, or a separate issue? > Also, is this 9.0-RELEASE straight from the installation media, or did > you compile it yourself? If you compiled it yourself, what compiler did > you use (gcc or clang)? What optimization and what architecture > settings -- trying to tweak such things for maximum optimization > frequently leads to dissapointment. This is straight from the 64-bit memstick install. I have used both the standard install /usr/bin/find as well as a compiled /usr/src/usr.bin/find/ and both give the same results. I have no tweaks for zfs other than to zfs_enable on boot. Because this machine has 16GB of RAM, I believe prefetch is automatically enabled. I have some additional information that I didnt see before actually digging into the log file. It is quite interesting. There are 82,206 subdirectories in one of the folders. Like this: /zfs_mount/directoryA/token[1-82206]/various_tileset_files When looking at the output of find, here is what I see: Lines 1-9996943: The output of find, good as good can be Lines 9996944-10062479: Subdirectory entries only, it traversed none of them. Notice 10062479-9996944+1 = 65536 = 2^16 So, of the 82206 subdirectories, the first 82206-2^16 were traversed, and the final 2^16 were not. The plot thickens... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 03:24:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5348D106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rbanfield@weogeo.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236F48FC15 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:24:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by daec6 with SMTP id c6so4012941dae.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.135.10 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.135.10; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rbanfield@weogeo.com designates 10.68.135.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rbanfield@weogeo.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.135.10]) by 10.68.135.10 with SMTP id po10mr44173983pbb.121.1330399470851 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.135.10 with SMTP id po10mr37289661pbb.121.1330399470693; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:24:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (pool-72-91-240-41.tampfl.fios.verizon.net. [72.91.240.41]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f8sm14409210pbe.42.2012.02.27.19.24.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 19:24:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4C48EB.8070106@weogeo.com> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:24:27 -0500 From: Robert Banfield User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Fedora/3.1.16-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.16 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> <4F4C094C.1010900@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F4C3A3A.9080903@weogeo.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4C3A3A.9080903@weogeo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkHFLOsl0eNJzmcQ445oedUzJHpEgs6TZv+S4yYKoeQjvQJ0I1LDkRUxMRexjGZivl+zkru Subject: Re: "find" not traversing all directories on a single zfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:24:31 -0000 On 02/27/2012 09:21 PM, Robert Banfield wrote: > > ls -R appears to be traversing all subdirectories. Scratch that... ls -R fails to traverse the same directories that find does. Is there a subdirectory limit in ZFS? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 04:18:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C998C106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:18:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@growveg.net) Received: from smtp1.servage.net (smtp1.servage.net [IPv6:2a01:3b0:1:fb:1::2001]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EA5F8FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potato.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.servage.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE42C3220D; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:40:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F4C55B4.6030808@growveg.net> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:19:00 +0000 From: FreeBSD Mailing Lists User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120226 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Sierchio References: <4F4BC1B3.3050202@growveg.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: odd SDcard behaviour in freebsd-9.0-R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 04:18:46 -0000 On 27/02/2012 17:55, Michael Sierchio wrote: > Forgive the naive question, but on one of my Nikons, it is possible to > present the device itself, or the SD card as a USD drive. Which are > you doing? No doubt there is no driver for the D50 in the kernel, but > the generic umass driver should handle the device. Hi, Yes, on freebsd 8.2 the camera has only ever presented itself as storage and it has only ever been the sd card within the camera that has been visible to freebsd. On 9.0 I can see umass output in /var/log/messages but not any corresponding disk descriptor like /dev/da5s1 so I have no way of accessing the sd card. -- freebsd at growveg dot net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 06:50:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667801065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:50:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msabramo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F808FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so1629797obb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.60.13.1 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.13.1; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.60.13.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=msabramo@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=msabramo@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.13.1]) by 10.60.13.1 with SMTP id d1mr5947424oec.41.1330411832653 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:50:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mpH2wo2J5LhFoSzltxH+gfLUft4tAmZm5UESEjCBTlY=; b=kAW+wgfBM6GMIA3KFJJyNxrFBT0MRbBGn+iE+YINgBAI8nfTTHTrKjLBue6uzbRtXo PFSvEZpZlqYqSfJI2+DwoPtMeGONP7manOSG8KF7U/+0X5IotHvoZU4IIBZHqThfOA/Z LE6yPrlY0x64Y6834FDsPk4+t1CsFSjposSAg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.13.1 with SMTP id d1mr5244407oec.41.1330410137739; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:22:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.24.7 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:22:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 22:22:17 -0800 Message-ID: From: Marc Abramowitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: DTrace userland X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:50:33 -0000 I'm using FreeBSD 9.0 on amd64 in VMware Fusion and trying to DTrace userland programs. I think I must be doing something wrong. I recompiled my kernel and world, following the instructions at http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace and I've read http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace/userland: The test.c pid provider example worked fine for me: $ sudo dtrace -s pid.d -c ./test dtrace: script 'pid.d' matched 2 probes dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 0 43030 main:entry 0 43031 sleep:entry 0 43031 sleep:entry 0 43031 sleep:entry As does a simple probe of test.c specified with the -n option: [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:test:main:entry' -c ./test dtrace: description 'pid$target:test:main:entry' matched 1 probe dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 0 43030 main:entry When I start trying to dtrace other programs, things don't go so well... $ sudo dtrace -n ":::entry" -c /usr/local/bin/python Python 2.4.5 (#2, Dec 5 2011, 15:19:09) [GCC 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]] on freebsd9 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import os >>> os.getpid() 1603 >>> dtrace: failed to control pid 1603: process exited with status 0 $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:::entry' -c '/bin/cat hello_world.txt' dtrace: description 'pid$target:::entry' matched 3315 probes dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 0 43448 _rtld_bind:entry 0 43903 rlock_acquire:entry 0 43125 def_thread_set_flag:entry (Had to hit Ctrl-C to exit; it never displayed hello_world.txt to stdout) [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo make install ... [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:::entry' -c '/usr/local/bin/gcat config.log' dtrace: description 'pid$target:::entry' matched 3823 probes dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 0 43524 _rtld_bind:entry 0 43979 rlock_acquire:entry 0 43201 def_thread_set_flag:entry ^C $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:cat:main:entry' -c '/bin/cat hello_world.txt' causes a kernel panic. According to the core.txt file, it was a "Fatal trap 10: trace trap while in kernel mode" and here's the KDB backtrace: KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff8089025e at kdb_backtrace+0x5e #1 0xffffffff80858ce7 at panic+0x187 #2 0xffffffff80b4bf20 at trap_fatal+0x290 #3 0xffffffff80b4c540 at trap+0x180 #4 0xffffffff80b36963 at calltrap+0x8 #5 0xffffffff8162583d at dtrace_assfail+0x2d #6 0xffffffff8188aa2e at fasttrap_provider_free+0x1de #7 0xffffffff8188ad13 at fasttrap_pid_cleanup_cb+0x1c3 #8 0xffffffff8086dfa1 at softclock+0x3a1 #9 0xffffffff8082d724 at intr_event_execute_handlers+0x104 #10 0xffffffff8082eee4 at ithread_loop+0xa4 #11 0xffffffff8082a34f at fork_exit+0x11f #12 0xffffffff80b36e8e at fork_trampoline+0xe [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:gcat::entry' -c '/usr/local/bin/gcat config.log' (Another kernel panic) I can provide full crash dumps if necessary. Any idea what's going on here? Cheers, Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 07:11:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 662F61065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:11:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msabramo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B1B8FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:10:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so1650049obb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.182.155.68 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.155.68; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.182.155.68 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=msabramo@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=msabramo@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.155.68]) by 10.182.155.68 with SMTP id vu4mr6239900obb.61.1330413059605 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:10:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=j9jLgPqBZPmFxYPIQrRk4qJqdhjhTa2UNFSB7lylohM=; b=E83g1dEV83+QEJDZ9tmJquR4HCpvL/L1mCJqBoBb1WUyc/94XM+/dVwzIL9RH/8o2z OG+B0HEpH5Sv4ntLBhxUqZthu83wco+ALQcIxgUt4MqNlubPVZS1Hxsu3xfgEnEgoZ4y qxKY/NBgLriE41Zw7lZXiCmil7Df1TiRcvIsA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.155.68 with SMTP id vu4mr5538870obb.61.1330413059517; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:10:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.24.7 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:10:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:10:59 -0800 Message-ID: From: Marc Abramowitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: DTrace userland X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:11:00 -0000 Another strange behavior: [Tab 1] $ /bin/sleep 300 & [1] 1806 [Tab 2] $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid1806:sleep::entry' $ echo $? 158 [Tab 1] [1]+ Killed: 9 /bin/sleep 300 Something seems very wrong that DTrace is killing processes and causing kernel panics. Marc On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Marc Abramowitz wrote: > I'm using FreeBSD 9.0 on amd64 in VMware Fusion and trying to DTrace > userland programs. I think I must be doing something wrong. > > I recompiled my kernel and world, following the instructions at > http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace and I've read > http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace/userland: > > The test.c pid provider example worked fine for me: > > $ sudo dtrace -s pid.d -c ./test > dtrace: script 'pid.d' matched 2 probes > dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m > CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME > 0 43030 main:entry > 0 43031 sleep:entry > 0 43031 sleep:entry > 0 43031 sleep:entry > > As does a simple probe of test.c specified with the -n option: > > [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:test:main:entry' -c > ./test > dtrace: description 'pid$target:test:main:entry' matched 1 probe > dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m > CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME > 0 43030 main:entry > > When I start trying to dtrace other programs, things don't go so well... > > $ sudo dtrace -n ":::entry" -c /usr/local/bin/python > Python 2.4.5 (#2, Dec 5 2011, 15:19:09) > [GCC 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]] on freebsd9 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. > >>> import os > >>> os.getpid() > 1603 > >>> > dtrace: failed to control pid 1603: process exited with status 0 > > $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:::entry' -c '/bin/cat hello_world.txt' > dtrace: description 'pid$target:::entry' matched 3315 probes > dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m > CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME > 0 43448 _rtld_bind:entry > 0 43903 rlock_acquire:entry > 0 43125 def_thread_set_flag:entry > (Had to hit Ctrl-C to exit; it never displayed hello_world.txt to stdout) > > [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo make install > ... > [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo dtrace -n > 'pid$target:::entry' -c '/usr/local/bin/gcat config.log' > dtrace: description 'pid$target:::entry' matched 3823 probes > dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m > CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME > 0 43524 _rtld_bind:entry > 0 43979 rlock_acquire:entry > 0 43201 def_thread_set_flag:entry > ^C > > $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:cat:main:entry' -c '/bin/cat hello_world.txt' > causes a kernel panic. > According to the core.txt file, it was a "Fatal trap 10: trace trap while > in kernel mode" and here's the KDB backtrace: > > KDB: stack backtrace: > #0 0xffffffff8089025e at kdb_backtrace+0x5e > #1 0xffffffff80858ce7 at panic+0x187 > #2 0xffffffff80b4bf20 at trap_fatal+0x290 > #3 0xffffffff80b4c540 at trap+0x180 > #4 0xffffffff80b36963 at calltrap+0x8 > #5 0xffffffff8162583d at dtrace_assfail+0x2d > #6 0xffffffff8188aa2e at fasttrap_provider_free+0x1de > #7 0xffffffff8188ad13 at fasttrap_pid_cleanup_cb+0x1c3 > #8 0xffffffff8086dfa1 at softclock+0x3a1 > #9 0xffffffff8082d724 at intr_event_execute_handlers+0x104 > #10 0xffffffff8082eee4 at ithread_loop+0xa4 > #11 0xffffffff8082a34f at fork_exit+0x11f > #12 0xffffffff80b36e8e at fork_trampoline+0xe > > [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo dtrace -n > 'pid$target:gcat::entry' -c '/usr/local/bin/gcat config.log' > (Another kernel panic) > > I can provide full crash dumps if necessary. > > Any idea what's going on here? > > Cheers, > Marc > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 07:35:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88F71065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:35:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hufeng1987@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B3B8FC1C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:35:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iaae16 with SMTP id e16so1807018iaa.13 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:35:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of hufeng1987@gmail.com designates 10.43.53.1 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.43.53.1; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of hufeng1987@gmail.com designates 10.43.53.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=hufeng1987@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=hufeng1987@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.43.53.1]) by 10.43.53.1 with SMTP id vo1mr20656447icb.2.1330414541278 (num_hops = 1); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:35:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Pl9TZB3z3eAl2XTc17mHbFQjRDXSqvLD236QhwbPl9U=; b=MM21eSzZ7pUZXLaTBq6R/nv3hwnExktJV6QIDNtPq+NQ2YtsItPS3fwU9OiXmGFW5d d9v12aySkReOCPxAl8VxAdYKVYo+3hs5bT5zRf7B1C42VQBjg/Xv8LFQmSkSL63dK6Nv X7vLzwnBW8AVeyLpP710tBUDUCtwTjtT2pPQg= Received: by 10.43.53.1 with SMTP id vo1mr16789655icb.2.1330413104425; Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:11:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([111.173.187.46]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ko6sm12369945igc.2.2012.02.27.23.11.35 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 27 Feb 2012 23:11:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4C7E23.3050404@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:11:31 +0800 From: netroby User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Delete files let FreeBSD crashes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:35:42 -0000 i installed freebsd 9 on virtualbox, when i try to delete a directory with following command: rm -rf ./zf2 the system will halt , then restart. i had using fsck -y to check the filesystem, but seems not work. following the output: ------------------------------------- bsd# cd /root/repos/ bsd# ls -l total 8 drwxr-xr-x 12 root wheel 1024 Feb 28 14:26 httpd drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Feb 28 14:53 zf2 bsd# fsck -y ** /dev/ada0p2 (NO WRITE) USE JOURNAL? no ** Skipping journal, falling through to full fsck SETTING DIRTY FLAG IN READ_ONLY MODE UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ** Last Mounted on / ** Root file system ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes INCORRECT BLOCK COUNT I=332256 (2688 should be 768) CORRECT? no 1393793 DUP I=332265 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY 1393794 DUP I=332265 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY 1402537 DUP I=332266 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY INTERNAL ERROR: dups with softupdates UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ** Phase 1b - Rescan For More DUPS 1402537 DUP I=331641 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY 1393793 DUP I=332080 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY 1393794 DUP I=332080 UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ** Phase 2 - Check Pathnames DUP/BAD I=331641 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=3011 MTIME=Feb 28 14:59 2012 FILE=/root/.history UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no DUP/BAD I=332080 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=9115 MTIME=Feb 28 14:58 2012 FILE=/root/.viminfo UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no DIRECTORY CORRUPTED I=332254 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY SALVAGE? no MISSING '.' I=332254 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no DIRECTORY CORRUPTED I=332277 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY SALVAGE? no MISSING '.' I=332277 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no UNALLOCATED I=332089 OWNER=root MODE=0 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 NAME=/root/repos/zf2/.git/objects/pack/tmp_pack_KboUfa UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no SETTING DIRTY FLAG IN READ_ONLY MODE UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY SETTING DIRTY FLAG IN READ_ONLY MODE UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY DIRECTORY CORRUPTED I=332275 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY SALVAGE? no MISSING '.' I=332275 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no DIRECTORY CORRUPTED I=426347 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY SALVAGE? no MISSING '.' I=426347 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no BAD INODE NUMBER FOR '.' I=426361 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 DIR=? UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no BAD TYPE VALUE I=426374 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4289 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 FILE=?/pngtest UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no BAD TYPE VALUE I=426375 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=11439 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 FILE=?/zlib UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no BAD TYPE VALUE I=426376 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=5444 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 FILE=?/libpng UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY FIX? no UNALLOCATED I=439236 OWNER=root MODE=0 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 NAME=/root/repos/zf2/library/Zend/Feed/Writer/AbstractFeed.php UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no UNALLOCATED I=439237 OWNER=root MODE=0 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 NAME=/root/repos/zf2/library/Zend/Feed/Writer/Deleted.php UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no UNALLOCATED I=439238 OWNER=root MODE=0 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 NAME=/root/repos/zf2/library/Zend/Feed/Writer/Entry.php UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY REMOVE? no ** Phase 3 - Check Connectivity UNREF DIR I=441064 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=1024 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=441056 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=426361 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=426347 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=332275 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=363375 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=332277 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=332254 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no UNREF DIR I=332253 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no ** Phase 4 - Check Reference Counts UNREF FILE I=194795 OWNER=operator MODE=100400 SIZE=2048 MTIME=Feb 28 13:11 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT FILE I=194796 OWNER=smmsp MODE=100600 SIZE=50 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 COUNT 1 SHOULD BE 2 LINK COUNT INCREASING UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=194960 OWNER=root MODE=140666 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194961 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=3 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194962 OWNER=root MODE=100444 SIZE=194 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194964 OWNER=root MODE=100444 SIZE=67 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194965 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194966 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=3 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194967 OWNER=root MODE=140666 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194968 OWNER=root MODE=140600 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194969 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4297 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194970 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194971 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194972 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=5 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194973 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=5 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194974 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=79 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=194975 OWNER=root MODE=100600 SIZE=4 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=237063 OWNER=mysql MODE=100660 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332251 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=41 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332252 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=41 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=332253 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 3 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no LINK COUNT DIR I=332254 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=332255 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=160 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332256 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1320096 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332261 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=8064 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332263 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=31042 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332264 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=11324 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no BAD/DUP FILE I=332265 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=7433 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 CLEAR? no BAD/DUP FILE I=332266 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3933 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332267 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=6963 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332268 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=8325 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332269 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=20357 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332270 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=16240 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332271 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4023 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332272 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=16325 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332273 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=12003 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332274 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2778 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=332275 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=332276 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2289 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=332277 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=332278 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1206 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=332279 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=41 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=364931 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=1536 MTIME=Feb 28 14:53 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 3 LINK COUNT INCREASING UNEXPECTED SOFT UPDATE INCONSISTENCY ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=426338 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 15:06 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426340 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=22425 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426341 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=5490 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426342 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=19780 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426343 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=48929 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426344 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=8829 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426345 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4035 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426346 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1035 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=426347 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=426348 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1135 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426349 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1380 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426350 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2423 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426351 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1396 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426352 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1379 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426353 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=6075 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426354 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3996 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426355 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3853 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426356 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4683 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426357 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2365 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426358 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2909 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426360 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1035 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=426361 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no UNREF FILE I=426362 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1176 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426363 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2402 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426364 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3070 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426365 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3291 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426366 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=7431 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426367 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3565 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426368 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2203 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426369 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4107 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426370 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2929 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426371 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=2259 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426372 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1815 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426379 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=8754 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426380 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=4872 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426381 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1211 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426382 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=19119 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426383 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=7719 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426384 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=3919 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426385 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=18025 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426386 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=1317 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no UNREF FILE I=426387 OWNER=root MODE=100644 SIZE=356 MTIME=Feb 28 14:33 2012 RECONNECT? no CLEAR? no ZERO LENGTH DIR I=440682 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=0 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 CLEAR? no LINK COUNT DIR I=441056 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=512 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no LINK COUNT DIR I=441064 OWNER=root MODE=40755 SIZE=1024 MTIME=Feb 28 14:51 2012 COUNT 2 SHOULD BE 1 ADJUST? no ** Phase 5 - Check Cyl groups FREE BLK COUNT(S) WRONG IN SUPERBLK SALVAGE? no SUMMARY INFORMATION BAD SALVAGE? no BLK(S) MISSING IN BIT MAPS SALVAGE? no ALLOCATED FRAGS 1330765-1330767 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1330776-1330783 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1393496-1393497 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1394192-1394193 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1399669-1399670 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1400060-1400061 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1402541-1402542 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1403456-1403457 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAG 1468654 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1704976-1704983 MARKED FREE ALLOCATED FRAGS 1707960-1707967 MARKED FREE 228938 files, 649913 used, 1766357 free (13333 frags, 219128 blocks, 0.5% fragmentation) bsd# ls -l total 8 drwxr-xr-x 12 root wheel 1024 Feb 28 14:26 httpd drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Feb 28 14:53 zf2 bsd# rm -rf zf2 rm: zf2/.git/objects/pack/tmp_pack_KboUfa: Bad file descriptor rm: zf2/.git/objects/pack: Directory not empty rm: zf2/.git/objects: Directory not empty rm: zf2/.git: Directory not empty ------------------------------------------------------------------- netroby From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 08:03:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16DDC106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2008FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:03:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so1624904wgb.31 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.101.72 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.101.72; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.101.72 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.101.72]) by 10.180.101.72 with SMTP id fe8mr35805971wib.4.1330416228920 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.101.72 with SMTP id fe8mr28404331wib.4.1330416228855; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:03:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot.local (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm12244588wiy.7.2012.02.28.00.03.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:03:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:03:45 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlUYnkjS7hqFLEsbU+G3DfN+oPC3toITbLyBbHGMFtoKA5xaDakspInMUKLGL++Sk9Ey3ae Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:03:51 -0000 On 2/28/12 1:52 AM, sw2wolf wrote: >> uname -a > FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #3: Fri Sep 30 > 15:23:56 CST 2011 > root@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 > > I am using 8.2 for a long time. And it works VERY well. > > > Any suggestion is appreciated! > This is an entirely subjective question and one that only you can answer. For example, given the number of problem reports I'm seeing on the lists, I'm going to stick with the 8-STABLE branch for still a long time, likely until 9.1 or 9.2-RELEASE. You may want to reflect on the features you currently use and whether they've been improved in 9.0-RELEASE or not (eg ZFS v28) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 08:09:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93D4106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:09:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D188FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:09:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1850875wib.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:09:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.107.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.107.67; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.107.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.107.67]) by 10.180.107.67 with SMTP id ha3mr35726807wib.8.1330416589216 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:09:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.107.67 with SMTP id ha3mr28260174wib.8.1330416589136; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:09:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot.local (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fl2sm67439096wib.4.2012.02.28.00.09.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:09:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4C8BCA.1080809@my.gd> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:09:46 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4C7E23.3050404@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4C7E23.3050404@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmeg/02UYQZg71RBuoQw6T73tSp6NiJgB4l+lHQi6NCI1waFuIhjaI964ASeS4uKRq4D7PK Subject: Re: Delete files let FreeBSD crashes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:09:50 -0000 On 2/28/12 8:11 AM, netroby wrote: > i installed freebsd 9 on virtualbox, when i try to delete a directory > with following command: > > rm -rf ./zf2 > > the system will halt , then restart. > > i had using fsck -y to check the filesystem, but seems not work. > > following the output: > *** HALT *** You're not running fsck on a MOUNTED device are you ? If you are, kindly stop doing so to prevent damage to your system. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 08:45:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC878106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:45:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CDC8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:45:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1S8j3sq089772 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:45:04 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q1S8j3sq089772 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330418704; bh=WLi6uRt28dzMoaekviz9H8Z4zYsC3hflsK+xd9D0b+w=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=HWASQNvBHgSF9khzo39sQ1ggkVZ5CQfPkImKa2WMNUK66bosRFzrNOEFuksxe+xao JJvXIqQdPTUJeTkrhIr6qIRXtF2IUvJO0o2irr8IErYP/u8D57p8mzrsFsY0ewde2M CzirNqOhu0Lgnv/gDlmAT75H08xRP50wr9O4LhBc= Message-ID: <4F4C9407.6090507@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:44:55 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4BFB09.9090002@weogeo.com> <4F4C094C.1010900@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F4C3A3A.9080903@weogeo.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4C3A3A.9080903@weogeo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7D9A41A9B34CB51B4F6BAE31" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: "find" not traversing all directories on a single zfs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 08:45:09 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7D9A41A9B34CB51B4F6BAE31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/02/2012 02:21, Robert Banfield wrote: > I have some additional information that I didnt see before actually > digging into the log file. It is quite interesting. There are 82,206 > subdirectories in one of the folders. Like this: >=20 > /zfs_mount/directoryA/token[1-82206]/various_tileset_files >=20 > When looking at the output of find, here is what I see: >=20 > Lines 1-9996943: The output of find, good as good can be > Lines 9996944-10062479: Subdirectory entries only, it traversed none o= f > them. >=20 > Notice 10062479-9996944+1 =3D 65536 =3D 2^16 >=20 > So, of the 82206 subdirectories, the first 82206-2^16 were traversed, > and the final 2^16 were not. The plot thickens... Now this is very interesting indeed. 80,000 subdirectories is quite a lot.. As is a grand total of more than 10,000,000 files. Hmmm... and you see the find problem just when searching within the structure under directoryA? I think you have found a bug, although whether it is in find(1), the filesystem or elsewhere is not clear. Given that 'ls -R' shows the same problem, the bug could be in fts(3). Still, that's a testable hypothesis. Let me see if I can reproduce the problem. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig7D9A41A9B34CB51B4F6BAE31 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9MlA4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyTxQCglbQ/KZOOoBa9/XQghEFL0r6b 5ccAnjzQpBeylXIrtmSrk31Dt6p6I8gM =wyQF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7D9A41A9B34CB51B4F6BAE31-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 09:18:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C40F106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:18:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153448FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:18:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2JC2-0002Gz-7D for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:18:08 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2JBs-000564-0I for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:17:48 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1S9Hlqo052390 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:17:47 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1S9Hltk052389 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:17:47 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:17:46 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:18:11 -0000 I'm putting together a small presentation about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? The info here is a bit out of date: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html Thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 10:51:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B712106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B630C8FC18 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:51:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFC65C2B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:05:18 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F2C635C22 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:05:17 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:46:51 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:51:51 -0000 On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm putting together a small presentation > about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. > > Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? > > The info here is a bit out of date: > > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x column. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 11:03:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AC61065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D358FC0C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2Kq3-0004IV-O1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2Kq3-0003DK-Ka for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SB3NfF056562 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1SB3NR1056561 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:25 -0000 On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:46:51PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >I'm putting together a small presentation > >about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. > > > >Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? > > > >The info here is a bit out of date: > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html > Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x column. Oh.. I see. I only looked in the top table. Still, I don't get an idea from the table of how close FreeBSD is to full POSIX compliance. I guess that's the aim, isn't it? -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 11:25:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26F3106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:25:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6817F8FC12 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:25:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so1426673yhg.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:25:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.101.65.5 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.101.65.5; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.101.65.5 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.101.65.5]) by 10.101.65.5 with SMTP id s5mr913610ank.79.1330428342739 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:25:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.65.5 with SMTP id s5mr656577ank.79.1330428342601; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:25:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p18sm46420376yhh.9.2012.02.28.03.25.39 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:25:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3TxyJL2QzYz2CG4D for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:25:38 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:25:37 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlw9pBID8YkRQzgT9fSlP6DwiUGLOeh1ORWny3aEHJ03IJWGFwchWTACViUa9ealCNk8kQx Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:25:43 -0000 On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 Anton Shterenlikht articulated: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:46:51PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > >I'm putting together a small presentation > > >about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. > > > > > >Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? > > > > > >The info here is a bit out of date: > > > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html > > Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x > > column. > > Oh.. I see. I only looked in the top table. > > Still, I don't get an idea from the table of > how close FreeBSD is to full POSIX compliance. > I guess that's the aim, isn't it? The answer is rather simple. In your presentation you would simple indicate that FreeBSD is not fully compliant. You then have the option of making copies of all the pages referenced in the above URL and including them in the presentation packet you are supplying to the group or simply referring them to the above URL. Figuring out which is more impressive I'll leave up to you. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 11:32:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7F6106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FDD8FC13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2LHy-0007Bg-9L for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:14 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2LHy-0004km-49 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:14 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SBWDgE056654 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:13 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1SBWDgf056653 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:13 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:13 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:32:15 -0000 On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:25:37AM -0500, Jerry wrote: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 > Anton Shterenlikht articulated: > > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:46:51PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > > > On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > >I'm putting together a small presentation > > > >about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. > > > > > > > >Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? > > > > > > > >The info here is a bit out of date: > > > > > > > >http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html > > > Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x > > > column. > > > > Oh.. I see. I only looked in the top table. > > > > Still, I don't get an idea from the table of > > how close FreeBSD is to full POSIX compliance. > > I guess that's the aim, isn't it? > > The answer is rather simple. In your presentation you would simple > indicate that FreeBSD is not fully compliant. You then have the option > of making copies of all the pages referenced in the above URL and > including them in the presentation packet you are supplying to the group > or simply referring them to the above URL. Figuring out which is more > impressive I'll leave up to you. sorry to be a pain. Are we talking 10%, 50%, 90% complete? Does the above page include all tasks that need to be completed? In other words, if all tasks on the above page are ticked, does this aumtomatically give 100% compliance, or is it not that simple? -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 11:45:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6338106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8379A8FC12 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:45:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6345F5C28 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:58:43 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C0BD5C22 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:58:42 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F4CBD21.9040909@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:40:17 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:45:15 -0000 On 02/28/12 21:32, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:25:37AM -0500, Jerry wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 >> Anton Shterenlikht articulated: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:46:51PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: >>>> On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>>>> I'm putting together a small presentation >>>>> about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. >>>>> >>>>> Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? >>>>> >>>>> The info here is a bit out of date: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html >>>> Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x >>>> column. >>> Oh.. I see. I only looked in the top table. >>> >>> Still, I don't get an idea from the table of >>> how close FreeBSD is to full POSIX compliance. >>> I guess that's the aim, isn't it? >> The answer is rather simple. In your presentation you would simple >> indicate that FreeBSD is not fully compliant. You then have the option >> of making copies of all the pages referenced in the above URL and >> including them in the presentation packet you are supplying to the group >> or simply referring them to the above URL. Figuring out which is more >> impressive I'll leave up to you. > sorry to be a pain. > > Are we talking 10%, 50%, 90% complete? > > Does the above page include all tasks > that need to be completed? In other words, > if all tasks on the above page are ticked, > does this aumtomatically give 100% compliance, > or is it not that simple? As I understand it, the ticks stand for completed. There are other measures on there that say 1/2, or not started, or unable to until another is completed. The legend is closer to the bottom of the page. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 06:01:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CA1106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from shanib.kk@experionglobal.com) Received: from smtp144.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp144.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.144]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87B268FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:01:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp14.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 126A729B00D for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:43:46 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp14.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: shanib.kk-AT-experionglobal.com) with ESMTPSA id ACF7A29AFFB for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:43:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <4F4C698D.4000701@experionglobal.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0530 From: "shanib.k.k" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:26 +0000 Cc: Subject: FreeBsd Beginner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 06:01:35 -0000 HI, Hi am a Ruby on rails developer. I have done a project in ROR and currently its hosted in Ubuntu.Now the requires it to be changed to FreeBSD. As am entirely fresh to FreeBSD i would like to know more about how can configure or install it. Am using Windows OS in my personal system.How can i install FreeBSD in my local system and do a try before configuring in main server directly... Expecting Your Response Shanib.k.k ROR Developer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 12:06:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B123D1065673 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:06:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@exonetric.com) Received: from relay0.exonetric.net (relay0.exonetric.net [178.250.72.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 787B38FC24 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.20.10.3] (92.40.253.154.threembb.co.uk [92.40.253.154]) by relay0.exonetric.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1D55721F; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:35:56 +0000 (GMT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Mark Blackman In-Reply-To: <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:35:54 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <92468E79-ED9B-4C05-B891-875FA0B65C0E@exonetric.com> References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: Anton Shterenlikht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:06:24 -0000 On 28 Feb 2012, at 11:32, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > sorry to be a pain. > > Are we talking 10%, 50%, 90% complete? Depending on how you weight the various items of POSIX compliance, a finger-in-the-air guess would be around 90%, but I think only the -hackers list can give you a good answer. It's probably instructive to compare to various other OSes level of compliance as well (for your presentation). - Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 12:13:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECB6106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B157E8FC12 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1SCCrOX027457; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:13:00 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:21:35 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: Damien Fleuriot Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:13:13 -0000 Hi, I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the even branches until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the machine here runs 8.3 and will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will arrive at the scene. But for technical reasons, I have left one machine on 7 after the upgrade from 6 to 8 failed. It is a very old machine and some hardware support got dropped. Erich On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:03:45 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On 2/28/12 1:52 AM, sw2wolf wrote: > >> uname -a > > FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #3: Fri Sep 30 > > 15:23:56 CST 2011 > > root@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 > > > > I am using 8.2 for a long time. And it works VERY well. > > > > > > Any suggestion is appreciated! > > > > This is an entirely subjective question and one that only you can answer. > > For example, given the number of problem reports I'm seeing on the > lists, I'm going to stick with the 8-STABLE branch for still a long > time, likely until 9.1 or 9.2-RELEASE. > > You may want to reflect on the features you currently use and whether > they've been improved in 9.0-RELEASE or not (eg ZFS v28) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 12:26:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4581065696 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:26:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F82B8FC23 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:26:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SCQdsw093672 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:26:39 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q1SCQdsw093672 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330432001; bh=Q4djDz3sQRAQPIDpImEZSAuu49d1SHfnXiLo0iZIdrg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=QJuBtw3KQekWU4s+NQ9HLc7rWc3sF51OhNEgVmAmjzJBY9vfWenGViuQFW5we8a+2 SMGcb9H75+ki1YdPTvY81TsMux23PJ+mFwfvHI5ef8+mTgR3fTXsc93HrxYDTzlZqX +Bfq/sDyqTZTnPPFUbTEX1mXCzsI+lt3kSM6sh5A= Message-ID: <4F4CC7F4.7070500@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:26:28 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4C698D.4000701@experionglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4C698D.4000701@experionglobal.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig342E062CED225BA46A654E31" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: FreeBsd Beginner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:26:53 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig342E062CED225BA46A654E31 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/02/2012 05:43, shanib.k.k wrote: > Hi am a Ruby on rails developer. I have done a project in ROR and > currently its hosted in Ubuntu.Now the requires it to be changed to > FreeBSD. As am entirely fresh to FreeBSD i would like to know more abou= t > how can configure or install it. The best place to start is by reading the Handbook. Here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ One thing that may surprise you is that FreeBSD itself is just the OS kernel, the core libraries and a number of command-line utilities. If you want a windowing system, then you'll need to install one from ports. Similarly, you'll need to install Ruby and all the other gubbins to make your RoR applications work, but the ports makes that pretty easy. Alternatively, you might find PC-BSD easier to get along with. This is a fully featured desktop system built around FreeBSD but with all the usual sort of desktop applications already included. Get it here: http://www.pcbsd.org/ As it's FreeBSD underneath, it makes a good system to learn about FreeBSD before setting up a pure FreeBSD server. > Am using Windows OS in my personal system.How can i install FreeBSD in= > my local system and do a try before configuring in main server directly= =2E.. You can install FreeBSD as a guest OS in a virtualization system quite readily. It works pretty well with most VMs -- VirtualBox is known to work well, and it's free but whatever you're used to should be fine. Alternatively you can download a DVD or USB MemStick image, and boot from that as a live-system without trashing whatever you already have installed. If you can free up a disk, or a partition (about 5GB is the absolute minimum needed for a useful system, but more is better), then you can install FreeBSD there and make your machine dual boot. Or you can just blow away whatever is on the machine already and start from ground-zero with nothing but FreeBSD. I wouldn't recommend this unless you are quite well versed in FreeBSD already, as otherwise you'll find it quite frustrating before you learn the ropes, and your productivity will nosedive as you do that... Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig342E062CED225BA46A654E31 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9Mx/4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyAvwCeOZi4PU3UEGvrxEiRA8hreXRi ycoAnjeB9Ra6CpBnzo/V5MD7zAO3KjRC =3y3w -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig342E062CED225BA46A654E31-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 12:30:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 467AE106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:30:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD3158FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:30:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [109.190.13.180]) (Authenticated sender: kha@dichotomia.fr) by sslmail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6B233DD07D for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:29:58 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F4CC8D1.4070000@dichotomia.fr> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:30:09 +0100 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (sslmail.dichotomia.fr); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:29:59 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:30:30 -0000 On 28/02/2012 12:32, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:25:37AM -0500, Jerry wrote: >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 >> Anton Shterenlikht articulated: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:46:51PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: >>>> On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>>>> I'm putting together a small presentation >>>>> about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. >>>>> >>>>> Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? >>>>> >>>>> The info here is a bit out of date: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html >>>> Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x >>>> column. >>> Oh.. I see. I only looked in the top table. >>> >>> Still, I don't get an idea from the table of >>> how close FreeBSD is to full POSIX compliance. >>> I guess that's the aim, isn't it? >> The answer is rather simple. In your presentation you would simple >> indicate that FreeBSD is not fully compliant. You then have the option >> of making copies of all the pages referenced in the above URL and >> including them in the presentation packet you are supplying to the group >> or simply referring them to the above URL. Figuring out which is more >> impressive I'll leave up to you. > sorry to be a pain. > > Are we talking 10%, 50%, 90% complete? > > Does the above page include all tasks > that need to be completed? In other words, > if all tasks on the above page are ticked, > does this aumtomatically give 100% compliance, > or is it not that simple? > It is not that simple, POSIX is more a set of norms than a norm by itself. There are Posix aspects that are not in FreeBSD and probably never will be, other aspects that do exist in FreeBSD but you should definitly not use them as they are painfull to use or flawed or both (Posix capabilities for exemple). Also there are systems that do support a fair part of Posix, but which are just a pain to use in a Posix compatible environment, basically requiring you to code quite a lot of tools to have a Posix environment. Basically Windows Server supports quite a good deal of Posix norms, and it works well for small projects or simple programs, but if you want to create a Posix compliant distributed datastore you are in for a hell of a ride. Linux is becoming basically the same, in that more and more core system tools have dependencies on Linux specific API. (And I won't talk about MacOS X) A good way of making a presentation would be to first look at what aspects of Posix you need and try to find out where these aspect are best supported. Now a simple and true enough answer would be to say that FreeBSD has one of the broader _and most usable_ Posix support, second only to Solaris. (Way better than AIX and on par with HP-UX in my humble opinion). It is mostly true in the sense that FreeBSD does support quite a lot of Posix norms including the latest ones. It is false int the sense that AIX, HP-UX IRIX and quite alot of others have a 100% certified compliance for some (quite old now) Posix norms. CF : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_UNIX_Specification#BSD_descendants At one point FreeBSD was very close to be fully Posix compliant with norm 1.e, then norm 1.e was more or less thrown out the windows, and posix norming system pretty much imploded at this time. So basically it is quite hard to answer without first knowing exactly why you need Posix compliance. It is also worth noting that porting an application from one fully compliant OS to another is not always easier than porting from that OS to a non compliant one. Quite a lot of problems can arise in slightly different interpretations of the norm, and quite a lot of assumption that are correct under one system will require carefull tweaking and lib binding in another. Another thing that is worth noting is that Posix norming system is dying, I do not know of one system that has compliance above UNIX03, a norm written in 2001... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 12:48:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50EB106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:48:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B59C8FC16 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:48:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2MT5-00066S-5S; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:47:57 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2MSm-00012m-QE; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:47:28 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SClSEY057358; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:47:28 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1SClSrO057357; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:47:28 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bris.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bris.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:47:28 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Jerome Herman Message-ID: <20120228124728.GA57348@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Jerome Herman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120228091746.GA48977@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CB09B.7010806@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120228110323.GA56536@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20120228062537.31ac74c0@scorpio> <20120228113213.GA56638@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4F4CC8D1.4070000@dichotomia.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F4CC8D1.4070000@dichotomia.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: posix compliance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:48:03 -0000 On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 01:30:09PM +0100, Jerome Herman wrote: > On 28/02/2012 12:32, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 06:25:37AM -0500, Jerry wrote: > >>On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:03:23 +0000 > >>Anton Shterenlikht articulated: > >> > >>>On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:46:51PM +1000, Da Rock wrote: > >>>>On 02/28/12 19:17, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >>>>>I'm putting together a small presentation > >>>>>about FreeBSD for our IT support staff. > >>>>> > >>>>>Is fbsd POSIX compliant? Fully? Partially? > >>>>> > >>>>>The info here is a bit out of date: > >>>>> > >>>>>http://www.freebsd.org/projects/c99/index.html > >>>>Looking at the doc its not that out of date. Just check the 9.x > >>>>column. > >>>Oh.. I see. I only looked in the top table. > >>> > >>>Still, I don't get an idea from the table of > >>>how close FreeBSD is to full POSIX compliance. > >>>I guess that's the aim, isn't it? > >>The answer is rather simple. In your presentation you would simple > >>indicate that FreeBSD is not fully compliant. You then have the option > >>of making copies of all the pages referenced in the above URL and > >>including them in the presentation packet you are supplying to the group > >>or simply referring them to the above URL. Figuring out which is more > >>impressive I'll leave up to you. > >sorry to be a pain. > > > >Are we talking 10%, 50%, 90% complete? > > > >Does the above page include all tasks > >that need to be completed? In other words, > >if all tasks on the above page are ticked, > >does this aumtomatically give 100% compliance, > >or is it not that simple? > > > It is not that simple, POSIX is more a set of norms than a norm by > itself. There are Posix aspects that are not in FreeBSD and probably > never will be, other aspects that do exist in FreeBSD but you should > definitly not use them as they are painfull to use or flawed or both > (Posix capabilities for exemple). Also there are systems that do support > a fair part of Posix, but which are just a pain to use in a Posix > compatible environment, basically requiring you to code quite a lot of > tools to have a Posix environment. Basically Windows Server supports > quite a good deal of Posix norms, and it works well for small projects > or simple programs, but if you want to create a Posix compliant > distributed datastore you are in for a hell of a ride. Linux is becoming > basically the same, in that more and more core system tools have > dependencies on Linux specific API. (And I won't talk about MacOS X) > A good way of making a presentation would be to first look at what > aspects of Posix you need and try to find out where these aspect are > best supported. > Now a simple and true enough answer would be to say that FreeBSD has one > of the broader _and most usable_ Posix support, second only to Solaris. > (Way better than AIX and on par with HP-UX in my humble opinion). It is > mostly true in the sense that FreeBSD does support quite a lot of Posix > norms including the latest ones. It is false int the sense that AIX, > HP-UX IRIX and quite alot of others have a 100% certified compliance for > some (quite old now) Posix norms. CF : > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/POSIX > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_UNIX_Specification#BSD_descendants > > At one point FreeBSD was very close to be fully Posix compliant with > norm 1.e, then norm 1.e was more or less thrown out the windows, and > posix norming system pretty much imploded at this time. > > So basically it is quite hard to answer without first knowing exactly > why you need Posix compliance. It is also worth noting that porting an > application from one fully compliant OS to another is not always easier > than porting from that OS to a non compliant one. Quite a lot of > problems can arise in slightly different interpretations of the norm, > and quite a lot of assumption that are correct under one system will > require carefull tweaking and lib binding in another. > Another thing that is worth noting is that Posix norming system is > dying, I do not know of one system that has compliance above UNIX03, a > norm written in 2001... A very helpful reply, thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 13:24:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEB5106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:24:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rocky@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362FD8FC12 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330C05C28 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:38:16 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8848A5C22 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:38:16 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F4CD476.4020005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:19:50 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: VBox network boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:24:50 -0000 I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead, bloated, and full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for network booting in VBox on FBSD host? I _was_ considering it for some tests I was running... :( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 13:42:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5AA7106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stas@legolasweb.nl) Received: from smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971268FC16 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.134] (helo=smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2Msb-0002re-5E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:14:09 +0100 Received: from 5357e32a.cm-6-8d.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([83.87.227.42] helo=homey.local) by smtp3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S2Msa-00020D-Sx for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:14:09 +0100 Received: from homey.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homey.local (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SDEPgX009644 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:14:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stas@homey.local) Received: (from stas@localhost) by homey.local (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1SDEPDI009643 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:14:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from stas) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:14:25 +0100 From: Stas Verberkt To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local> References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: -0.8 X-Ziggo-spamreport: ALL_TRUSTED=-1, BAYES_05=-0.5, NO_DNS_FOR_FROM=2.496, PROLO_TRUST_RDNS=-3, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.2 X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:42:48 -0000 --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:21:35PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the even br= anches until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the machine here ru= ns 8.3 and will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will arrive at the scene. >=20 Just wondering: is there any difference between an even and an uneven branch? Kind regards, Stas Verberkt --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQJFBAEBCAAvBQJPTNMxKBpodHRwOi8vc3Rhcy52ZXJiZXJrdC5uZXQvcGdwL3Bv bGljeS50eHQACgkQaH4c59IqtYhaGg//W7ngg2pcB1nEAAcr3McXyTMkL0bbTFuR 4hKd/tLY9GB2UyNYAV5XGYCLvsvtjrPiGYJv/LKyBMgMe+TbMPLFbCJivh3j3uPe Q3onfKMHip/U/SwZnMfrskJ9TjE2SdMbM2k9I28EQNNOhatCEUbsAJYPAU142nKU xkv7awA92STigREntZm66oY82f4qmxzpU3MNk7t0yNRpJgln3hS3OdHwzWXHskvd iM3UZjoxGYwNFHctOitI8VmVMqI6fCFQeOSLkLuVXfGDyB48ZXeDokvYULlQdsii nqRZ0N9FNqD8CHpOl8bGRgxZESsktr3zJVywTFF9XsImLGsJ1Ebu0HTObhqva9e2 GJKBQ4wUtW4INtUXQCu84pgHDpi4dI8S4a89FOFCm27rdg5Z06HAQMPWbXPwDdBD DsTjvBrSxpzzpqcAUxzg4GbguWXBKZcZFaTlvN16A3xt73aAc69Lvhr0yLJPq7dQ eGWloWQGycqNaw5XE3jcKnHBQW1X9bGsA/nvz7d8UBeJB8GTG8iwz1j3jA5sih+C bs0lukKevL9lXWUTsc0Y+uJ4m3r1aUBjAU0klWag3oMU7ZdHS1cAkGxcsWuRY6it LawabYuysoJqdy/g/6Fk1lLiPP1JwvSgZQKl0iL1ZpI2k+UkD9u00hy8cqls3tNh NQvSdbMUO7k= =ggIZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 13:52:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BCB1106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFBC8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:52:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2741364bkc.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:52:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.204.152.12 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.204.152.12; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.204.152.12 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.204.152.12]) by 10.204.152.12 with SMTP id e12mr5461767bkw.29.1330437147768 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:52:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.152.12 with SMTP id e12mr4362828bkw.29.1330437147573; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:52:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w15sm31408893bku.0.2012.02.28.05.52.25 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 05:52:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4CDC18.8060905@my.gd> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:52:24 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local> In-Reply-To: <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnReolpCHyCQCq9XHJCrK44a8OQb0aGYKYbolBLUS2FmtATEH3Z3qWeFqVKEpYEtm+4LOvr Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:52:29 -0000 On 2/28/12 2:14 PM, Stas Verberkt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:21:35PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the even branches until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the machine here runs 8.3 and will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will arrive at the scene. >> > Just wondering: is there any difference between an even and an uneven > branch? > > Kind regards, > > Stas Verberkt > To be honest, there shouldn't be. There's an old saying that goes along the lines of "uneven are unstable/experimental" but recent comments on the ML have claimed otherwise. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 14:02:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C968D106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:02:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303418FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SE2cZe095173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:02:38 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q1SE2cZe095173 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330437758; bh=0+4HrULBR+p+qbQtUbCwgWIiciyAwXTJenFn3PnPYtg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=aSf54krxkIqv/EhWqRgsBqrP1gPf5tjHgHwagpscdQzC0DGQa4VILTxM+z9byqj4E +Lrw+ku9yYFlrBFQveQH6GrRHi1Rf1OQPCuYikoagkNI6KSLLgGUf+I1GewYt/sWQj ZNAe0aKzSPqhdLxIRfDueD2VQ2iqRbJRwrU8hKT0= Message-ID: <4F4CDE76.8090302@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:02:30 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local> In-Reply-To: <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6B9049D754761028DDFE4FC5" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:02:42 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6B9049D754761028DDFE4FC5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/02/2012 13:14, Stas Verberkt wrote: > Just wondering: is there any difference between an even and an uneven > branch? No. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig6B9049D754761028DDFE4FC5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9M3n0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwtTQCggkyxIIMWhcUcRRAGhj7USY8X 3FIAn0olky7WDwvzEPQOgkkZl90g6pqk =o9wQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6B9049D754761028DDFE4FC5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 15:20:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5903B1065689 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:20:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6BCB8FC21 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so2182170wib.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:20:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rwmaillists@googlemail.com designates 10.180.87.100 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.87.100; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rwmaillists@googlemail.com designates 10.180.87.100 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rwmaillists@googlemail.com; dkim=pass header.i=rwmaillists@googlemail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.87.100]) by 10.180.87.100 with SMTP id w4mr5790160wiz.22.1330442435001 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:20:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gB+SGkfHwQZx9V6z1QTH4I709xY/cw3l73D7Nm+2ZJU=; b=eSXeSn0AoZziL7ENgHVLX+yGpFuXvmTFCG0JE00HG45PALdgbwfRX4O5dk8U4pjiPk JLTNEX7G/zI1DapSvS6BlkFfzGMQJrxFUGrUyK2goitNoVa/dfrrpqhdn30t6S6YR5n+ 42IpnEFHZJ/uG3UBdAEwFpVpekQ4y+QwnodzI= Received: by 10.180.87.100 with SMTP id w4mr4595404wiz.22.1330442434938; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:20:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id dw7sm29405765wib.4.2012.02.28.07.20.31 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:20:33 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:20:30 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120228152030.1d702439@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4CDC18.8060905@my.gd> References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> <20120228131425.GA1676@homey.local> <4F4CDC18.8060905@my.gd> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:20:36 -0000 On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:52:24 +0100 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > On 2/28/12 2:14 PM, Stas Verberkt wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 05:21:35PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >> I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the > >> even branches until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the > >> machine here runs 8.3 and will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will > >> arrive at the scene. > >> > > Just wondering: is there any difference between an even and an > > uneven branch? > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Stas Verberkt > > > > To be honest, there shouldn't be. > > There's an old saying that goes along the lines of "uneven are > unstable/experimental" but recent comments on the ML have claimed > otherwise. That's a Linux thing surely. I've never seen it claimed for FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 15:22:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDF85106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:22:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidianwalker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77B38FC19 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so529780iah.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:22:13 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.50.197.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.197.161; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.50.197.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=davidianwalker@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=davidianwalker@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.197.161]) by 10.50.197.161 with SMTP id iv1mr2932248igc.41.1330442533213 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:22:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=UY1AyBL7Og6KLcUNWbrbN8+zQY757eg2qti3S6gEbJo=; b=lWss0ckPh1wHzAipt9p89Uzy9tfrjp241a8TOuzkA67KoR5QMmhjbhNdMLkb3/waae 8IVA8b5aQ4R13kS+NLcmGerKYhrtD/ZY8mqP6M/rCRtauZav6roAXtrMacZ+PqYDtbZi 8CpJxKrdMC6HKPFc9S8/lSwq8GEGJ5/6v0vBw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.197.161 with SMTP id iv1mr2453585igc.41.1330442533146; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:22:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.96.6 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:22:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:52:13 +1030 Message-ID: From: David Walker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Simple question about pkg_add ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:22:14 -0000 Hey. I believe I have a pcmcia card that requires upgt firmware. >From upgt(4) ... This driver requires the upgtfw firmware to be installed before it will work. The firmware files are not publicly available. A package of the firmware which can be installed via pkg_add(1) is available: http://weongyo.org/project/upgt/upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0.tar.gz pkg_add http://weongyo.org/project/upgt/upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0.tar.gz Fetching http://weongyo.org/project/upgt/upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0.tar.gz... Done. pkg_add: unable to open table of contents file '+CONTENTS' - not a package? Best wishes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 15:34:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187711065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:34:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schulra@earlham.edu) Received: from chkenon.earlham.edu (chkenon.earlham.edu [159.28.1.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7E0F8FC1B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:34:40 +0000 (UTC) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1330442399-037b9f0db963900001-jLrpzn Received: from tdream.lly.earlham.edu (tdream.lly.earlham.edu [159.28.7.241]) by chkenon.earlham.edu with ESMTP id olV5soPr0fOahkUZ for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:19:59 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: schulra@earlham.edu X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 159.28.7.241 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:21:42 -0500 (EST) From: Randy Schultz X-X-Sender: schulra@tdream.lly.earlham.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: zpool not grabbing hot spare User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Barracuda-Connect: tdream.lly.earlham.edu[159.28.7.241] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1330442399 X-Barracuda-URL: http://159.28.1.87:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at earlham.edu X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.89781 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: zpool not grabbing hot spare X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:34:41 -0000 Howdy howdy, Got a zpool that lost a drive: Feb 24 20:46:01 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): lost device Feb 24 20:46:41 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0xa, scsi status == 0x0 Feb 24 20:46:41 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): removing device entry however the spare never came online: zpool status -v pool: data state: DEGRADED status: One or more devices has been removed by the administrator. Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue functioning in a degraded state. action: Online the device using 'zpool online' or replace the device with 'zpool replace'. scan: resilvered 0 in 0h2m with 0 errors on Tue Oct 25 13:40:59 2011 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM data DEGRADED 0 0 0 raidz2-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 da2 ONLINE 0 0 0 da3 ONLINE 0 0 0 da4 ONLINE 0 0 0 da5 ONLINE 0 0 0 da6 ONLINE 0 0 0 da7 ONLINE 0 0 0 da9 ONLINE 0 0 0 da10 ONLINE 0 0 0 da11 ONLINE 0 0 0 da12 ONLINE 0 0 0 da13 ONLINE 0 0 0 da14 ONLINE 0 0 0 da15 ONLINE 0 0 0 da17 ONLINE 0 0 0 da18 ONLINE 0 0 0 da19 ONLINE 0 0 0 da20 ONLINE 0 0 0 da21 ONLINE 0 0 0 da22 ONLINE 0 0 0 da23 ONLINE 0 0 0 da25 ONLINE 0 0 0 da26 ONLINE 0 0 0 da27 ONLINE 0 0 0 da28 ONLINE 0 0 0 da29 ONLINE 0 0 0 da30 REMOVED 0 0 0 da31 ONLINE 0 0 0 da32 ONLINE 0 0 0 da33 ONLINE 0 0 0 da34 ONLINE 0 0 0 da35 ONLINE 0 0 0 da36 ONLINE 0 0 0 da37 ONLINE 0 0 0 da38 ONLINE 0 0 0 da39 ONLINE 0 0 0 da40 ONLINE 0 0 0 da41 ONLINE 0 0 0 da42 ONLINE 0 0 0 da43 ONLINE 0 0 0 da44 ONLINE 0 0 0 da45 ONLINE 0 0 0 da46 ONLINE 0 0 0 da47 ONLINE 0 0 0 logs mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 da24 ONLINE 0 0 0 da16 ONLINE 0 0 0 spares da1 AVAIL I thought the spare was supposed to come online and be resilvered automatically. Did I miss some config thing or did I just misunderstand how the hot spare bit works? -- Randy (schulra@earlham.edu) 765.983.1283 <*> nosce te ipsum From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 15:41:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ECE1065675 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:41:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsalinux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f47.google.com (mail-qw0-f47.google.com [209.85.216.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3E18FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:41:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qadz30 with SMTP id z30so1915200qad.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:41:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.196.66 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.196.66; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.196.66 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bsalinux@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=bsalinux@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.196.66]) by 10.224.196.66 with SMTP id ef2mr1053893qab.64.1330443689865 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:41:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=gwURaU13+G7qFw9dsqMe648erq2JDhQC0DNSiFr3osA=; b=l02tEitI/baspkZuGK+CMYkHDnKZ+hAFkl3VTLHasx4Rf3Fttgl/6Gn7Ca3mto1l9E 5O5hyJp1FM/RFxSDXFqN8QsmOZ/mSlHTBohWGyRwAkpfk6YPjNr7gIOzv8d2E3Tr67p7 RuYh1+AxAQ3Wp/tSukrPe5kJRo/PFPLnUzDSw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.196.66 with SMTP id ef2mr912491qab.64.1330443689796; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:41:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.211.80 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:41:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:41:29 -0800 Message-ID: From: "bsalinux@gmail.com" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:41:30 -0000 The real issue is that the USB boot device sits at da16 and if any of the da members below da16 drops, the usb boot device becomes da15 at next boot. The loader.conf still looks at da6 for root device and that is not present. How to solve this issue? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 16:14:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB567106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schulra@earlham.edu) Received: from chkenon.earlham.edu (chkenon.earlham.edu [159.28.1.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26418FC1D for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:14:28 +0000 (UTC) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1330445668-037b9f0db963f10001-jLrpzn Received: from tdream.lly.earlham.edu (tdream.lly.earlham.edu [159.28.7.241]) by chkenon.earlham.edu with ESMTP id jiMIRn9hZB9pPdpy for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:14:28 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: schulra@earlham.edu X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 159.28.7.241 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:16:11 -0500 (EST) From: Randy Schultz X-X-Sender: schulra@tdream.lly.earlham.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: zpool not grabbing hot spare Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Barracuda-Connect: tdream.lly.earlham.edu[159.28.7.241] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1330445668 X-Barracuda-URL: http://159.28.1.87:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at earlham.edu X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.89785 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Subject: Re: zpool not grabbing hot spare X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:14:30 -0000 On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Randy Schultz spaketh thusly: -} -}I thought the spare was supposed to come online and be resilvered -}automatically. Did I miss some config thing -}or did I just misunderstand how the hot spare bit works? Gah. Forgot to check the beasty forums (tnx Mark for the gentle poke). For any others not aware, the docs all say the spare is hot, but this is not accurate. See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2012-January/013428.html Heh, shows how much I've been paying attention - I didn't even realize there was a freebsd-fs list. "But I'm feeling much better now". ;> -- Randy (schulra@earlham.edu) 765.983.1283 <*> nosce te ipsum From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 16:15:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A0F1065674 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB0FF8FC0C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SGFPdG072834 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:15:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q1SGFPqQ072831 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:15:25 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:15:25 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4F4CD476.4020005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Message-ID: References: <4F4CD476.4020005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:15:26 -0700 (MST) Subject: Re: VBox network boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:15:27 -0000 On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote: > I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead, bloated, and > full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for network booting in VBox > on FBSD host? To PXE-boot a VM guest, set networking to to Bridged and use the PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A) adapter type. If the host is FreeBSD, the vboxnet kernel module has to be loaded. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 16:18:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A722106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:18:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8DC8FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:18:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C4B31E31D; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:18:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1SGILtI001963; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:18:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:18:21 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "shanib.k.k" Message-Id: <20120228171821.6a3c1b84.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4F4C698D.4000701@experionglobal.com> References: <4F4C698D.4000701@experionglobal.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBsd Beginner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:18:25 -0000 On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:13:41 +0530, shanib.k.k wrote: > As am entirely fresh to FreeBSD i would like to know more about > how can configure or install it. The basic documentation on how to install and configure the system can be found in The FreeBSD Handbook and the FAQ available from the main web site of the project. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/faq/ Also PC-BSD is worth checking out. If you come from a "Windows" background and have experiences with Ubuntu Linux, this should look and feel familiar. http://www.pcbsd.org/ But as a developer, you should not have _any_ problems getting started with a pure FreeBSD installation that will then fit your requirements (e. g. a development environment workstation, a test server, or a mixed form of both). > Am using Windows OS in my personal system.How can i install FreeBSD in > my local system and do a try before configuring in main server directly... You can use the typical means of virtualization that are possible inside a "Windows" installation. Emulate "a full PC" and install the system to it. For easily trying out a configured system I recommend having a look at VirtualBSD. http://www.virtualbsd.info/ It can easily be used without installation in a VirtualBox environment which should even be possible in "Windows". -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 16:25:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF5A1065786 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 401138FC23 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:25:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SGOuTZ097709 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:24:56 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q1SGOuTZ097709 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330446296; bh=K93MOU5tCihy7/NzAtY0I9HrmVgA52BoFbTJDhZ7vzU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=AD3ZO1GsbLkKMnjcIFp4PwvkRfXH1lJdeO5xA+Pc+M5nEQITXVbE7K8lzdsibsgXU eeF6PJiFSfYQMz9EVvbuKwOyNzJknI4DOzRUgOREohTvw4WOGQkPJOazNyDfdJuNPY 4L0hsagkLIHx8bC2fqV7tmpE/IAHj1768A+s4XEg= Message-ID: <4F4CFFCF.4010207@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:24:47 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9636C0BEA83528452C3E439A" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: zpool not grabbing hot spare X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:25:00 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9636C0BEA83528452C3E439A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 28/02/2012 15:21, Randy Schultz wrote: > Got a zpool that lost a drive: > Feb 24 20:46:01 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): lost device > Feb 24 20:46:41 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): Synchronize cache > failed, status =3D=3D 0xa, scsi status =3D=3D > 0x0 > Feb 24 20:46:41 booto kernel: (da30:mpt3:0:6:0): removing device ent= ry >=20 > however the spare never came online: > zpool status -v > pool: data > state: DEGRADED > status: One or more devices has been removed by the administrator. > Sufficient replicas exist for the pool to continue > functioning in a > degraded state. > action: Online the device using 'zpool online' or replace the device= > with > 'zpool replace'. > scan: resilvered 0 in 0h2m with 0 errors on Tue Oct 25 13:40:59 201= 1 > config: >=20 > NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM > data DEGRADED 0 0 0 > raidz2-0 DEGRADED 0 0 0 > da2 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da3 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da4 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da5 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da6 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da7 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da9 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da10 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da11 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da12 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da13 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da14 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da15 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da17 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da18 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da19 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da20 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da21 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da22 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da23 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da25 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da26 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da27 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da28 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da29 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da30 REMOVED 0 0 0 > da31 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da32 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da33 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da34 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da35 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da36 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da37 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da38 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da39 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da40 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da41 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da42 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da43 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da44 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da45 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da46 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da47 ONLINE 0 0 0 > logs > mirror-1 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da24 ONLINE 0 0 0 > da16 ONLINE 0 0 0 > spares > da1 AVAIL >=20 > I thought the spare was supposed to come online and be resilvered > automatically. Did I miss some config thing > or did I just misunderstand how the hot spare bit works? Yes. That's the generally accepted meaning of the concept of a 'hot spare.' The fact that the spare hasn't been automatically bought on-line in this case is a bug. There's an open PR on the subject: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dkern/134491 That seems to suggest the problem was known to be solved at some point in 2011, but it was not necessarily propagated to all stable branches. However, given your experience perhaps that is not the case. You should be able to use zfs commands manually to sub-in the spare drive and get it resilvered. As an aside -- you've got a pretty odd setup there: 41 drives all in one big RAIDZ2 vdev? Standard practice would be to create something like 5 RAIDZ2 vdevs of 8 drives each (Or maybe 6 vdevs of 7 drives apiece: 6--9 drives is about the sweet spot for a RAIDZ2) and then stripe those vdevs together to create your zpool. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig9636C0BEA83528452C3E439A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9M/9cACgkQ8Mjk52CukIy29gCggNSAKQKVQHhivn5+wrFhnVHw tekAmgOKrqqXUstaHU5HrIJF95l0L7OD =VJVh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9636C0BEA83528452C3E439A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 16:28:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E3E106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:28:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 567E88FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDBFB3D0A9; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:28:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1SGS86U002585; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:28:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:28:08 +0100 From: Polytropon To: David Walker Message-Id: <20120228172808.c0754b14.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simple question about pkg_add ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:28:10 -0000 On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:52:13 +1030, David Walker wrote: > Hey. > > I believe I have a pcmcia card that requires upgt firmware. > From upgt(4) ... > > This driver requires the upgtfw firmware to be installed before it will > work. The firmware files are not publicly available. A package of the > firmware which can be installed via pkg_add(1) is available: > > http://weongyo.org/project/upgt/upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0.tar.gz > > pkg_add http://weongyo.org/project/upgt/upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0.tar.gz > Fetching http://weongyo.org/project/upgt/upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0.tar.gz... Done. > pkg_add: unable to open table of contents file '+CONTENTS' - not a package? Did you have a look at what's inside the .tar.gz file? A directory upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0 with the following files: Makefile, distinfo, pkg-descr, and pkg-plist. Obviously, that's not a binary package for pkg_add use. It's a port. Extract the file and use it with the port infrastructure (i. e. "make install"). Seems that the instruction in "man 4 upgt" is just missing the proper terminology... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 16:30:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9399106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:30:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889BB8FC15 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918C23CE39; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:30:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1SGUgXS002604; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:30:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:30:42 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "bsalinux@gmail.com" Message-Id: <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:30:43 -0000 On Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:41:29 -0800, bsalinux@gmail.com wrote: > The real issue is that the USB boot device sits at da16 and if any of > the da members below da16 drops, the usb boot device becomes da15 at > next boot. The loader.conf still looks at da6 for root device and that > is not present. > > How to solve this issue? Label the drives and use labels instead of device names. Get some inspiration from Warren's excellent article here: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 16:58:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B99C9106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:58:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from schulra@earlham.edu) Received: from chkenon.earlham.edu (chkenon.earlham.edu [159.28.1.87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16B68FC13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:58:49 +0000 (UTC) X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1330448328-037b9f0db964160001-jLrpzn Received: from tdream.lly.earlham.edu (tdream.lly.earlham.edu [159.28.7.241]) by chkenon.earlham.edu with ESMTP id PJzyFcbbfWPHSzAL; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:58:48 -0500 (EST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: schulra@earlham.edu X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 159.28.7.241 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:00:31 -0500 (EST) From: Randy Schultz X-X-Sender: schulra@tdream.lly.earlham.edu To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <4F4CFFCF.4010207@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: zpool not grabbing hot spare Message-ID: References: <4F4CFFCF.4010207@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Barracuda-Connect: tdream.lly.earlham.edu[159.28.7.241] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1330448328 X-Barracuda-URL: http://159.28.1.87:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at earlham.edu X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=1000.0 tests= X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.89789 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zpool not grabbing hot spare X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:58:51 -0000 On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Matthew Seaman spaketh thusly: -} -}Yes. That's the generally accepted meaning of the concept of a 'hot -}spare.' The fact that the spare hasn't been automatically bought -}on-line in this case is a bug. There's an open PR on the subject: -} -}http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/134491 Tnx for the pointer! -} -}That seems to suggest the problem was known to be solved at some point -}in 2011, but it was not necessarily propagated to all stable branches. -}However, given your experience perhaps that is not the case. Yeah, current kernel src's (8.2-STABLE) were sup'd and rebuilt Dec 22. -} -}You should be able to use zfs commands manually to sub-in the spare -}drive and get it resilvered. -} -}As an aside -- you've got a pretty odd setup there: 41 drives all in one -}big RAIDZ2 vdev? Standard practice would be to create something like 5 -}RAIDZ2 vdevs of 8 drives each (Or maybe 6 vdevs of 7 drives apiece: 6--9 -}drives is about the sweet spot for a RAIDZ2) and then stripe those vdevs -}together to create your zpool. We looked at doing things this way, especially since it give much better performance. However, performance was less important than maximizing storage. Over the last 9 weeks we are averaging (including nighly backups): capacity operations bandwidth pool alloc free read write read write ---------- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- data 1.41T 8.34T 47 29 2.82M 1.31M raidz2 1.41T 8.34T 47 27 2.82M 1.17M da2 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da3 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da4 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da5 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da6 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da7 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da9 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da10 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da11 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da12 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da13 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da14 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da15 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da17 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da18 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da19 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da20 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da21 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da22 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da23 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da25 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da26 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da27 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da28 - - 20 2 69.4K 30.1K da29 - - 20 2 69.2K 30.1K da30 - - 20 2 67.6K 29.9K da31 - - 20 2 69.2K 30.1K da32 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da33 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da34 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da35 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da36 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da37 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da38 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da39 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da40 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da41 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da42 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da43 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da44 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da45 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da46 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K da47 - - 20 2 69.3K 30.1K -- Randy (schulra@earlham.edu) 765.983.1283 <*> nosce te ipsum From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 17:05:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C176106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:05:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from redcondor1.peak.org (redcondor1.peak.org [69.59.192.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5B68FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail-mta02.peak.org ([207.55.16.112]) by redcondor1.peak.org ({e03e86cd-14ae-47ce-9578-3c080ce9c462}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20120228170501620 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:05:01 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from birch.localnet (unknown [207.55.106.132]) by zmail-mta02.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 406D06C95AE for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:05:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [192.168.193.34]) by birch.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC548556E8 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:04:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F93ACB9A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:04:59 -0800 (PST) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q1SH4x1v085696; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:04:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4CD476.4020005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:04:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Warren Block's message of "Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:15:25 -0700 (MST)") Message-ID: <87d38yc2is.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: VBox network boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:05:02 -0000 Warren Block writes: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote: > >> I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead, >> bloated, and full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for >> network booting in VBox on FBSD host? > > To PXE-boot a VM guest, set networking to to Bridged and use the > PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A) adapter type. If the host is FreeBSD, the > vboxnet kernel module has to be loaded. Please emphasize that the PCnet-PCI II card emulation is necessary. I was trying the Intel emulation and making no progress. I then noticed your page and tried the PCnet-PCI II card and it started working. I would guess that means their Intel card emulation is incomplete. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 18:51:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C073F106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsdq@peterk.org) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [216.241.167.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BC88FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from poshta.pknet.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by poshta.pknet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40C51471B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:51:32 -0700 (MST) Received: from poshta.pknet.net ([127.0.0.1]) by poshta.pknet.net (poshta.pknet.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id To7XurHUt7To for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:51:28 -0700 (MST) Received: from pop.pknet.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by poshta.pknet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42371395F for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:51:27 -0700 (MST) Received: from 74.63.162.21 (SquirrelMail authenticated user fbsdq@peterk.org) by pop.pknet.net with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:51:27 -0700 Message-ID: <836b68e817a2b27b77ab82dbfadf45ca.squirrel@pop.pknet.net> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:51:27 -0700 From: "Peter" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.22 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: tar --exclude not working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:51:34 -0000 Hello, Ran into a weird issue where the 'exclude' pattern to tar isn't matching correctly: pkbsd:$find ./ ./ ./file ./dir1 ./dir1/file ./dir2 ./dir2/file This is expected: pkbsd:$tar Jcvf /tmp/tar.test ./ a . a ./file a ./dir1 a ./dir2 a ./dir2/file a ./dir1/file This is correct: pkbsd:$tar --exclude './dir2/file' -Jcvf /tmp/tar.test ./ a . a ./file a ./dir1 a ./dir2 a ./dir1/file Here I want to _only_ exlude './file', NOT ./dir?/file pkbsd:$tar --exclude './file' -Jcvf /tmp/tar.test ./ a . a ./dir1 a ./dir2 Anyway to exclude just './file' ? If I specify full path, it works as expected: pkbsd:$tar --exclude "home/peter/t/blah/file" -Jcvf /tmp/tar.test /home/peter/t/blah tar: Removing leading '/' from member names a home/peter/t/blah a home/peter/t/blah/dir1 a home/peter/t/blah/dir2 a home/peter/t/blah/dir2/file a home/peter/t/blah/dir1/file Why not relative './file' ? ['\./file' also does not work]. ]Peter[ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 18:59:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5398E1065678 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rg.lists@rzweb.com) Received: from flabnapple.net (flabnapple.net [216.129.104.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4547D8FC12 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:59:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.flabnapple.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by flabnapple.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D861B1CC06F for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:59:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:59:07 -0800 From: "Ron (Lists)" To: Message-ID: X-Sender: rg.lists@rzweb.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.7 Subject: User disappeared during update error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:59:08 -0000 I did a upgrade to FreeBSD 9 a few weeks ago and just started using it, and when I try and create a new user, I get the follow: pw: user 'todd' disappeared during update adduser: ERROR: There was an error adding user (todd). I first noticed this issue when trying to install postfix and got a similar error. Anyone know what this is or how to fix it without a complete re-install? Ron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 19:46:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08FC4106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:46:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24608FC18 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roxette.lamaiziere.net (136.9.74.86.rev.sfr.net [86.74.9.136]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 17142FAA2D08; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:46:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roxette.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643C1100C6; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:46:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:46:04 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, sw2wolf Message-ID: <20120228204604.19ef4eb5@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:46:08 -0000 Le Mon, 27 Feb 2012 16:52:32 -0800 (PST), sw2wolf a crit : Hello, > I am using 8.2 for a long time. And it works VERY well. If it works don't break it :) I don't use 9.0 on production server, but as far I can see on my desktops (at home and at work) that works fine (with USF2 journal and ZFS). This is the first step for me. Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 20:08:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13494106566C for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:08:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED608FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so2422258wib.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gobble.wa@gmail.com designates 10.180.101.228 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.101.228; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gobble.wa@gmail.com designates 10.180.101.228 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gobble.wa@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=gobble.wa@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.101.228]) by 10.180.101.228 with SMTP id fj4mr10974664wib.4.1330459698624 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:08:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=qXdplyHI5lC2bX99RIm1gwMdyPP4oe3/gs7mAk3Cn60=; b=q3txT8FBfSpbYnYycD1rT3AaXFfVPpuEpqvsESD44hudrtXFd975Rx7j7JJEbcbABx eMWHjSxjcUHak8UUbl3MknPoKaQ8JeN/3GZ2lysx2UnRvnRA6IlCHmwTn/3sx4CMjaDU ARdJBwLt/26UXVkqRfwIlw2+NIKnfYH21td+M= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.101.228 with SMTP id fj4mr8739909wib.4.1330459698481; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.154.131 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:08:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.154.131 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:08:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> References: <1330390351993-5520494.post@n5.nabble.com> <4F4C8A61.5010605@my.gd> <201202281721.35827.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:08:18 -0800 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: Erich Dollansky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Damien Fleuriot , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it worthy upgrading to 9.0 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:08:20 -0000 On Feb 28, 2012 4:13 AM, "Erich Dollansky" wrote: > > Hi, > > I cannot tell how often I have said this already. I stay with the even branches until the next even branch comes out. Currently, the machine here runs 8.3 and will stick to 8 until 10.0 or 10.1 will arrive at the scene. > > But for technical reasons, I have left one machine on 7 after the upgrade from 6 to 8 failed. It is a very old machine and some hardware support got dropped. > > Erich > > On Tuesday 28 February 2012 15:03:45 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > > > On 2/28/12 1:52 AM, sw2wolf wrote: > > >> uname -a > > > FreeBSD mybsd.zsoft.com 8.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE #3: Fri Sep 30 > > > 15:23:56 CST 2011 > > > root@mybsd.zsoft.com:/media/G/usr/obj/media/G/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL i386 > > > > > > I am using 8.2 for a long time. And it works VERY well. > > > > > > > > > Any suggestion is appreciated! > > > > > > > This is an entirely subjective question and one that only you can answer. > > > > For example, given the number of problem reports I'm seeing on the > > lists, I'm going to stick with the 8-STABLE branch for still a long > > time, likely until 9.1 or 9.2-RELEASE. > > > > You may want to reflect on the features you currently use and whether > > they've been improved in 9.0-RELEASE or not (eg ZFS v28) > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" 10.0-CURRENT works pretty good for me, i'm running it on an intel 32 machine and an amd64 machine. i have some servers running 7, i totally skipped 8 and tried 9 for a couple of months. but i wanted better wireless hardware support so i started pulling cvs head. For kicks i'm merging updated gnu and gpl software (that's been frozen since GPLv3 hit) into 10 src (ie /usr/src/gnu and /usr/src/contrib) just to see what kind of trouble it will cause. Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 20:24:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB521065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:24:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msabramo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E4EB8FC17 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:24:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so2717294obb.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:24:41 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.60.28.10 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.28.10; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.60.28.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=msabramo@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=msabramo@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.28.10]) by 10.60.28.10 with SMTP id x10mr7071633oeg.71.1330460681307 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:24:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Fu+Ho4IYxE7HxcE6ph2nXqCRb+meJyyDWW5tlEsRbnw=; b=P3qcrWd9MZ0ymqWmFt1HAAMMmm/O7WmsrfNiQ/oslkIJPU+7EKLwMOyOmICciNSFn8 QXInXpQ5RqbIuvPGaTpG9UFG15A89YIUVprmbbL6MXAUsGw7QGzQNqaG/rCQ28VU7ioT JN6CE7SVfxr8Ji90ci2mIIan55Z0sEbdFTq6o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.28.10 with SMTP id x10mr6296537oeg.71.1330460681213; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:24:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.24.7 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:24:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:24:41 -0800 Message-ID: From: Marc Abramowitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: DTrace userland X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:24:42 -0000 Here's another way to cause a kernel panic: [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ sudo kldload dtraceall [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ cat -n test.c 1 #include 2 3 int main() 4 { 5 sleep(15); 6 7 FILE *fp = fopen("hello.txt", "w"); 8 fprintf(fp, "Here I am at %s:%d.\n", __FILE__, __LINE__); 9 fclose(fp); 10 } [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ gcc test.c -o test [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:test:main:entry' -c ./test dtrace: description 'pid$target:test:main:entry' matched 1 probe dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME 0 43030 main:entry (Kernel panic! After reboot....) [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ cat hello.txt Here I am at test.c:8. Interestingly, the crash doesn't occur until after the sleep and the fprintf call, so it looks the kernel panic happens as a result of the traced process _exiting_... Marc On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Marc Abramowitz wrote: > Another strange behavior: > > [Tab 1] > $ /bin/sleep 300 & > [1] 1806 > > [Tab 2] > $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid1806:sleep::entry' > $ echo $? > 158 > > [Tab 1] > [1]+ Killed: 9 /bin/sleep 300 > > Something seems very wrong that DTrace is killing processes and causing > kernel panics. > > Marc > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Marc Abramowitz wrote: > >> I'm using FreeBSD 9.0 on amd64 in VMware Fusion and trying to DTrace >> userland programs. I think I must be doing something wrong. >> >> I recompiled my kernel and world, following the instructions at >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace and I've read >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/DTrace/userland: >> >> The test.c pid provider example worked fine for me: >> >> $ sudo dtrace -s pid.d -c ./test >> dtrace: script 'pid.d' matched 2 probes >> dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m >> CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME >> 0 43030 main:entry >> 0 43031 sleep:entry >> 0 43031 sleep:entry >> 0 43031 sleep:entry >> >> As does a simple probe of test.c specified with the -n option: >> >> [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:test:main:entry' -c >> ./test >> dtrace: description 'pid$target:test:main:entry' matched 1 probe >> dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m >> CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME >> 0 43030 main:entry >> >> When I start trying to dtrace other programs, things don't go so well... >> >> $ sudo dtrace -n ":::entry" -c /usr/local/bin/python >> Python 2.4.5 (#2, Dec 5 2011, 15:19:09) >> [GCC 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]] on freebsd9 >> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >> >>> import os >> >>> os.getpid() >> 1603 >> >>> >> dtrace: failed to control pid 1603: process exited with status 0 >> >> $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:::entry' -c '/bin/cat hello_world.txt' >> dtrace: description 'pid$target:::entry' matched 3315 probes >> dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m >> CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME >> 0 43448 _rtld_bind:entry >> 0 43903 rlock_acquire:entry >> 0 43125 def_thread_set_flag:entry >> (Had to hit Ctrl-C to exit; it never displayed hello_world.txt to stdout) >> >> [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo make install >> ... >> [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo dtrace -n >> 'pid$target:::entry' -c '/usr/local/bin/gcat config.log' >> dtrace: description 'pid$target:::entry' matched 3823 probes >> dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m >> CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME >> 0 43524 _rtld_bind:entry >> 0 43979 rlock_acquire:entry >> 0 43201 def_thread_set_flag:entry >> ^C >> >> $ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:cat:main:entry' -c '/bin/cat hello_world.txt' >> causes a kernel panic. >> According to the core.txt file, it was a "Fatal trap 10: trace trap while >> in kernel mode" and here's the KDB backtrace: >> >> KDB: stack backtrace: >> #0 0xffffffff8089025e at kdb_backtrace+0x5e >> #1 0xffffffff80858ce7 at panic+0x187 >> #2 0xffffffff80b4bf20 at trap_fatal+0x290 >> #3 0xffffffff80b4c540 at trap+0x180 >> #4 0xffffffff80b36963 at calltrap+0x8 >> #5 0xffffffff8162583d at dtrace_assfail+0x2d >> #6 0xffffffff8188aa2e at fasttrap_provider_free+0x1de >> #7 0xffffffff8188ad13 at fasttrap_pid_cleanup_cb+0x1c3 >> #8 0xffffffff8086dfa1 at softclock+0x3a1 >> #9 0xffffffff8082d724 at intr_event_execute_handlers+0x104 >> #10 0xffffffff8082eee4 at ithread_loop+0xa4 >> #11 0xffffffff8082a34f at fork_exit+0x11f >> #12 0xffffffff80b36e8e at fork_trampoline+0xe >> >> [marca@freebsd9-0 /usr/ports/sysutils/coreutils]$ sudo dtrace -n >> 'pid$target:gcat::entry' -c '/usr/local/bin/gcat config.log' >> (Another kernel panic) >> >> I can provide full crash dumps if necessary. >> >> Any idea what's going on here? >> >> Cheers, >> Marc >> >> >> >> > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 21:01:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D091065676 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca (idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca [24.71.223.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163168FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:01:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pd3ml1so-ssvc.prod.shaw.ca ([10.0.141.140]) by pd2mo1so-svcs.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2012 13:46:22 -0700 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.1 cv=MPNiKFfsidoaPqBs0kThsodqbsbgvPHp5CGEg9DOvhI= c=1 sm=1 a=QrugwKR0C_UA:10 a=wAGQQ9Az6v0A:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=ICAaq7hcmGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IbtKDeXwb2+SRU442/pi3A==:17 a=BWvPGDcYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=tVljRJ1pE4qhpqRra58A:9 a=YwbVKLKTFpwo0zfxWvQA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=V7tsTZBp22UA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=oh104g0XNklmF5Wd:21 a=ArP2B0mpyZnrQ5jK:21 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Received: from unknown (HELO spqr.komquats.com) ([96.50.7.119]) by pd3ml1so-dmz.prod.shaw.ca with ESMTP; 28 Feb 2012 13:46:22 -0700 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy8 [10.2.2.6]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53CD646B6F for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:46:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SKkK19004913 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:46:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@komquats.com) Message-Id: <201202282046.q1SKkK19004913@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3 From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.komquats.com/ To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:46:20 -0800 Cc: Subject: Webcam Selection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Cy Schubert List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:01:24 -0000 Hi all, After a number of years just lying in desk drawer my old Logitech spherical webcam died. So, I'm looking for a new one. It's not that I use it a lot. My wife will be heading out of province to our son's place next month to be there for the birth of our first grandson. The plan was to use a webcam to send back pictures later (not on the day of, of course but a week later). Anyhow I need to replace the old with a new webcam. The last time I used the old webcam it was hooked up to a Windows XP system. I've since retired that machine, along with the retirement of three FreeBSD machines, leaving me with a few servers and my FreeBSD laptop. I'm hoping to use the webcam with Pidgin with MSN. Can anyone suggest a brand and model? It needs to have good image quality and needs to work with FreeBSD 9.0. Any suggestions? -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 21:08:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35F41065670 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsalinux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8682C8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so1790881qcs.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.111.142 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.111.142; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.111.142 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bsalinux@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=bsalinux@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.111.142]) by 10.224.111.142 with SMTP id s14mr15622379qap.78.1330463284925 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:08:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=AFMFINTWlUJE4S1O1NEOnc//qVZkYlIffbhbFmS729E=; b=dMb2C7Uc8UnOCmFEI+MONDfiskVvdpv9MJBtnrrgLbXKPfdeUgreSDQs0usMxzyA4G nA8Dg/KHQeweQRS+f+ncbizmcYljw2S1fIJVxJAPFypNVjTijewIEHUfE8pdg7MsguUs NIxiuTEo/UhW3W6zHW68JgPWxqKTuPldKTb8k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.111.142 with SMTP id s14mr13163913qap.78.1330463284697; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:08:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.211.80 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:08:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:08:04 -0800 Message-ID: From: "bsalinux@gmail.com" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:08:05 -0000 Thanks, I got the part where you can label the partitions but the loader doesn't look at labels. Loader looks at ufs:/dev/da0 So how can this be resolved at "boot" time (not mount time). Thanks. On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 8:30 AM, Polytropon wrote: > > Label the drives and use labels instead of device names. > > Get some inspiration from Warren's excellent article here: > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 21:23:33 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D8C106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:23:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 548208FC29 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbdt10 with SMTP id dt10so2585378wgb.1 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:23:32 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of amvandemore@gmail.com designates 10.216.134.157 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.216.134.157; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amvandemore@gmail.com designates 10.216.134.157 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=amvandemore@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=amvandemore@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.216.134.157]) by 10.216.134.157 with SMTP id s29mr10924994wei.1.1330464212305 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:23:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=IOMb+I8WqhSeUC9OGW2vGVC3uyHvenQbxhkjpW6icvE=; b=kbrrN5g2b4xgWty3TIvh5rewiimpP6+rlctDoY+3uu8jt+TBJbBK5hmADK9sNsHb9z TCPHj+mhK+c090HrEzZwIQ72GcrA1mwabOwOrGn4ch/pH2xl5elcgWc3VJJKBmferLpT WAMEzGps2PHE8Gt0Beov8y9ImtRIRWSjrSg58= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.134.157 with SMTP id s29mr8718458wei.1.1330464212257; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:23:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.93.138 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:23:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:23:32 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: "bsalinux@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:23:34 -0000 On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:41 AM, bsalinux@gmail.com wrote: > The real issue is that the USB boot device sits at da16 and if any of > the da members below da16 drops, the usb boot device becomes da15 at > next boot. The loader.conf still looks at da6 for root device and that > is not present. > > How to solve this issue? > Add to /boot/loader.conf and adjust to your needs: hint.scbus.0.at="da0" hint.scbus.0.bus="0" hint.da.0.at="scbus0" hint.da.0.target="0" hint.da.0.unit="0" hint.scbus.1.bus="umass-sim0" hint.da.1.at="scbus1" hint.da.1.target="0" hint.da.1.unit="0" -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 22:08:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA095106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsalinux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899708FC15 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:08:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qao25 with SMTP id 25so2379254qao.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:08:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.105.203 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.105.203; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.105.203 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bsalinux@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=bsalinux@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.105.203]) by 10.224.105.203 with SMTP id u11mr15849007qao.77.1330466903047 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:08:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=UjQN+cJRQ5jsyV6P3JL95/GvWAQVCDlK32tM/oRbcow=; b=MFd5KIcwL8ySw6Gguzs3hiEvo25hk26YvI2OvXWChze3/NtCeDFDqhOAwpLsYW5X6R ksClLK10p3Idd5iOQdMOJVMXQxvBYNvMh5zggJMMCeBTY4MDE7jrXcalA5bNFo9YKwKM TZKC3zRNAbUP3fe+YFhUAWcBPVYSgFCpdzhrg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.105.203 with SMTP id u11mr13384082qao.77.1330466902991; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:08:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.211.80 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:08:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 14:08:22 -0800 Message-ID: From: "bsalinux@gmail.com" To: Adam Vande More , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:08:23 -0000 Adam, This worked like a charm :-) I found that my umass-sim0 is at scbus6 and added following lines in loader.conf hint.scbus.6.bus="umass-sim0" hint.da.0.at="scbus6" hint.da.0.target="0" hint.da.0.unit="0" Thanks a lot. On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 1:23 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > > Add to /boot/loader.conf and adjust to your needs: > > hint.scbus.0.at="da0" > hint.scbus.0.bus="0" > hint.da.0.at="scbus0" > hint.da.0.target="0" > hint.da.0.unit="0" > hint.scbus.1.bus="umass-sim0" > hint.da.1.at="scbus1" > hint.da.1.target="0" > hint.da.1.unit="0" > > > -- > Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 22:40:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB73106564A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:40:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milu@dat.pl) Received: from jab.dat.pl (dat.pl [80.51.155.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004078FC15 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jab.dat.pl (jsrv.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) by jab.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AECA7; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:21:24 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dat.pl Received: from jab.dat.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by jab.dat.pl (jab.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 77kC4bJcPEt1; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:21:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from snifi.localnet (178-36-156-106.adsl.inetia.pl [178.36.156.106]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jab.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FC7273; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:21:21 +0100 (CET) From: Maciej Milewski To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:21:51 +0100 Message-ID: <7783796.gZcd11fCqx@snifi> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.2.7-1-ARCH; KDE/4.8.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "bsalinux@gmail.com" Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:40:18 -0000 Dnia wtorek, 28 lutego 2012 13:08:04 bsalinux@gmail.com pisze: > Thanks, > > I got the part where you can label the partitions but the loader > doesn't look at labels. Loader looks at ufs:/dev/da0 > > So how can this be resolved at "boot" time (not mount time). > > Thanks. vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/label/bigdisk in loader.conf doesn't work? I think that worked with stock FreeBSD loader. Maciej From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 22:56:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B402D106566B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 727628FC15 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:56:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1SMuq7W074824; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:56:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q1SMuqeT074821; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:56:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:56:52 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Carl Johnson In-Reply-To: <87d38yc2is.fsf@oak.localnet> Message-ID: References: <4F4CD476.4020005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <87d38yc2is.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:56:52 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VBox network boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:56:53 -0000 On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Carl Johnson wrote: > Warren Block writes: > >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote: >> >>> I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead, >>> bloated, and full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for >>> network booting in VBox on FBSD host? >> >> To PXE-boot a VM guest, set networking to to Bridged and use the >> PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A) adapter type. If the host is FreeBSD, the >> vboxnet kernel module has to be loaded. > > Please emphasize that the PCnet-PCI II card emulation is necessary. Updated in the PXE article, thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 23:32:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44691065672 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:32:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsalinux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DFF48FC1A for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsg15 with SMTP id g15so1864920qcs.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.105.203 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.105.203; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.105.203 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bsalinux@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=bsalinux@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.105.203]) by 10.224.105.203 with SMTP id u11mr16155382qao.77.1330471938210 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:32:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=yMS5pojHiCA+MIsZHAlQdIBszxZ9f6uHWGgV6v7j+io=; b=TBAoaxre62tE3BUFzq7k1mIlji0znffEsushCqA4xRQL8VcpvPzZk+zYCWIrAk7bQd W+g+ejm8WN1CNfvrsT1fFi3KFw3eSRwOeePz+vtDh4fX6pbJ3I9NEFo7EYvA2QJtciWl yBxnQSZ09stVYjbqTu//ioV/LT7Pmobg0JLn4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.105.203 with SMTP id u11mr13645430qao.77.1330471938151; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:32:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.211.80 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:32:18 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <7783796.gZcd11fCqx@snifi> References: <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> <7783796.gZcd11fCqx@snifi> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:32:18 -0800 Message-ID: From: "bsalinux@gmail.com" To: Maciej Milewski Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:32:19 -0000 Maciej I didn't know if the label would work in loader.conf. This solution suggested by Adam worked and seems much simpler than labeling the filesystem. hint.da.0.at="scbus6" Thanks. On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Maciej Milewski wrote: > vfs.root.mountfrom=ufs:/dev/label/bigdisk in loader.conf doesn't work? > > I think that worked with stock FreeBSD loader. > > > > Maciej From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 00:13:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B847106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA878FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579D05C28 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:27:25 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DE695C22 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:27:24 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F4D6C99.1000604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:08:57 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4CD476.4020005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <87d38yc2is.fsf@oak.localnet> In-Reply-To: <87d38yc2is.fsf@oak.localnet> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: VBox network boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:13:58 -0000 On 02/29/12 03:04, Carl Johnson wrote: > Warren Block writes: > >> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote: >> >>> I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead, >>> bloated, and full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for >>> network booting in VBox on FBSD host? >> To PXE-boot a VM guest, set networking to to Bridged and use the >> PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A) adapter type. If the host is FreeBSD, the >> vboxnet kernel module has to be loaded. > Please emphasize that the PCnet-PCI II card emulation is necessary. I > was trying the Intel emulation and making no progress. I then noticed > your page and tried the PCnet-PCI II card and it started working. I > would guess that means their Intel card emulation is incomplete. I took it for granted the bridge part (I usually use it anyway), but I would never have guessed the PCnet card in a blue fit! There was even a PR on virtualbox for the issue of the lack of PXE with Oracle basically saying "too bad, so sad...". Apparently PXE licensing didn't allow them to distribute it directly, but offer an extension pack (which doesn't work on FBSD) instead. Ergo my conclusion. Apparently (based on this thread) it only affects intel cards though... Where is your page Warren, and why didn't it show up in my searches? ;) I'll follow it from here on out I think... Thanks guys... saved me a lot more fussing! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 00:25:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF9C10656B5 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:25:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482C08FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:25:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C2D5C28 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:38:39 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BBD545C22 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:38:38 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F4D6F3C.8020101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:20:12 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201202282046.q1SKkK19004913@slippy.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: <201202282046.q1SKkK19004913@slippy.cwsent.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Webcam Selection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:25:11 -0000 On 02/29/12 06:46, Cy Schubert wrote: > Hi all, > > After a number of years just lying in desk drawer my old Logitech spherical > webcam died. So, I'm looking for a new one. It's not that I use it a lot. > My wife will be heading out of province to our son's place next month to be > there for the birth of our first grandson. The plan was to use a webcam to > send back pictures later (not on the day of, of course but a week later). > Anyhow I need to replace the old with a new webcam. The last time I used > the old webcam it was hooked up to a Windows XP system. I've since retired > that machine, along with the retirement of three FreeBSD machines, leaving > me with a few servers and my FreeBSD laptop. I'm hoping to use the webcam > with Pidgin with MSN. Can anyone suggest a brand and model? It needs to > have good image quality and needs to work with FreeBSD 9.0. Any suggestions? Thanks to the hard work of Luigi Rizzo and Co, just about any CE device should work. If it works on linux it will work here now, using webcamd. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 00:54:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F30106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:54:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 722038FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:54:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1T0sqHk075297 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:54:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q1T0sqBO075294 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:54:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:54:52 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4F4D6C99.1000604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Message-ID: References: <4F4CD476.4020005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <87d38yc2is.fsf@oak.localnet> <4F4D6C99.1000604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:54:52 -0700 (MST) Subject: Re: VBox network boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:54:53 -0000 On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote: > On 02/29/12 03:04, Carl Johnson wrote: >> Warren Block writes: >> >>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote: >>> >>>> I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead, >>>> bloated, and full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for >>>> network booting in VBox on FBSD host? >>> To PXE-boot a VM guest, set networking to to Bridged and use the >>> PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A) adapter type. If the host is FreeBSD, the >>> vboxnet kernel module has to be loaded. >> Please emphasize that the PCnet-PCI II card emulation is necessary. I >> was trying the Intel emulation and making no progress. I then noticed >> your page and tried the PCnet-PCI II card and it started working. I >> would guess that means their Intel card emulation is incomplete. > I took it for granted the bridge part (I usually use it anyway), but I would > never have guessed the PCnet card in a blue fit! There was even a PR on > virtualbox for the issue of the lack of PXE with Oracle basically saying "too > bad, so sad...". Apparently PXE licensing didn't allow them to distribute it > directly, but offer an extension pack (which doesn't work on FBSD) instead. > Ergo my conclusion. Apparently (based on this thread) it only affects intel > cards though... > > Where is your page Warren, and why didn't it show up in my searches? ;) I'll > follow it from here on out I think... Sorry, it's at http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/pxe.html . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 01:25:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4471065670 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hufeng1987@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5288FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:25:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so1329880iah.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:25:15 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of hufeng1987@gmail.com designates 10.50.194.232 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.194.232; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of hufeng1987@gmail.com designates 10.50.194.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=hufeng1987@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=hufeng1987@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.194.232]) by 10.50.194.232 with SMTP id hz8mr5114415igc.38.1330478715922 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:25:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=n1qlAnb2/KTYx7DapiPNHZn/6EuOpYGf6Wae+KIKAoY=; b=UfeG7naZ5hc1tF10fN8FRE3/9iwnc+7dX4dwGf5crmHafMqzMp3prG5xbTciN6T4By klqvRfjZvmKLgJgTbXEkDdp7Nchg4vRuiEc+L8TZ+/n51HDgAt7DmoJKebWqC6m0z+FC UsovDstO7yKbyJMekGPsaSx0F+GeL9/kY2G8k= Received: by 10.50.194.232 with SMTP id hz8mr4248243igc.38.1330478715883; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:25:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.27.218 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:24:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4C8BCA.1080809@my.gd> References: <4F4C7E23.3050404@gmail.com> <4F4C8BCA.1080809@my.gd> From: netroby Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:55 +0800 Message-ID: To: Damien Fleuriot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Delete files let FreeBSD crashes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:25:17 -0000 Thanks . I had resolved the problem : 1. restart FreeBSD to single user mode. 2. umount all device then run fsck -f 3. after finished the fsck, restart FreeBSD , return to normal mode. 4. delete the broken directory, and restore the data from backup. 5. every thing seems ok now. netroby ---------------------------------- http://www.netroby.com =E5=9C=A8 2012=E5=B9=B42=E6=9C=8828=E6=97=A5 =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=884:09=EF=BC= =8CDamien Fleuriot =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > On 2/28/12 8:11 AM, netroby wrote: > > i installed freebsd 9 on virtualbox, when i try to delete a directory > > with following command: > > > > rm -rf ./zf2 > > > > the system will halt , then restart. > > > > i had using fsck -y to check the filesystem, but seems not work. > > > > following the output: > > > > *** HALT *** > > You're not running fsck on a MOUNTED device are you ? > > If you are, kindly stop doing so to prevent damage to your system. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 01:34:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4BF1065670; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:34:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msabramo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA898FC14; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:34:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so3105538obb.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:34:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+gy5+nN38JcqyXB4coKjFBvzLkK/hNFkSj00u1kxGyg=; b=WLc0X3uSkETxsJ3oKu5olxX7hGwnm/gCciIgS6Fy1vHQg4T+0gAATgYDlzxh+aEgmD meznKZlXPdsNzllvZsdDmod4JZ9DKWncGPj9/Kmxs+HVY/B91Gl1etvhMgwiK2VKudlJ jW8mktIwZthnDSJryzbhcWj307PdKCQq9jNyo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.147.106 with SMTP id tj10mr6770774obb.71.1330479281676; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:34:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.24.7 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:34:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8628A952-3C4F-4C9C-944D-30B30747B05F@freebsd.org> References: <8628A952-3C4F-4C9C-944D-30B30747B05F@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:34:41 -0800 Message-ID: From: Marc Abramowitz To: Rui Paulo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DTrace userland X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:34:42 -0000 On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Rui Paulo wrote: > Please file a PR. These are problems that we have to fix. I submitted a PR for the kernel panic at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165541 Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 01:36:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6810106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msabramo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 630EB8FC1A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:36:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwc7 with SMTP id wc7so3106866obb.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:36:02 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.182.155.68 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.182.155.68; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of msabramo@gmail.com designates 10.182.155.68 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=msabramo@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=msabramo@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.182.155.68]) by 10.182.155.68 with SMTP id vu4mr7641353obb.61.1330479362057 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:36:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=nIIwKrO6ABmGUM6vsCNUjckz+8Wtd7l7BFFV+nFNkPc=; b=d9PEQ6WL3ptnHpRaRAgQpdlHA++bGEyUnREWY1l/I18Ak2Nn8MuelyeLbu1LP3SwMO UPysEHzsYDGw/SQR8hWGkqEVxzpRpoW0OPN5dr/rtaoOJwtbiVTQbfkizlOi1Ph5rx3p 6WT0FLmORumFnX73ehDsPZTiTZ+IIXwNcxWZE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.155.68 with SMTP id vu4mr6759954obb.61.1330479362016; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:36:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.24.7 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:36:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 17:36:01 -0800 Message-ID: From: Marc Abramowitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: DTrace userland X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:36:02 -0000 On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Marc Abramowitz wrote: > Here's another way to cause a kernel panic: > > [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ sudo kldload dtraceall > ... > [marca@freebsd9-0 ~]$ sudo dtrace -n 'pid$target:test:main:entry' -c > ./test > dtrace: description 'pid$target:test:main:entry' matched 1 probe > dtrace: buffer size lowered to 1m > CPU ID FUNCTION:NAME > 0 43030 main:entry > (Kernel panic! After reboot....) > > I submitted a PR for this kernel panic at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=165541 Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 02:11:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D3C106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidianwalker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE008FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so1391775iah.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:11:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.50.207.4 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.50.207.4; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.50.207.4 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=davidianwalker@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=davidianwalker@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.50.207.4]) by 10.50.207.4 with SMTP id ls4mr5229975igc.33.1330481506417 (num_hops = 1); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:11:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pYhY1JeP+D+i/c/t6btQocMQE33R7TBa1D11qlSLSp4=; b=QP2uiEjgQHS4bKycZhwTzZYt6rexIdpqPuweduL2is4rRxltCPcUFa3DEqvFKk2VJR v8EdhI01yDU1uu4jinp0tWxGTZcEVCN96zDB1/yhwNB3qoj6zFGeQGB35smPrCEg5yfc Oe1rqMK5xEDaobyR+9ft/574dVHZckvlBqCTY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.207.4 with SMTP id ls4mr4355354igc.33.1330481506376; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:11:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.96.6 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:11:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120228172808.c0754b14.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20120228172808.c0754b14.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:41:46 +1030 Message-ID: From: David Walker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd@edvax.de Subject: Re: Simple question about pkg_add ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:11:47 -0000 Hi Polytropon. I did have a look inside and I did pkg_add -v which gives enough information combined with my meagre knowledge to guess that it had something to do with source. I'm so unfamiliar with pkg_add I'm not sure if that is normal. I'm very new here. Certainly it's not in a suitable format for pkg_add to deal with. I guess pkg_add is the preferred option for firmware installation. I'll contact the maintainer. On 29/02/2012, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:52:13 +1030, David Walker wrote: >> Hey. >> >> I believe I have a pcmcia card that requires upgt firmware. >> From upgt(4) ... >> >> This driver requires the upgtfw firmware to be installed before it >> will >> work. The firmware files are not publicly available. A package of >> the >> firmware which can be installed via pkg_add(1) is available: >> >> http://weongyo.org/project/upgt/upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0.tar.gz >> >> pkg_add http://weongyo.org/project/upgt/upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0.tar.gz >> Fetching http://weongyo.org/project/upgt/upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0.tar.gz... >> Done. >> pkg_add: unable to open table of contents file '+CONTENTS' - not a >> package? > > Did you have a look at what's inside the .tar.gz file? > A directory upgt-firmware-2.13.1.0 with the following > files: Makefile, distinfo, pkg-descr, and pkg-plist. > > Obviously, that's not a binary package for pkg_add use. > It's a port. > > Extract the file and use it with the port infrastructure > (i. e. "make install"). > > Seems that the instruction in "man 4 upgt" is just missing > the proper terminology... > > > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 02:22:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23951065679 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB84E8FC17 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F267F3CAED; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:22:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1T2MieK004366; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:22:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:22:44 +0100 From: Polytropon To: David Walker Message-Id: <20120229032244.d667bcda.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20120228172808.c0754b14.freebsd@edvax.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd@edvax.de, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Simple question about pkg_add ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 02:22:48 -0000 On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:41:46 +1030, David Walker wrote: > Hi Polytropon. > > I did have a look inside and I did pkg_add -v which gives enough > information combined with my meagre knowledge to guess that it had > something to do with source. A port (as you can find it inside the archive) is a "recipe" for dealing with sources, e. g. where to obtain then, how to compile, where to install to and so on. The ports collection of the FreeBSD OS is used to deal with handling software based on sources: configure, patch, build, install, deinstall, upgrade and similar tasks. See "man ports" for a better explaination. > I'm so unfamiliar with pkg_add I'm not sure if that is normal. The pkg_add utility installs programs from binary packages. Those packages are created by compiling a port - typically with its default options. Those packages are built for the FreeBSD ports collection and made available by the FreeBSD team. "External packages", created outside the world of FreeBSD ports, are possible. See "man pkg_add" for details. > I'm very new here. > Certainly it's not in a suitable format for pkg_add to deal with. Correct. A pkg_add package typically contains compiled stuff, i. e. binaries, and a "packaging list" for installation and later removal. Additional tasks can also be scripted. > I guess pkg_add is the preferred option for firmware installation. It's used to install programs (or libraries) to the FreeBSD system. The use with firmware is also possible. Basically, ports (from source) and packages (precompiled binaries) have the same purpose: Get things installed. If the maintainer would compile the port (that he provided for download) and give the proper URL of the result in the manpage, pkg_add would work as intended. > I'll contact the maintainer. That would be a good idea as the description you quoted from the manpage is technically not correct. Option 1: Provide a pkg_add-able package. Option 2: Provide instructions on how to deal with the port. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 05:42:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43045106566B; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:42:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from naylor.b.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A05748FC08; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:42:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so2691596wib.13 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:42:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=UGa8cjL2Im3Bh2DUnllmrouyBdLFrqMtaML9DzDrGAM=; b=myth6M96feSk/KcQyI2cq23hXM1jTBb+0WlDRHS3LZcHOapiFFkKKDH7a+XjFWiXhK Yx+RdcDq/U4B62JK+bOk1F2ZUoxJnOMmkvUpDFSnh+y2lQdwDZ4/svLZSdHryMtAgFZo ceCmGXqwIkPxQqzTbANwexpJD89N9vEqheS5k= Received: by 10.180.14.37 with SMTP id m5mr26736897wic.19.1330494176684; Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:42:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.dg (41-132-92-120.dsl.mweb.co.za. [41.132.92.120]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id d8sm19285281wia.11.2012.02.28.21.42.53 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:42:55 -0800 (PST) From: David Naylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:42:46 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.0-STABLE; KDE/4.7.1; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1903142.K7G3jya4tf"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201202290742.50090.naylor.b.david@gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Wine-fbsd64 updated to 1.4.rc5 (32bit Wine for 64bit FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:42:58 -0000 --nextPart1903142.K7G3jya4tf Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Packages [1] for wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc5 have been uploaded to mediafire [2]. There are many reports that wine does not work with a clang compiled world (help in fixing this problem is appreciated as it affects quite a few users). The patch [3] for nVidia users is now included in the package and is run on installation (if the relevant files are accessible). Please read the installation messages for further information. Regards, David [1] MD5 (freebsd8/wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc5,1.tbz) = 53c37ef9fbd0f12f6c456efac942a575 MD5 (freebsd9/wine-fbsd64-1.4.rc5,1.txz) = 4f653f5d8e29fd5e7811dec2f81469a8 [2] http://www.mediafire.com/wine_fbsd64 [3] The patch is located at /usr/local/share/wine/patch-nvidia.sh --nextPart1903142.K7G3jya4tf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk9NutoACgkQUaaFgP9pFrKl7gCdEhZKNhnt8mH2F9qkiANELHuj 85MAoIOu/sKPutjyBoYmJ+fEEOOWprzn =crPI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1903142.K7G3jya4tf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 05:57:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCEF106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4348FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:57:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.95.244] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S2cXV-0004xT-JX for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:57:25 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q1T5vPm0002152 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:57:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id q1T5vPns002151 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:57:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:57:25 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120229055724.GA2118@tinyCurrent> References: <201202282046.q1SKkK19004913@slippy.cwsent.com> <4F4D6F3C.8020101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4F4D6F3C.8020101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 93.104.95.244 Subject: Re: Webcam Selection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:57:27 -0000 El da Wednesday, February 29, 2012 a las 10:20:12AM +1000, Da Rock escribi: > On 02/29/12 06:46, Cy Schubert wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After a number of years just lying in desk drawer my old Logitech spherical > > webcam died. So, I'm looking for a new one. It's not that I use it a lot. > > My wife will be heading out of province to our son's place next month to be > > there for the birth of our first grandson. The plan was to use a webcam to > > send back pictures later (not on the day of, of course but a week later). > > Anyhow I need to replace the old with a new webcam. The last time I used > > the old webcam it was hooked up to a Windows XP system. I've since retired > > that machine, along with the retirement of three FreeBSD machines, leaving > > me with a few servers and my FreeBSD laptop. I'm hoping to use the webcam > > with Pidgin with MSN. Can anyone suggest a brand and model? It needs to > > have good image quality and needs to work with FreeBSD 9.0. Any suggestions? See http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat for a list of known to work webcams; HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11 | UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2 | FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 06:40:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD12106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carbon-dev-bounces@wso2.org) Received: from cheetara.wso2.com (cheetara.wso2.com [209.126.229.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A4648FC13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:40:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [204.13.82.216] (helo=db51235.aspadmin.net) by cheetara.wso2.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S2bwd-0005P0-Cb for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:19:19 +0000 Received: from sr7.us1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by db51235.aspadmin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7CC9317748A3 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:13:28 -0500 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: carbon-dev-bounces@wso2.org To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 21:13:26 -0500 Precedence: bulk X-BeenThere: carbon-dev@wso2.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 X-List-Administrivia: yes Sender: carbon-dev-bounces@wso2.org Errors-To: carbon-dev-bounces@wso2.org X-Spam_score: 3.9 X-Spam_score_int: 39 X-Spam_bar: +++ X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "cheetara.wso2.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Your mail to 'Carbon-dev' with the subject Mail System Error - Returned Mail Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. [...] Content analysis details: (3.9 points, 4.8 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.7 SPF_SOFTFAIL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail) 1.6 DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5023] 0.8 RDNS_NONE Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 204.13.82.216 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: carbon-dev-bounces@wso2.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on cheetara.wso2.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: Subject: Your message to Carbon-dev awaits moderator approval X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:40:35 -0000 Your mail to 'Carbon-dev' with the subject Mail System Error - Returned Mail Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval. The reason it is being held: Post by non-member to a members-only list Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive notification of the moderator's decision. If you would like to cancel this posting, please visit the following URL: http://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/confirm/carbon-dev/dab54409bee58ebdb97928b535773a38c6c2be94 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 09:14:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070B81065670 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:14:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MHerman@advatech.pl) Received: from jehu.advatech.pl (jehu.advatech.pl [217.30.156.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F273E8FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:14:49 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KeepSent: F8637974:9D5017CD-C12579B3:003124F6; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1 September 28, 2009 Message-ID: From: Mariusz Herman Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:59:01 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on jehu/AES at 29/02/2012 10:14:49, Serialize complete at 29/02/2012 10:14:49 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="=_related 00315A73C12579B3_=" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:14:51 -0000 To jest wieloczciowa wiadomo w formacie MIME. --=_related 00315A73C12579B3_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for=20 FreeBSD. For configuration: Lp Model Description Qty 1.0 7100139 Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: model family 4 1.1 7100142 Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: 3 RU base chassis with motherboard and 2 PSUs 4 1.2 7100140 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E7-4820 8-core 2 GHz processors (for factory=20 installation) 8 1.3 7100166 Two 8-DIMM riser cards (for factory installation) 16 1.4 7100152 Two 4 GB DDR3-1333 DIMMs (for factory installation) 48 1.5 2352A 2 memory DIMM slot filler (for factory installation) 80 1.6 RB-SS2CF-300G10K2 One 300 GB 10000 rpm 2.5-inch SAS-2 HDD with bracket (for factory=20 installation) 8 1.7 6331A-N 2.5-inch HDD filler panel (for factory installation) 16 1.8 8370A DVD-RW drive (for factory installation) 4 1.9 SG-SAS6-INT-Z Sun Storage 6 Gb SAS PCIe HBA, Internal: 8 port (for factory Installation) 4 1.10 4446A-Z-N Sun x4 Quad-port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter UTP 8 1.11 5394A PCIe filler panel (for factory installation) 32 1.12 2365A Tool-less rackmount rail kit (for factory Installation) 4 1.13 2364A Cable management arm (for factory installation) 4 1.14 SR-JUMP-1MC13 Power cord: Sun Rack 2 jumper, 1 meter, C14RA plug, C13 connector, 13 A=20 (for factory installation) 8 =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=20 Kind regards Mariusz Herman Sales Support Specialist e-mail: mherman@advatech.pl=20 tel. (+4871) 772 66 08 kom. +48 661 917 210 =20 Advatech Sp. z o.o. ul. Kleci=F1ska 123 54-413 Wroc=B3aw tel. (+4871) 772 66 00 fax. (+4871) 798 57 75 www.advatech.pl Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru S=B1dowego pod numerem 0000145269 S=B1d Rejonowy dla Wroc=B3awia - Fabrycznej we Wroc=B3awiu VI Wydzia=B3=20 Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru S=B1dowego NIP: PL 899-21-85-891 Kapita=B3 zak=B3adowy 50 000 z=B3, kapita=B3 w=B3asny 6 686 037 z=B3 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20 --=_related 00315A73C12579B3_=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 09:24:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02914106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8245E8FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werl4 with SMTP id l4so2388859wer.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:24:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.74.177 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.74.177; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.180.74.177 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.74.177]) by 10.180.74.177 with SMTP id u17mr47008885wiv.13.1330507484550 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:24:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.74.177 with SMTP id u17mr37303413wiv.13.1330507484426; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:24:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.54.118.203] ([92.90.16.98]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id df3sm34092488wib.1.2012.02.29.01.24.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:24:43 -0800 (PST) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Message-Id: <2A6E4B6A-8FE7-4AAC-93C6-B5FDD02ADB18@my.gd> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:23:48 +0100 To: Mariusz Herman X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnK6hu18nMg5E5I++EJqbpuZVCNV1DWQvwsuFsMusV9PF7/GiIMqx6N4CFw5P/XVtgqn4O6 Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:46 -0000 5-star rating this gem right now. This does, however, raise an interesting question. Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support and e= ngineering ? Like, a la RHEL or SLES. Excluding dedicated servers rental, since they don't actually provide the re= al support. On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:59, Mariusz Herman wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for=20 > FreeBSD. >=20 > For configuration: >=20 > Lp > Model > Description > Qty > 1.0 > 7100139 > Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: model family > 4 > 1.1 > 7100142 > Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: 3 RU base chassis with motherboard and 2 PSUs > 4 > 1.2 > 7100140 > 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E7-4820 8-core 2 GHz processors (for factory=20 > installation) > 8 > 1.3 > 7100166 > Two 8-DIMM riser cards (for factory installation) > 16 > 1.4 > 7100152 > Two 4 GB DDR3-1333 DIMMs (for factory installation) > 48 > 1.5 > 2352A > 2 memory DIMM slot filler (for factory installation) > 80 > 1.6 > RB-SS2CF-300G10K2 > One 300 GB 10000 rpm 2.5-inch SAS-2 HDD with bracket (for factory=20 > installation) > 8 > 1.7 > 6331A-N > 2.5-inch HDD filler panel (for factory installation) > 16 > 1.8 > 8370A > DVD-RW drive (for factory installation) > 4 > 1.9 > SG-SAS6-INT-Z > Sun Storage 6 Gb SAS PCIe HBA, Internal: 8 port (for factory Installation)= > 4 > 1.10 > 4446A-Z-N > Sun x4 Quad-port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter UTP > 8 > 1.11 > 5394A > PCIe filler panel (for factory installation) > 32 > 1.12 > 2365A > Tool-less rackmount rail kit (for factory Installation) > 4 > 1.13 > 2364A > Cable management arm (for factory installation) > 4 > 1.14 > SR-JUMP-1MC13 > Power cord: Sun Rack 2 jumper, 1 meter, C14RA plug, C13 connector, 13 A=20= > (for factory installation) > 8 >=20 > _____________________________________=20 > Kind regards > Mariusz Herman > Sales Support Specialist >=20 > e-mail: mherman@advatech.pl=20 > tel. (+4871) 772 66 08 > kom. +48 661 917 210 >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > Advatech Sp. z o.o. > ul. Kleci=C5=84ska 123 > 54-413 Wroc=C5=82aw > tel. (+4871) 772 66 00 > fax. (+4871) 798 57 75 > www.advatech.pl >=20 > Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru S=C4=85dowego pod numerem 0000145269 > S=C4=85d Rejonowy dla Wroc=C5=82awia - Fabrycznej we Wroc=C5=82awiu VI Wyd= zia=C5=82=20 > Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru S=C4=85dowego > NIP: PL 899-21-85-891 > Kapita=C5=82 zak=C5=82adowy 50 000 z=C5=82, kapita=C5=82 w=C5=82asny 6 68= 6 037 z=C5=82 > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 09:31:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62918106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Traiano.Welcome@mtnbusiness.co.za) Received: from smtprelay01.ops.mtnbusiness.co.za (smtprelay01.ops.mtnbusiness.co.za [41.181.93.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6503F8FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [196.30.97.135] (helo=CPT-EXCH01.int.mtnbusiness.net) by smtprelay01.ops.mtnbusiness.co.za with esmtp (ULTRA Special SMTP Internal Alpha) (envelope-from ) id 1S2fsk-000GZn-HJ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:31:34 +0200 Received: from CPT-EXCH01.int.mtnbusiness.net ([196.30.97.135]) by CPT-EXCH01.int.mtnbusiness.net ([196.30.97.135]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:31:26 +0200 From: Traiano Welcome To: Damien Fleuriot , Mariusz Herman Thread-Topic: request a quote Thread-Index: AQHM9sK2ue3iSsTFSEeEMQSIWjosyZZTeKIAgAAjqQA= Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:31:25 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <2A6E4B6A-8FE7-4AAC-93C6-B5FDD02ADB18@my.gd> Accept-Language: en-US, en-ZA Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121 x-originating-ip: [196.30.72.139] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-ID: <87A41BDEAA02544396FF5722B93B0326@int.mtnbusiness.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd questions Subject: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:31:45 -0000 On 29/02/2012 11:23, "Damien Fleuriot" wrote: >5-star rating this gem right now. > > > > > >This does, however, raise an interesting question. > >Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support >and engineering ? >Like, a la RHEL or SLES. The only one that comes a close match is: http://www.ixsystems.com/ix/support/software/freebsd-support?gclid=3DCLjug= vH vwq4CFUcTfAodSQp_Vw I saw their advert in BSD Mag. > >Excluding dedicated servers rental, since they don't actually provide the >real support. > > > >On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:59, Mariusz Herman wrote: > >> Hi, >>=20 >> I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for >> FreeBSD. >>=20 >> For configuration: >>=20 >> Lp >> Model >> Description >> Qty >> 1.0 >> 7100139 >> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: model family >> 4 >> 1.1 >> 7100142 >> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: 3 RU base chassis with motherboard and 2 PSUs >> 4 >> 1.2 >> 7100140 >> 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E7-4820 8-core 2 GHz processors (for factory >> installation) >> 8 >> 1.3 >> 7100166 >> Two 8-DIMM riser cards (for factory installation) >> 16 >> 1.4 >> 7100152 >> Two 4 GB DDR3-1333 DIMMs (for factory installation) >> 48 >> 1.5 >> 2352A >> 2 memory DIMM slot filler (for factory installation) >> 80 >> 1.6 >> RB-SS2CF-300G10K2 >> One 300 GB 10000 rpm 2.5-inch SAS-2 HDD with bracket (for factory >> installation) >> 8 >> 1.7 >> 6331A-N >> 2.5-inch HDD filler panel (for factory installation) >> 16 >> 1.8 >> 8370A >> DVD-RW drive (for factory installation) >> 4 >> 1.9 >> SG-SAS6-INT-Z >> Sun Storage 6 Gb SAS PCIe HBA, Internal: 8 port (for factory >>Installation) >> 4 >> 1.10 >> 4446A-Z-N >> Sun x4 Quad-port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter UTP >> 8 >> 1.11 >> 5394A >> PCIe filler panel (for factory installation) >> 32 >> 1.12 >> 2365A >> Tool-less rackmount rail kit (for factory Installation) >> 4 >> 1.13 >> 2364A >> Cable management arm (for factory installation) >> 4 >> 1.14 >> SR-JUMP-1MC13 >> Power cord: Sun Rack 2 jumper, 1 meter, C14RA plug, C13 connector, 13 A >> (for factory installation) >> 8 >>=20 >> _____________________________________ >> Kind regards >> Mariusz Herman >> Sales Support Specialist >>=20 >> e-mail: mherman@advatech.pl >> tel. (+4871) 772 66 08 >> kom. +48 661 917 210 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Advatech Sp. z o.o. >> ul. Kleci=F1ska 123 >> 54-413 Wroc=B3aw >> tel. (+4871) 772 66 00 >> fax. (+4871) 798 57 75 >> www.advatech.pl >>=20 >> Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru S=B1dowego pod numerem 0000145269 >> S=B1d Rejonowy dla Wroc=B3awia - Fabrycznej we Wroc=B3awiu VI Wydzia=B3 >> Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru S=B1dowego >> NIP: PL 899-21-85-891 >> Kapita=B3 zak=B3adowy 50 000 z=B3, kapita=B3 w=B3asny 6 686 037 z=B3 >>=20 >>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 09:33:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D91106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jherman@dichotomia.fr) Received: from mail.dichotomia.fr (hydrogen.dichotomia.net [91.121.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024048FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.11] (unknown [109.190.13.180]) (Authenticated sender: kha@dichotomia.fr) by sslmail.dichotomia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95D0B3DD07D for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:33:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4F4DF0BE.8030101@dichotomia.fr> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:32:46 +0100 From: Jerome Herman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2A6E4B6A-8FE7-4AAC-93C6-B5FDD02ADB18@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <2A6E4B6A-8FE7-4AAC-93C6-B5FDD02ADB18@my.gd> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (sslmail.dichotomia.fr); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:33:27 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:33:59 -0000 On 29/02/2012 10:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > 5-star rating this gem right now. > > > > > > This does, however, raise an interesting question. > > Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support and engineering ? > Like, a la RHEL or SLES. > > Excluding dedicated servers rental, since they don't actually provide the real support. There a few indeed, but I am not quite sure how the mailing list mainteners would take it if we were to publicize them here. The makers of PC-BSD offers this kind of service. Jerome Herman > > > > On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:59, Mariusz Herman wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for >> FreeBSD. >> >> For configuration: >> >> Lp >> Model >> Description >> Qty >> 1.0 >> 7100139 >> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: model family >> 4 >> 1.1 >> 7100142 >> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: 3 RU base chassis with motherboard and 2 PSUs >> 4 >> 1.2 >> 7100140 >> 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E7-4820 8-core 2 GHz processors (for factory >> installation) >> 8 >> 1.3 >> 7100166 >> Two 8-DIMM riser cards (for factory installation) >> 16 >> 1.4 >> 7100152 >> Two 4 GB DDR3-1333 DIMMs (for factory installation) >> 48 >> 1.5 >> 2352A >> 2 memory DIMM slot filler (for factory installation) >> 80 >> 1.6 >> RB-SS2CF-300G10K2 >> One 300 GB 10000 rpm 2.5-inch SAS-2 HDD with bracket (for factory >> installation) >> 8 >> 1.7 >> 6331A-N >> 2.5-inch HDD filler panel (for factory installation) >> 16 >> 1.8 >> 8370A >> DVD-RW drive (for factory installation) >> 4 >> 1.9 >> SG-SAS6-INT-Z >> Sun Storage 6 Gb SAS PCIe HBA, Internal: 8 port (for factory Installation) >> 4 >> 1.10 >> 4446A-Z-N >> Sun x4 Quad-port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter UTP >> 8 >> 1.11 >> 5394A >> PCIe filler panel (for factory installation) >> 32 >> 1.12 >> 2365A >> Tool-less rackmount rail kit (for factory Installation) >> 4 >> 1.13 >> 2364A >> Cable management arm (for factory installation) >> 4 >> 1.14 >> SR-JUMP-1MC13 >> Power cord: Sun Rack 2 jumper, 1 meter, C14RA plug, C13 connector, 13 A >> (for factory installation) >> 8 >> >> _____________________________________ >> Kind regards >> Mariusz Herman >> Sales Support Specialist >> >> e-mail: mherman@advatech.pl >> tel. (+4871) 772 66 08 >> kom. +48 661 917 210 >> >> >> >> >> Advatech Sp. z o.o. >> ul. Klecińska 123 >> 54-413 Wrocław >> tel. (+4871) 772 66 00 >> fax. (+4871) 798 57 75 >> www.advatech.pl >> >> Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego pod numerem 0000145269 >> Sąd Rejonowy dla Wrocławia - Fabrycznej we Wrocławiu VI Wydział >> Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru Sądowego >> NIP: PL 899-21-85-891 >> Kapitał zakładowy 50 000 zł, kapitał własny 6 686 037 zł >> ======================================================================================== >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 09:38:39 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D4C106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:38:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MHerman@advatech.pl) Received: from jehu.advatech.pl (jehu.advatech.pl [217.30.156.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116388FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:38:33 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: References: <2A6E4B6A-8FE7-4AAC-93C6-B5FDD02ADB18@my.gd> To: Traiano Welcome MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KeepSent: 06619B1F:D1856168-C12579B3:0034D77C; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1 September 28, 2009 Message-ID: From: Mariusz Herman Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:38:29 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on jehu/AES at 29/02/2012 10:38:33, Serialize complete at 29/02/2012 10:38:33 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="=_related 0034F7CFC12579B3_=" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Damien Fleuriot , freebsd questions Subject: ODP: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:38:39 -0000 To jest wieloczciowa wiadomo w formacie MIME. --=_related 0034F7CFC12579B3_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Thank you a lot for link. That would very helpful. Have a nice day. =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=20 Kind regards Mariusz Herman Sales Support Specialist e-mail: mherman@advatech.pl=20 tel. (+4871) 772 66 08 kom. +48 661 917 210 =20 Advatech Sp. z o.o. ul. Kleci=F1ska 123 54-413 Wroc=B3aw tel. (+4871) 772 66 00 fax. (+4871) 798 57 75 www.advatech.pl Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru S=B1dowego pod numerem 0000145269 S=B1d Rejonowy dla Wroc=B3awia - Fabrycznej we Wroc=B3awiu VI Wydzia=B3=20 Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru S=B1dowego NIP: PL 899-21-85-891 Kapita=B3 zak=B3adowy 50 000 z=B3, kapita=B3 w=B3asny 6 686 037 z=B3 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20 Od: Traiano Welcome Do: Damien Fleuriot , Mariusz Herman DW: freebsd questions Data: 2012-02-29 10:31 Temat: Re: request a quote On 29/02/2012 11:23, "Damien Fleuriot" wrote: >5-star rating this gem right now. > > > > > >This does, however, raise an interesting question. > >Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support >and engineering ? >Like, a la RHEL or SLES. The only one that comes a close match is: =20 http://www.ixsystems.com/ix/support/software/freebsd-support?gclid=3DCLjugvH vwq4CFUcTfAodSQp=5FVw I saw their advert in BSD Mag. > >Excluding dedicated servers rental, since they don't actually provide the >real support. > > > >On 29 Feb 2012, at 09:59, Mariusz Herman wrote: > >> Hi, >>=20 >> I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for >> FreeBSD. >>=20 >> For configuration: >>=20 >> Lp >> Model >> Description >> Qty >> 1.0 >> 7100139 >> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: model family >> 4 >> 1.1 >> 7100142 >> Sun Fire X4470 M2 server: 3 RU base chassis with motherboard and 2 PSUs >> 4 >> 1.2 >> 7100140 >> 2 Intel(R) Xeon(R) E7-4820 8-core 2 GHz processors (for factory >> installation) >> 8 >> 1.3 >> 7100166 >> Two 8-DIMM riser cards (for factory installation) >> 16 >> 1.4 >> 7100152 >> Two 4 GB DDR3-1333 DIMMs (for factory installation) >> 48 >> 1.5 >> 2352A >> 2 memory DIMM slot filler (for factory installation) >> 80 >> 1.6 >> RB-SS2CF-300G10K2 >> One 300 GB 10000 rpm 2.5-inch SAS-2 HDD with bracket (for factory >> installation) >> 8 >> 1.7 >> 6331A-N >> 2.5-inch HDD filler panel (for factory installation) >> 16 >> 1.8 >> 8370A >> DVD-RW drive (for factory installation) >> 4 >> 1.9 >> SG-SAS6-INT-Z >> Sun Storage 6 Gb SAS PCIe HBA, Internal: 8 port (for factory >>Installation) >> 4 >> 1.10 >> 4446A-Z-N >> Sun x4 Quad-port Gigabit Ethernet Adapter UTP >> 8 >> 1.11 >> 5394A >> PCIe filler panel (for factory installation) >> 32 >> 1.12 >> 2365A >> Tool-less rackmount rail kit (for factory Installation) >> 4 >> 1.13 >> 2364A >> Cable management arm (for factory installation) >> 4 >> 1.14 >> SR-JUMP-1MC13 >> Power cord: Sun Rack 2 jumper, 1 meter, C14RA plug, C13 connector, 13 A >> (for factory installation) >> 8 >>=20 >> =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F >> Kind regards >> Mariusz Herman >> Sales Support Specialist >>=20 >> e-mail: mherman@advatech.pl >> tel. (+4871) 772 66 08 >> kom. +48 661 917 210 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> Advatech Sp. z o.o. >> ul. Kleci=F1ska 123 >> 54-413 Wroc=B3aw >> tel. (+4871) 772 66 00 >> fax. (+4871) 798 57 75 >> www.advatech.pl >>=20 >> Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru S=B1dowego pod numerem 0000145269 >> S=B1d Rejonowy dla Wroc=B3awia - Fabrycznej we Wroc=B3awiu VI Wydzia=B3 >> Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru S=B1dowego >> NIP: PL 899-21-85-891 >> Kapita=B3 zak=B3adowy 50 000 z=B3, kapita=B3 w=B3asny 6 686 037 z=B3 >>=20 >>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D >>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20 >> =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=_related 0034F7CFC12579B3_=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 09:39:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DD0F1065674 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:39:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEEB8FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:39:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1T9cvvL016686 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:39:02 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q1T9cvvL016686 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/q1T9cvvL016686; dkim=none (no signature); dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <4F4DF228.30406@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:38:48 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE4B89D58BAAB179BE8947318" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Subject: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:39:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE4B89D58BAAB179BE8947318 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/02/2012 08:59, Mariusz Herman wrote: > I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for=20 > FreeBSD. You seem to be under a misapprehension of what FreeBSD.org is. We aren't an Operating Systems vendor that offers a product for sale. Instead, we are a group of like-minded people who like to produce and give away, for free, an operating system. There isn't really any overarching company that offers FreeBSD support in the way you are looking for; instead, you should look for a contractor -- the freebsd-jobs@freebsd.org list might be a better place to ask. Considering the list of hardware you've supplied -- I can't see any obvious problems with FreeBSD compatibility (but I could be wrong) -- however, that's the sort of thing that tends to get sorted out in the first day or so of work. Could you expand a bit more on what you want in terms of FreeBSD support? What the purpose of the system is to be, what applications you want to run, expectations of what you want the support person to provide? Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --------------enigE4B89D58BAAB179BE8947318 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9N8jEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzhHQCfQFsXvDaDWxxXFxE/V8NVfz2j bOIAn1659nOJNHqy0KAdIPzdyfClTqqx =Nl4c -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE4B89D58BAAB179BE8947318-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 09:58:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99491106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:58:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141A68FC17 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1T9w60N017057 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:58:06 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q1T9w60N017057 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330509489; bh=4R8GaheygrDG0GuC6DCTrV0AgJI43eu0hyQcvSxwb2I=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=tu9ChlgpuIEAGHmlZYmVixhuf0gAh82w0a04AnEGHk/fPmhiT/84Rw2NkiPJ4Oezs goIJikbKviO7xrGsXNRK3FuwmoLn+RXXQbls2hm4AByAxUEuZbZrhYQSvz4Y9FQkiV 2H8DR300qbDoo2zqqWdAzWU7KSh0GXpXpBVSM39g= Message-ID: <4F4DF6AE.3010903@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:58:06 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2A6E4B6A-8FE7-4AAC-93C6-B5FDD02ADB18@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <2A6E4B6A-8FE7-4AAC-93C6-B5FDD02ADB18@my.gd> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0B8DF8801BDF964A49E606C8" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:58:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0B8DF8801BDF964A49E606C8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/02/2012 09:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > This does, however, raise an interesting question. >=20 > Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support= and engineering ? > Like, a la RHEL or SLES. None that I know of. People have tried to set up such things in the past, and unfortunately have failed miserably. The closest thing is iXSystems -- but their primary business is supplying hardware, and while they do provide FreeBSD support, their offering is US centric -- maybe even US-West Coast focussed. Personally I think that having a commercial entity behind FreeBSD in this way would be a good thing. As a central provider that will help promote FreeBSD commercial usage and fund a deal of development that nowadays either doesn't happen, or that takes far too long, and provide employment for FreeBSD developers and admins, it certainly has some obvious benefits. Setting up such an entity and making it work as a profitable concern is an entirely different matter. It's a competitive market out there, an a new company would be going up against the likes of RedHat, Microsoft, Oracle and other well established behemoths. While I think that FreeBSD and FreeBSD people have the technical quality to succeed, what is missing is the business capability -- people who can go out and sell FreeBSD and that can attract investors and make them feel confident that they can invest. That's pretty rare to find in combination with the sort of technical expertise the FreeBSD project (unconciously) selects fo= r. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig0B8DF8801BDF964A49E606C8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9N9q4ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIypwwCeMRS3pRB4Vd9r/7Vd8vflgA8n 43cAoIIXVclv9FH8CeUHLLIakfGphQ1j =NMnk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0B8DF8801BDF964A49E606C8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 10:44:41 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7222F106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:44:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8348FC19 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S2h1S-0000Iq-Qe for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:44:38 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([np-19-75.prenet.pl]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:44:38 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:44:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:44:22 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1) Subject: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:44:41 -0000 Mariusz Herman advatech.pl> writes: > > Hi, > > I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for > FreeBSD. > ... This may help (NetBSD and FreeBSD support comes in pairs): http://netbsd.org/gallery/consultants.html jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 11:03:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85279106566C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:03:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3B78FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so3910605bkc.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:03:29 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.204.174.13 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.204.174.13; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of ml@my.gd designates 10.204.174.13 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=ml@my.gd Received: from mr.google.com ([10.204.174.13]) by 10.204.174.13 with SMTP id r13mr11386179bkz.122.1330513409888 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:03:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.174.13 with SMTP id r13mr9246440bkz.122.1330513409714; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:03:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y9sm36667441bkw.5.2012.02.29.03.03.28 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 03:03:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4E05FF.5030409@my.gd> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:03:27 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2A6E4B6A-8FE7-4AAC-93C6-B5FDD02ADB18@my.gd> <4F4DF6AE.3010903@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F4DF6AE.3010903@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2OUC6EcwLxNxkkOUhoEjcNiUguN/tDawFMpE/yFNgluarAhYLQZhZk3jjuPZjOGBdC0VT Subject: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:03:31 -0000 On 2/29/12 10:58 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 29/02/2012 09:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >> This does, however, raise an interesting question. >> >> Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd support and engineering ? >> Like, a la RHEL or SLES. > > None that I know of. People have tried to set up such things in the > past, and unfortunately have failed miserably. > > The closest thing is iXSystems -- but their primary business is > supplying hardware, and while they do provide FreeBSD support, their > offering is US centric -- maybe even US-West Coast focussed. > > Personally I think that having a commercial entity behind FreeBSD in > this way would be a good thing. As a central provider that will help > promote FreeBSD commercial usage and fund a deal of development that > nowadays either doesn't happen, or that takes far too long, and provide > employment for FreeBSD developers and admins, it certainly has some > obvious benefits. > That was the point of my question exactly. Having worked in a banking environment in the past, I can tell that high profile companies shun open source software UNLESS they can get a support contract. That's the reason Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Suse Linux Enterprise Server are successful, not only do they provide the software, but they also sell the support contract and guarantees that go with it. Such a business model would imo do wonders to promote FreeBSD as a professional OS. > Setting up such an entity and making it work as a profitable concern is > an entirely different matter. It's a competitive market out there, an a > new company would be going up against the likes of RedHat, Microsoft, > Oracle and other well established behemoths. While I think that FreeBSD > and FreeBSD people have the technical quality to succeed, what is > missing is the business capability -- people who can go out and sell > FreeBSD and that can attract investors and make them feel confident that > they can invest. That's pretty rare to find in combination with the > sort of technical expertise the FreeBSD project (unconciously) selects for. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 11:42:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449681065673 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:42:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2E38FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:42:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1TBg5Fu018631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:42:06 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q1TBg5Fu018631 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330515726; bh=nSH9+ts1bGukSlwOn8dailgMrYcPywSJWE6fCSoHgvo=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=J/i1R56Ku8CoMkIktecwIECMK3vOLQ4/bffXNNikzrAv0XufCXd6S1hqmaMv1jrtt Fz5tpTDVVut7Q5MSIiBsfRrLJO8E4RqyrI4NdslN25XsvoyCxfAQLeLshx8dSnEtes SXbSxbiCd6hP0fn87Af/03YSTH7z6+9rKMMls2kc= Message-ID: <4F4E0F06.3010305@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:41:58 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <2A6E4B6A-8FE7-4AAC-93C6-B5FDD02ADB18@my.gd> <4F4DF6AE.3010903@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4F4E05FF.5030409@my.gd> In-Reply-To: <4F4E05FF.5030409@my.gd> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigDBB74AA93A5D74F81472C920" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:42:17 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigDBB74AA93A5D74F81472C920 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 29/02/2012 11:03, Damien Fleuriot wrote: > Having worked in a banking environment in the past, I can tell that hig= h > profile companies shun open source software UNLESS they can get a > support contract. >=20 > That's the reason Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Suse Linux Enterprise > Server are successful, not only do they provide the software, but they > also sell the support contract and guarantees that go with it. >=20 > Such a business model would imo do wonders to promote FreeBSD as a > professional OS. Like I said though -- the problem is not with having such a business, but with establishing the business. Even a company like iXSystems that has been active in this area for more than 10 years has not managed to grow into a company with a visible global presence. It is also the case that many large concerns simply will not deal with small companies: unless your balance-sheet and turnover are "big enough" you just don't get a look in on any contracts that may be available. (Yes, this is a short-sighted approach, but you can appreciate the reasoning behind it: small companies are much riskier propositions, and do tend to go bust much more easily.) If there's anybody out there that knows how to do this -- take an idea and turn it into a working business -- but doesn't have the right idea yet: look over here! Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigDBB74AA93A5D74F81472C920 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9ODw0ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxgGACfYzE+ziO1CIgersSCRG5dkQbv QwMAn1JYMYEjcIxRYFyqVOEbd7QE8Ugq =/vT0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigDBB74AA93A5D74F81472C920-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 12:21:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1D91065787 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Traiano.Welcome@mtnbusiness.co.za) Received: from smtprelay01.ops.mtnbusiness.co.za (smtprelay01.ops.mtnbusiness.co.za [41.181.93.235]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB03D8FC17 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [196.30.97.135] (helo=CPT-EXCH01.int.mtnbusiness.net) by smtprelay01.ops.mtnbusiness.co.za with esmtp (ULTRA Special SMTP Internal Alpha) (envelope-from ) id 1S2iXa-000LCw-4r; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:21:54 +0200 Received: from CPT-EXCH01.int.mtnbusiness.net ([196.30.97.135]) by CPT-EXCH01.int.mtnbusiness.net ([196.30.97.135]) with mapi id 14.01.0218.012; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:21:49 +0200 From: Traiano Welcome To: Damien Fleuriot , freebsd questions Thread-Topic: request a quote Thread-Index: AQHM9sK2ue3iSsTFSEeEMQSIWjosyZZTeKIAgAAJlQCAABJCgIAAN22A Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:21:48 +0000 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4F4E05FF.5030409@my.gd> Accept-Language: en-US, en-ZA Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121 x-originating-ip: [196.30.72.139] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:21:58 -0000 On 29/02/2012 13:03, "Damien Fleuriot" wrote: > > >On 2/29/12 10:58 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 29/02/2012 09:23, Damien Fleuriot wrote: >>> This does, however, raise an interesting question. >>> >>> Do you guys know of any company whose business model is freebsd >>>support and engineering ? >>> Like, a la RHEL or SLES. >>=20 >> None that I know of. People have tried to set up such things in the >> past, and unfortunately have failed miserably. >>=20 >> The closest thing is iXSystems -- but their primary business is >> supplying hardware, and while they do provide FreeBSD support, their >> offering is US centric -- maybe even US-West Coast focussed. >>=20 >> Personally I think that having a commercial entity behind FreeBSD in >> this way would be a good thing. As a central provider that will help >> promote FreeBSD commercial usage and fund a deal of development that >> nowadays either doesn't happen, or that takes far too long, and provide >> employment for FreeBSD developers and admins, it certainly has some >> obvious benefits. >>=20 > >That was the point of my question exactly. > >Having worked in a banking environment in the past, I can tell that high >profile companies shun open source software UNLESS they can get a >support contract. > >That's the reason Red Hat Enterprise Linux and Suse Linux Enterprise >Server are successful, not only do they provide the software, but they >also sell the support contract and guarantees that go with it. > > >Such a business model would imo do wonders to promote FreeBSD as a >professional OS. I can vouch for the fact that most of the big ISPs in South Africa (for example) are big users of FreeBSD, but often end up purchasing RedHat or SuSE support contracts to run vendor applications that are only supported on an O.S with a clear line of enterprise vendor support ... > > > > >> Setting up such an entity and making it work as a profitable concern is >> an entirely different matter. It's a competitive market out there, an a >> new company would be going up against the likes of RedHat, Microsoft, >> Oracle and other well established behemoths. While I think that FreeBSD >> and FreeBSD people have the technical quality to succeed, what is >> missing is the business capability -- people who can go out and sell >> FreeBSD and that can attract investors and make them feel confident that >> they can invest. That's pretty rare to find in combination with the >> sort of technical expertise the FreeBSD project (unconciously) selects >>for. >>=20 >> Cheers, >>=20 >> Matthew >>=20 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 13:14:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 635A8106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:14:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milu@dat.pl) Received: from jab.dat.pl (dat.pl [80.51.155.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E14E08FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jab.dat.pl (jsrv.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) by jab.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EAFF7; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:14:11 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dat.pl Received: from jab.dat.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by jab.dat.pl (jab.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id lJ69Aq5UV-Sn; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:14:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from snifi.localnet (unknown [212.69.68.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jab.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CB65128; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:14:04 +0100 (CET) From: Maciej Milewski To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:14:23 +0100 Message-ID: <3964897.NONTnNlzpI@snifi> User-Agent: KMail/4.8.0 (Linux/3.2.7-1-ARCH; KDE/4.8.0; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <7783796.gZcd11fCqx@snifi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "bsalinux@gmail.com" Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:14:13 -0000 Dnia wtorek, 28 lutego 2012 15:32:18 bsalinux@gmail.com pisze: > Maciej > > I didn't know if the label would work in loader.conf. > > This solution suggested by Adam worked and seems much simpler than > labeling the filesystem. Depends on your needs. For me it was essential to have the same name of the disk no matter to what server I connect it. Label is working fine for me. Anyway I'm glad that you resolved your problem. Have a nice day, Maciej From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 13:42:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB21D106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3718FC17 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.36]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 29 Feb 2012 08:42:22 -0500 Received: from smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.104]) by mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BPR06968; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:42:21 -0500 Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 29 Feb 2012 08:42:21 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20302.11068.426551.17422@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:42:20 -0500 To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr16.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: "bsalinux@gmail.com" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:42:23 -0000 Polytropon writes: > Label the drives and use labels instead of device names. > > Get some inspiration from Warren's excellent article here: > http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html Good piece, but it doesn't explicitly cover one case and "man" provides no example. I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was (obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached. Can I add a label to that partition later? "man gpart" only shows a label being added when the partition is created, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 13:48:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545F8106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:48:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E798FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so662829lag.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:48:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of wodfer@gmail.com designates 10.112.45.74 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.45.74; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of wodfer@gmail.com designates 10.112.45.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=wodfer@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=wodfer@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.45.74]) by 10.112.45.74 with SMTP id k10mr123029lbm.107.1330523323992 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:48:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KwT/gOAapUqCq4N5ktaDO60kGUvCepOWfTwtW+uP6QE=; b=FXDToTKKQf7l9lRAgeFTIzFm3R2VxvJnf42HYGUlVV+oTVZbuKoFudyQYQwDLm26m8 kd+1H1bk9S7Zf8xjVDqITvXAbYZjs/7lhcm2VSro+2+URdiVr0b6ABZ6AE4cKAhIOanz MCTwg0Lrn2XfwhVZywriIz8GZOhrSk88uEeVo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.45.74 with SMTP id k10mr101426lbm.107.1330523323923; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:48:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.112.34 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 05:48:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:48:43 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Wodfer To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Help compiling ffmpeg from source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:48:46 -0000 I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64). I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is installed from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there. Heres what I do: ./configure gmake and the problem looks like this: [snip] /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,2)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1 Any idea what I can do to fix this? Thanks! Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 13:55:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB31D106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:55:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693A78FC13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:55:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1179B5C28 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:09:21 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4859E5C22 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:09:21 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F4E2D3D.3020905@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:50:53 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:55:54 -0000 On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote: > I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64). > > I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I > must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is installed > from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there. > > Heres what I do: > > ./configure > gmake > > and the problem looks like this: > > [snip] > /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is not a > valid 64 bit base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is not a > valid 64 bit base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a > valid 64 bit base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,2)' is not > a valid 64 bit base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is not a > valid 64 bit base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is not a > valid 64 bit base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a > valid 64 bit base/index expression > gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1 Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of trouble if I remember correctly). The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working solo. HTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 14:09:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5857106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:09:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9DC8FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so694476lag.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:09:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of wodfer@gmail.com designates 10.152.112.132 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.152.112.132; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of wodfer@gmail.com designates 10.152.112.132 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=wodfer@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=wodfer@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.152.112.132]) by 10.152.112.132 with SMTP id iq4mr409072lab.28.1330524586086 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:09:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=YOut7VM9VwBKhg5Cd54BdsgwWJpLQkjEYCPrZpBEsZI=; b=UqTWbwjbev+scM6/VcPyhz1Ke+xRBQVUOCUaka106X1xj9LwdeJW8s50hmH0MhAuX1 58COM/ERZRCzQG/GQLx0RoC+GIFLN8WTzAwEPeOY2fm6sSdC5Gyck8XEOSlRcHV+Bxdu BAhshIX7AfrZwwtJS/SxnihFKtd5zSgHf7iQg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.112.132 with SMTP id iq4mr333466lab.28.1330524585986; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:09:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.112.34 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 06:09:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4E2D3D.3020905@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F4E2D3D.3020905@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:09:45 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Wodfer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:09:47 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock < freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: > On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote: > >> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64). >> >> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I >> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is >> installed >> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there. >> >> Heres what I do: >> >> ./configure >> gmake >> >> and the problem looks like this: >> >> [snip] >> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is not a >> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is not a >> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a >> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)' >> is not >> a valid 64 bit base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is not a >> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is not a >> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a >> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1 >> > Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every > time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of > trouble if I remember correctly). > > The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working solo. > > Ok - thanks! I'm currently doing this: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html I will report back on how it goes. :-) Cheers, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 14:55:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBB51065674 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:55:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A371C8FC13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1TEtZ36079193; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:55:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q1TEtZWe079190; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:55:35 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:55:35 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Robert Huff In-Reply-To: <20302.11068.426551.17422@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Message-ID: References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> <20302.11068.426551.17422@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:55:35 -0700 (MST) Cc: Polytropon , "bsalinux@gmail.com" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:55:39 -0000 On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Robert Huff wrote: > > Polytropon writes: > >> Label the drives and use labels instead of device names. >> >> Get some inspiration from Warren's excellent article here: >> http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/disksetup.html > > Good piece, but it doesn't explicitly cover one case and "man" > provides no example. > I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was > (obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached. > Can I add a label to that partition later? "man gpart" only > shows a label being added when the partition is created, (untested) # gpart modify -i 2 -l mylabel ada0 There's also http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/labels.html , which talks about filesystem labels. UFS labels can be added later with tunefs(8). I really need to do a combined article that covers all the different types of labels. It's on the list. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 15:31:14 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E7A106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:31:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Received: from ozzie.tundraware.com (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6FE78FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:31:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by ozzie.tundraware.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1TFV2Dm071217 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:31:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from tundra@tundraware.com) Message-ID: <4F4E44B1.30207@tundraware.com> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:30:57 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk Organization: TundraWare Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (ozzie.tundraware.com [75.145.138.73]); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:31:05 -0600 (CST) X-TundraWare-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-TundraWare-MailScanner-ID: q1TFV2Dm071217 X-TundraWare-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-TundraWare-MailScanner-From: tundra@tundraware.com X-Spam-Status: No Subject: FreeBSD And ARM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tundra@tundraware.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:31:14 -0000 I'm not quite sure where to ask this so even a pointer to the right place would be appreciated: Is there any intent/work underway to port FBSD to the Raspberry PI ARM SBC? At $35 this thing looks perfect for firewall/DNS/dhcp boundary machines. Thanks, ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Tim Daneliuk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 15:33:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C211065675 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:33:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 833B98FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:33:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 29 Feb 2012 10:33:18 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA) with ESMTP id BJD20293; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:33:18 -0500 Received-SPF: None identity=pra; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None identity=helo; client-ip=209.6.86.84; receiver=smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net; envelope-from="roberthuff@rcn.com"; x-sender="postmaster@jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received: from 209-6-86-84.c3-0.smr-ubr2.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.86.84]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 29 Feb 2012 10:33:19 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <20302.17725.515279.964152@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:33:17 -0500 To: "bsalinux@gmail.com" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> <20302.11068.426551.17422@jerusalem.litteratus.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: Subject: disk labels (was: Re: fixating USB Storage) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:33:19 -0000 Warren Block writes: > > I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was > > (obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached. > > Can I add a label to that partition later? "man gpart" only > > shows a label being added when the partition is created, > > (untested) > # gpart modify -i 2 -l mylabel ada0 I did this, and nothing exploded. :-) When (and where) should I expect to see these appear under /dev? Immediately? After rebooting? I want to edit fstab, but want to be clear on how. Respectfully, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 15:52:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B2F106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:52:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C6688FC2B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:52:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1TFq1aU028612; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:52:01 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <4F4E49A1.9030609@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:52:01 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120219 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: tundra@tundraware.com References: <4F4E44B1.30207@tundraware.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4E44B1.30207@tundraware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: FreeBSD And ARM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:52:08 -0000 On 02/29/12 15:30, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > I'm not quite sure where to ask this so even a pointer to the > right place would be appreciated: > > Is there any intent/work underway to port FBSD to the Raspberry PI > ARM SBC? At $35 this thing looks perfect for firewall/DNS/dhcp > boundary machines. +1 on the question as I'd like to use these devices for a variety of things (stratum 1 NTP server with a USB GPS attached, cheap and cheerful low power file/web server, media box maybe) and I'm far happier with FBSD than Linux. For firewall use remember that the Model B has only one ether socket (and the Model A has none). Anyone know how good USB ether adapters are? I've never used one. Of course, all this presumes you can actually get one, which has proved difficult - all 10,000 units in the first batch went in a few minutes. :-( From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 16:22:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AC2106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:22:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B70848FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6713CD26; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:22:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q1TGM7Zd001955; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:22:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:22:07 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Message-Id: <20120229172207.0db7326f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> <20302.11068.426551.17422@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fixating USB Storage X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:22:10 -0000 On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:55:35 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote: > I really need to do a combined article that covers all the > different types of labels. It's on the list. Please be so kind and also mention ufsid "labels" (unique file system id) in that article. Why? "Any partitions with ufsid labels can be mounted in this way, eliminating the need to create permanent labels for them manually, while still enjoying the benefits of device-name independent mounting." ... even though they are "not normal words" in a typical reader's mind. :-) They can be found explained in The FreeBSD Handbook at 20.7.1: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-glabel.html (bottom of the page) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 16:48:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E3CE106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB388FC1E for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:48:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so3184319wib.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of illoai@gmail.com designates 10.180.7.231 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.7.231; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of illoai@gmail.com designates 10.180.7.231 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=illoai@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=illoai@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.7.231]) by 10.180.7.231 with SMTP id m7mr23196560wia.3.1330534100846 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:48:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=tcqtNsBB+rcBGxziYf+94zN8dypi8Xpj1cTbcOvDcyQ=; b=bceORLoMyzvQ0G7JaEpD8AMDTSZ+ExPdI1Uyjm7QsmRzUUty2Z5c2abfADPvsPH5n6 bQQWA/J1oIu1EfB8uo06a9fVUBMHS9ECBSDRtHJdyXX4QGpen2h+0nElb92Fezu0hmoe +T0kpIYJp9DF5YciNMsbsGrW2Gl/iiYxYa9/0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.7.231 with SMTP id m7mr18586957wia.3.1330534100800; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:48:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.5.142 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 08:48:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20302.17725.515279.964152@jerusalem.litteratus.org> References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> <20302.11068.426551.17422@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20302.17725.515279.964152@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:48:20 -0500 Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Robert Huff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "bsalinux@gmail.com" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk labels (was: Re: fixating USB Storage) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:48:22 -0000 On 29 February 2012 10:33, Robert Huff wrote: > > Warren Block writes: >> =A0> =A0 =A0I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was >> =A0> (obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached. >> =A0> =A0 =A0Can I add a label to that partition later? =A0"man gpart" on= ly >> =A0> shows a label being added when the partition is created, >> >> =A0(untested) >> =A0# gpart modify -i 2 -l mylabel ada0 > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0I did this, and nothing exploded. =A0:-) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0When (and where) should I expect to see these appear under > /dev? =A0Immediately? =A0After rebooting? =A0I want to edit fstab, but > want to be clear on how. > The label(s) should be accessible immediately, HOWEVER: if the filesystem is mounted rw they'll be lost on reboot. So you probably want to do the labelling from single-user mode. --=20 -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 17:18:21 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07941065672 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:18:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B12B8FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S2nAQ-0006Q2-VC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:18:18 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([np-19-75.prenet.pl]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:18:18 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:18:18 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:18:03 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 145 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1) Subject: hard disk behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:18:22 -0000 Hi, I very often hear this metallic (mechanical) clicking from my hard disk when it is active. I experience this behavior under FreeBSD only (not other OSs). Is there any way to figure out what it means ? Any other tools, except SMART below, to try ? What to look for ? # /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/ada0 smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Family: Western Digital Scorpio Blue Serial ATA Device Model: WDC WD1600BEVS-08RST2 Serial Number: WD-WXC308897633 LU WWN Device Id: 5 0014ee 2abfdb88c Firmware Version: 11.01G11 User Capacity: 160,041,885,696 bytes [160 GB] Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] ATA Version is: 7 ATA Standard is: Exact ATA specification draft version not indicated Local Time is: Wed Feb 29 18:01:06 2012 CET SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED General SMART Values: Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity was never started. Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled. Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine completed without error or no self-test has ever been run. Total time to complete Offline data collection: ( 6780) seconds. Offline data collection capabilities: (0x7b) SMART execute Offline immediate. Auto Offline data collection on/off support. Suspend Offline collection upon new command. Offline surface scan supported. Self-test supported. Conveyance Self-test supported. Selective Self-test supported. SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering power-saving mode. Supports SMART auto save timer. Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported. General Purpose Logging supported. Short self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes. Extended self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 87) minutes. Conveyance self-test routine recommended polling time: ( 6) minutes. SCT capabilities: (0x103f) SCT Status supported. SCT Error Recovery Control supported. SCT Feature Control supported. SCT Data Table supported. SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always - 0 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 188 188 021 Pre-fail Always - 1558 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 972 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always - 0 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 087 087 000 Old_age Always - 10148 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 051 Pre-fail Always - 0 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0012 100 100 051 Old_age Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 773 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 29 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 001 001 000 Old_age Always - 779337 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 115 104 000 Old_age Always - 32 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 253 000 Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0009 100 253 051 Pre-fail Offline - 0 SMART Error Log Version: 1 No Errors Logged SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error # 1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 8212 - SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1 SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS 1 0 0 Not_testing 2 0 0 Not_testing 3 0 0 Not_testing 4 0 0 Not_testing 5 0 0 Not_testing Selective self-test flags (0x0): After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay. [root@localhost /home/jb]# # /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -t short /dev/ada0smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net === START OF OFFLINE IMMEDIATE AND SELF-TEST SECTION === Sending command: "Execute SMART Short self-test routine immediately in off-line mode". Drive command "Execute SMART Short self-test routine immediately in off-line mode" successful. Testing has begun. Please wait 2 minutes for test to complete. Test will complete after Wed Feb 29 18:12:35 2012 Use smartctl -X to abort test. [root@localhost /home/jb]# /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -H /dev/ada0 smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED [root@localhost /home/jb]# jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 17:38:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC22106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:38:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2008FC18 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:38:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q1THcSsX015066; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:38:31 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:38:31 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203010038.31858.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: jb Subject: Re: hard disk behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:38:46 -0000 Hi, On Thursday 01 March 2012 00:18:03 jb wrote: > I very often hear this metallic (mechanical) clicking from my hard disk when > it is active. I experience this behavior under FreeBSD only (not other OSs). > Is there any way to figure out what it means ? > Any other tools, except SMART below, to try ? What to look for ? > nothing seems to be wrong with the disk from my point of view. I have no idea what causes the noise. What is the machine doing when you hear it? Erich > # /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/ada0 > smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386] (local build) > Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net > > === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === > Model Family: Western Digital Scorpio Blue Serial ATA > Device Model: WDC WD1600BEVS-08RST2 > Serial Number: WD-WXC308897633 > LU WWN Device Id: 5 0014ee 2abfdb88c > Firmware Version: 11.01G11 > User Capacity: 160,041,885,696 bytes [160 GB] > Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical > Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] > ATA Version is: 7 > ATA Standard is: Exact ATA specification draft version not indicated > Local Time is: Wed Feb 29 18:01:06 2012 CET > SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. > SMART support is: Enabled > > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === > SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED > > General SMART Values: > Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity > was never started. > Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled. > Self-test execution status: ( 0) The previous self-test routine completed > without error or no self-test has ever > been run. > Total time to complete Offline > data collection: ( 6780) seconds. > Offline data collection > capabilities: (0x7b) SMART execute Offline immediate. > Auto Offline data collection on/off support. > Suspend Offline collection upon new > command. > Offline surface scan supported. > Self-test supported. > Conveyance Self-test supported. > Selective Self-test supported. > SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering > power-saving mode. > Supports SMART auto save timer. > Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported. > General Purpose Logging supported. > Short self-test routine > recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes. > Extended self-test routine > recommended polling time: ( 87) minutes. > Conveyance self-test routine > recommended polling time: ( 6) minutes. > SCT capabilities: (0x103f) SCT Status supported. > SCT Error Recovery Control supported. > SCT Feature Control supported. > SCT Data Table supported. > > SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 16 > Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: > ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED > WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE > 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always - > 0 > 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 188 188 021 Pre-fail Always - > 1558 > 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - > 972 > 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always - > 0 > 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always - > 0 > 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 087 087 000 Old_age Always - > 10148 > 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 051 Pre-fail Always - > 0 > 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0012 100 100 051 Old_age Always - > 0 > 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - > 773 > 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - > 29 > 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 001 001 000 Old_age Always - > 779337 > 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 115 104 000 Old_age Always - > 32 > 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - > 0 > 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 200 200 000 Old_age Always - > 0 > 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 253 000 Old_age Offline - > 0 > 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - > 0 > 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0009 100 253 051 Pre-fail Offline - > 0 > > SMART Error Log Version: 1 > No Errors Logged > > SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 > Num Test_Description Status Remaining LifeTime(hours) > LBA_of_first_error > # 1 Short offline Completed without error 00% 8212 - > > SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1 > SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS > 1 0 0 Not_testing > 2 0 0 Not_testing > 3 0 0 Not_testing > 4 0 0 Not_testing > 5 0 0 Not_testing > Selective self-test flags (0x0): > After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. > If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay. > > [root@localhost /home/jb]# > # /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -t short /dev/ada0smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 > [FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386] (local build) > Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net > > === START OF OFFLINE IMMEDIATE AND SELF-TEST SECTION === > Sending command: "Execute SMART Short self-test routine immediately in off-line > mode". > Drive command "Execute SMART Short self-test routine immediately in off-line > mode" successful. > Testing has begun. > Please wait 2 minutes for test to complete. > Test will complete after Wed Feb 29 18:12:35 2012 > > Use smartctl -X to abort test. > [root@localhost /home/jb]# /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -H /dev/ada0 > smartctl 5.42 2011-10-20 r3458 [FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE i386] (local build) > Copyright (C) 2002-11 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net > > === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === > SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED > > [root@localhost /home/jb]# > jb > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 17:53:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3C711065670 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:53:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dmk.sbor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4D78FC13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:53:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so2373256yhg.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:53:58 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dmk.sbor@gmail.com designates 10.236.72.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.72.170; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of dmk.sbor@gmail.com designates 10.236.72.170 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=dmk.sbor@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=dmk.sbor@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.72.170]) by 10.236.72.170 with SMTP id t30mr1915428yhd.101.1330538038086 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:53:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=+Fx98/tgt+kAZY5/zypbf6P1vskYGg/43XAbqy5vy68=; b=ak8IqZAv+WBjTQ5olfnY8pMn3Flv4fdCxAFLuyvWL+5TuOFI9a8RLrErJpW0X4L4Oy zBuuEdObi5bzrGegcxzzWL1fsEg8/aAWDMtu6Z9DKyydew8Z+weySK77oi6Jb1IszpmC r10w5b8hHrrh2JVOvdtXx+YDXxm7UH5VO2W2Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.72.170 with SMTP id t30mr1521343yhd.101.1330538038044; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:53:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.146.168.1 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:53:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:53:57 +0300 Message-ID: From: "Dmitry S. Kasterin" To: jb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hard disk behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:53:59 -0000 Hi! 2012/2/29, jb : > Hi, > I very often hear this metallic (mechanical) clicking from my hard disk when > it is active. I experience this behavior under FreeBSD only (not other OSs). > Is there any way to figure out what it means ? Some time ago I had a similar problem with an external WD Scorpio Blue disk. As my point of view, it tends to park its heads too often, even under heavy load, so this results in a clicking. As far as I remember, you can check Load_Cycle_Count from SMART output. Take some measurements during minute or two. Rapid growth of this parameter indicates a problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 17:54:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39A8106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F0E48FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werl4 with SMTP id l4so2805463wer.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of amvandemore@gmail.com designates 10.180.99.7 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.99.7; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amvandemore@gmail.com designates 10.180.99.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=amvandemore@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=amvandemore@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.99.7]) by 10.180.99.7 with SMTP id em7mr3057336wib.7.1330538082499 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:54:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=42E9QrX3f++j198+73GNpO3YBuym5gn6lsCwZX6430o=; b=tFKH7hIgYvucR/+EGGF9stxPe9hl7NseHgOEoA/bISK8cxq/Zh2UuFwxcWKoXL+8nA sMJ/HGHb30kR0Nq3dguzeDbVoWjd+X6OViZOYjWff/yyp11+kk0jBR6J98izEmbTM3m5 3Q7gsi+rJkrnzfOidJf5cG68/nuxxyUpznmYA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.99.7 with SMTP id em7mr2452600wib.7.1330538082453; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:54:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.93.138 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:54:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 11:54:42 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: jb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hard disk behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:54:44 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:18 AM, jb wrote: > Hi, > I very often hear this metallic (mechanical) clicking from my hard disk > when > it is active. I experience this behavior under FreeBSD only (not other > OSs). > Is there any way to figure out what it means ? > Any other tools, except SMART below, to try ? What to look for ? > > # /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/ada0 > > 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 001 001 000 Old_age Always > - > 779337 > Likely the noise you are hearing roughly corresponds to Load_Cycle_Count. Yours is quite high. You may be able to use sysutils/ataidle to disable the parking like so: ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0 Not entirely sure if this works on the ada driver, so if not you might want to ask on freebsd-stable@ or boot up in a Live CD of Linux and use the tools there. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 18:04:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EF51065678 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717E38FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S2nt7-0005Ub-I5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:04:29 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([np-19-75.prenet.pl]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:04:29 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:04:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 40 Message-ID: References: <201203010038.31858.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1) Subject: Re: hard disk behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:04:31 -0000 Erich Dollansky ovitrap.com> writes: > ... > I have no idea what causes the noise. What is the machine doing when you hear > it? > > Erich > I use it as a desktop. Mostly web browsing, Firefox, there is always some background activity in there, like financial data streaming, etc. But this sound is so concerning: click ...click-clack, click-clack ... etc. $ top last pid: 62014; load averages: 0.09, 0.06, 0.06 up 4+02:07:06 18:56:08 63 processes: 1 running, 62 sleeping CPU 0: 0.8% user, 0.0% nice, 2.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 97.2% idle CPU 1: 3.1% user, 0.0% nice, 0.8% system, 0.0% interrupt, 96.1% idle Mem: 190M Active, 890M Inact, 261M Wired, 312K Cache, 112M Buf, 644M Free Swap: 3043M Total, 3043M Free PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE C TIME WCPU COMMAND 58910 jb 22 20 0 319M 262M uwait 0 14:07 1.07% firefox-bi 1283 root 1 20 0 9716K 1148K select 1 5:15 0.98% moused 3344 root 2 23 0 14156K 4940K select 0 8:31 0.00% upowerd 1865 root 1 20 0 9612K 1104K select 1 7:17 0.00% powerd 1978 haldaemon 2 20 0 23300K 6292K piperd 0 7:07 0.00% hald 58961 jb 1 20 0 118M 30068K select 0 5:08 0.00% npviewer.b 58845 jb 1 20 0 374M 309M select 1 4:37 0.00% Xorg 58951 jb 2 20 0 70360K 31416K kqread 0 2:10 0.00% plugin-con 1757 messagebus 1 20 0 9812K 2520K select 0 1:46 0.00% dbus-daemo 59121 jb 5 22 0 56108K 29028K uwait 1 0:32 0.00% pan 1902 root 1 20 0 11324K 3360K select 1 0:23 0.00% sendmail 58882 jb 1 20 0 11944K 2904K select 0 0:22 0.00% gam_server 59173 jb 2 20 0 40164K 20444K piperd 1 0:15 0.00% Terminal 58883 jb 2 20 0 40168K 19744K piperd 1 0:09 0.00% xfce4-pane 58884 jb 1 20 0 39932K 20396K select 0 0:07 0.00% xfdesktop [jb@localhost ~]$ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 18:13:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E07106566C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CEC8FC17 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S2o1o-00037z-6v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:13:28 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([np-19-75.prenet.pl]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:13:28 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:13:28 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 26 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1) Subject: Re: hard disk behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:13:32 -0000 Adam Vande More gmail.com> writes: > ... > > # /usr/local/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/ada0 > > > > 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 001 001 000 Old_age Always > > - > > 779337 > > > > Likely the noise you are hearing roughly corresponds to Load_Cycle_Count. > Yours is quite high. You may be able to use sysutils/ataidle to disable > the parking like so: > > ataidle -P 0 /dev/ada0 > > Not entirely sure if this works on the ada driver, so if not you might want > to ask on freebsd-stable@ or boot up in a Live CD of Linux and use the > tools there. > Dmitry and Adam, I think your description of excessive heads parking may be very close. I will try this remedy and will let you know. jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 18:28:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE967106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) Received: from redcondor1.peak.org (redcondor1.peak.org [69.59.192.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E328FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:28:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail-mta02.peak.org ([207.55.16.112]) by redcondor1.peak.org ({e03e86cd-14ae-47ce-9578-3c080ce9c462}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20120229182830085 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:28:30 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: Received: from birch.localnet (unknown [207.55.106.132]) by zmail-mta02.peak.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1299489E54 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:28:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [192.168.193.34]) by birch.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id E840355B5D for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:28:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CBCCCB5 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:28:27 -0800 (PST) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id q1TISRxM080884; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:28:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4CD476.4020005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <87d38yc2is.fsf@oak.localnet> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:28:27 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Warren Block's message of "Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:56:52 -0700 (MST)") Message-ID: <878vjlbik4.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: VBox network boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:28:30 -0000 Warren Block writes: > On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Carl Johnson wrote: > >> Warren Block writes: >> >>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote: >>> >>>> I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead, >>>> bloated, and full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for >>>> network booting in VBox on FBSD host? >>> >>> To PXE-boot a VM guest, set networking to to Bridged and use the >>> PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A) adapter type. If the host is FreeBSD, the >>> vboxnet kernel module has to be loaded. >> >> Please emphasize that the PCnet-PCI II card emulation is necessary. > > Updated in the PXE article, thanks. Thank you, that makes it perfectly clear. I had initially ignored that suggestion, thinking that it wasn't important! -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 19:37:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA577106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:37:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C128FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1TJbJO0080559; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:37:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q1TJbJH6080556; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:37:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:37:19 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Robert Huff In-Reply-To: <20302.17725.515279.964152@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Message-ID: References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> <20302.11068.426551.17422@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20302.17725.515279.964152@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:37:19 -0700 (MST) Cc: "bsalinux@gmail.com" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk labels (was: Re: fixating USB Storage) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:37:21 -0000 On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Robert Huff wrote: > > Warren Block writes: >> > I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was >> > (obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached. >> > Can I add a label to that partition later? "man gpart" only >> > shows a label being added when the partition is created, >> >> (untested) >> # gpart modify -i 2 -l mylabel ada0 > > I did this, and nothing exploded. :-) > When (and where) should I expect to see these appear under > /dev? Immediately? After rebooting? I want to edit fstab, but > want to be clear on how. They will be in /dev/gpt/. Labels created with glabel are in /dev/label/, and filesystem labels go in directories named for the filesystem like /dev/ufs/. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 19:46:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9CD106566C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F128FC17 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:46:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1TJkjk1080622; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:46:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id q1TJkjnh080619; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:46:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:46:45 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: "illoai@gmail.com" In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201202040953.19456.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <201202041433.55000.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <20120228173042.218144e7.freebsd@edvax.de> <20302.11068.426551.17422@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20302.17725.515279.964152@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="-902635197-1577957914-1330544318=:80458" Content-ID: X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:46:45 -0700 (MST) Cc: Robert Huff , "bsalinux@gmail.com" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk labels (was: Re: fixating USB Storage) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:46:46 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---902635197-1577957914-1330544318=:80458 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-15; FORMAT=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 29 February 2012 10:33, Robert Huff wrote: >> >> Warren Block writes: >>> > I have a disk - ad1 - with a partition - p2 - that was >>> > (obviously) created by gpart ... but no label was attached. >>> > Can I add a label to that partition later? "man gpart" only >>> > shows a label being added when the partition is created, >>> >>> (untested) >>> # gpart modify -i 2 -l mylabel ada0 >> >> I did this, and nothing exploded. :-) >> When (and where) should I expect to see these appear under >> /dev? Immediately? After rebooting? I want to edit fstab, but >> want to be clear on how. >> > > The label(s) should be accessible immediately, HOWEVER: > if the filesystem is mounted rw they'll be lost on reboot. So > you probably want to do the labelling from single-user mode. With filesystem labels, yes. Should not be a problem with gpart labels on a partition. (Just tried it.) ---902635197-1577957914-1330544318=:80458-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 19:51:51 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F43106566B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:51:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward6.mail.yandex.net (unknown [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:202:22cf:30ff:fe6b:6ebc]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E28B8FC26 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp6.mail.yandex.net (smtp6.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.56]) by forward6.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 2A9C41122EEB for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:51:50 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1330545110; bh=PdyVL1zwqNasX6ySrB9tQ282rXX1iwJuxW1kFfOImcM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DAJVoY8hSPpDwMiVLhvD28cVhVcl3Yvy4qin4SsxbS8MX423kQS1QE3lKRbqjSiY3 Ne+Ba+3gaYVOrAUpL2jkc8ROTNuHkJ13aYYE/aGfYUacAdyPyUEvNjSwr/ypo55i5I Bc8qgIq8aPhdQokcw/sAQJxhLwdNtNS+dD59wAmc= Received: from smtp6.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp6.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 090FC16403C8 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:51:50 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1330545110; bh=PdyVL1zwqNasX6ySrB9tQ282rXX1iwJuxW1kFfOImcM=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=DAJVoY8hSPpDwMiVLhvD28cVhVcl3Yvy4qin4SsxbS8MX423kQS1QE3lKRbqjSiY3 Ne+Ba+3gaYVOrAUpL2jkc8ROTNuHkJ13aYYE/aGfYUacAdyPyUEvNjSwr/ypo55i5I Bc8qgIq8aPhdQokcw/sAQJxhLwdNtNS+dD59wAmc= Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.18]) by smtp6.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id pnICajNV-pnIqWDlj; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:51:49 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:52:01 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <524626530.20120229215201@yandex.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: IGB driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:51:51 -0000 HI, Freebsd-questions. Can I use 7-STABLE and checkout latest IGB drivers from HEAD? Will them work? -- , mailto:kes-kes@yandex.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 20:08:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAE8106566C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:08:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBD1B8FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so1199841lag.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:08:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of wodfer@gmail.com designates 10.112.47.232 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.47.232; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of wodfer@gmail.com designates 10.112.47.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=wodfer@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=wodfer@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.47.232]) by 10.112.47.232 with SMTP id g8mr818901lbn.65.1330546134641 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:08:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7krNoQEVCeABOvyhOJGNX8E/X1l1saLUO3vITiDbMnM=; b=skJK0oeG5ICGB0jpXi6/Uiw7AaxncuRcBj8op6Ou188Tqq2VLF1dot3RmOu3mf6bQX 0ugr44/K11jxlUYpSW/UA8Eaf6MGm+BdoME8c9ptMQfcfR922UyDcXLPLaMNhQZIpHj8 bpsCO0VdxiEHxUQBkeptIS58iHVFAHHkBmokc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.47.232 with SMTP id g8mr674192lbn.65.1330546134537; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:08:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.112.34 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:08:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F4E2D3D.3020905@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:08:54 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Wodfer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:08:56 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock < > freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote: >> >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64). >>> >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is >>> installed >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there. >>> >>> Heres what I do: >>> >>> ./configure >>> gmake >>> >>> and the problem looks like this: >>> >>> [snip] >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is not a >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is not >>> a >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)' >>> is not >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is not a >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is not >>> a >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1 >>> >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of >> trouble if I remember correctly). >> >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working solo. >> >> > Ok - thanks! > > I'm currently doing this: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html > > I will report back on how it goes. :-) > > Cheers, > Andy > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from ports. I updated /etc/make.conf as described here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the other ones below in the article. Here's some outputs: # gmake -v GNU Make 3.82 Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2 Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. # gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD] How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what causes the problems)? Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my orginal post. Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-) All the best, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 20:20:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12061065674 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6404F8FC17 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so3266392wgb.31 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gobble.wa@gmail.com designates 10.180.100.228 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.100.228; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gobble.wa@gmail.com designates 10.180.100.228 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gobble.wa@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=gobble.wa@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.100.228]) by 10.180.100.228 with SMTP id fb4mr4112673wib.1.1330546808443 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:20:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4yI9K747ASu0NOBZozRD55J+ibj8SBXG9OvW06k/ECY=; b=oAmysIMM7R1041k+H2ybV5MGR7alJSZyv1igqqUdll2ixqf+nrUlfaah/sBT9TbG5k p7Bs95PYgBWEjkB7ocneGbUAmOtriX1hWlovd0vv9AOZNCoqBAdBA9+b95S8LispyRvY 2wrjqFTeClXOC0qv5LlLxN+Y/r2ph/l6mxOH4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.100.228 with SMTP id fb4mr3311842wib.1.1330546808371; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.154.131 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.154.131 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:20:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F4E2D3D.3020905@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:20:08 -0800 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: Andy Wodfer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:20:10 -0000 On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer" wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock < > > freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: > > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote: > >> > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64). > >>> > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when compiling. I > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is > >>> installed > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there. > >>> > >>> Heres what I do: > >>> > >>> ./configure > >>> gmake > >>> > >>> and the problem looks like this: > >>> > >>> [snip] > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is not a > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is not > >>> a > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit > >>> base/index expression > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)' > >>> is not > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is not a > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is not > >>> a > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit > >>> base/index expression > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not a > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1 > >>> > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of > >> trouble if I remember correctly). > >> > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working solo. > >> > >> > > Ok - thanks! > > > > I'm currently doing this: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html > > > > I will report back on how it goes. :-) > > > > Cheers, > > Andy > > > > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from ports. I > updated /etc/make.conf as described here: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html > > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the other > ones below in the article. > > Here's some outputs: > > # gmake -v > GNU Make 3.82 > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2 > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later < http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html > > > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. > > # gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD] > > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what > causes the problems)? > > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my orginal > post. > > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-) > > All the best, > Andy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo? should be # export CC=gcc46 or # setenv CC gcc46 if building from source -- Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 20:31:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585FB106567B for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:31:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBA68FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:31:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so3357277wib.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:31:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gobble.wa@gmail.com designates 10.216.134.30 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.216.134.30; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gobble.wa@gmail.com designates 10.216.134.30 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gobble.wa@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=gobble.wa@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.216.134.30]) by 10.216.134.30 with SMTP id r30mr967603wei.42.1330547488794 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:31:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=pbPxe81sLXXTAQ5fIl7b1nE6yGSpLOsSB3Hcy5RQpzM=; b=VqHM/IxuYjYGXvRR/c5XS2YjGToTB4fcNaPG+CbVXaXgEI4rNLyezjeMzGS9NxHNAl tX0EIPmk0vHiDttlH4sbffDGc8dM6pGR0QSCVjOKb9TgRO+TnNQauiB2gdCso68Ad/sM ZY8iuJxeMsnAvvgaEX92DgvaF3GFRiKGM9Gp4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.134.30 with SMTP id r30mr779086wei.42.1330547488664; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:31:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.154.131 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:31:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F4E2D3D.3020905@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:31:28 -0800 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: Andy Wodfer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:31:30 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer" wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock < > > > freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: > > > > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote: > > >> > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64). > > >>> > > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when > compiling. I > > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is > > >>> installed > > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there. > > >>> > > >>> Heres what I do: > > >>> > > >>> ./configure > > >>> gmake > > >>> > > >>> and the problem looks like this: > > >>> > > >>> [snip] > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is > not a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is > not > > >>> a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit > > >>> base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not > a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: > `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)' > > >>> is not > > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is > not a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is > not > > >>> a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit > > >>> base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not > a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1 > > >>> > > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every > > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of > > >> trouble if I remember correctly). > > >> > > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working > solo. > > >> > > >> > > > Ok - thanks! > > > > > > I'm currently doing this: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html > > > > > > I will report back on how it goes. :-) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Andy > > > > > > > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from ports. I > > updated /etc/make.conf as described here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html > > > > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the other > > ones below in the article. > > > > Here's some outputs: > > > > # gmake -v > > GNU Make 3.82 > > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2 > > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later < > http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html > > > > > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. > > > > # gcc -v > > Using built-in specs. > > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd > > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler > > Thread model: posix > > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD] > > > > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what > > causes the problems)? > > > > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my > orginal > > post. > > > > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-) > > > > All the best, > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo? > > should be > # export CC=gcc46 > or > # setenv CC gcc46 > > if building from source > > -- > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA > OOps my bad, that's the gcc development version... stable is 4.6.2.. or gcc46 ... didn't notice there was a port :) Waitman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 20:37:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5634A106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C608D8FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so593672eaa.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:37:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of wodfer@gmail.com designates 10.112.45.74 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.45.74; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of wodfer@gmail.com designates 10.112.45.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=wodfer@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=wodfer@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.45.74]) by 10.112.45.74 with SMTP id k10mr838729lbm.107.1330547844558 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:37:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8sEAFssFEpA9R3v4Glu8W03egysEtRp12j3guKSpoEw=; b=kLcWK50Io1QrmzH/NyGfPRkvuag6a7oLdyOdTD2C7hz+9uE6k/H0n0g6uv4gjlQJ0E zoXBQ/6QcrLcNTHHgSg4e9pfFit+Tk406J1gYMQgSmowk6SoAN/v3HTIayhoFJmb6ILB NErIKEVR2Go/7IlqEsuo3bRG5bVEeYTQ3EtfI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.45.74 with SMTP id k10mr696873lbm.107.1330547844444; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:37:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.112.34 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:37:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F4E2D3D.3020905@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:37:24 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Wodfer To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:37:26 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer" wrote: > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock < > > > freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: > > > > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote: > > >> > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64). > > >>> > > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when > compiling. I > > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is > > >>> installed > > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there. > > >>> > > >>> Heres what I do: > > >>> > > >>> ./configure > > >>> gmake > > >>> > > >>> and the problem looks like this: > > >>> > > >>> [snip] > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is > not a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is > not > > >>> a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit > > >>> base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not > a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: > `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)' > > > >>> is not > > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is > not a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is > not > > >>> a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 bit > > >>> base/index expression > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is not > a > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1 > > >>> > > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you every > > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of > > >> trouble if I remember correctly). > > >> > > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working > solo. > > >> > > >> > > > Ok - thanks! > > > > > > I'm currently doing this: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html > > > > > > I will report back on how it goes. :-) > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Andy > > > > > > > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from ports. I > > updated /etc/make.conf as described here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html > > > > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the other > > ones below in the article. > > > > Here's some outputs: > > > > # gmake -v > > GNU Make 3.82 > > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2 > > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later < > http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html > > > > > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. > > > > # gcc -v > > Using built-in specs. > > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd > > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler > > Thread model: posix > > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD] > > > > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what > > causes the problems)? > > > > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my > orginal > > post. > > > > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-) > > > > All the best, > > Andy > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo? > > should be > # export CC=gcc46 > or > # setenv CC gcc46 > > if building from source > > -- > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA > Yes, gcc47 was out a few days ago. So, I'm making some progress. I now export CC=gcc47 and by adding this ./configure --extra-cflags=-DBROKEN_RELOCATIONS (what does this mean/do???) I'm able to get past the h264 compile fail. However, I now stop at vp5 with the following message: CC libavcodec/vp5.o /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s: Assembler messages: /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:323: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:436: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:548: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:669: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:920: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1136: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1422: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1531: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1826: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1923: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2020: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2116: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2226: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:8827: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:9738: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:10351: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:10988: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:11625: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:12262: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:13499: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit base/index expression gmake: *** [libavcodec/vp5.o] Error 1 Any idea of what my next step could be? Cheers, Andy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 20:46:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34B21065672 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 405BE8FC16 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werl4 with SMTP id l4so2934731wer.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:46:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gobble.wa@gmail.com designates 10.180.78.130 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.78.130; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gobble.wa@gmail.com designates 10.180.78.130 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gobble.wa@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=gobble.wa@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.78.130]) by 10.180.78.130 with SMTP id b2mr20953630wix.1.1330548363364 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:46:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=/gbOoYUpAodrJL83pFqI5/ggcmL52SqkNLrtwSBoIfE=; b=fMMxQ+50vqhKN7VxTv5F7wKFrKrZ55+dJ3xqVzMzc/ccmY6S5B7nzlzKwNcfhMlNTM GTxsKsXghcGS0bwL2KHVSJBsiXvsaMXJ7oNo2Zt8hTXujCbKyHP/KxRPhR3dA9cuse9T fc1XXBXuiYW/Oq80DsLDgWmEDma94q4LHW7yE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.78.130 with SMTP id b2mr16771977wix.1.1330548363269; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:46:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.154.131 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:46:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F4E2D3D.3020905@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:46:03 -0800 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: Andy Wodfer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:46:04 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Waitman Gobble > wrote: > > > > > On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer" wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock < > > > > freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: > > > > > > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote: > > > >> > > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64). > > > >>> > > > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when > > compiling. I > > > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is > > > >>> installed > > > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there. > > > >>> > > > >>> Heres what I do: > > > >>> > > > >>> ./configure > > > >>> gmake > > > >>> > > > >>> and the problem looks like this: > > > >>> > > > >>> [snip] > > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is > > not a > > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' > is > > not > > > >>> a > > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 bit > > > >>> base/index expression > > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is > not > > a > > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: > > `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)' > > > > > >>> is not > > > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression > > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is > > not a > > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' > is > > not > > > >>> a > > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 > bit > > > >>> base/index expression > > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is > not > > a > > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression > > > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1 > > > >>> > > > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you > every > > > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out of > > > >> trouble if I remember correctly). > > > >> > > > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working > > solo. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > Ok - thanks! > > > > > > > > I'm currently doing this: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html > > > > > > > > I will report back on how it goes. :-) > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from ports. > I > > > updated /etc/make.conf as described here: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html > > > > > > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the other > > > ones below in the article. > > > > > > Here's some outputs: > > > > > > # gmake -v > > > GNU Make 3.82 > > > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2 > > > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > > > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later < > > http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html > > > > > > > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. > > > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. > > > > > > # gcc -v > > > Using built-in specs. > > > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd > > > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler > > > Thread model: posix > > > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD] > > > > > > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what > > > causes the problems)? > > > > > > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my > > orginal > > > post. > > > > > > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-) > > > > > > All the best, > > > Andy > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo? > > > > should be > > # export CC=gcc46 > > or > > # setenv CC gcc46 > > > > if building from source > > > > -- > > Waitman Gobble > > San Jose California USA > > > > Yes, gcc47 was out a few days ago. > > So, I'm making some progress. > > I now export CC=gcc47 > > and by adding this ./configure --extra-cflags=-DBROKEN_RELOCATIONS (what > does this mean/do???) > > I'm able to get past the h264 compile fail. > > However, I now stop at vp5 with the following message: > > CC libavcodec/vp5.o > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s: Assembler messages: > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:323: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:436: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:548: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:669: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:920: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1136: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1422: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1531: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1826: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1923: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2020: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2116: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2226: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:8827: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:9738: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:10351: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:10988: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:11625: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:12262: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:13499: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit > base/index expression > gmake: *** [libavcodec/vp5.o] Error 1 > > Any idea of what my next step could be? > > Cheers, > Andy > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > here's the info about broken relocations.., http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/2007-April/005557.html but there's this.. http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-users/2011-July/083048.html I believe that says you don't really want to define BROKEN_RELOCATIONS but instead update GNU binutils b/c 'stock' binutils don't do 64bit ... I think binutils update must be in ports. I do know if you pkg_add -r mplayer it installs gcc46 and updated binutils.,, :-) Waitman Gobble San Jose California USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 21:03:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7505A1065676 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:03:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA0DC8FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so1274892lag.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of wodfer@gmail.com designates 10.152.112.132 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.152.112.132; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of wodfer@gmail.com designates 10.152.112.132 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=wodfer@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=wodfer@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.152.112.132]) by 10.152.112.132 with SMTP id iq4mr1822614lab.28.1330549401754 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:03:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=tyrneTOnIFXxN6I8Q+W1Co/g2YQYcrDOpKe81xLiqck=; b=EWfs47vi7VQ1HgGCPKVmLJngkVqoTZYFFPeiKKVN79xAWulDJ3ZRkZbsc4waRXTb6/ fx3izgfIGA6xVNriDqmKKgje9OiESQyqOW6VQYC61eALL1Sfm4z+e0enS/M2MTlVRTfY Kyr0ZlaVplt+SuMKYGU5P3ysFfH5/1x9BTGzc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.112.132 with SMTP id iq4mr1503459lab.28.1330549401577; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:03:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.112.34 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:03:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F4E2D3D.3020905@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:03:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: Andy Wodfer To: Waitman Gobble Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:03:23 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Waitman Gobble >> wrote: >> >> > >> > On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer" wrote: >> > > >> > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock < >> > > > freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote: >> > > >> >> > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64). >> > > >>> >> > > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when >> > compiling. I >> > > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is >> > > >>> installed >> > > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there. >> > > >>> >> > > >>> Heres what I do: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> ./configure >> > > >>> gmake >> > > >>> >> > > >>> and the problem looks like this: >> > > >>> >> > > >>> [snip] >> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is >> > not a >> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' >> is >> > not >> > > >>> a >> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 >> bit >> > > >>> base/index expression >> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is >> not >> > a >> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: >> > `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)' >> > >> > > >>> is not >> > > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression >> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is >> > not a >> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' >> is >> > not >> > > >>> a >> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 >> bit >> > > >>> base/index expression >> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is >> not >> > a >> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >> > > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1 >> > > >>> >> > > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you >> every >> > > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out >> of >> > > >> trouble if I remember correctly). >> > > >> >> > > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working >> > solo. >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > Ok - thanks! >> > > > >> > > > I'm currently doing this: >> > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html >> > > > >> > > > I will report back on how it goes. :-) >> > > > >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > Andy >> > > > >> > > >> > > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from >> ports. I >> > > updated /etc/make.conf as described here: >> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html >> > > >> > > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the >> other >> > > ones below in the article. >> > > >> > > Here's some outputs: >> > > >> > > # gmake -v >> > > GNU Make 3.82 >> > > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2 >> > > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> > > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later < >> > http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html >> > > > >> > > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. >> > > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. >> > > >> > > # gcc -v >> > > Using built-in specs. >> > > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd >> > > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler >> > > Thread model: posix >> > > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD] >> > > >> > > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's what >> > > causes the problems)? >> > > >> > > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my >> > orginal >> > > post. >> > > >> > > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-) >> > > >> > > All the best, >> > > Andy >> > > _______________________________________________ >> > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> > is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo? >> > >> > should be >> > # export CC=gcc46 >> > or >> > # setenv CC gcc46 >> > >> > if building from source >> > >> > -- >> > Waitman Gobble >> > San Jose California USA >> > >> >> Yes, gcc47 was out a few days ago. >> >> So, I'm making some progress. >> >> I now export CC=gcc47 >> >> and by adding this ./configure --extra-cflags=-DBROKEN_RELOCATIONS (what >> does this mean/do???) >> >> I'm able to get past the h264 compile fail. >> >> However, I now stop at vp5 with the following message: >> >> CC libavcodec/vp5.o >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s: Assembler messages: >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:323: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:436: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:548: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:669: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:920: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1136: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1422: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1531: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1826: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1923: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2020: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2116: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2226: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:8827: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:9738: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:10351: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:10988: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:11625: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:12262: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:13499: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >> base/index expression >> gmake: *** [libavcodec/vp5.o] Error 1 >> >> Any idea of what my next step could be? >> >> Cheers, >> Andy >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > here's the info about broken relocations.., > > http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/2007-April/005557.html > > but there's this.. > > http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-users/2011-July/083048.html > > I believe that says you don't really want to define BROKEN_RELOCATIONS but > instead update GNU binutils b/c 'stock' binutils don't do 64bit ... > I think binutils update must be in ports. I do know if you pkg_add -r > mplayer it installs gcc46 and updated binutils.,, :-) > > > Waitman Gobble > San Jose California USA > > > Fantastic! That did the trick and it compiled and installed successfully now. :-) Here's a rundown of what solved it: 1. Updated binutils to latest version from ports. 2. Updated gmake to latest version from ports 3. Updated gcc to version 47 from ports. 4. removed /usr/bin/as and made a symlink from /usr/bin/as to /usr/local/bin/as (newer version) export CC=gcc47 or setenv. Perhaps all I really needed to do was point 4?. Anyway, thanks a lot for great help! All the best, Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 21:12:23 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F181106566C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:12:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gobble.wa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57CA8FC13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so3385487wib.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of gobble.wa@gmail.com designates 10.180.82.227 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.82.227; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of gobble.wa@gmail.com designates 10.180.82.227 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=gobble.wa@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=gobble.wa@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.82.227]) by 10.180.82.227 with SMTP id l3mr4424372wiy.1.1330549941703 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:12:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uJAyVticMdsPBs1yyKUAVXF9/BvYMImCFLygZAZU7vA=; b=D4NvcJfeBuQ8BRu84cbMPtToINUFvyPJRMutQsiMTid2uTnwez54MrIxlShSM6tNi2 kobVJ0iZSrwrFEshWFTh7Invtyxfd4FV1wG8tD2r8dstItDsxbGlnnr9WQ3UyUhYjG07 0Nanwiupq/1yGuzbqyFVqicLZb945rnv+TSwQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.82.227 with SMTP id l3mr3562077wiy.1.1330549941581; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.154.131 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:12:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4F4E2D3D.3020905@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:12:21 -0800 Message-ID: From: Waitman Gobble To: Andy Wodfer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: Help compiling ffmpeg from source X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:12:23 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Waitman Gobble >>> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> > On Feb 29, 2012 12:10 PM, "Andy Wodfer" wrote: >>> > > >>> > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Andy Wodfer >>> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Da Rock < >>> > > > freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > >> On 02/29/12 23:48, Andy Wodfer wrote: >>> > > >> >>> > > >>> I'm on FreeBSD 8.2 STABLE (AMD64). >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> I need to install the latest ffmpeg 0.10, but it fails when >>> > compiling. I >>> > > >>> must admit I very rarely do it this way. Normally all software is >>> > > >>> installed >>> > > >>> from ports, but I couldn't find this version of ffmpeg there. >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> Heres what I do: >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> ./configure >>> > > >>> gmake >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> and the problem looks like this: >>> > > >>> >>> > > >>> [snip] >>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26921: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r10d)' is >>> > not a >>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26923: Error: >>> `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%edi)' is >>> > not >>> > > >>> a >>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26931: Error: `-1(%r9d)' is not a valid 64 >>> bit >>> > > >>> base/index expression >>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:26936: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is >>> not >>> > a >>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27045: Error: >>> > `ff_h264_lps_range(%r9d,%r12d,**2)' >>> > >>> > > >>> is not >>> > > >>> a valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27055: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%r12d)' is >>> > not a >>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27057: Error: >>> `ff_h264_mlps_state+128(%r9d)' is >>> > not >>> > > >>> a >>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27065: Error: `-1(%r11d)' is not a valid 64 >>> bit >>> > > >>> base/index expression >>> > > >>> /var/tmp//ccKzWhb0.s:27070: Error: `ff_h264_norm_shift(%ecx)' is >>> not >>> > a >>> > > >>> valid 64 bit base/index expression >>> > > >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/h264_cabac.o] Error 1 >>> > > >>> >>> > > >> Thats right, I remember this one- really simple but will get you >>> every >>> > > >> time! You need a newer gcc version (probably 4.6 will get you out >>> of >>> > > >> trouble if I remember correctly). >>> > > >> >>> > > >> The port already sets this, it will only bite when you're working >>> > solo. >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > Ok - thanks! >>> > > > >>> > > > I'm currently doing this: >>> > > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html >>> > > > >>> > > > I will report back on how it goes. :-) >>> > > > >>> > > > Cheers, >>> > > > Andy >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > So, I updated gmake to 3.82 from ports and installed gcc47 from >>> ports. I >>> > > updated /etc/make.conf as described here: >>> > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/custom-gcc/article.html >>> > > >>> > > However, I don't have a libmap file so I skipped this one and the >>> other >>> > > ones below in the article. >>> > > >>> > > Here's some outputs: >>> > > >>> > > # gmake -v >>> > > GNU Make 3.82 >>> > > Built for amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2 >>> > > Copyright (C) 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >>> > > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later < >>> > http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html >>> > > > >>> > > This is free software: you are free to change and redistribute it. >>> > > There is NO WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law. >>> > > >>> > > # gcc -v >>> > > Using built-in specs. >>> > > Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd >>> > > Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler >>> > > Thread model: posix >>> > > gcc version 4.2.2 20070831 prerelease [FreeBSD] >>> > > >>> > > How do I tell the system to use gcc47 instead of 4.2.2 (if that's >>> what >>> > > causes the problems)? >>> > > >>> > > Compiling ffmpeg from source still failes on the same line as in my >>> > orginal >>> > > post. >>> > > >>> > > Thanks a lot for any pointers that will help me resolve this. :-) >>> > > >>> > > All the best, >>> > > Andy >>> > > _______________________________________________ >>> > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> > >>> > is there a gcc47 or maybe a typo? >>> > >>> > should be >>> > # export CC=gcc46 >>> > or >>> > # setenv CC gcc46 >>> > >>> > if building from source >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Waitman Gobble >>> > San Jose California USA >>> > >>> >>> Yes, gcc47 was out a few days ago. >>> >>> So, I'm making some progress. >>> >>> I now export CC=gcc47 >>> >>> and by adding this ./configure --extra-cflags=-DBROKEN_RELOCATIONS (what >>> does this mean/do???) >>> >>> I'm able to get past the h264 compile fail. >>> >>> However, I now stop at vp5 with the following message: >>> >>> CC libavcodec/vp5.o >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s: Assembler messages: >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:323: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:436: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:548: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:669: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:920: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1136: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1422: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1531: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1826: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:1923: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2020: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2116: Error: `(%esi,%edx)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:2226: Error: `(%r8d,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:8827: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:9738: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:10351: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:10988: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:11625: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:12262: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> /var/tmp//ccmvakth.s:13499: Error: `(%esi,%eax)' is not a valid 64 bit >>> base/index expression >>> gmake: *** [libavcodec/vp5.o] Error 1 >>> >>> Any idea of what my next step could be? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Andy >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> here's the info about broken relocations.., >> >> http://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-cvslog/2007-April/005557.html >> >> but there's this.. >> >> http://lists.mplayerhq.hu/pipermail/mplayer-users/2011-July/083048.html >> >> I believe that says you don't really want to define BROKEN_RELOCATIONS >> but instead update GNU binutils b/c 'stock' binutils don't do 64bit ... >> I think binutils update must be in ports. I do know if you pkg_add -r >> mplayer it installs gcc46 and updated binutils.,, :-) >> >> >> Waitman Gobble >> San Jose California USA >> >> >> > Fantastic! That did the trick and it compiled and installed successfully > now. :-) > > Here's a rundown of what solved it: > > 1. Updated binutils to latest version from ports. > 2. Updated gmake to latest version from ports > 3. Updated gcc to version 47 from ports. > 4. removed /usr/bin/as and made a symlink from /usr/bin/as to > /usr/local/bin/as (newer version) > > export CC=gcc47 or setenv. > > Perhaps all I really needed to do was point 4?. > > Anyway, thanks a lot for great help! > > All the best, > Andreas > Maybe... but gas (/usr/local/bin/as) comes from #1 in your list. version of gmake probably OK. gcc, hmmm. i've run into some issues compiling stuff with 4.2.1 - but for ffmpeg probably want newer gcc anyway. Waitman From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 21:47:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C5B106564A for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CA48FC13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S2rMh-0007aR-FS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:47:15 +0100 Received: from np-19-75.prenet.pl ([np-19-75.prenet.pl]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:47:15 +0100 Received: from jb.1234abcd by np-19-75.prenet.pl with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:47:15 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: jb Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:47:04 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 79.139.19.75 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:9.0.1) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/9.0.1) Subject: Re: hard disk behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 21:47:16 -0000 jb gmail.com> writes: > ... > Dmitry and Adam, > I think your description of excessive heads parking may be very close. > I will try this remedy and will let you know. > jb > OK. Thanks. jb From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 23:01:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9891065680 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:01:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrei693@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com (mail-ee0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB4528FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:01:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eekd17 with SMTP id d17so2557596eek.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:01:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of andrei693@gmail.com designates 10.14.125.14 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.14.125.14; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of andrei693@gmail.com designates 10.14.125.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=andrei693@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=andrei693@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.14.125.14]) by 10.14.125.14 with SMTP id y14mr1429951eeh.5.1330556511870 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:01:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Uq9RNP6qE51VMhSP3k15NTRZ3bSpYhwUpZRc6ZHtZaQ=; b=c+NQnZUx3il3gvh+gRT/OyutUoIarHnNcYut9ezIalsmStwm+QFYseyUfgZh4GfaA6 kBceqCU+C4g8tP1ehXYDUcnupdYj2PHo/BI1Ahz7beenhWrPTYlaRmplHXjKIa/beSQC HSZjyNpKNzDPFN9Dr64dyFPsxkcxWtilkP3TU= Received: by 10.14.125.14 with SMTP id y14mr1071845eeh.5.1330554701744; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:31:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dhcp-077-251-216-229.chello.nl. [77.251.216.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm87842435eem.11.2012.02.29.14.31.40 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:31:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F4EA742.5030104@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:31:30 +0100 From: Andrei Brezan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4CD476.4020005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <87d38yc2is.fsf@oak.localnet> <4F4D6C99.1000604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F4D6C99.1000604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: VBox network boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:01:53 -0000 On 29/02/2012 01:08, Da Rock wrote: > On 02/29/12 03:04, Carl Johnson wrote: >> Warren Block writes: >> >>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote: >>> >>>> I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead, >>>> bloated, and full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for >>>> network booting in VBox on FBSD host? >>> To PXE-boot a VM guest, set networking to to Bridged and use the >>> PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A) adapter type. If the host is FreeBSD, the >>> vboxnet kernel module has to be loaded. >> Please emphasize that the PCnet-PCI II card emulation is necessary. I >> was trying the Intel emulation and making no progress. I then noticed >> your page and tried the PCnet-PCI II card and it started working. I >> would guess that means their Intel card emulation is incomplete. > I took it for granted the bridge part (I usually use it anyway), but I > would never have guessed the PCnet card in a blue fit! There was even > a PR on virtualbox for the issue of the lack of PXE with Oracle > basically saying "too bad, so sad...". Apparently PXE licensing didn't > allow them to distribute it directly, but offer an extension pack > (which doesn't work on FBSD) instead. Ergo my conclusion. Apparently > (based on this thread) it only affects intel cards though... > > Where is your page Warren, and why didn't it show up in my searches? > ;) I'll follow it from here on out I think... > > Thanks guys... saved me a lot more fussing! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi all, You can also look at https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads and https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch01.html#intro-installing for info related to the extension pack where you can find the PXE boot ROM for the Intel E1000 cards, unfortunately it's PUEL, virtualbox on FBSD is OSE. My worst case scenario was with a custom linux kernel on the guest that didn't had drivers for Amd cards, I had to do something like this: NIC 1: MAC: 0800276F42C6, Attachment: Bridged Interface 'bridge0', Cable connected: on, Trace: off (file: none), Type: Am79C970A, Reported speed: 0 Mbps, Boot priority: 0 NIC 2: MAC: 0800276F42C6, Attachment: Bridged Interface 'bridge0', Cable connected: on, Trace: off (file: none), Type: 82540EM, Reported speed: 0 Mbps, Boot priority: 0 Regards, -- Andrei Brezan email From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 29 23:13:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5B4106566C for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:13:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsalinux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C368FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qao25 with SMTP id 25so58848qao.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:13:33 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.194.65 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.194.65; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.194.65 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bsalinux@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=bsalinux@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.194.65]) by 10.224.194.65 with SMTP id dx1mr514101qab.90.1330557213694 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:13:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=spS20ohTukQweAo8c/Yht9iHVJhupi+0ZzZL4dT3Lq0=; b=CT1UIPzNECp8dfDmiIzOxumJv1b/fcdkqhyb9kojpXMOiNkAzcOWJh/Ds39pgjjD1X /om/sxpAxcRPZeq4Y0sKYkGp+q+RvztEcpi3aPXHdDV/n+WulmKy8laj/5gqjEZ0Wc3I nYzohT714Nl9o2P7iZvlnToJknzUmMyC3l4+Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.194.65 with SMTP id dx1mr435146qab.90.1330557213613; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:13:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.211.80 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:13:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F4E44B1.30207@tundraware.com> References: <4F4E44B1.30207@tundraware.com> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:13:33 -0800 Message-ID: From: "bsalinux@gmail.com" To: tundra@tundraware.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD And ARM X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:13:34 -0000 Hi Tim, FreeBSD-arm should be the list to look into http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Tim Daneliuk wrote= : > I'm not quite sure where to ask this so even a pointer to the > right place would be appreciated: > > Is there any intent/work underway to port FBSD to the Raspberry PI > ARM SBC? =A0At $35 this thing looks perfect for firewall/DNS/dhcp > boundary machines. > > Thanks, > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Tim Daneliuk > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 00:57:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 409C4106564A for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:57:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267858FC16 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 36036E804E7; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:57:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:57:53 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20120301005750.GA10885@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Of_Interest: With 25 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Subject: which FF ad blocker? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 00:57:54 -0000 which of the many adblockers should i try? thanks in advance for your insights! -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Voice By Computer (for Universal Access): http:/www.thought.org/vbc The 8.57a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org Twenty-five years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 01:06:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02972106566C for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 01:06:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kingedgar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pz0-f44.google.com (mail-pz0-f44.google.com [209.85.210.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6FF98FC16 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 01:06:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dakl33 with SMTP id l33so287193dak.17 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kingedgar@gmail.com designates 10.68.208.196 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.208.196; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kingedgar@gmail.com designates 10.68.208.196 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kingedgar@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=kingedgar@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.208.196]) by 10.68.208.196 with SMTP id mg4mr13577444pbc.108.1330564005436 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:06:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=8bI79wO/kK7F/zKe2wQ+fMw9xu2hfRvlG2mO52gp6Gs=; b=gjQqraa3lGVMphbk+LPSsDI811AMM1x+/JmIydFFkbmyy/VWuamDzxBIJcK2MgSrfs E9F2py2oLxqJlJ1wcTnB89dd99g3lEpFVD/AoU1RSIyLtJ853OZEUzrCFwQpjBPYTS5E 3J64+7IlP+/d1vAf2F+b/pUDLLwy+XQ03Dxvo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.208.196 with SMTP id mg4mr11266752pbc.108.1330564005303; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:06:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.200.70 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:06:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120301005750.GA10885@thought.org> References: <20120301005750.GA10885@thought.org> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:06:45 -0600 Message-ID: From: Jason Garrett To: Gary Kline Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: which FF ad blocker? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:06:46 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 18:57, Gary Kline wrote: > which of the many adblockers should i try? > > thanks in advance for your insights! > > imho Add Block Plus is the best > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service > Unix > Voice By Computer (for Universal Access): http:/www.thought.org/vbc > The 8.57a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org > Twenty-five years of service to the Unix community. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 01:51:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D04106566C for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 01:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BD18FC18 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 01:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so30558ggn.13 for ; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:51:52 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kurt.buff@gmail.com designates 10.236.153.230 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.153.230; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kurt.buff@gmail.com designates 10.236.153.230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kurt.buff@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=kurt.buff@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.153.230]) by 10.236.153.230 with SMTP id f66mr4175707yhk.37.1330566712127 (num_hops = 1); Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:51:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8p1z1G9KYARjyhbNwdrNwWrxE1SnYMFVPyubGItly2Q=; b=h8xlgqUkEycwHmbt4oqf4B3nfUZNPOJ7Ft4JDDnv/tNGDWgg+IjjofP4svwLR+un+/ o5iz/apbEbLeehkALV74JE9iV6fctNxt2me1VinReXVbhGtIVnOBxf8IxsxXQ7813XAf l8dS1CaxYFfzsmJ9EdawOhQ3PZaT7A1rO7ihs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.153.230 with SMTP id f66mr3209520yhk.37.1330564930830; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:22:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.147.133.18 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:22:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20120301005750.GA10885@thought.org> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:22:10 -0800 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: which FF ad blocker? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:51:53 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 17:06, Jason Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 18:57, Gary Kline wrote: > >> which of the many adblockers should i try? >> >> thanks in advance for your insights! >> > imho Add Block Plus is the best Agreed, and for further security, I also use NoScript and Request Policy. Many folks won't like the latter two, as they tend to block an awful lot until you get them tuned, but they make me happ(y|ier) while browsing. If you do use them, you will at least begin to see how complex web browsing has become... Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 02:55:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00EEA106566C for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 02:55:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2DC68FC0A for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 02:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2DC5BE804E7; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:55:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 18:55:44 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: Kurt Buff Message-ID: <20120301025544.GA936@thought.org> References: <20120301005750.GA10885@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. Of_Interest: With 25 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: which FF ad blocker? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 02:55:45 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 05:22:10PM -0800, Kurt Buff wrote: > Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:22:10 -0800 > From: Kurt Buff > Subject: Re: which FF ad blocker? > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 17:06, Jason Garrett wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 18:57, Gary Kline wrote: > > > >> which of the many adblockers should i try? > >> > >> thanks in advance for your insights! > >> > > imho Add Block Plus is the best > > Agreed, and for further security, I also use NoScript and Request Policy. > > Many folks won't like the latter two, as they tend to block an awful > lot until you get them tuned, but they make me happ(y|ier) while > browsing. If you do use them, you will at least begin to see how > complex web browsing has become... > > Kurt agree with noscript. i dont recall the other one, but i was blocking just too much and opened everything up. i'll try 'add block plus' thanks much, gary > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix Voice By Computer (for Universal Access): http:/www.thought.org/vbc The 8.57a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org Twenty-five years of service to the Unix community. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 03:02:54 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94493106566C for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:02:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perrin@apotheon.com) Received: from oproxy1-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy1.bluehost.com [IPv6:2605:dc00:100:2::a1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3F4278FC14 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12531 invoked by uid 0); 1 Mar 2012 03:02:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO box543.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.143) by oproxy1.bluehost.com with SMTP; 1 Mar 2012 03:02:52 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apotheon.com; s=default; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=0syVUwXYkxyr637OUp73Cmq2NyXEAkdW/gZxVL0qoFg=; b=mgUFcZ3lxxjNSqJPAnpbWML0CgsQyiVozhy3J/kPkyUTnJndT/yLdf4m5Mi1JFQiDBf7BpHKMlEKrgOomQ+/LqsIUir5G04Z+1OsO0SGBrzojsVRsTVqgxMF5yBVomW7; Received: from c-24-8-180-234.hsd1.co.comcast.net ([24.8.180.234] helo=localhost) by box543.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1S2wI7-0008Ln-Tg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:02:51 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:02:53 -0700 From: Chad Perrin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120301030252.GA27545@hemlock.hydra> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120301005750.GA10885@thought.org> <20120301025544.GA936@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120301025544.GA936@thought.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Identified-User: {2737:box543.bluehost.com:apotheon:apotheon.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.8.180.234 authed with perrin@apotheon.com} Subject: Re: which FF ad blocker? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:02:54 -0000 On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:55:44PM -0800, Gary Kline wrote: > > agree with noscript. i dont recall the other one, but i was > blocking just too much and opened everything up. i'll try > 'add block plus' I'm pretty sure the extension you want is called Adblock Plus, not Add Block Plus. It has been a little bit since I've dealt with these extensions, though, because I started using another browser that offers things like plugin and JavaScript whitelisting as a core feature. Take my memory of it for what it's worth. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 03:34:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE74106564A for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com) Received: from alogreentechnologies.com (alogreentechnologies.com [67.212.226.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCAC58FC08 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 03:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from amd620.ovitrap.com ([49.128.188.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by alogreentechnologies.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q213Y2vR013878; Wed, 29 Feb 2012 20:34:05 -0700 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:33:58 +0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/8.3-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.7.4; amd64; ; ) References: <20120301005750.GA10885@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20120301005750.GA10885@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201203011033.58541.erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> Cc: Gary Kline Subject: Re: which FF ad blocker? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 03:34:17 -0000 Hi, On Thursday 01 March 2012 07:57:53 Gary Kline wrote: > which of the many adblockers should i try? I use /etc/hosts to block unwanted sites. I used http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm as a starting point and added other sites over time. If course, adds which are served from the visited host are not blocked that way. Let them earn some money. Erich > > thanks in advance for your insights! > > -- > Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix > Voice By Computer (for Universal Access): http:/www.thought.org/vbc > The 8.57a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org > Twenty-five years of service to the Unix community. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 10:36:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE60106564A for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78558FC08 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:36:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OctaHexa64-MkII (HPQuadro64.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.130.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q21AOSrK032834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:24:28 GMT Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:24:30 +0000 From: Karl Pielorz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <0D52CADE287778C263E7EF6A@OctaHexa64-MkII> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: FreeBSD 9-R pxeboot fails with 'Mounting root filesystem rw failed'... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:36:15 -0000 Hi, I've got a 9.0-R amd64 system I'm trying to netboot / pxeboot from the network, to install other machines (and do fixups etc.) I set this up as we setup previous versions here - but setting up a tftp server, and nfs server - and 'dumping' the contents of the install CD to a directory on the dhcp server, which is exported via nfs (it's exported as read/write). The system kind of boots, but falls over with: " Interface em0 IP-Address 192.168.0.47 Broadcast 192.168.0.255 Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_pick kickstart. Starting file system checks: mount_nfs: no : nfs-name Mounting root filesystem rw failed, startup aborted ERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)! Mar 1 118:10 init: /bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to single user mode Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh: " It looks like it's failing to 'remount' / promote the root file system as read/write (It's definitely exported as read/write - I've tested it by mounting it on another machine). If you start a shell at this point and run mount, you get: " 192.168.0.37:/usr2/netboot/os/9.0-amd64 on / (nfs, read-only) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel) " Is there something I have to set (e.g. in '/etc/rc.conf') in order to fix this? Previous systems setup this way would always boot through to the sysinstall menu. Thanks, -Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 10:53:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE5C106566C for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:53:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop03.sare.net (proxypop03.sare.net [194.30.0.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0946B8FC13 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www1.saremail.com (webmail1.sarenet.es [194.30.0.36]) by proxypop03.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 640469DC506; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:53:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from 194.30.18.3 (proxying for 192.148.167.11) (SquirrelMail authenticated user egoitz@ramattack.net) by www1.saremail.com with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:53:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <55469.194.30.18.3.1330599220.squirrel@www1.saremail.com> In-Reply-To: <0D52CADE287778C263E7EF6A@OctaHexa64-MkII> References: <0D52CADE287778C263E7EF6A@OctaHexa64-MkII> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:53:40 +0100 (CET) From: egoitz@ramattack.net To: "Karl Pielorz" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9-R pxeboot fails with 'Mounting root filesystem rw failed'... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:53:42 -0000 Take a look at freebsd-hackers mailing list... I have suggested some change in some Makefile and sh script in order to unless at this moment to be able to have an unattended system built with sysinstall (the idea I think it was to maintain sysinstall in 9.0 unless).... and using you're install.cfg.... At freebsd-hackers seems that people is pretty busy and can't look at this in order for committing or unless saying something about it... perhaps they're working on another thing or so, or don't know I assume they can't check this now... but like changes are not significant... I am going to do with the changes suggested and have tested and release builts fine and you can use Jumpstart without issues.. this way... So I recomend you reading last mails of mine in freebsd-hackers... Hope it helps, Bye! El Jue, 1 de Marzo de 2012, 11:24 am, Karl Pielorz escribi: > Hi, > > > I've got a 9.0-R amd64 system I'm trying to netboot / pxeboot from the > network, to install other machines (and do fixups etc.) > > I set this up as we setup previous versions here - but setting up a tftp > server, and nfs server - and 'dumping' the contents of the install CD to a > directory on the dhcp server, which is exported via nfs (it's exported > as read/write). > > The system kind of boots, but falls over with: > > > " > Interface em0 IP-Address 192.168.0.47 Broadcast 192.168.0.255 > Entropy harvesting: interrupts ethernet point_to_pick kickstart. > Starting file system checks: > mount_nfs: no : nfs-name > Mounting root filesystem rw failed, startup aborted > ERROR: ABORTING BOOT (sending SIGTERM to parent)! > Mar 1 118:10 init: /bin/sh on /etc/rc terminated abnormally, going to > single user mode Enter full pathname of shell or RETURN for /bin/sh: > " > > > It looks like it's failing to 'remount' / promote the root file system as > read/write (It's definitely exported as read/write - I've tested it by > mounting it on another machine). If you start a shell at this point and > run mount, you get: > > " > 192.168.0.37:/usr2/netboot/os/9.0-amd64 on / (nfs, read-only) > devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel) " > > > Is there something I have to set (e.g. in '/etc/rc.conf') in order to fix > this? > > Previous systems setup this way would always boot through to the > sysinstall menu. > > > Thanks, > > > -Karl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 12:43:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77AEF106564A for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECDF8FC13 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OctaHexa64-MkII (HPQuadro64.dmpriest.net.uk [62.13.130.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q21Chu0h044533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Mar 2012 12:43:57 GMT Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:43:58 +0000 From: Karl Pielorz To: egoitz@ramattack.net Message-ID: <326A337AEB321D9EDA1AFFF4@OctaHexa64-MkII> In-Reply-To: <55469.194.30.18.3.1330599220.squirrel@www1.saremail.com> References: <0D52CADE287778C263E7EF6A@OctaHexa64-MkII> <55469.194.30.18.3.1330599220.squirrel@www1.saremail.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9-R pxeboot fails with 'Mounting root filesystem rw failed'... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:43:58 -0000 --On 01 March 2012 11:53 +0100 egoitz@ramattack.net wrote: > So I recomend you reading last mails of mine in freebsd-hackers... > > Hope it helps, > Bye! For what it's worth - I've resolved the issue I had (which was basically the system booted, but failed trying to re-mount root as RW, and hence wouldn't go into the installer). The fix I did was to change the '/etc/fstab' on the Netboot server (i.e. the copy of FreeBSD that you're booting). It contains: " /dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL / cd9660 ro 0 0 " Just commenting out that line, i.e. " #/dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL / cd9660 ro 0 0 " Means the boot now completes, and I get offered the "Install / Shell / Live CD" prompt, instead of an error about not being able to remount root. I've yet to complete an install this way (so far we're just using a script to extract the new 9.x style '.txz' files). But that little change does let us netboot correctly now, enough for what we need. -Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 14:34:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C16E4106564A for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348C18FC0C for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 14:34:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9AA5C28 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:48:03 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D6B85C22 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:48:03 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F4F87CD.2060505@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:29:33 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4CD476.4020005@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <87d38yc2is.fsf@oak.localnet> <4F4D6C99.1000604@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F4EA742.5030104@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4EA742.5030104@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: VBox network boot X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 14:34:35 -0000 On 03/01/12 08:31, Andrei Brezan wrote: > On 29/02/2012 01:08, Da Rock wrote: >> On 02/29/12 03:04, Carl Johnson wrote: >>> Warren Block writes: >>> >>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Da Rock wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm starting to believe this dog won't hunt (in fact is dead, >>>>> bloated, and full of worms...); but has anyone got a solution for >>>>> network booting in VBox on FBSD host? >>>> To PXE-boot a VM guest, set networking to to Bridged and use the >>>> PCnet-PCI II (Am79C970A) adapter type. If the host is FreeBSD, the >>>> vboxnet kernel module has to be loaded. >>> Please emphasize that the PCnet-PCI II card emulation is necessary. I >>> was trying the Intel emulation and making no progress. I then noticed >>> your page and tried the PCnet-PCI II card and it started working. I >>> would guess that means their Intel card emulation is incomplete. >> I took it for granted the bridge part (I usually use it anyway), but >> I would never have guessed the PCnet card in a blue fit! There was >> even a PR on virtualbox for the issue of the lack of PXE with Oracle >> basically saying "too bad, so sad...". Apparently PXE licensing >> didn't allow them to distribute it directly, but offer an extension >> pack (which doesn't work on FBSD) instead. Ergo my conclusion. >> Apparently (based on this thread) it only affects intel cards though... >> >> Where is your page Warren, and why didn't it show up in my searches? >> ;) I'll follow it from here on out I think... >> >> Thanks guys... saved me a lot more fussing! >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi all, > > You can also look at https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads and > https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch01.html#intro-installing for info > related to the extension pack where you can find the PXE boot ROM for > the Intel E1000 cards, unfortunately it's PUEL, virtualbox on FBSD is > OSE. My worst case scenario was with a custom linux kernel on the > guest that didn't had drivers for Amd cards, I had to do something > like this: > > NIC 1: MAC: 0800276F42C6, Attachment: Bridged Interface > 'bridge0', Cable connected: on, Trace: off (file: none), Type: > Am79C970A, Reported speed: 0 Mbps, Boot priority: 0 > NIC 2: MAC: 0800276F42C6, Attachment: Bridged Interface > 'bridge0', Cable connected: on, Trace: off (file: none), Type: > 82540EM, Reported speed: 0 Mbps, Boot priority: 0 The extensions don't work with FBSD. Period. End of story. Oracle is _very_ clear about that- they won't support FBSD at all, and show no mercy to those who complain. It is possible to write your own though... BTW, is anyone aware if the patches are still required? I'm getting "
is not in my arp table". I'm using booting techniques as describe by Warren (gpxelinux.0, menu, and chain loading), and I have pxeboot sent over using tftp and boot off nfs. And that is why the error shows up - the address is the nfs server. I'm not sure the patches help this though... This works (mostly) using real hardware. It snags on the next stage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 15:16:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F31B106566B for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:16:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF4B8FC12 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:16:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so291363yhg.13 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:16:00 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of vrwmiller@gmail.com designates 10.60.22.40 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.60.22.40; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of vrwmiller@gmail.com designates 10.60.22.40 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=vrwmiller@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.60.22.40]) by 10.60.22.40 with SMTP id a8mr1909512oef.59.1330614960301 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:16:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=mxsTfop+XLmm5sYTaZGruwQqN785apxsElnixe2+7QU=; b=gUG7FD1PpS7aWNAMjPCc4jbWepMGV5gy0ph7QppnY0Hgug8IrYzSadb/pr0FfcYuh0 7+4kyIBBsxd8ZM9Mv4/PB2qxzjc41fQeXEbIfwogTMJXKzDhw4VEvvOlnugLhAQ3vPJR vJWNbgjyciuAI/YlD+CQKYUQcyZz9PLlRuXeo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.60.22.40 with SMTP id a8mr1672063oef.59.1330614960245; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 07:16:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.182.106.46 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 07:16:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:16:00 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: b7q0k5sRFYSH3V2j62bb7flX3Os Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Running OS tftp vs. pxeboot tftp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:16:01 -0000 Hi All, Are there significant differences in the implementation between the tftp client in FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE and the client implementation in pxeboot.bs? I ask because I have encountered a scenario where pxeboot.bs is tftp'ing boot files from a PXE server and fails in random spots while attempting to download boot files to start a 8.2-RELEASE install. When we run the same sequence of tftp gets in a running 8.2-RELEASE instance continuously, we never received a single failure in a solid hour of attempts. -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 18:50:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB73A106566B for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from egoitz@ramattack.net) Received: from proxypop04.sare.net (proxypop04.sare.net [194.30.0.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F7E8FC15 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 18:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.saremail.com (unknown [194.30.0.100]) by proxypop04.sare.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F4A29DC551; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 19:50:55 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:50:55 +0100 From: egoitz@ramattack.net To: Karl Pielorz In-Reply-To: <326A337AEB321D9EDA1AFFF4@OctaHexa64-MkII> References: <0D52CADE287778C263E7EF6A@OctaHexa64-MkII> <55469.194.30.18.3.1330599220.squirrel@www1.saremail.com> <326A337AEB321D9EDA1AFFF4@OctaHexa64-MkII> Message-ID: <7037aefa6e807250861702438777767d@ramattack.net> X-Sender: egoitz@ramattack.net User-Agent: Saremail/0.6-svn Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9-R pxeboot fails with 'Mounting root filesystem rw failed'... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:50:56 -0000 In the "new" way of booting... you need to have the cd because the own cd is the root filesystem... and in fact is live filesystem too.... so unless you're booting from mfsroot... I assume you should have that line in /etc/fstab inside the iso image.... but if you're using mfsroot... I really even am not creating etc dir inside the iso image... because it's not needed and in previous releases and iso images when always booted from mfsroot (and where not livefs cds and so) it wasn't necessary... On Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:43:58 +0000, Karl Pielorz wrote: > --On 01 March 2012 11:53 +0100 egoitz@ramattack.net wrote: > >> So I recomend you reading last mails of mine in freebsd-hackers... >> >> Hope it helps, >> Bye! > > For what it's worth - I've resolved the issue I had (which was > basically the system booted, but failed trying to re-mount root as > RW, > and hence wouldn't go into the installer). > > The fix I did was to change the '/etc/fstab' on the Netboot server > (i.e. the copy of FreeBSD that you're booting). > > It contains: > > " > /dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL / cd9660 ro 0 0 > " > > Just commenting out that line, i.e. > > " > #/dev/iso9660/FREEBSD_INSTALL / cd9660 ro 0 0 > " > > Means the boot now completes, and I get offered the "Install / Shell > / Live CD" prompt, instead of an error about not being able to > remount > root. > > I've yet to complete an install this way (so far we're just using a > script to extract the new 9.x style '.txz' files). > > But that little change does let us netboot correctly now, enough for > what we need. > > -Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 20:07:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0D091065670 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavierfreebsdquestions@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590B18FC16 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:07:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ggnk4 with SMTP id k4so550777ggn.13 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:07:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of xavierfreebsdquestions@gmail.com designates 10.101.129.7 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.101.129.7; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of xavierfreebsdquestions@gmail.com designates 10.101.129.7 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=xavierfreebsdquestions@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=xavierfreebsdquestions@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.101.129.7]) by 10.101.129.7 with SMTP id g7mr3011827ann.12.1330632466773 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:07:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=VBX+CE7uQ4WA8xjG8NqdBmDlZkhgOkQOp+5kgM91h/8=; b=T1cidPd6yckDPU7kCziuoYk3PoDqK6fWVoHqK5Kf1wIE4sLDGTDTW6wjzPsvu+uWzj NBR3Qrq+ROdTx36kgmrHUOTVoUV4su2rWN9QqqIsevtJYRC35T5EhLfpZLFOGwLuYkNQ 2l5c41eKEpGoYApUsBQhRDTX44KYYGtRN4j3d7JGGJc6n7PHRTaDy3TeocuCQyhUykRW D1KwE6ugWL8ZvWnKbHn8t2zxMWhO7UquPGnImK1sGR/XVrDW4i/d5fQJRxMHcMOEQN3h oMSNN7R13niWcfaYcd4c4xoD3VGu2VMQXf0w5AEHJ9Ev5PkGgVxbMWzfhuaAX+/jRxGF X/Wg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.101.129.7 with SMTP id g7mr2352121ann.12.1330630813859; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:40:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.147.170.16 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:40:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:40:13 +0100 Message-ID: From: Xavier FreeBSD questions To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: "SCSI sense: UNIT ATTENTION" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 20:07:47 -0000 Hi, I have: 9.0-RELEASE and this problem: ugen4.8: at usbus4 umass2: on usbus4 umass2: 8070i (ATAPI) over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0100 umass2:4:2:-1: Attached to scbus4 (probe0:umass-sim2:2:0:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 (probe0:umass-sim2:2:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (probe0:umass-sim2:2:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition (probe0:umass-sim2:2:0:0): SCSI sense: UNIT ATTENTION asc:29,0 (Power on, reset, or bus device reset occurred) cd1 at umass-sim2 bus 2 scbus4 target 0 lun 0 cd1: <_NEC DVD_RW ND-3500AG 2.07> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd1: 40.000MB/s transfers cd1: cd present [2295104 x 2048 byte records] (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 23 5 3f 0 0 1 0 (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mode for t his track) (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): Info: 0x23053f (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back The DVDRW don't work correctly, ant idea for solvent this problem ? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 1 20:25:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17341065677 for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:25:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech.junk@myfairpoint.net) Received: from mail28c26.carrierzone.com (mail28c26-2170.carrierzone.com [64.29.152.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90ED58FC2C for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:25:17 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: tech.junk.myfairpoint.net Received: from tardis.cinnet (pool-71-168-71-177.cncdnh.fast.myfairpoint.net [71.168.71.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail28c26.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q21KP95P029703 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 20:25:12 GMT Message-ID: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:25:09 -0500 From: sean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120220 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=KcVuPaGlu33GK6U+M2PA5qdbC69FGXWqM6/JkLAFICY= c=1 sm=1 a=ZHgFDMM0ft4A:10 a=i9SFsS4JL3sA:10 a=YamaJ3vGr5cA:10 a=qiV6Z9L8f1sA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=TBCEi6aOmQt/yhIoq6hKNg==:17 a=pWDhWfEuNuO7eRZSLPoA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=TBCEi6aOmQt/yhIoq6hKNg==:117 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.4F4FDB2B.0105, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 Subject: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tech.junk@myfairpoint.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 20:25:18 -0000 Hello All, I am unable to get the built in mic of a Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision to capture sound. I have been testing it using Skype. -lsusb shows the logitech device. -Device "sound" and "snd_ich" is complied into my custom kernel. -running "FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Mon Feb 20 04:40:40 EST 2012 amd64" -The Skype test call produces sound and can capture video through the camera. -mixer show the mic at 97:97 -webcamd_enabled="YES" entered into /etc/rc.conf Would anyone have some ideas on what check? Thanks in advance to all replies, Sean From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 00:05:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190091065677 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edmundj2@yahoo.com) Received: from nm5-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm5-vm2.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAACB8FC2B for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.57] by nm5.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Mar 2012 23:52:46 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.166] by tm10.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Mar 2012 23:52:46 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1022.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Mar 2012 23:52:46 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 648735.1925.bm@omp1022.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 28269 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Mar 2012 23:52:46 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1330645966; bh=W4j8HwdCRT9ApZQyMHB3oLLZbj8saRVKNLY1x/98b1I=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xrTF/bQMAedfyuvl4xztaQ1S2HgDKYDAXPEIXQB69BlmgP+pFgU3EQxy8C49RGH1aFlhp2gt0v385Nen8waYPxgZ/mPFj4jaJKMZdIPq+RRDJnuoPySGxuBodrcCbEdUMKCeXsBDYFtXHSlZ78lECCVriTg+aF2tVttkM1PPSbc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=SYhkgJVI0AZv52dzK43pIjewXjU/jIUmE6t3IyjpfpTS8DXtu8H/JbY1jxkGihhQ5U4gM4KCmaZjVYyqmKbRHrp6mgQUFS5GmoPL8uUeCM9JjbCe11K8JddcH+CgAo2KKON1nma2a9zWckML/Ofr6B+PY0c7qEiPt+Lsf/uYi0c=; X-YMail-OSG: aSKclPAVM1mzuHJOItmQY.oS0Gk8m9JuknT8xYDKjyDSpRF 3q4USbYfmoNEKETrVfKfq_Lo71AOF8Bh8kZJJzo1Kx4rJtjpGQnE3RTjKUj5 RCrx5JLX2X.gF0pyc1RfY0j10bioPPpZRaJ27j_O3MS5fsKqWv_yRRlSQqmS 6eMbFuu62n1dVglDIgBn0oOHrf20aR8ZRVKOXo_R.5q.Z9YKoJA_XZs3XXlQ 0Ye5r1DPNdGZhVdUcN7.v2MbRsRwcaVqCf8zutxa0rm3LW27J8E8VZj1zVkw L9C.MoBGXIL6it7gNX4mDKx2b1zfGp_En_WweLhOZTQ00bEKoWafnugVCurm vyyST14bO75deNC8Bc6DHStGD2gp9h.zpRa_HcqtetDCApe5KQTDRg_N60LP ukw-- Received: from [140.147.236.194] by web120804.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:52:46 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.338427 Message-ID: <1330645966.46434.YahooMailNeo@web120804.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:52:46 -0800 (PST) From: Me Me To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: THe number of cdrom in /dev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Me Me List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:05:40 -0000 hi,=0A=A0I'm sorry to bother you. I know you probably got something better = to do. So I'll just take=A0a minute.=0AMy system's been down for a while -= =A0anyway I wanted to add data from a cd, but the prompt reads "can't have = more than 32 cd devices or drives." I couldn't figure it out=A0 tried alot.= So now I'd like to take some of the devices out of the directory. However,= I "rm" and they mostly return. I'm careful to keep those I see in the ref = 4.2 book but do I have to change permissions or file types or should I use = "mv" to another directory so I don't lose them permenetly? Cause I need a j= ob and all I want to do is -- Can you belive this! practice SQL admin and d= atabase=A0 --oh joy!=0Aanyway if you've got an advisory or a fix for this a= nd your not to annoyed please send it.=0AYou guys do a great job I wouldn't= miss this for nut'in.=A0 Thanks and Happy New year. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 00:30:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1652A1065672 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAABA8FC12 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-185-71.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.185.71]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281623D289; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 01:30:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id q220UEfJ002180; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 01:30:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 01:30:14 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Me Me Message-Id: <20120302013014.bd752266.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1330645966.46434.YahooMailNeo@web120804.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1330645966.46434.YahooMailNeo@web120804.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: THe number of cdrom in /dev X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:30:17 -0000 On Thu, 1 Mar 2012 15:52:46 -0800 (PST), Me Me wrote: > My system's been down for a while -=A0anyway I wanted to add > data from a cd, but the prompt reads "can't have more than > 32 cd devices or drives." Which program does show this message? Please explain what you've done in order to get that text. How many _actual_ CD drives does your system have? Just to make sure this isn't the problem... :-) > I couldn't figure it out=A0 tried alot. So now I'd like to take > some of the devices out of the directory. However, I "rm" and > they mostly return. FreeBSD's current /dev directory is a dynamical thing. It gets populated automatically under the control of devfs (at boot time) and devd (at run time) which control several actions that can be taken. > I'm careful to keep those I see in the ref 4.2 book but do > I have to change permissions or file types or should I use > "mv" to another directory so I don't lose them permenetly? Which OS version are you currently using? > anyway if you've got an advisory or a fix for this and your > not to annoyed please send it. Just provide a bit more information so your problem can be diagnosed. At the moment, I'm just guessing. :-) --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 00:31:09 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0011065672 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:31:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D8C28FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 00:31:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7EDC5C28 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:44:37 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28CC45C22 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 10:44:37 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:26:07 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> In-Reply-To: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 00:31:09 -0000 On 03/02/12 06:25, sean wrote: > Hello All, > > I am unable to get the built in mic of a Logitech QuickCam Ultra > Vision to capture sound. I have been testing it using Skype. > > -lsusb shows the logitech device. > -Device "sound" and "snd_ich" is complied into my custom kernel. > -running "FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Mon Feb 20 > 04:40:40 EST 2012 amd64" > -The Skype test call produces sound and can capture video through the > camera. > -mixer show the mic at 97:97 Which mixer? Check `ls /dev/mixer*`, and use `mixer -f /dev/mixer -webcamd_enabled="YES" entered into /etc/rc.conf > > Would anyone have some ideas on what check? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 03:23:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF62106566B for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 03:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0B08FC12 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 03:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so2125585lag.13 for ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:23:35 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 10.112.85.233 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.112.85.233; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 10.112.85.233 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rsimmons0@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=rsimmons0@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.112.85.233]) by 10.112.85.233 with SMTP id k9mr3481831lbz.56.1330658615014 (num_hops = 1); Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:23:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=srC2ujAcxkFQdPhd+iq3kwQAZWMfk8pgjEX1JwrUaos=; b=iyhMHXPV1XNaAtnS0m+K3AfRSci8TxannIODhbAR2BLf1SqQ0zzu/34EKwvk1f09f4 ep0DjX8qAFCjoCMTR/q94cB9e2cQH+sTYcJl8ljyqbjqflA5P7U0Ll6tzu9hfjbTkr5n iNWmscNjethTZlRM1sYkWXXIRzrMMopTgLSSD6z0Javh7Vlx1e9NGu5vYPh1qZnAcoA6 frZSwi1+DnGCGrXAZPLynZMKRLZIYZj9uAfwxV9JtabvzeYeqq/Q2lQOqpDhgIhIMzbl U8uh7wJYYJ3s79LO9rR9G6HZhE+uJh/dmTfxT65EDtcgbshP1BaqxEdG80GUotlCTXkT ZrzQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.85.233 with SMTP id k9mr2848416lbz.56.1330658614941; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 19:23:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.145.73 with HTTP; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 19:23:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 22:23:34 -0500 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: default value for DESTDIR X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 03:23:36 -0000 During the new installer for 9.0, what is the default value for DESTDIR? The reason I'm asking is I setup my partitions manually in the shell provided for doing this, and I want to know where I need to leave them mounted before I exit the shell to continue installation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 05:15:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB04C106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 05:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dcdowse@gmx.net) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 137FF8FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 05:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 02 Mar 2012 04:48:20 -0000 Received: from f051070165.adsl.alicedsl.de (EHLO byteboxII.home) [78.51.70.165] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 02 Mar 2012 05:48:20 +0100 X-Authenticated: #30106961 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18c7ex1AyscTf2u5LK1X7yEmJp4Hrfw79BHQyTTT8 UOceCD49epvivm Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 05:48:11 +0100 From: "Daniel C. Dowse" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120302054811.a72c89c8.dcdowse@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.2 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) X-Face: 'NB5d@1]I],; 5f]D0Fw?; g&E6i|{1:sF'aA|FuxoBv8CQLNWai(8%vgK9RiTO}Zz\yEafdV GZ-/g%=?L6uwChNkpYQ3yaPv`#sH@sM(uy}HqNi''HAi!rxx Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 05:15:04 -0000 On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 10:26:07 +1000, Da Rock wrote: >On 03/02/12 06:25, sean wrote: >> Hello All, >> >> I am unable to get the built in mic of a Logitech QuickCam Ultra >> Vision to capture sound. I have been testing it using Skype. >> >> -lsusb shows the logitech device. >> -Device "sound" and "snd_ich" is complied into my custom kernel. >> -running "FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #0: Mon Feb 20 >> 04:40:40 EST 2012 amd64" >> -The Skype test call produces sound and can capture video through the >> camera. >> -mixer show the mic at 97:97 >Which mixer? Check `ls /dev/mixer*`, and use `mixer -f >/dev/mixer> -webcamd_enabled="YES" entered into /etc/rc.conf >> >> Would anyone have some ideas on what check? > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hi, usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 usbconfig -d ugenX.Y reset usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 and then restart webcamd. may help, it worked on my Logitech Business Pro Cam cheers -- Daniel Dowse \\|// (o o) ---------------------------------------------ooO-(_)-Ooo--------- - "Jim, Wahnsinn dient keinem Zweck. - - Er kennt keine Vernunft, aber er kann ein Ziel haben!" - - (Spock) - ----------------------------------------------------------------- - []-/""| DISLIKE ! - - []-\ _| - - U www.fsf.org/facebook - ----------------------------------------------------------------- - () ascii ribbon campaign - against html mail - - /\ - against microsoft attachments - - - - Please reply below quoted text section - ----------------------------------------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 06:04:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A04106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226F98FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:04:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [93.104.94.178] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S3Lbs-0007QX-5A; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:04:56 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2264sYJ003526; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 07:04:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.4/8.14.3/Submit) id q2264rcs003525; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 07:04:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 07:04:53 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: "Daniel C. Dowse" Message-ID: <20120302060453.GA3506@tinyCurrent> References: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120302054811.a72c89c8.dcdowse@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20120302054811.a72c89c8.dcdowse@gmx.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 93.104.94.178 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:04:58 -0000 El da Friday, March 02, 2012 a las 05:48:11AM +0100, Daniel C. Dowse escribi: > Hi, > > usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 > usbconfig -d ugenX.Y reset > usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 > > and then restart webcamd. > > may help, it worked on my Logitech Business Pro Cam > > cheers FWHIW, such quirks are also shown in http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat and once your webcam is working fine it could show up there too; HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11 | UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2 | FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 11:25:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A74106566C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:25:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from siefke_listen@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate07.web.de (fmmailgate07.web.de [217.72.192.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B72518FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moweb002.kundenserver.de (moweb002.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.108]) by fmmailgate07.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E514ED1FF34 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:25:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from gentoo-desk.silviosiefke.de ([87.123.184.250]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MgfXb-1RjR3k2xEN-00NCUj; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:25:31 +0100 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:25:43 +0100 From: "siefke_listen@web.de" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.8; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:7XLCoFDgRB53nSjqdNzXhfwVTBX57slagt0q83sewgs Eca3HznNJdn4uq4RB1DJmHo/gJqJmHvQlf7j2g6XXb1lDu+BFQ pNX+Rej9kn/t0Vc9HcNlLqTd1+K0Zz9tSrC1vwP4p2woL2eyIN qyRWh0gs2gkpynzI1H1a0SpgQ6JWigifcc0CfcXHddZFMV0WrH tiDsdCrs9ipNE5gsClzhQ== Subject: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:25:35 -0000 Hello, i use a Brother MFC-7320 printer at a vodafone Box. The printer can used with the adress lpd://192.168.0.2/MFC7320. I copied the Linux driver and adapted, but unfortunately, the printer would not work on FreeBSD. On Windows and Gentoo, there are no problems. Has someone run the Brother Printer MFC-7320 and can share the way? Regards Silvio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 11:45:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B322B1065853 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C3E8FC1B for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:45:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id C224B5C28 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 21:58:54 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 39EA75C22 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 21:58:54 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F50B1A4.6070800@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 21:40:20 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> In-Reply-To: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:45:26 -0000 On 03/02/12 21:25, siefke_listen@web.de wrote: > Hello, > > > i use a Brother MFC-7320 printer at a vodafone Box. The printer can used > with the adress lpd://192.168.0.2/MFC7320. I copied the Linux driver and > adapted, but unfortunately, the printer would not work on FreeBSD. On > Windows and Gentoo, there are no problems. > > Has someone run the Brother Printer MFC-7320 and can share the way? Unfortunately according to openprinting this printer is a paperweight :) Thats using foomatic. It may be possible to use the linuxulator to run the linux filters, but it maybe more trouble than its worth. You need to ensure the elf is set right in the binaries. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 11:52:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C12106566B for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:52:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DB78FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so558703yen.13 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 03:52:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.185.168 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.185.168; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.185.168 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.185.168]) by 10.236.185.168 with SMTP id u28mr13082831yhm.73.1330689143628 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 03:52:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.185.168 with SMTP id u28mr10322265yhm.73.1330689143552; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 03:52:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b6sm8413957anc.3.2012.03.02.03.52.22 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 03:52:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3Tzplm58Hxz2CG4p for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:52:20 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:52:20 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120302065220.2b4fa8f9@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> References: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/jXjJd2EK/w5fUcVcol/0JPnSRfaf3+GBKOf6bMNZSRJmryUePXUoFu5MOY7qaFWdyvuq Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 11:52:24 -0000 On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:25:43 +0100 siefke_listen@web.de articulated: > i use a Brother MFC-7320 printer at a vodafone Box. The printer can > used with the adress lpd://192.168.0.2/MFC7320. I copied the Linux > driver and adapted, but unfortunately, the printer would not work on > FreeBSD. On Windows and Gentoo, there are no problems. > > Has someone run the Brother Printer MFC-7320 and can share the way? I have an MFC-9560CDW that works (somewhat) but it needs CUPS installed. Even then it doesn't work with a program that does not offer an "LPR" print option. The fact that it works under Windows is not surprising. Printing under Windows "just works". There is a movement towards that goal now in progress for now-Windows based systems. See for further details. Brother does supply print drivers for Linux; however (and I have checked), they have no intention of writing ones for other operating systems. I have spend some time trying to port those drivers to BSD; however, I just don't have the necessary time required to complete the project. This is where a "paid" entity or organization to accomplish such a task would be of immeasurable use. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 12:16:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6510A106566B for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:16:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from siefke_listen@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate05.web.de (fmmailgate05.web.de [217.72.192.243]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524708FC08 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moweb002.kundenserver.de (moweb002.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.108]) by fmmailgate05.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623216A90BA8 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:15:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from silviosiefke.silviosiefke.de ([87.123.184.250]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MT8sw-1RwKdM10lC-00SIHA; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:15:58 +0100 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:15:54 +0100 From: "siefke_listen@web.de" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120302131554.25016adc.siefke_listen@web.de> In-Reply-To: <20120302065220.2b4fa8f9@scorpio> References: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> <20120302065220.2b4fa8f9@scorpio> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:pihzIjsaESiO+DTG9AB7sqQfwZpEqe8qniSWaz2xMfm p6r0f8rTxfFaC0YwC+MLOvgEd7of1P5PrB0zAs2GsuWjPUcRuH FANu9HPnBi02/Vct+8oKREKUd7cDvAPN3rpEgvLWgfHJF3u+/Z hkIR12xpE1JWVlZ0a/6PDvOhVBBCmxiAVkVSWV+LagUg7u4T80 fkSSqT7wgwz3QpdAEJfyQ== Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:16:00 -0000 Hello, On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:52:20 -0500 Jerry wrote: > I have an MFC-9560CDW that works (somewhat) but it needs CUPS > installed. Even then it doesn't work with a program that does > not offer an "LPR" print option. I installed cups. The printer is created but also, and the Linux drivers are also found. But he refuses to print. I would say this is due to the shell script. > The fact that it works under Windows is not surprising. Printing under > Windows "just works". There is a movement towards that goal now in > progress for now-Windows based systems. See > > for further details. It is clear under Windows would be running a cow with no effort. :) > Brother does supply print drivers for Linux; however (and I have > checked), they have no intention of writing ones for other operating > systems. I have spend some time trying to port those drivers to BSD; > however, I just don't have the necessary time required to complete the > project. This is where a "paid" entity or organization to accomplish > such a task would be of immeasurable use. Yes it's true. I asked if Brother can not create a PPD file, without the junction with the shell scripts. Until now has not answered Brother. Regards Silvio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 12:18:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 298421065670 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech.junk@myfairpoint.net) Received: from mail14c26.carrierzone.com (mail14c26-2170.carrierzone.com [64.29.152.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73508FC08 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:18:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: tech.junk.myfairpoint.net Received: from tardis.cinnet (pool-71-168-71-177.cncdnh.fast.myfairpoint.net [71.168.71.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail14c26.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q22CId5U007832 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:18:40 GMT Message-ID: <4F50BA9F.3040502@myfairpoint.net> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:18:39 -0500 From: sean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120220 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=Zq5LsoIwtmcqGCbI01KTh0kpTatfT7wXYlniCLQ2RbA= c=1 sm=1 a=ZHgFDMM0ft4A:10 a=He1UjKf1Cp0A:10 a=YamaJ3vGr5cA:10 a=qiV6Z9L8f1sA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=TBCEi6aOmQt/yhIoq6hKNg==:17 a=m_-DXrjB9U_wQXQQelIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=TBCEi6aOmQt/yhIoq6hKNg==:117 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020203.4F50BAA3.01EE, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 Subject: Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tech.junk@myfairpoint.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:18:45 -0000 On 03/01/12 19:26, Da Rock wrote: > Which mixer? Check `ls /dev/mixer*`, and use `mixer -f > /dev/mixer Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A4A106566C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:23:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech.junk@myfairpoint.net) Received: from mail14c26.carrierzone.com (mail14c26-2170.carrierzone.com [64.29.152.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE728FC08 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:23:09 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: tech.junk.myfairpoint.net Received: from tardis.cinnet (pool-71-168-71-177.cncdnh.fast.myfairpoint.net [71.168.71.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail14c26.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q22CN404017439 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:23:06 GMT Message-ID: <4F50BBA8.8090203@myfairpoint.net> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:23:04 -0500 From: sean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120220 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120302054811.a72c89c8.dcdowse@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <20120302054811.a72c89c8.dcdowse@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=Zq5LsoIwtmcqGCbI01KTh0kpTatfT7wXYlniCLQ2RbA= c=1 sm=1 a=ZHgFDMM0ft4A:10 a=He1UjKf1Cp0A:10 a=YamaJ3vGr5cA:10 a=qiV6Z9L8f1sA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=TBCEi6aOmQt/yhIoq6hKNg==:17 a=XbCxvu-ilpeQmDG0YNIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=TBCEi6aOmQt/yhIoq6hKNg==:117 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A02020A.4F50BBAD.00A6, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 Subject: Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tech.junk@myfairpoint.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:23:10 -0000 On 03/01/12 23:48, Daniel C. Dowse wrote: > > Hi, > > usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 > usbconfig -d ugenX.Y reset > usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 > > and then restart webcamd. > > may help, it worked on my Logitech Business Pro Cam > > cheers > I had tried that previously, but went through it again. I get a notice of no device or lack of permissions, even though I am running the command as root. tardis# dmesg | grep pcm pcm0: port 0xc800-0xc8ff,0xcc00-0xcc3f irq 17 at device 7.5 on pci0 pcm0: pcm1: on uaudio0 tardis# cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64) Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default pcm1: (rec) tardis# usbconfig -d ugen1.0 do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 No device match or lack of permissions. tardis# whoami root tardis# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 12:24:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBE01065670 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:24:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from siefke_listen@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate07.web.de (fmmailgate07.web.de [217.72.192.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C6CB8FC19 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:24:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moweb002.kundenserver.de (moweb002.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.108]) by fmmailgate07.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DABDD2A761 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:24:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from silviosiefke.silviosiefke.de ([87.123.184.250]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0MINMF-1S7YnS3skh-004H9Z; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:24:06 +0100 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:24:02 +0100 From: "siefke_listen@web.de" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120302132402.432d9bd9.siefke_listen@web.de> In-Reply-To: <4F50B1A4.6070800@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> <4F50B1A4.6070800@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:cT6m/Gc7WqVYoSy0MsWHJbHjF8hf0KtOlj3zju78pMe imXUMzR193zcVFvqXvpnsDa86aGgxJbwL+donQz4La/dHnYWuY Sc+LKvaQ/PImJ57z1U48vdItHqlZTIjjMVsnrHfqk3lSg2Ho58 3cfCk2ECjAm3uuu5SCM9TVGia8YVq3ur+kVsXUpC7ZYjjMjFnC /VoD1765hW8Isw7XDlGQw== Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:24:07 -0000 On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 21:40:20 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > On 03/02/12 21:25, siefke_listen@web.de wrote: > Unfortunately according to openprinting this printer is a paperweight :) Yes, but he does his service reliably and inexpensively, and my duty cycle is not small. > Thats using foomatic. It may be possible to use the linuxulator to run > the linux filters, but it maybe more trouble than its worth. You need to > ensure the elf is set right in the binaries. The filters are just shell scripts. I have this as far as it adjusted. The four programs are available on BSD. Do not understand why this will not run. I find annoying. If you have a great operating system, and must again be annoyed by vendors. I've tested enough and Linux systems on my Pentium 4 computer, FreeBSD and Gentoo are the best choice. Always make any one a spanner in the works. How can we be satisfied? Regards Silvio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 12:31:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8EBF1065674 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:31:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech.junk@myfairpoint.net) Received: from mail10c26.carrierzone.com (mail10c26-2170.carrierzone.com [64.29.152.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617B28FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:31:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: tech.junk.myfairpoint.net Received: from tardis.cinnet (pool-71-168-71-177.cncdnh.fast.myfairpoint.net [71.168.71.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail10c26.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q22CVLdd026375 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:31:23 GMT Message-ID: <4F50BD99.7090509@myfairpoint.net> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 07:31:21 -0500 From: sean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120220 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120302054811.a72c89c8.dcdowse@gmx.net> <20120302060453.GA3506@tinyCurrent> In-Reply-To: <20120302060453.GA3506@tinyCurrent> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=w7zDIwfjDQcZeG2cwdsucCKKoL0lS7ocr6PGC43+Qag= c=1 sm=1 a=ZHgFDMM0ft4A:10 a=He1UjKf1Cp0A:10 a=YamaJ3vGr5cA:10 a=qiV6Z9L8f1sA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=TBCEi6aOmQt/yhIoq6hKNg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=Ln5fHFcUpYURBixELwQA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=TBCEi6aOmQt/yhIoq6hKNg==:117 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020204.4F50BD9E.0054, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 Subject: Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tech.junk@myfairpoint.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:31:27 -0000 On 03/02/12 01:04, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El da Friday, March 02, 2012 a las 05:48:11AM +0100, Daniel C. Dowse escribi: > >> Hi, >> >> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 >> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y reset >> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 >> >> and then restart webcamd. >> >> may help, it worked on my Logitech Business Pro Cam >> >> cheers > FWHIW, such quirks are also shown in http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat > and once your webcam is working fine it could show up there too; > > HIH > > matthias I have been using that page for help. I just entered lsusb and the Quickcam Ultra reports different numbers alongside ugen then what is show reviewing dmesg or cat /dev/sndstat. Is this the problem, the assigned numbers don't match? If I run the usbconfig command with 4.2 instead of 1.0 at least I do not get the can't be found or does not exist reply. Instead I get a generic "REQUEST = " message. My camera is also not listed on that site. tardis# whoami root tardis# lsusb Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen2.5: ID 050d:016a Belkin Components Bluetooth Mini Dongle Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen2.4: ID 0a5c:4503 Broadcom Corp. Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen2.3: ID 0a5c:4502 Broadcom Corp. Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen1.4: ID 047d:2048 Kensington Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen4.2: ID 046d:08c9 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Ultra Vision Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen2.2: ID 0a5c:4500 Broadcom Corp. BCM2046B1 USB 2.0 Hub (part of BCM2046 Bluetooth) Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen1.3: ID 046d:c315 Logitech, Inc. Classic New Touch Keyboard Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen1.2: ID 05e3:0608 Genesys Logic, Inc. USB-2.0 4-Port HUB Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen4.1: ID 0000:0000 Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen3.1: ID 0000:0000 Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen2.1: ID 0000:0000 Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen1.1: ID 0000:0000 Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen0.1: ID 0000:0000 tardis# usbconfig -d ugen4.2 do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 REQUEST = tardis# usbconfig -d ugen4.2 do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 REQUEST = tardis# dmesg | grep pcm pcm0: port 0xc800-0xc8ff,0xcc00-0xcc3f irq 17 at device 7.5 on pci0 pcm0: pcm1: on uaudio0 tardis# cat /dev/sndstat FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64) Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default pcm1: (rec) tardis# From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 12:31:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851C31065739 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:31:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AD68FC22 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:31:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0C85C22 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:45:25 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2AE55C2B for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:45:24 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F50BC8E.207@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:26:54 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F50BA9F.3040502@myfairpoint.net> In-Reply-To: <4F50BA9F.3040502@myfairpoint.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:31:57 -0000 On 03/02/12 22:18, sean wrote: > On 03/01/12 19:26, Da Rock wrote: >> Which mixer? Check `ls /dev/mixer*`, and use `mixer -f >> /dev/mixer > I did not realize there was more than one mixer. > Anyway, here are my results to the commands above. > tardis# ls /dev/mixer* > /dev/mixer0 /dev/mixer1 > tardis# mixer > Mixer vol is currently set to 91:91 > Mixer pcm is currently set to 97:97 > Mixer line is currently set to 75:75 > Mixer mic is currently set to 97:97 > Mixer cd is currently set to 91:91 > Mixer rec is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer igain is currently set to 0:0 > Mixer ogain is currently set to 50:50 > Mixer line1 is currently set to 75:75 > Mixer phin is currently set to 0:0 > Mixer phout is currently set to 0:0 > Recording source: mic > tardis# mixer1 > mixer1: Command not found. > tardis# mixer -f /dev/mixer > Mixer vol is currently set to 91:91 > Mixer pcm is currently set to 97:97 > Mixer line is currently set to 75:75 > Mixer mic is currently set to 97:97 > Mixer cd is currently set to 91:91 > Mixer rec is currently set to 100:100 > Mixer igain is currently set to 0:0 > Mixer ogain is currently set to 50:50 > Mixer line1 is currently set to 75:75 > Mixer phin is currently set to 0:0 > Mixer phout is currently set to 0:0 > Recording source: mic Somehow I think you've misunderstood what I said. Just post the output of `mixer -f /dev/mixer1`. I think you will find your answer there. The default mixer (/dev/mixer0) is your soundcard, and this will be the basis of `mixer` and `mixer -f /dev/mixer`; the other will probably be the webcam audio ports- to verify this, it will only show recording tunables. You can adjust the levels similarly, and you should be able to get a result from that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 12:45:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DF6106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203F88FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:45:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4E75C28 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:58:52 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D683D5C22 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:58:51 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F50BFB5.6040003@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:40:21 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> <20120302065220.2b4fa8f9@scorpio> <20120302131554.25016adc.siefke_listen@web.de> In-Reply-To: <20120302131554.25016adc.siefke_listen@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:45:24 -0000 On 03/02/12 22:15, siefke_listen@web.de wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:52:20 -0500 Jerry wrote: >> I have an MFC-9560CDW that works (somewhat) but it needs CUPS >> installed. Even then it doesn't work with a program that does >> not offer an "LPR" print option. > I installed cups. The printer is created but also, and the Linux drivers are > also found. But he refuses to print. I would say this is due to the shell > script. Are you sure its just a script? Any clue as to what shell it is using? Bash? I do believe there should be some binaries there somewhere as well. Do you know what printer language it is using? This was mostly obscured on the net, but I presume GDI. You also may have some success using another similar driver (trial and error though). >> The fact that it works under Windows is not surprising. Printing under >> Windows "just works". There is a movement towards that goal now in >> progress for now-Windows based systems. See >> >> for further details. > It is clear under Windows would be running a cow with no effort. :) Love this response :D >> Brother does supply print drivers for Linux; however (and I have >> checked), they have no intention of writing ones for other operating >> systems. I have spend some time trying to port those drivers to BSD; >> however, I just don't have the necessary time required to complete the >> project. This is where a "paid" entity or organization to accomplish >> such a task would be of immeasurable use. > Yes it's true. I asked if Brother can not create a PPD file, without the > junction with the shell scripts. Until now has not answered Brother. You'll be lucky if you get an answer, but it will invariably be "no. Piss off, its not worth our time". Its always hard to give up on a piece of hardware that _should_ work. Depends how hard you want to work to get it to operate: you can probably get one of those old pdp systems they've mentioned here recently to run FreeBSD, but it will take a lot of work :) But you do have a lot of help here... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 12:48:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE44106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D786F8FC14 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550B35C28 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:01:38 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D5B6C5C22 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:01:37 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F50C05B.10303@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:43:07 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120302054811.a72c89c8.dcdowse@gmx.net> <20120302060453.GA3506@tinyCurrent> <4F50BD99.7090509@myfairpoint.net> In-Reply-To: <4F50BD99.7090509@myfairpoint.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:48:10 -0000 On 03/02/12 22:31, sean wrote: > On 03/02/12 01:04, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> El da Friday, March 02, 2012 a las 05:48:11AM +0100, Daniel C. Dowse >> escribi: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB >>> 0x00 >>> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y reset >>> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB >>> 0x00 >>> >>> and then restart webcamd. >>> >>> may help, it worked on my Logitech Business Pro Cam >>> >>> cheers >> FWHIW, such quirks are also shown in >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat >> and once your webcam is working fine it could show up there too; >> >> HIH >> >> matthias > I have been using that page for help. > I just entered lsusb and the Quickcam Ultra reports different numbers > alongside ugen then what is show reviewing dmesg or cat /dev/sndstat. > Is this the problem, the assigned numbers don't match? > If I run the usbconfig command with 4.2 instead of 1.0 at least I do > not get the can't be found or does not exist reply. > Instead I get a generic "REQUEST = " message. > My camera is also not listed on that site. > > tardis# whoami > root > tardis# lsusb > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen2.5: ID 050d:016a Belkin Components > Bluetooth Mini Dongle > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen2.4: ID 0a5c:4503 Broadcom Corp. > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen2.3: ID 0a5c:4502 Broadcom Corp. > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen1.4: ID 047d:2048 Kensington > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen4.2: ID 046d:08c9 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam > Ultra Vision > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen2.2: ID 0a5c:4500 Broadcom Corp. > BCM2046B1 USB 2.0 Hub (part of BCM2046 Bluetooth) > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen1.3: ID 046d:c315 Logitech, Inc. Classic > New Touch Keyboard > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen1.2: ID 05e3:0608 Genesys Logic, Inc. > USB-2.0 4-Port HUB > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen4.1: ID 0000:0000 > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen3.1: ID 0000:0000 > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen2.1: ID 0000:0000 > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen1.1: ID 0000:0000 > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen0.1: ID 0000:0000 > tardis# usbconfig -d ugen4.2 do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 > 0xBB 0x00 > REQUEST = > tardis# usbconfig -d ugen4.2 do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 > 0xBB 0x00 > REQUEST = > tardis# dmesg | grep pcm > pcm0: port 0xc800-0xc8ff,0xcc00-0xcc3f irq 17 at device 7.5 > on pci0 > pcm0: > pcm1: on uaudio0 > tardis# cat /dev/sndstat > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 64bit 2009061500/amd64) > Installed devices: > pcm0: (play/rec) default > pcm1: (rec) Bang! There it is. pcm1 - see the (rec) following it? Adjust the levels using `mixer -f /dev/mixer1` and away you go, happy conferencing ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 12:58:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8493D106567D for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:58:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ACB28FC18 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 12:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so821705yhg.13 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:58:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.184.6 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.184.6; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.184.6 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.184.6]) by 10.236.184.6 with SMTP id r6mr13419288yhm.82.1330693094791 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:58:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.184.6 with SMTP id r6mr10596406yhm.82.1330693094720; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:58:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x13sm8629348ang.21.2012.03.02.04.58.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 04:58:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3TzrCm2Lhsz2CG4p for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 07:58:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 07:58:11 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120302075811.6a2446cf@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120302131554.25016adc.siefke_listen@web.de> References: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> <20120302065220.2b4fa8f9@scorpio> <20120302131554.25016adc.siefke_listen@web.de> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmlbfkGnnvfVjWO+e2Eh4s2tcVaIiv+L+RXPzFdKZHhOYiL6m7MkKryFT7yHG/yFAalPwg4 Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 12:58:15 -0000 On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:15:54 +0100 siefke_listen@web.de articulated: > On Fri, 2 Mar 2012 06:52:20 -0500 Jerry wrote: > > I have an MFC-9560CDW that works (somewhat) but it needs CUPS > > installed. Even then it doesn't work with a program that does > > not offer an "LPR" print option. > > I installed cups. The printer is created but also, and the Linux > drivers are also found. But he refuses to print. I would say this is > due to the shell script. Turn up error logging in CUPS, restart it and see what the log file says. Does it even print a test page? Does the printer even eject a blank page? > > Brother does supply print drivers for Linux; however (and I have > > checked), they have no intention of writing ones for other operating > > systems. I have spend some time trying to port those drivers to BSD; > > however, I just don't have the necessary time required to complete > > the project. This is where a "paid" entity or organization to > > accomplish such a task would be of immeasurable use. > > Yes it's true. I asked if Brother can not create a PPD file, without > the junction with the shell scripts. Until now has not answered > Brother. The do for several models. I am not sure if yours is included. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 13:00:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3A91065691 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7D228FC21 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:00:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBE06F.dip.t-dialin.net [93.203.224.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id q22D09ic008115; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:00:10 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q22Cxw4N015601; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:59:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q22CxjLX015113; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:59:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201203021259.q22CxjLX015113@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Mariusz Herman From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:44:22 GMT." Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:59:45 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:00:25 -0000 jb wrote: > Mariusz Herman advatech.pl> writes: > > > > > Hi, > > > > I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for > > FreeBSD. > > ... > > This may help (NetBSD and FreeBSD support comes in pairs): > http://netbsd.org/gallery/consultants.html http://berklix.com/consultants/ http://www.freebsd.org/commercial/commercial.html http://www.bsdpie.com/ Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64, quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. http://berklix.org/yahoo/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 13:02:38 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A16CD1065670 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:02:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from MHerman@advatech.pl) Received: from jehu.advatech.pl (jehu.advatech.pl [217.30.156.157]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B7F28FC1D for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:02:37 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <201203021259.q22CxjLX015113@fire.js.berklix.net> References: Your message "Wed, 29 Feb 2012 10:44:22 GMT." <201203021259.q22CxjLX015113@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "Julian H. Stacey" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-KeepSent: E43A6D05:3F55F8AC-C12579B5:0047A288; type=4; name=$KeepSent X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5.1 September 28, 2009 Message-ID: From: Mariusz Herman Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:02:35 +0100 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on jehu/AES at 02/03/2012 14:02:37, Serialize complete at 02/03/2012 14:02:37 Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="=_related 0047A76AC12579B5_=" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: jhs@berklix.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ODP: Re: request a quote X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:02:38 -0000 To jest wieloczciowa wiadomo w formacie MIME. --=_related 0047A76AC12579B5_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Thank you. =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F= =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=5F=20 Kind regards Mariusz Herman Sales Support Specialist e-mail: mherman@advatech.pl=20 tel. (+4871) 772 66 08 kom. +48 661 917 210 =20 Advatech Sp. z o.o. ul. Kleci=F1ska 123 54-413 Wroc=B3aw tel. (+4871) 772 66 00 fax. (+4871) 798 57 75 www.advatech.pl Wpisana do Krajowego Rejestru S=B1dowego pod numerem 0000145269 S=B1d Rejonowy dla Wroc=B3awia - Fabrycznej we Wroc=B3awiu VI Wydzia=B3=20 Gospodarczy Krajowego Rejestru S=B1dowego NIP: PL 899-21-85-891 Kapita=B3 zak=B3adowy 50 000 z=B3, kapita=B3 w=B3asny 6 686 037 z=B3 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=20 Od: "Julian H. Stacey" Do: Mariusz Herman DW: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Data: 2012-03-02 14:00 Temat: Re: request a quote Wys=B3ane przez: jhs@berklix.com jb wrote: > Mariusz Herman advatech.pl> writes: >=20 > >=20 > > Hi, > >=20 > > I would be thankful, if you could send me price of 4-year support for=20 > > FreeBSD. > > ... >=20 > This may help (NetBSD and FreeBSD support comes in pairs): > http://netbsd.org/gallery/consultants.html http://berklix.com/consultants/ http://www.freebsd.org/commercial/commercial.html http://www.bsdpie.com/ Cheers, Julian --=20 Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich=20 http://berklix.com Reply below not above, cumulative like a play script, & indent with "> ". Format: Plain text. Not HTML, multipart/alternative, base64,=20 quoted-printable. Mail from @yahoo dumped @berklix. =20 http://berklix.org/yahoo/ --=_related 0047A76AC12579B5_=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 13:03:53 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDD5106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from root@tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from tensor.gdynia.pl (tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B118FC14 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:03:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q22Cgq52080244 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:42:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from root@tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: (from root@localhost) by tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q22Cgp0s080243; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:42:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from root) Newsgroups: Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 11:51:39 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fcc: sent-mail Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-Cursor-Pos: : 184 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8 Status: X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 5 X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.72]); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:42:52 +0100 (CET) Subject: tunefs -j enable -S ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:03:53 -0000 tried to do tunefs -j enable -S 256M on large and heavily used filesystem (instead of default 32M for softdep-journal). works fine, until fsck needs to replay journal, when it needs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 13:13:35 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC06106566C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from siefke_listen@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate07.web.de (fmmailgate07.web.de [217.72.192.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E6998FC1F for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moweb002.kundenserver.de (moweb002.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.108]) by fmmailgate07.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F890D3156C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:13:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from silviosiefke.silviosiefke.de ([87.123.184.250]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb001) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0Mg7Zl-1Rim5I1stp-00Nbcp; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:13:17 +0100 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:13:13 +0100 From: "siefke_listen@web.de" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120302141313.4d02f3eb.siefke_listen@web.de> In-Reply-To: <4F50BFB5.6040003@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> <20120302065220.2b4fa8f9@scorpio> <20120302131554.25016adc.siefke_listen@web.de> <4F50BFB5.6040003@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:Q0U2Ko90Y4iL9UHhmtTSWj6pz4FQ68XlzxDiLFr0pkW hdlWWgx/h1uC+y12SBCVzG06C5yTc3cfV+3TR1PsItkP8M6piM 8n+3kvvPr2y0Wev1m+BDyKApzJG26CE644QX/djWp13kO1eFqT lhtbZQuRXu5R+0nwZuuD8YFryjDRkaC7zM/rkB4MxOtqHTmk6W TVJewk043cT6Yy1UEBfMw== Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:13:36 -0000 Hello, On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:40:21 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > Are you sure its just a script? Any clue as to what shell it is using? > Bash? I do believe there should be some binaries there somewhere as well. Yes im sure. I have a ppd File, they linked to /usr/local/libexec/brlpdwrapperMFC730 and thats a shell scipt. Bash, its start with #! /bin/sh. > Do you know what printer language it is using? This was mostly obscured > on the net, but I presume GDI. Yes the printer use GDI. I have try other Brother Printer Driver, but thats most end in empty letter print without end. > You'll be lucky if you get an answer, but it will invariably be "no. > Piss off, its not worth our time". That makes me really angry. I understand it even if software companies keep your code closed, every programmer has to eat too. But why not give hardware manufacturers enough information so that other programmers can assemble a capable driver, is beyond my understanding. > Its always hard to give up on a piece of hardware that _should_ work. > Depends how hard you want to work to get it to operate: you can probably > get one of those old pdp systems they've mentioned here recently to run > FreeBSD, but it will take a lot of work :) But you do have a lot of help > here... I know FreeBSD now for 4 years. I started on my servers, then I am also change the Ubuntu Desktop (shame) to Freebsd. Only now I have installed Gentoo, because FreeBSD will not run some programms. Gentoo comes very close to Freebsd. The community from FreeBSD is really the best i see. The community of Freebsd share the knowledge, without making to smart. PS. When u want see the scripts i can send it. Its really all shell scripts. Regards Silvio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 13:34:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D411065677 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:34:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEBC8FC08 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6DC5C28 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:48:24 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 545965C22 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:48:24 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F50CB51.307@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:29:53 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> <20120302065220.2b4fa8f9@scorpio> <20120302131554.25016adc.siefke_listen@web.de> <4F50BFB5.6040003@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120302141313.4d02f3eb.siefke_listen@web.de> In-Reply-To: <20120302141313.4d02f3eb.siefke_listen@web.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:34:57 -0000 On 03/02/12 23:13, siefke_listen@web.de wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:40:21 +1000 Da Rock wrote: >> Are you sure its just a script? Any clue as to what shell it is using? >> Bash? I do believe there should be some binaries there somewhere as well. > Yes im sure. I have a ppd File, they linked > to /usr/local/libexec/brlpdwrapperMFC730 and thats a shell scipt. > > Bash, its start with #! /bin/sh. > >> Do you know what printer language it is using? This was mostly obscured >> on the net, but I presume GDI. > Yes the printer use GDI. I have try other Brother Printer Driver, but thats > most end in empty letter print without end. > > >> You'll be lucky if you get an answer, but it will invariably be "no. >> Piss off, its not worth our time". > That makes me really angry. I understand it even if software companies keep > your code closed, every programmer has to eat too. But why not give hardware > manufacturers enough information so that other programmers can assemble a > capable driver, is beyond my understanding. Same with most hardware- makes no sense whatsoever. But thats the ridiculous world we live in where greedy nutters rule the roost and demand every last blood soaked dollar in the twisted name of intellectual property. >> Its always hard to give up on a piece of hardware that _should_ work. >> Depends how hard you want to work to get it to operate: you can probably >> get one of those old pdp systems they've mentioned here recently to run >> FreeBSD, but it will take a lot of work :) But you do have a lot of help >> here... > I know FreeBSD now for 4 years. I started on my servers, then I am also > change the Ubuntu Desktop (shame) to Freebsd. Only now I have > installed Gentoo, because FreeBSD will not run some programms. > Gentoo comes very close to Freebsd. The community from FreeBSD > is really the best i see. The community of Freebsd share the knowledge, > without making to smart. The lists are so vastly different, and for FreeBSD they're really quite welcoming as opposed to being narky and flammable. Desktop usage on FreeBSD has also greatly improved; I've been using FreeBSD for about 5 years now on laptops as well, and have rid myself of linux for the past 2. For servers I've been using it a lot longer. > PS. When u want see the scripts i can send it. Its really all shell scripts. That might be interesting to see as I'm surprised there are no binaries at all. Might be able to figure out a solution too... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 13:57:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37CBA1065670 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:57:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45118FC12 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 13:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id q22DvrZV031141 ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:57:53 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 164 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D9F0F20356; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:57:52 +0100 (CET) From: Michel Talon Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:57:51 +0100 Message-Id: <297511A5-2081-4367-AE6C-9D043371085C@lpthe.jussieu.fr> To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4F50D1E1.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4F50D1E1.001/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "siefke_listen@web.de" Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 13:57:55 -0000 On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:40:21 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > Are you sure its just a script? Any clue as to what shell it is using?=20= > Bash? I do believe there should be some binaries there somewhere as = well. Yes im sure. I have a ppd File, they linked to /usr/local/libexec/brlpdwrapperMFC730 and thats a shell scipt.=20 I just went to the Brother site and downloaded a cups driver from here. = It is not exactly the same as yours, it is for the MFC7320 but for sure there is a shell = script plus a binary. called brcupsconfig3, which is called in the shell script called = cupswrapperMFC7320-2.0.2. The binary is=20 niobe% file brcupsconfig3=20 brcupsconfig3: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), = dynamically linked (uses shared libs),=20 for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, not stripped So at best you can hope to run it with Linux emulation. Personally i = have an Epson dot printer and it is the same, the Linux driver contains binary blobs and cannot be = run under FreeBSD. If you want to avoid such problems the only solution is to buy a = printer with postscript or pdf support and direct network connection, that is an expensive one. = Here at the lab we are very happy with Xerox sublimation models (i think it is an evolution of the old = Tektronix phaser) for doing color prints. In particular the use costs are low, much lower = than with color laser printers, in par with black and white laser printers. But if you want to produce nice photographic prints, unfortunately you = have to rely on good epson dot printers or similar, which means FreeBSD is excluded, = unfortunately. -- Michel Talon talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 14:08:11 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD1E1065673 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:08:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech.junk@myfairpoint.net) Received: from mail10c26.carrierzone.com (mail10c26-2170.carrierzone.com [64.29.152.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26B3F8FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:08:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Authenticated-User: tech.junk.myfairpoint.net Received: from tardis.cinnet (pool-71-168-71-177.cncdnh.fast.myfairpoint.net [71.168.71.177]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail10c26.carrierzone.com (8.13.6/8.13.1) with ESMTP id q22E85Qa031725 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:08:07 GMT Message-ID: <4F50D445.5070708@myfairpoint.net> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 09:08:05 -0500 From: sean User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120220 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120302054811.a72c89c8.dcdowse@gmx.net> <20120302060453.GA3506@tinyCurrent> <4F50BD99.7090509@myfairpoint.net> <4F50C05B.10303@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4F50C05B.10303@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=1.1 cv=w7zDIwfjDQcZeG2cwdsucCKKoL0lS7ocr6PGC43+Qag= c=1 sm=1 a=ZHgFDMM0ft4A:10 a=He1UjKf1Cp0A:10 a=YamaJ3vGr5cA:10 a=qiV6Z9L8f1sA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=TBCEi6aOmQt/yhIoq6hKNg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=7sWQzMfwekB-8ISAP9IA:9 a=eZylBJ7gTjcONzuelDUA:7 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=TBCEi6aOmQt/yhIoq6hKNg==:117 X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A02020B.4F50D44A.00A2, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 Subject: Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: tech.junk@myfairpoint.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:08:11 -0000 On 03/02/12 07:43, Da Rock wrote: > On 03/02/12 22:31, sean wrote: >> On 03/02/12 01:04, Matthias Apitz wrote: >>> El da Friday, March 02, 2012 a las 05:48:11AM +0100, Daniel C. >>> Dowse escribi: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB >>>> 0x00 >>>> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y reset >>>> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB >>>> 0x00 >>>> >>>> and then restart webcamd. >>>> >>>> may help, it worked on my Logitech Business Pro Cam >>>> >>>> cheers >>> FWHIW, such quirks are also shown in >>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat >>> and once your webcam is working fine it could show up there too; >>> >>> HIH >>> >>> matthias >> >> Installed devices: >> pcm0: (play/rec) default >> pcm1: (rec) > Bang! There it is. pcm1 - see the (rec) following it? > > Adjust the levels using `mixer -f /dev/mixer1` and away you go, happy > conferencing ;) Well I adjusted the volume as you pointed out, still no luck. Currently I am thinking I might need to get the usbconfig command above to now work, but it gives a nondescript error. tardis# usbconfig ugen4.2: at usbus4, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON tardis# lsusb Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen4.2: ID 046d:08c9 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Ultra Vision tardis# usbconfig -d ugen4.2 do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 0xBB 0x00 REQUEST = tardis# I have looked at the man pages in trying to figure out exactly what the eight number sets after do-request are doing, thinking that I might have to adjust them for some reason. I am also starting to wonder if my camera mic will work with Skype. I ran the mic test listed on the webcam site, http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat . tardis# dd if=/dev/dsp1.0 of=/dev/dsp0.0 bs=64 ^C1073+0 records in 1073+0 records out 68672 bytes transferred in 8.571198 secs (8012 bytes/sec) tardis# The test works, the mic picked me up and played it through the speakers, with some nasty loop feedback, but it did work. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 14:13:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98D6F106566B for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:13:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from siefke_listen@web.de) Received: from fmmailgate07.web.de (fmmailgate07.web.de [217.72.192.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285468FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:13:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from moweb002.kundenserver.de (moweb002.kundenserver.de [172.19.20.108]) by fmmailgate07.web.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16CFD22A1C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:13:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from silviosiefke.silviosiefke.de ([87.123.184.250]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb002) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 0LrKEG-1SX07V32fE-013yKA; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:13:25 +0100 Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:13:22 +0100 From: "siefke_listen@web.de" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20120302151322.8beb298d.siefke_listen@web.de> In-Reply-To: <4F50CB51.307@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <20120302122543.0dc89556.siefke_listen@web.de> <20120302065220.2b4fa8f9@scorpio> <20120302131554.25016adc.siefke_listen@web.de> <4F50BFB5.6040003@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120302141313.4d02f3eb.siefke_listen@web.de> <4F50CB51.307@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:xfqukiLYxRUwDKCRk8K02t+4H8R2oj4FNq/eSGuT2ef AFRjK54zQYKIIeEBe/ofmCOVLkEi+51dYbjFasMmLmDKzxx9BE Ps60eYYXtVLKIHZjOnBsik1yeYeAAk0GdygsJGd+hnK4OnI5T4 rPQOAXOfo9cOT5R8K0KsOoHk7pnyavxy3vpfP6E7gDUS0uKC8G JFNeWuHhxU1u2eNj2zJ8g== Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:13:27 -0000 On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:29:53 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > Same with most hardware- makes no sense whatsoever. But thats the > ridiculous world we live in where greedy nutters rule the roost and > demand every last blood soaked dollar in the twisted name of > intellectual property. I'm not so sure if it is only the companies. I think we are also consumers simply add too much. I know enough to buy all the crap, just to own it. Instead of buying wisely. Then there is intelligent advertising and the chaos is complete. > The lists are so vastly different, and for FreeBSD they're really quite > welcoming as opposed to being narky and flammable. Desktop usage on > FreeBSD has also greatly improved; I've been using FreeBSD for about 5 > years now on laptops as well, and have rid myself of linux for the past > 2. For servers I've been using it a lot longer. My motivation for switching to FreeBSD were performance reasons. The Linux kernel is so bloated the last few years, that must be studied in order to adapt it. Than, the distributions are beastly against the grain. The patch Linux to death. I sometimes feel the distributions to use Windows users and enthusiasts alike. That can not work though. There's no real compromise. To those who offer a truly custom installation? Gentoo is the distro that still allows real control. One need only study the kernel. I use only a used system. This is old. That's the advantage of FreeBSD/Gentoo. The adjustment to the hardware. This protects the system and the reserves. > That might be interesting to see as I'm surprised there are no binaries > at all. Might be able to figure out a solution too... When the update is that I'm going to look in more detail. I have not found any binaries, but perhaps lacking just this. Regards Silvio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 15:33:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA6E106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:33:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64BE58FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:33:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48125C28 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:46:53 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 84FA15C22 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:46:53 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F50E716.7020800@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:28:22 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F4FDB25.5020400@myfairpoint.net> <4F50139F.6050203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20120302054811.a72c89c8.dcdowse@gmx.net> <20120302060453.GA3506@tinyCurrent> <4F50BD99.7090509@myfairpoint.net> <4F50C05B.10303@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4F50D445.5070708@myfairpoint.net> In-Reply-To: <4F50D445.5070708@myfairpoint.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: USB Logitech QuickCam Ultra Vision X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:33:26 -0000 On 03/03/12 00:08, sean wrote: > On 03/02/12 07:43, Da Rock wrote: >> On 03/02/12 22:31, sean wrote: >>> On 03/02/12 01:04, Matthias Apitz wrote: >>>> El da Friday, March 02, 2012 a las 05:48:11AM +0100, Daniel C. >>>> Dowse escribi: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 >>>>> 0xBB 0x00 >>>>> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y reset >>>>> usbconfig -d ugenX.Y do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 >>>>> 0xBB 0x00 >>>>> >>>>> and then restart webcamd. >>>>> >>>>> may help, it worked on my Logitech Business Pro Cam >>>>> >>>>> cheers >>>> FWHIW, such quirks are also shown in >>>> http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat >>>> and once your webcam is working fine it could show up there too; >>>> >>>> HIH >>>> >>>> matthias >>> > >>> Installed devices: >>> pcm0: (play/rec) default >>> pcm1: (rec) >> Bang! There it is. pcm1 - see the (rec) following it? >> >> Adjust the levels using `mixer -f /dev/mixer1` and away you go, happy >> conferencing ;) > > Well I adjusted the volume as you pointed out, still no luck. > Currently I am thinking I might need to get the usbconfig command > above to now work, but it gives a nondescript error. > > tardis# usbconfig > ugen4.2: at usbus4, cfg=0 md=HOST > spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON > > tardis# lsusb > Bus /dev/usb Device /dev/ugen4.2: ID 046d:08c9 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam > Ultra Vision > > tardis# usbconfig -d ugen4.2 do_request 0x22 0x01 0x100 0x86 0x03 0x80 > 0xBB 0x00 > REQUEST = > tardis# > > I have looked at the man pages in trying to figure out exactly what > the eight number sets after do-request are doing, thinking that I > might have to adjust them for some reason. I am also starting to > wonder if my camera mic will work with Skype. > > I ran the mic test listed on the webcam site, > http://wiki.freebsd.org/WebcamCompat . > tardis# dd if=/dev/dsp1.0 of=/dev/dsp0.0 bs=64 > ^C1073+0 records in > 1073+0 records out > 68672 bytes transferred in 8.571198 secs (8012 bytes/sec) > tardis# > > The test works, the mic picked me up and played it through the > speakers, with some nasty loop feedback, but it did work. Yes, unfortunately you have to use headphones or switch the mic off- caused me no end of issues with recording hunting for a hidden mic pickup in the settings ;) I'm not 100% sure how skype works myself, but does it have a audio settings list? Where do you tell it where to output audio? It should offer an option for input too. I don't know if your usbconfig actually needs tweaking of you can pick up sound. Maybe check your LD environment variables. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 15:42:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1153D106566C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C5E8FC13 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402B55C28 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:56:14 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D96F35C22 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:56:13 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F50E946.2090209@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:37:42 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <297511A5-2081-4367-AE6C-9D043371085C@lpthe.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <297511A5-2081-4367-AE6C-9D043371085C@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:42:46 -0000 On 03/02/12 23:57, Michel Talon wrote: > On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:40:21 +1000 Da Rock wrote: >> Are you sure its just a script? Any clue as to what shell it is using? >> Bash? I do believe there should be some binaries there somewhere as well. > Yes im sure. I have a ppd File, they linked > to /usr/local/libexec/brlpdwrapperMFC730 and thats a shell scipt. > > I just went to the Brother site and downloaded a cups driver from here. It is not exactly > the same as yours, it is for the MFC7320 but for sure there is a shell script plus a binary. > called brcupsconfig3, which is called in the shell script called cupswrapperMFC7320-2.0.2. > > The binary is > niobe% file brcupsconfig3 > brcupsconfig3: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), > for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, not stripped > > So at best you can hope to run it with Linux emulation. Personally i have an Epson dot printer > and it is the same, the Linux driver contains binary blobs and cannot be run under FreeBSD. > > If you want to avoid such problems the only solution is to buy a printer with postscript > or pdf support and direct network connection, that is an expensive one. Here at the lab we are very happy > with Xerox sublimation models (i think it is an evolution of the old Tektronix phaser) > for doing color prints. In particular the use costs are low, much lower than with color laser printers, > in par with black and white laser printers. > But if you want to produce nice photographic prints, unfortunately you have to rely on good > epson dot printers or similar, which means FreeBSD is excluded, unfortunately. How good are the sublimation printers? When I was at Xerox, the C410 produced brilliant photographic prints and it was laser; I'd expect better from the subs. I'm also surprised epson doesn't work. As to this brother problem, I've also heard from Robert, so this also influences this discussion. Could it be possible to run the binaries under linuxulator? Don't port it as such. The whole premise of cups is a pipeline, so this should work surely? Forget compiling and run it all under linuxulator - main program _and_ .so. I considered this before with other printers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 19:42:29 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 169FA1065677 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:42:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kyle.law@fgconferences.com) Received: from mail.fgconferences.com (mail.fgconferences.com [219.91.147.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDD58FC13 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from WIN7-PC (unknown [192.168.70.241]) by mail.fgconferences.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F891A6AE0 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:12:19 +0530 (IST) From: "Kyle Law" To: "freebsd-questions" MIME-Version: 1.0 Organization: FG Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 03:42:12 +0800 Priority: urgent X-Priority: 1 Message-Id: <20120302194219.60F891A6AE0@mail.fgconferences.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Invitation to Efficient Plant Shutdown & Turnaround Forum 2012 - Kuala Lumpur X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:42:29 -0000 20 - 21 March 2012, The Royale Chulan Hotel, Kuala Lumpur A Regional TAR Management Forum - APAC Dear Energy Peer, =E2=80=9CHow should we handle forced outages?=E2=80=9D - Avoid a heart= rending sight of smouldering our plants with spiralling smoke. We're spending years to plan TAR. We definitely know how challenging i= t is. Attend and learn from our TAR peers (who used to face the same challen= ges as we do) on how to spearhead our most expensive project of the ye= ar towards EXCELLENCE and conquer the challenges: 1. Implementing World Class HSE Standards 2. Forced Outages =E2=80=93 How to Handle Unplanned Situations Like= an Expert 3. Dealing & Overcoming Uncertainties During a Planned Shutdown 4. Analysing Effectiveness of Turnaround for Future Improvement 5. Planning & Mobilising Large Workforce Resources 6. Controlling the Shutdown & Turnaround Budget 7. Assessing Plant Readiness for Shutdown 8. Leadership Behaviour that Shapes the Turnaround and Business Res= ults 9. Lively Discussion with TAR Experts - the experienced real expert= s 10. Developing & Maintaining a Detailed Support Plan=20 Lucky Draw! 2 units of Apple iPads pre-loaded with "Turnaround Managem= ent System Checklists" to be given away. Download agenda now! Forward this to your concerned colleagues also. Best, Kyle Law T: 603 2141 5357 E: kyle.law@fleminggulf.com =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 19:44:20 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 603EA1065670 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:44:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@growveg.net) Received: from smtp1.servage.net (smtp1.servage.net [IPv6:2a01:3b0:1:fb:1::2001]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EA18FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 19:44:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potato.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.servage.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E26B321DE for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 20:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F51232F.8090105@growveg.net> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:44:47 +0000 From: FreeBSD Mailing Lists User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.27) Gecko/20120228 Thunderbird/3.1.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: make install fails for /usr/ports/security/sudo after downgrade from 9.0-R to 8-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:44:20 -0000 Hello list, I had to downgrade from 9-R to 8-STABLE. To do this, I did the following: 1. rm -rf /usr/obj 2. pkg_delete -a 3. rm -rf /usr/ports 4. mkdir -p /usr/ports/distfiles 5. rm -rf /usr/src 6. rm -rf /usr/local/* 6. csup 8-STABLE sources 7. csup ports 8. cd /usr/src && make cleandir && make cleandir && make buildworld && make buildkernel && make installkernel && mergemaster -p 9. (merged required files) 10. make installworld && mergemaster 11. reboot. Practically everything in ports actually builds. I've installed X, icewm, windowmaker, firefox36, thunderbird, gimp and a few others. I think I've eliminated all the cruft from 9.0. However, I can't build sudo (or screen) and I can't work out why. Here is the error: # make distclean clean install ===> Cleaning for sudo-1.8.4 ===> Deleting distfiles for sudo-1.8.4 ===> License sudo accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for sudo-1.8.3_2 => sudo-1.8.4p2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/sudo-1.8.4p2.tar.gz ===> License sudo accepted by the user ===> Found saved configuration for sudo-1.8.3_2 => sudo-1.8.4p2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/sudo-1.8.4p2.tar.gz [...] cc -c -I../include -I.. -I. -I.. -I. -O2 -pipe -march=core2 -I/usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" ./ttyname.c cc -c -I../include -I.. -I. -I.. -I. -O2 -pipe -march=core2 -I/usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" ./ttysize.c cc -c -I../include -I.. -I. -I.. -I. -O2 -pipe -march=core2 -I/usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" ./utmp.c ./utmp.c: In function 'utmp_settime': ./utmp.c:132: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:133: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c: In function 'utmp_fill': ./utmp.c:151: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:153: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:154: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:157: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:160: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:160: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:161: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:161: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:166: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c:170: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type ./utmp.c: In function 'utmp_login': ./utmp.c:294: error: storage size of 'utbuf' isn't known /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=disable-static --mode=compile cc -c -I../include -I.. -I. -I.. -I. -O2 -pipe -march=core2 -I/usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" ./sudo_noexec.c ./utmp.c: In function 'utmp_logout': ./utmp.c:343: error: storage size of 'utbuf' isn't known *** Error code 1 libtool: compile: cc -c -I../include -I.. -I. -I.. -I. -O2 -pipe -march=core2 -I/usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/local/share/locale\" ./sudo_noexec.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/sudo_noexec.o 1 error *** Error code 2 1 error *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. Can anyone help please? -- freebsd at growveg dot net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 22:00:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20955106566B for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from mail.mroute.net (lax-gw02.mailroute.net [199.89.0.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1DEB8FC12 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by lax-gw02.mroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805001DF573 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:00:09 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [208.79.95.2]) by lax-gw02.mroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480BE1DF571 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:00:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 262901ACF; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:00:07 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.19.3.6; tzolkin = 9 Cimi; haab = 14 Kayab Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:00:06 -0800 Message-ID: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:00:10 -0000 I know openssl is in the core, but the version in FreeBSD 8.2 is vulnerable to some recent attacks. (Hmm, I wonder why there hasn't been an 8.2 update then...) I installed the version from ports, which was recently updated, but now I'm not sure how to get my other ports to use that port instead of the core libraries. Is it sufficient to restart the apps (apache in particular), or do I need to recompile things? -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 22:07:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69A481065675 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:07:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from max@mxcrypt.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203588FC13 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so745179vcm.13 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:07:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of max@mxcrypt.com designates 10.52.240.200 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.240.200; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of max@mxcrypt.com designates 10.52.240.200 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=max@mxcrypt.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.240.200]) by 10.52.240.200 with SMTP id wc8mr18350213vdc.64.1330726059441 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:07:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.240.200 with SMTP id wc8mr15653235vdc.64.1330726059271; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:07:39 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.141.75 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:07:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> From: Maxim Khitrov Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:07:09 -0500 Message-ID: To: "Randal L. Schwartz" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnMo0CwR/182k46SOM9L6DVto2c4F1Xz7FygMpn4LVim+8BvIeCz4wfO72JiAOIelwr9bY5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:07:40 -0000 On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > > I know openssl is in the core, but the version in FreeBSD 8.2 is > vulnerable to some recent attacks. =C2=A0(Hmm, I wonder why there hasn't = been > an 8.2 update then...) Which attacks are you referring to? > I installed the version from ports, which was recently updated, but now > I'm not sure how to get my other ports to use that port instead of the > core libraries. =C2=A0Is it sufficient to restart the apps (apache in > particular), or do I need to recompile things? You will need to recompile ports that depend on OpenSSL, passing WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=3D flag to make. My preferred way to do this is to install ports-mgmt/portconf and use something like this for /usr/local/etc/ports.conf: *: WITHOUT_IPV6 | WITHOUT_NLS | WITHOUT_X11 | WITHOUT_GTK | WITH_OPENSSL_PO= RT - Max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 22:12:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C37106566C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:12:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from mail.mroute.net (lax-gw12.mailroute.net [199.89.0.112]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544DE8FC15 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:12:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lax-gw12.mroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D043270C97; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:12:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [208.79.95.2]) by lax-gw12.mroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD863270BB3; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:12:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1EC6F1AF1; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:12:30 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Maxim Khitrov References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.19.3.6; tzolkin = 9 Cimi; haab = 14 Kayab Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:12:29 -0800 In-Reply-To: (Maxim Khitrov's message of "Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:07:09 -0500") Message-ID: <86booeveia.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:12:32 -0000 >>>>> "Maxim" =3D=3D Maxim Khitrov writes: Maxim> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Randal L. Schwartz Maxim> wrote: >>=20 >> I know openssl is in the core, but the version in FreeBSD 8.2 is >> vulnerable to some recent attacks. =C2=A0(Hmm, I wonder why there hasn't= been >> an 8.2 update then...) Maxim> Which attacks are you referring to? http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=3DCVE-2011-4109 Theoretically, this should have triggered a FreeBSD 8.2 security update, now that I keep thinking about it. Did I miss an announcement in the past few days? >> I installed the version from ports, which was recently updated, but now >> I'm not sure how to get my other ports to use that port instead of the >> core libraries. =C2=A0Is it sufficient to restart the apps (apache in >> particular), or do I need to recompile things? Maxim> You will need to recompile ports that depend on OpenSSL, passing Maxim> WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=3D flag to make. My preferred way to do this is to Maxim> install ports-mgmt/portconf and use something like this for Maxim> /usr/local/etc/ports.conf: Maxim> *: WITHOUT_IPV6 | WITHOUT_NLS | WITHOUT_X11 | WITHOUT_GTK | WITH_OPE= NSSL_PORT Is that the same as setting it in /etc/make.conf ? That's where I have "WITHOUT_X11=3Dyes". And you're gonna regret that WITHOUT_IPV6 in a couple of months. :) (Googling a bit..) Oh, it makes it easier to make it non-universal. Cool. --=20 Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 22:16:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40486106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:16:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBC28FC0A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so1186142yhg.13 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:16:34 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.179.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.179.67; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.179.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.179.67]) by 10.236.179.67 with SMTP id g43mr16223384yhm.66.1330726594645 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:16:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.179.67 with SMTP id g43mr12878022yhm.66.1330726594546; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:16:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q55sm17263930yhi.0.2012.03.02.14.16.33 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:16:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3V04c00YC5z2CG4p for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:16:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:16:31 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkG/yZAcw1VHJATpQSxV4RJLp/3r6XngJRpa5k/kDz3VlLOytMHbTSgZ7H4sZxYy8K6up8J Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:16:36 -0000 On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:00:06 -0800 Randal L. Schwartz articulated: > > I know openssl is in the core, but the version in FreeBSD 8.2 is > vulnerable to some recent attacks. (Hmm, I wonder why there hasn't > been an 8.2 update then...) > > I installed the version from ports, which was recently updated, but > now I'm not sure how to get my other ports to use that port instead > of the core libraries. Is it sufficient to restart the apps (apache > in particular), or do I need to recompile things? I have used the port's version for quite some time now. I am not sure if it is still required; however, I placed the following in the "/etc/make.conf" file: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes I then rebuilt all of the ports that require OpenSSL. Perhaps someone else has an easier solution. BTW, if you find a port that does not build with the port's version, file a PR against it. I found several that had to be fixed before they built correctly. Maybe they have all been fixed by now. That was over two years ago. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 22:27:25 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F224C1065670 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from mail.mroute.net (lax-gw02.mailroute.net [199.89.0.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28B18FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by lax-gw02.mroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9861DF59D for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:27:25 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [208.79.95.2]) by lax-gw02.mroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF8E51DF59A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:27:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DF0CA1B3A; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 14:27:23 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: FreeBSD References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.19.3.6; tzolkin = 9 Cimi; haab = 14 Kayab Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:27:23 -0800 In-Reply-To: <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> (jerry@seibercom.net's message of "Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:16:31 -0500") Message-ID: <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:27:26 -0000 >>>>> "Jerry" == Jerry writes: Jerry> I have used the port's version for quite some time now. I am not sure Jerry> if it is still required; however, I placed the following in the Jerry> "/etc/make.conf" file: Jerry> WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes Jerry> I then rebuilt all of the ports that require OpenSSL. Perhaps someone Jerry> else has an easier solution. Ahh, according to my read of /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk, it looks like: # if no preference was set, check for an installed base version # but give an installed port preference over it. .if !defined(WITH_OPENSSL_BASE) && \ !defined(WITH_OPENSSL_PORT) && \ !exists(${DESTDIR}/${LOCALBASE}/lib/libcrypto.so) && \ exists(${DESTDIR}/usr/include/openssl/opensslv.h) WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes .endif and later .if exists(${LOCALBASE}/lib/libcrypto.so) check-depends:: @${ECHO_CMD} "Dependency error: this port wants the OpenSSL library from the FreeBSD" @${ECHO_CMD} "base system. You can't build against it, while a newer" @${ECHO_CMD} "version is installed by a port." @${ECHO_CMD} "Please deinstall the port or undefine WITH_OPENSSL_BASE." @${FALSE} .endif So it looks like modern FreeBSD will Do The Right Thing if I just recompile the apache22 port. Once I knew what to look for, I found it with a bit of grepping. Thanks! -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 22:53:05 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF143106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from otrada.od.ua (universite-1-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:27:140::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D498B8FC16 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 22:53:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.10] ([10.0.0.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by otrada.od.ua (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q22MqwSj054754 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:53:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Message-ID: <4F514F23.7040804@ukr.net> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:52:19 +0200 From: "Vladislav V. Prodan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (otrada.od.ua [89.209.81.54]); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:53:00 +0200 (EET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,FREEMAIL_FROM, FSL_RU_URL,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua Subject: Do not work turn-off line to syslogd "last message repeated N times'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:53:05 -0000 Subj. # uname -a FreeBSD XXX.ru 9.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE #1: Mon Dec 5 14:56:07 EET 2011 root@XXX.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/XXX.2 amd64 # ps -auxww | grep syslog root 84784 0,0 0,0 12168 1348 ?? Ss ср00 0:03,24 /usr/sbin/syslogd -sc root 24776 0,0 0,0 16408 1364 9 S+ 2:50 0:00,00 grep syslog #man syslogd ... -c Disable the compression of repeated instances of the same line into a single line of the form ``last message repeated N times'' when the output is a pipe to another program. If specified twice, disable this compression in all cases. ... -- Vladislav V. Prodan System & Network Administrator http://support.od.ua +380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508 VVP88-RIPE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 23:07:49 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84C6106567C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from otrada.od.ua (universite-1-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:27:140::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DED98FC17 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.10] ([10.0.0.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by otrada.od.ua (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q22N7iq2058714; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:07:45 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Message-ID: <4F5152AF.6000405@ukr.net> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:07:27 +0200 From: "Vladislav V. Prodan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Yuri Pankov References: <4F514F23.7040804@ukr.net> <4F5150B9.90100@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F5150B9.90100@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (otrada.od.ua [89.209.81.54]); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:07:45 +0200 (EET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, FREEMAIL_FROM, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do not work turn-off line to syslogd "last message repeated N times'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:07:50 -0000 03.03.2012 0:59, Yuri Pankov wrote: > You have 'c' specified once and don't seem to be piping the output to > another program. Try specifying 'c' twice as the part of the manpage you > pasted suggests? > > It also does not work this version: # ps -auxww | grep syslog root 84784 0,0 0,0 12168 1348 ?? Ss ср00 0:03,24 /usr/sbin/syslogd -s -c -- Vladislav V. Prodan System & Network Administrator http://support.od.ua +380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508 VVP88-RIPE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 23:10:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00CD1065672 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:10:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout028.mac.com (asmtpout028.mac.com [17.148.16.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3CBE8FC13 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:10:28 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Received: from cswiger1.apple.com (unknown [17.209.4.71]) by asmtp028.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01 (7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTPSA id <0M0A009DC5PFSI40@asmtp028.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:10:27 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.6.7498,1.0.260,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-03-02_06:2012-03-02, 2012-03-02, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1012030000 definitions=main-1203020223 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4F514F23.7040804@ukr.net> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:10:26 -0800 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: <36E43B7A-DCB4-4EFD-92A2-4B5B50BF89AD@mac.com> References: <4F514F23.7040804@ukr.net> To: "Vladislav V. Prodan" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Do not work turn-off line to syslogd "last message repeated N times'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:10:29 -0000 On Mar 2, 2012, at 2:52 PM, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > # ps -auxww | grep syslog > root 84784 0,0 0,0 12168 1348 ?? Ss =D1=81=D1=8000 = 0:03,24 /usr/sbin/syslogd -sc > root 24776 0,0 0,0 16408 1364 9 S+ 2:50 0:00,00 = grep syslog Try specifying "-c" twice. > #man syslogd >=20 > ... > -c Disable the compression of repeated instances of the same = line > into a single line of the form ``last message repeated N = times'' > when the output is a pipe to another program. If = specified > twice, disable this compression in all cases. Presumably, you are just logging to a file, rather than to a pipe.... Regards, --=20 -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 23:10:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9BD106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:10:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC268FC15 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:10:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2600587bkc.13 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:10:28 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of yuri.pankov@gmail.com designates 10.204.129.199 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.204.129.199; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of yuri.pankov@gmail.com designates 10.204.129.199 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=yuri.pankov@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=yuri.pankov@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.204.129.199]) by 10.204.129.199 with SMTP id p7mr6247053bks.119.1330729828828 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:10:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=qBh09NR6P6s1gwR6PtaXRqHzdMz+ZBa+YlEopr9AhjE=; b=zfZedhIg7q5hps53Sk07n7RbWPdUM+6fNUGoBLEk8kO+MYn/ctjT+8zz29ASGH43Is ruuVPQtrVydbcjf98VUOO6nxANF3jjDXpYbBfGJWyOuKD+ZWrURW4zxvyYYPQe9vUcIL sDwIZrHs9b7CCHUBlL+8BPHK4AP15khlabUU2+i1x1ZFbAJ3nDnba5pZMiPaSbqaO6XW xxjh+l6uM8/73vxjWKywFFDzLrbdkRdPGnGWFAIQCEzOnUYZzBGs2DA4b90lDu8cGTBl tnfEsyvQiF6sqAQL2dbV06/TTKAm74K+finAAQWcFoKSBKUlyi0H4UlPV+z+TyvF8pPu de3A== Received: by 10.204.129.199 with SMTP id p7mr4982590bks.119.1330729828731; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:10:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([213.132.76.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t17sm11724889bke.6.2012.03.02.15.10.27 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:10:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F51535F.9030609@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 03:10:23 +0400 From: Yuri Pankov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Vladislav V. Prodan" References: <4F514F23.7040804@ukr.net> <4F5150B9.90100@gmail.com> <4F5152AF.6000405@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <4F5152AF.6000405@ukr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do not work turn-off line to syslogd "last message repeated N times'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:10:30 -0000 On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:07:27 +0200, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > 03.03.2012 0:59, Yuri Pankov wrote: >> You have 'c' specified once and don't seem to be piping the output to >> another program. Try specifying 'c' twice as the part of the manpage you >> pasted suggests? >> >> > > It also does not work this version: > > # ps -auxww | grep syslog > root 84784 0,0 0,0 12168 1348 ?? Ss ср00 > 0:03,24 /usr/sbin/syslogd -s -c Well, "twice" means "cc" :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 23:11:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 089751065678 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:11:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-f182.google.com (mail-we0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847498FC2A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:11:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by werl4 with SMTP id l4so1748136wer.13 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:11:55 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of amvandemore@gmail.com designates 10.180.99.100 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.99.100; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of amvandemore@gmail.com designates 10.180.99.100 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=amvandemore@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=amvandemore@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.99.100]) by 10.180.99.100 with SMTP id ep4mr571390wib.7.1330729915587 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:11:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0IGNuJk89yN5NYFKiWn7ft6VKgzrUNAnMOEog2Uks9E=; b=qnYavOIz0M/7BWVBvQPmDro0oXc00GoXXRSie8ro8jyfzG/1rJzoycD0A0InltJ+nn SzjxRBtaohzBe1ISa0TPiQv06vUvukQKyNeP1WGHu7zikMsTKZPgEmnT6B/+fKH4t5wj GD/LW2uXGDT3HGJr5z3d9KfSza9e/GZgA21RktA9ZbmFS855i0NZKqyNq+vZ1VmliSqR jMLeLFL1ah2UqjBPSd3M35vf9tP23NTWgxif1k7OtJZmtA/aCSp2yfzXqqIxWdKbqL5F 8VnF42T9CfurhuRrNbodaSHSl6t5a+G9jXmfM2ocedNKIFRd/RtThcaO/hz9GVh8zZoe OfeQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.99.100 with SMTP id ep4mr433545wib.7.1330729915514; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:11:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.93.138 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 15:11:55 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F5152AF.6000405@ukr.net> References: <4F514F23.7040804@ukr.net> <4F5150B9.90100@gmail.com> <4F5152AF.6000405@ukr.net> Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 17:11:55 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: "Vladislav V. Prodan" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Yuri Pankov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do not work turn-off line to syslogd "last message repeated N times'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:11:57 -0000 On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Vladislav V. Prodan wro= te: > 03.03.2012 0:59, Yuri Pankov wrote: > > You have 'c' specified once and don't seem to be piping the output to > > another program. Try specifying 'c' twice as the part of the manpage yo= u > > pasted suggests? > > > > > > It also does not work this version: > > # ps -auxww | grep syslog > root 84784 0,0 0,0 12168 1348 ?? Ss =D1=81=D1=8000 > 0:03,24 /usr/sbin/syslogd -s -c > Your use case really isn't clear, but don't you need -cc ? --=20 Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 23:22:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F7C106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:22:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE69F8FC13 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so1203452yhg.13 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:21:59 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.182.232 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.182.232; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.182.232 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.182.232]) by 10.236.182.232 with SMTP id o68mr16325459yhm.58.1330730519163 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:21:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.182.232 with SMTP id o68mr12960901yhm.58.1330730519083; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:21:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a24sm11463380ana.10.2012.03.02.15.21.57 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:21:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3V063S4lYcz2CG4p for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:21:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:21:56 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnhcVFVn+rSilKiO7yk+xQUl/rE20EpQbBE6ziPWi5rpL+7O/q5U1GyZkdDo8wldk7+Abv1 Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:22:00 -0000 On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:27:23 -0800 Randal L. Schwartz articulated: > So it looks like modern FreeBSD will Do The Right Thing if I just > recompile the apache22 port. Once I knew what to look for, I found it > with a bit of grepping. On a FreeBSD-8.2 STABLE system, I have this as the OPENSSL versions: ~ $ /usr/bin/openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010 ~ $ /usr/local/bin/openssl version OpenSSL 1.0.0g 18 Jan 2012 I am not sure why the base system lags so far behind the ports version, but it does. What is the base version in the FreeBSD-9.0 release? -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 23:26:50 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AB01065680 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri.pankov@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 638068FC08 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:26:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcjc3 with SMTP id jc3so2608529bkc.13 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:26:49 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of yuri.pankov@gmail.com designates 10.204.154.209 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.204.154.209; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of yuri.pankov@gmail.com designates 10.204.154.209 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=yuri.pankov@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=yuri.pankov@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.204.154.209]) by 10.204.154.209 with SMTP id p17mr173784bkw.6.1330730809371 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 15:26:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SfKRF4Ez8xXR+dimRVIUFmRleJRsZNVLoed/6R0eTKU=; b=D5ZFYjXbhVeYoGRVLDF3SyzEKN9IPZvn2aqT8Zv2DwSD721TwZX+NeT1xFVQWKfeid NsZCLh+TFuwOk6C6lWkWAWb/ClZO/leHP+6NM5KEc9Cdm0kRP9e6QhGV4grJ/5s2kk8k CmXlAsTdWfdYudJWdx7ZCTuAgaRLkWSRqFx7Hh5EIgprrDZETxkWCKlikWJ0W9WPwZdD gIghm9ACEoqlCiGmM0pKLE5VHefijFemgWpOLFCF06GIY2sDVejFwyP54AChWXTkls1E 4fj4g5wFac9ASO/RCk6gj31wevzroGIrsQtJkrwuq3d/yqapZipYgJjvdM+E1SbZ+qxy NqOQ== Received: by 10.204.154.209 with SMTP id p17mr97724bkw.6.1330729152887; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:59:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] ([213.132.76.142]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id ey8sm11708207bkb.1.2012.03.02.14.59.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 14:59:11 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F5150B9.90100@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:59:05 +0400 From: Yuri Pankov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Vladislav V. Prodan" References: <4F514F23.7040804@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <4F514F23.7040804@ukr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Do not work turn-off line to syslogd "last message repeated N times'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:26:51 -0000 On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:52:19 +0200, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > Subj. > > # uname -a > FreeBSD XXX.ru 9.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE #1: Mon Dec 5 > 14:56:07 EET 2011 root@XXX.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/XXX.2 amd64 > > > # ps -auxww | grep syslog > root 84784 0,0 0,0 12168 1348 ?? Ss ср00 > 0:03,24 /usr/sbin/syslogd -sc > root 24776 0,0 0,0 16408 1364 9 S+ 2:50 > 0:00,00 grep syslog > > > #man syslogd > > ... > -c Disable the compression of repeated instances of the same line > into a single line of the form ``last message repeated N > times'' > when the output is a pipe to another program. If specified > twice, disable this compression in all cases. > ... You have 'c' specified once and don't seem to be piping the output to another program. Try specifying 'c' twice as the part of the manpage you pasted suggests? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 23:34:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4B7C106564A for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:34:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Received: from otrada.od.ua (universite-1-pt.tunnel.tserv24.sto1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:27:140::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB668FC13 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.10] ([10.0.0.10]) (authenticated bits=0) by otrada.od.ua (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q22NYDpH064542 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:34:13 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from universite@ukr.net) Message-ID: <4F5158E3.4020200@ukr.net> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:33:55 +0200 From: "Vladislav V. Prodan" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F514F23.7040804@ukr.net> <4F5150B9.90100@gmail.com> <4F5152AF.6000405@ukr.net> <4F51535F.9030609@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F51535F.9030609@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (otrada.od.ua [89.209.81.54]); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:34:13 +0200 (EET) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, FREEMAIL_FROM, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mary-teresa.otrada.od.ua Subject: Re: Do not work turn-off line to syslogd "last message repeated N times'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:34:17 -0000 03.03.2012 1:10, Yuri Pankov wrote: > Well, "twice" means "cc" :-) #man syslogd ... SYNOPSIS syslogd [-468ACcdkNnosuv] [-a allowed_peer] [-b bind_address] [-f config_file] [-l [mode:]path] [-m mark_interval] [-P pid_file] [-p log_socket] ... Where do you see an indication to use the "-cc"? I need to remove the logs from the line of the form: "last message repeated N times" -- Vladislav V. Prodan System & Network Administrator http://support.od.ua +380 67 4584408, +380 99 4060508 VVP88-RIPE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 23:43:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9225106566B for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:43:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417FC8FC15 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q22NhWoF004095 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:43:33 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q22NhWoF004095 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330731813; bh=hbMnipv+CFo7raKcuqiMiq5zQt5t1w0FLSiLrIkvE0Y=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=YkQL/vEOCYrJevk4o9ja/V1x4vtTp1DVIkbjAGy++Mn2/mm4sSYnkc0U1vJRG565b fLV/2fPX8wkD8vUJXWJfuZVXlfXJ3hrHldN9tE+FbKwim8bKtxHkWWETzuDg1BlJq7 newAQQ7CZjYPRPCm3+fyEkYXd4dU/c5z4GROnKhA= Message-ID: <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:43:32 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig266098D90C8A0DD832FFA3EE" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:43:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig266098D90C8A0DD832FFA3EE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/03/2012 23:21, Jerry wrote: > I am not sure why the base system lags so far behind the ports > version, but it does. What is the base version in the FreeBSD-9.0 > release? Stable/9, but this hasn't changed in 9.0-RELEASE: worm:~:# /usr/bin/openssl version OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig266098D90C8A0DD832FFA3EE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9RWyQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxaZgCeN7BzW5GcTD7H74LEVBnIjjwH upsAn1LjRR5lWJEh1USUx6icaD5yOxjs =4/HM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig266098D90C8A0DD832FFA3EE-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 23:53:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94846106566C for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:53:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 131748FC08 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:53:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q22NreIH004293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:53:40 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q22NreIH004293 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330732420; bh=/6K4+UrkhKQNlkJcrHG+dMO82NCjdpBHQydR2DZSTHM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=ew4boG+H6zfVA2M+W0vh/qDAz+UXSppK3a2XnNi2my3igLbtGdHYcISJ6d1JOF13u v5HK/Rxfx6m6e9IwMcAI9PDvddx1tvQk9dM7IpwuVmbARuaQA5tClpai5C7vbf2U7x cocoZvyHd5rDGj50tzBTspysha+xduKbdlznlvXE= Message-ID: <4F515D83.9070501@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:53:39 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig9B1F8AD61716B8DE40D06C66" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:53:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig9B1F8AD61716B8DE40D06C66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02/03/2012 22:27, Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > Ahh, according to my read of /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk, > it looks like: >=20 > # if no preference was set, check for an installed base versi= on > # but give an installed port preference over it. > .if !defined(WITH_OPENSSL_BASE) && \ > !defined(WITH_OPENSSL_PORT) && \ > !exists(${DESTDIR}/${LOCALBASE}/lib/libcrypto.so) && \ > exists(${DESTDIR}/usr/include/openssl/opensslv.h) > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=3Dyes > .endif >=20 > and later >=20 > .if exists(${LOCALBASE}/lib/libcrypto.so) > check-depends:: > @${ECHO_CMD} "Dependency error: this port wants the OpenSSL= > library from the FreeBSD" > @${ECHO_CMD} "base system. You can't build against it, whil= e a > newer" > @${ECHO_CMD} "version is installed by a port." > @${ECHO_CMD} "Please deinstall the port or undefine > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE." > @${FALSE} > .endif >=20 > So it looks like modern FreeBSD will Do The Right Thing if I just > recompile the apache22 port. Once I knew what to look for, I found it > with a bit of grepping. You do need WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=3Dyes in /etc/make.conf or equivalent; just= installing security/openssl alone will cause any port that links against openssl shlibs to emit rude messages. Also, beware of any apache modules that might link against openssl in their own right which should also be rebuild to use the ports version -- the classic example here is php5-openssl loaded via mod_php -- but there are many ways of doing this. Trying to load two different OpenSSL shlibs into the same execution image causes instant crash and burn. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig9B1F8AD61716B8DE40D06C66 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9RXYQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwhJQCfbtk+1RLdr5I8uAMLw0yMfCzJ 51wAnRBqPJtDBRXxzHGAPS0AnWCX0sOY =xdWz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig9B1F8AD61716B8DE40D06C66-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 2 23:59:58 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1682C1065670 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BC28FC14 for ; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 23:59:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 10578294; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:59:55 -0500 Received: from [192.168.43.246] (account jon@radel.com HELO winesap.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 10578292 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:59:40 -0500 Message-ID: <4F515EEB.8050508@radel.com> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:59:39 -0500 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F514F23.7040804@ukr.net> <4F5150B9.90100@gmail.com> <4F5152AF.6000405@ukr.net> <4F51535F.9030609@gmail.com> <4F5158E3.4020200@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <4F5158E3.4020200@ukr.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms010705080709040104080502" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Do not work turn-off line to syslogd "last message repeated N times'" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:59:58 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms010705080709040104080502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 3/2/12 6:33 PM, Vladislav V. Prodan wrote: > > 03.03.2012 1:10, Yuri Pankov wrote: >> Well, "twice" means "cc" :-) > > #man syslogd > ... > SYNOPSIS > syslogd [-468ACcdkNnosuv] [-a allowed_peer] [-b bind_address] > [-f config_file] [-l [mode:]path] [-m mark_interval] > [-P pid_file] [-p log_socket] > ... > > Where do you see an indication to use the "-cc"? > > I need to remove the logs from the line of the form: > "last message repeated N times" > > There was a very clear indication in the quote from the manpage that=20 you, your very own self, sent us all just a few minutes ago. --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms010705080709040104080502-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 00:33:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31DB01065670 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arab@tangerine-army.co.uk) Received: from mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DEE8FC14 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.2]) by mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20120303003248.NGEA14668.mtaout03-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net> for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:32:48 +0000 Received: from [94.168.171.147] (helo=Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl) by know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1S3cu0-0001uh-1e for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:32:48 +0000 Received: from Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl ([fe80::b0b0:8497:b56e:9ced]) by Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl ([fe80::b0b0:8497:b56e:9ced%11]) with mapi; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:32:40 +0000 From: Graeme Dargie To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Thread-Topic: lighttpd + php + external mssql server Thread-Index: Acz4oW8G07kUWjh8Qcuy+0yWQwL1Ig== Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:32:40 +0000 Message-ID: <4C0F7421AA759346AF17299922AD57EB04DE85@Mercury.universe.galaxy.lcl> Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=JvdXmxIgLJv2/GthKqHpGJEEHukvLcvELVXUanXFreg= c=1 sm=0 a=Nvm-G8khQbgA:10 a=OMdUhd4NiskA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=HCndPm0j3Wp5L_3kjokA:9 a=NGGT4I_iI8vB-BaRX1AA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=DTQMSUZuzPOF8_IB_VsA:9 a=abEjpw8OIwQqXQ7__CUA:7 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: lighttpd + php + external mssql server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 00:33:34 -0000 I am just looking for some advice or hints if anyone has a clue how to make= a FreeBSD server running lighttpd + php5 connect to an instance of MS SQL = 2008 R2. I have already installed php-extensions for mssql but when I try and run a = connection from the FreeBSD server it gives a http 500 The error log has this 2012-03-02 18:20:09: (mod_fastcgi.c.2699) FastCGI-stderr: PHP Fatal error: = Call to undefined function mssql_connect() in /usr/local/www/data/ Php -m shows mssql as installed. Regards Graeme Dargie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 02:34:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111AF106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 02:34:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsalinux@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f172.google.com (mail-qy0-f172.google.com [209.85.216.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B28918FC16 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 02:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qcsq13 with SMTP id q13so1048429qcs.17 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:34:46 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.18.143 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.224.18.143; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of bsalinux@gmail.com designates 10.224.18.143 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=bsalinux@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=bsalinux@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.224.18.143]) by 10.224.18.143 with SMTP id w15mr293881qaa.90.1330742086986 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:34:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kUHdh5YkvDyOUcsdJM/NH2qxxxa/LAvlIalXT7Xvo7I=; b=LpYTk2aS+FPgKVbtQuJbK7TzEzPkyF64Y0p2e4r4krKcWOWwsUOZDT1v7g42wrzC3q +GU04JoVzx90Rwmp2KaYnmNJvGu07Sm2v2NOg7TqBws4TvQfK9SvAYgnwyzdlvTspH+K /M63GsP2iHbo8dbbGyP/nZTgjPc4tUjy56PovHgfcjwo90tB7lqaOnszqhKIPEbuiQk5 5xacJVP1C0u4izGh4JWKdihgTJuzkpXIFNCzL+jXKqfPXx2G+HPX0Tj8/Z+X9qWER55S 2A3zP5UBzWOuY3dGrGMXXJrGCrljBBfGano6RvYsws9PnfZQD5mKaYtUtQafEZ/Fq1fU aIPQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.18.143 with SMTP id w15mr253419qaa.90.1330742086857; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 18:34:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.211.80 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:34:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 18:34:46 -0800 Message-ID: From: "bsalinux@gmail.com" To: Xavier FreeBSD questions , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: "SCSI sense: UNIT ATTENTION" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:34:48 -0000 Double check the cables. Do you see these errors at boot time or when using the device? Can you plug the drive in another system and see if it works? On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Xavier FreeBSD questions wrote: > Hi, > > I have: > > 9.0-RELEASE > > and this problem: > > ugen4.8: at usbus4 > umass2: on usbu= s4 > umass2: =A08070i (ATAPI) over Bulk-Only; quirks =3D 0x0100 > umass2:4:2:-1: Attached to scbus4 > (probe0:umass-sim2:2:0:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 > (probe0:umass-sim2:2:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error > (probe0:umass-sim2:2:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition > (probe0:umass-sim2:2:0:0): SCSI sense: UNIT ATTENTION asc:29,0 (Power on, > reset, > =A0or bus device reset occurred) > cd1 at umass-sim2 bus 2 scbus4 target 0 lun 0 > cd1: <_NEC DVD_RW ND-3500AG 2.07> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd1: 40.000MB/s transfers > cd1: cd present [2295104 x 2048 byte records] > (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): READ(10). CDB: 28 0 0 23 5 3f 0 0 1 0 > (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error > (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition > (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:64,0 (Illegal mod= e > for t > his track) > (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): Info: 0x23053f > (cd1:umass-sim2:2:0:0): cddone: got error 0x6 back > > The DVDRW don't work correctly, ant idea for solvent this problem ? > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 05:14:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE764106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 05:14:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62BFF8FC15 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 05:14:39 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApMBAL+kUU/LevdH/2dsb2JhbAAMN7dBAQEBBDhBEAsOCgkWDwkDAgECAUUGDQEHAQHBKZBPBKhG Received: from ppp247-71.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.8.155]) ([203.122.247.71]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 03 Mar 2012 15:29:26 +1030 Message-ID: <4F51A4BF.3060200@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:27:35 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120213 Thunderbird/10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Cook References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:14:40 -0000 On 28/02/2012 03:24, Stephen Cook wrote: > Hello all! > > I'm relatively new to FreeBSD but I'm enjoying it so far. > > I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on > cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g. > setting up clusters of replicated databases, web server pools, etc). Another option to look at is using FreeBSD's Jails. Handbook chapter 16 Basically you can setup multiple jails on the machine that use the kernel of the base system (so it's not an entire emulated machine) but each jail has it's own environment, apps etc. --- Shane Ambler FreeBSD (at) ShaneWare (dot) Biz http://ShaneWare.Biz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 07:10:17 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ABF31065672 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 07:10:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sclists@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E528FC0C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 07:10:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so1003096vcm.13 for ; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:10:09 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sclists@gmail.com designates 10.52.93.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.93.18; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sclists@gmail.com designates 10.52.93.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sclists@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=sclists@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.93.18]) by 10.52.93.18 with SMTP id cq18mr21726216vdb.40.1330758609951 (num_hops = 1); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:10:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6QRkQRBdRR0Y0G39Dbl40Qj5UtaWAMR2PBh3hE8uCxI=; b=Ptb4lKfWlaK41fi9zmtr97zKk0uArI2VyiYpi+CP0aRjUeR1+6/e5SC359c4xoFe/I ReK8WLQPyh3MVoYD5hDQ/aOWzkhcKYiNOLotZV5XjelPvKs9eDVz0ktzUZiXurcvLB+p zlD6Xdgu3OX37a2uOXcxy7EL2R4uu8c5kS6XlDvTBXjLYuM7Z+5o9Z1W6V+b4oOzQYhp vD0RfPWMZz63jhrn4nfW7i7ITOciVUzmmzMKAqeJHdU2qVZSnTIEAXwuXhWEWmADLy7Q nc3JbwdEd+qoXXyDm91Tvi3gz3zdLvfX67DbCAtJv+lwiiVw6bvRBj4VFsmoUwUZ33ly YfTQ== Received: by 10.52.93.18 with SMTP id cq18mr18525957vdb.40.1330758609872; Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:10:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (ool-182c6755.dyn.optonline.net. [24.44.103.85]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cp2sm12914822vdb.3.2012.03.02.23.10.08 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:10:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F51C3D9.5010303@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 02:10:17 -0500 From: Stephen Cook User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shane Ambler References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> <4F51A4BF.3060200@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <4F51A4BF.3060200@ShaneWare.Biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:10:17 -0000 On 3/2/2012 11:57 PM, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 28/02/2012 03:24, Stephen Cook wrote: >> I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on >> cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g. >> setting up clusters of replicated databases, web server pools, etc). > > Another option to look at is using FreeBSD's Jails. Handbook chapter 16 > > Basically you can setup multiple jails on the machine that use the > kernel of the base system (so it's not an entire emulated machine) but > each jail has it's own environment, apps etc. > I read up on jails and I am impressed, I had a vague idea about them but they are apparently a lot more powerful than I thought. This will get some use from me in the future when I'm setting up real servers. However, for what I'm currently doing, I want to stick with a bunch of VirtualBox VMs so I can simulate database failover by killing the VM in rude way, dynamically throw another "machine" into the mix, etc. Thanks! -- Stephen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 09:56:22 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738EA106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 09:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd8@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mail-03.name-services.com (mail-03.name-services.com [69.64.155.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A8E8FC08 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 09:56:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; s=DKIM-NAME-SERVICES; d=a1poweruser.com; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:X-Sender:X-Envelope-From; l=500; bh=CZ9iW2bf2hRGim7RI+KE6Q1EdHDweg3pLFy+mEO4anI=; b=ato3gBxqTUmfRqBPXFr8ZhgDlSzO8zfegL4OcCB/cBEYX+LaLBn00vElfu1aG47L2/yrC745qQm3WUUBm6T+feosyEJ6NOX9f+4XnrD0LuYZboUjCbzwC1UC4+d7iF2Mq97BseCqlah09dd8sR1B8OINeaHroCRv349AU/SztU8= Received: from [192.168.1.125] ([120.29.64.34]) by mail-03.name-services.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:56:16 -0800 Message-ID: <4F51EAB9.7090007@a1poweruser.com> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 17:56:09 +0800 From: Fbsd8 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stephen Cook References: <4F4BB539.7030103@gmail.com> <4F51A4BF.3060200@ShaneWare.Biz> <4F51C3D9.5010303@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F51C3D9.5010303@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Mar 2012 09:56:16.0643 (UTC) FILETIME=[E0227D30:01CCF923] X-Sender: fbsd8@a1poweruser.com X-Envelope-From: fbsd8*a1poweruser.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cloning a FreeBSD system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:56:22 -0000 Stephen Cook wrote: > On 3/2/2012 11:57 PM, Shane Ambler wrote: >> On 28/02/2012 03:24, Stephen Cook wrote: >>> I have FreeBSD 9.0 installed as a VirtualBox guest, and I plan on >>> cloning it repeatedly to set up a fake network for me to toy with (e.g. >>> setting up clusters of replicated databases, web server pools, etc). >> >> Another option to look at is using FreeBSD's Jails. Handbook chapter 16 >> >> Basically you can setup multiple jails on the machine that use the >> kernel of the base system (so it's not an entire emulated machine) but >> each jail has it's own environment, apps etc. >> > > I read up on jails and I am impressed, I had a vague idea about them but > they are apparently a lot more powerful than I thought. This will get > some use from me in the future when I'm setting up real servers. > > However, for what I'm currently doing, I want to stick with a bunch of > VirtualBox VMs so I can simulate database failover by killing the VM in > rude way, dynamically throw another "machine" into the mix, etc. > > Thanks! > > -- Stephen > Cloning or duplicating a running system using dump/restore http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=11680 You should check out the qjail port for simple jail cloning. Only takes 30 seconds to clone a jail. http://qjail.sourceforge.net/ Both vm's and jails are targeted by ip address, killing one results in same outcome on the network no matter which one you use. I don't use Virtual Box but if it does not have a dump/restore function then cloning at that level is not possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 10:12:36 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57766106566B for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 10:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (unknown [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36EF58FC15 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 10:12:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id q23ACYbX016458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 3 Mar 2012 02:12:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.14.2/Submit) with UUCP id q23ACYqQ016457; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 02:12:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from fbsd81 ([192.168.200.81]) by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA12656; Sat, 3 Mar 12 02:09:02 PST Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 09:08:47 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr Message-Id: <4f52501f.U9tC8QsBXWI3quJz%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <297511A5-2081-4367-AE6C-9D043371085C@lpthe.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <297511A5-2081-4367-AE6C-9D043371085C@lpthe.jussieu.fr> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, siefke_listen@web.de Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:12:36 -0000 Michel Talon wrote: > If you want to avoid such problems the only solution is to buy > a printer with postscript or pdf support and direct network > connection, that is an expensive one ... I've been using a Samsung ML-2571N for something like a couple of years now. It has a direct net connection, supports PostScript, directly supports both lpd and Bonjour (Mac) protocols, and cost something like $60 or $70 (US) at Fry's. Granted that was a sale price -- regular was probably around $100 -- but even $100 does not seem all that expensive. I don't see the ML-2571N on frys.com today -- the closest is the ML-2545 ($70, I think it uses the same engine but without network support and may not have PostScript). If I were choosing from today's Fry's list, I would probably pick the ML-2955ND ($130) which does duplexing. (They also have wireless models, but I would not trust wireless unless the printer and all its clients were inside a Faraday cage :) And no, I don't work for either Fry's or Samsung. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 12:16:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF931065674 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:16:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from btillman99@yahoo.com) Received: from nm38-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm38-vm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.229.150]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 857948FC15 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.90.53] by nm38.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Mar 2012 12:03:54 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.232] by tm6.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Mar 2012 12:03:54 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1047.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 03 Mar 2012 12:03:54 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 213593.65324.bm@omp1047.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 16816 invoked by uid 60001); 3 Mar 2012 12:03:53 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1330776233; bh=TGd3Zufc+JpKWp7o/3cRzhA/GUsLT3aG7XFxp/A1vnk=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=zSC6ETo6Qh9/03Awmr093mvfltSuLs2XwOW9+7a9w2HzEijuozXPQuor/ys7ooMLJTNSCC2rsTBoZd1Py2p8OQLl66qLyXCc6fjlXZKq5JE/gQ2RHZGspBphqtQVnRpws2Zn/jJDsfUB78AA6X3teCroO9N+cCatnYCHPzN55sc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=yAWd2cfTU8sRv/VyYq3JDXs5Sb+ZJ4EZ84AQVVwQ4lN37iMEgWkgR5fgdFQS6pFp8fCD9uQCw3/lgLv8O3V76GPhadCks/mYqXtqND1cY/muiFinPQQ2LQs+RdYWoa5w5WLTWwJrLXdcSNN5LmXlAyvx2xUzs/ZjWE302WOBees=; X-YMail-OSG: EvsiY.UVM1k3IyKOP5vripT30Rrd_NE_YmnTofC1bELE2lj GzoDt1mkkoGTPIgz89Az6OHDocoYp40jIy83CugWs4M597._Z8ELKEwr2QSO A0BAXKAEq4E4NMJcO5URB_N8ZWf_4b7ehZc5ysxdzV5Ht0r79Xn8_OH.Vgnm g5lLTxtintl8Y_BcRBc7d8zDz3n5dGTi1BsIqLQwL4WJ7_SEivLxNX15DUdc ivEKf9lGyQkEnzXasDYgVIZ6hbcy6y_9fO66M8MYSXp6WPBXfB5KVrPdvbMv Us0Y1CMyyxWaA55Az4V_YgSQoJ9A3Lz7EonAwBy0urgEFNUIXRLahE8j4Yyp .3ll78kagC0g7c.Nup.TCA8C67MNNQnXpoiayRdhNR_CJ3d8GjsvlDrOUb9U 6YrEal6UKAzlrzLbGmi8vhlSkbXYqX2HMMas.Jf7E.FYo78xwDW5OF1QNac2 LvIguS4CURJ_XLsayzN.wW9Y- Received: from [98.203.44.66] by web36501.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:03:52 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.116.338427 References: <297511A5-2081-4367-AE6C-9D043371085C@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4F50E946.2090209@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Message-ID: <1330776232.16593.YahooMailNeo@web36501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 04:03:52 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Tillman To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <4F50E946.2090209@herveybayaustralia.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Bill Tillman List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:16:25 -0000 =0A=0A=0AFrom: Da Rock =0ATo: = freebsd-questions@freebsd.org =0ASent: Friday, March 2, 2012 10:37 AM=0ASub= ject: Re: Brother Printer=0A=0AOn 03/02/12 23:57, Michel Talon wrote:=0A> O= n Fri, 02 Mar 2012 22:40:21 +1000 Da Rock wrote:=0A>> Are you sure its just= a script? Any clue as to what shell it is using?=0A>> Bash? I do believe t= here should be some binaries there somewhere as well.=0A> Yes im sure. I ha= ve a ppd File, they linked=0A> to /usr/local/libexec/brlpdwrapperMFC730 and= thats a shell scipt.=0A> =0A> I just went to the Brother site and download= ed a cups driver from here. It is not exactly=0A> the same as yours, it is = for the MFC7320 but for sure there is a shell script plus a binary.=0A> cal= led brcupsconfig3, which is called in the shell script called cupswrapperMF= C7320-2.0.2.=0A> =0A> The binary is=0A> niobe% file brcupsconfig3=0A> brcup= sconfig3: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamic= ally linked (uses shared libs),=0A> for GNU/Linux 2.2.5, not stripped=0A> = =0A> So at best you can hope to run it with Linux emulation. Personally i h= ave an Epson dot printer=0A> and it is the same, the Linux driver contains = binary blobs and cannot be run under FreeBSD.=0A> =0A> If you want to=A0 av= oid such problems the only solution is to buy a printer with postscript=0A>= or pdf support and direct network connection, that is an expensive one. He= re at the lab we are very happy=0A> with Xerox sublimation models (i think = it is an evolution of the old Tektronix phaser)=0A> for doing color prints.= In particular the use costs are low, much lower than with color laser prin= ters,=0A> in par with black and white laser printers.=0A> But if you want t= o produce nice photographic prints, unfortunately you have to rely on good= =0A> epson dot printers or similar, which means FreeBSD is excluded, unfort= unately.=0AHow good are the sublimation printers? When I was at Xerox, the = C410 produced brilliant photographic prints and it was laser; I'd expect be= tter from the subs. I'm also surprised epson doesn't work.=0A=0AAs to this = brother problem, I've also heard from Robert, so this also influences this = discussion.=0A=0ACould it be possible to run the binaries under linuxulator= ? Don't port it as such. The whole premise of cups is a pipeline, so this s= hould work surely? Forget compiling and run it all under linuxulator - main= program _and_ .so. I considered this before with other printers.=0A_______= ________________________________________=0Afreebsd-questions@freebsd.org ma= iling list=0Ahttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions=0A= To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= "=0A=0A=0AI'm just a cheap, lazy hack and when faced with a similar problem= with my Brother Laser printer I opted for the cheap, lazy way out. I plugg= ed the printer into a USB port, installed Ghostsctipt (free), made a simple= printer filter file which redirected the PS input to ghostscript, setup th= e needed spooling directories under /var and installed lpd with the -w swit= ch so it would take print jobs from wireless laptops which are running on a= nother router in my home. Then on each Windows workstation and my son's Mac= book, we installed a simple PS printer, on the Windows machines I had to i= nstall Unix Printing Services, then directed these printers to lpr port on = my FreeBSD server. It works without CUPS, without Samba, it just works. I d= on't know if ghostscript would have a compatible driver for your model of p= rinter but it didn't have one for mine either. I just found one that was co= mpatible and it's been working now for several years without any hassles. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 12:20:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47BA1065677 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67ADC8FC21 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ghrr20 with SMTP id r20so1313652ghr.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:20:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.170.163 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.170.163; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.170.163 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.170.163]) by 10.236.170.163 with SMTP id p23mr18526355yhl.36.1330777214952 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:20:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.170.163 with SMTP id p23mr14672559yhl.36.1330777214851; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:20:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w44sm22250512yhk.17.2012.03.03.04.20.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:20:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3V0RKS0Ypwz2CG44 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 07:20:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 07:19:58 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/BAhJh=ANBXdh6r96dInPp1c"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl2vMXyy0Gzn986YXiqh0Aivg/UsaA/sAXk1XiZPFk8cbsel2NV8K1QG7UoiDFRlP8WDWsu Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:20:15 -0000 --Sig_/BAhJh=ANBXdh6r96dInPp1c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:43:32 +0000 Matthew Seaman articulated: > Stable/9, but this hasn't changed in 9.0-RELEASE: >=20 > worm:~:# /usr/bin/openssl version > OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010 Matthew, why does FreeBSD continue to use an older version of OPENSSL for the base system when a newer version is available? While I could understand, even if not fully approve the use of an older version in the same major version, its continues use as the de facto standard in an entirely new major version release is counter productive. There have been many improvements in the 1.x release of OPENSSL so I fail to see the logical use of the older version. If anything, they (the FreeBSD developers) could keep this older version available in the ports system and use the newer version as the default in the base system. --=20 Jerry =E2=99=94 Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ --Sig_/BAhJh=ANBXdh6r96dInPp1c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPUgx7AAoJEF2rWD2do7dN6DQIALIqtBZDHBPAe51WPzH8KyW5 QJ9ShXzfNfbywv1iecmNY8wuHQCTyD0+KjS/NejIjuWlxjPz4710G9fIueIPzNIc kB3xFWdEuvflPMSo29HWbfetfaBwaPFSaezJELYAPrBv/1TCgC/BNHkMa+9/A84A UgmAgVyu0lRn48cJmPAkk7Vlbmh5TNrkn8K5c8MHruFR9RSHjDzgr5dLLRdBjmZi WhY408mVsOkaGY08mIU4Afr6+iCXfcI/GNhz0o4leMoSv7XDBtMIdVULE0bNLmdZ uTzLf1BC+YNtdXpS4NF1ewSOEMzE42dyJGK5nR2UfY/FwC+gtVft3LuSw9ln5zM= =UpQi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/BAhJh=ANBXdh6r96dInPp1c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 12:32:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5921065670 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:32:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15EC8FC16 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:31:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so222389wgb.1 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:31:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fdEugHYgWZac82f2PibV3sWuFCzQDUAvcTeVD+NH1sU=; b=p4BPMRG1HFaZRpqeL6vIedjXynamyNxHRFpJE+Ri4QY+BffmKlIscQc2ThQdJdRe5p 66j8xetCsZms0GGZkKq93w7qs06VXG2fKGudOxm9X6VmJUtFsguasnSuRbEvnSkYepd7 m1XW9bdlUfO71Zm1meA5VLdmiKeHAQbTeM0nsgRfBB3JNXtfwoBJ9YmXedaeUPMSau4M JwsHKszJCdO1ULkQlDZZ4JrdI8BzvPqH8s/4BcK0xRmn9kIoZ1xdiSWZLQEBb3TCoa4s SASqMnOGR7wiJcV64xHbJ46Vwnop6v3Cfu7n4mqN3t/pJu2I4BUOogOlgty6eYtyUkWo USPA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.7.231 with SMTP id m7mr3751157wia.3.1330777918800; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:31:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.217.5.142 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 04:31:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4F51232F.8090105@growveg.net> References: <4F51232F.8090105@growveg.net> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 07:31:58 -0500 Message-ID: From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: FreeBSD Mailing Lists Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: make install fails for /usr/ports/security/sudo after downgrade from 9.0-R to 8-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:32:00 -0000 On 2 March 2012 14:44, FreeBSD Mailing Lists wrote: > Hello list, > > I had to downgrade from 9-R to 8-STABLE. To do this, I did the following: > > 1. rm -rf /usr/obj > 2. pkg_delete -a > 3. rm -rf /usr/ports > 4. mkdir -p /usr/ports/distfiles > 5. rm -rf /usr/src > 6. rm -rf /usr/local/* > 6. csup 8-STABLE sources > 7. csup ports > 8. cd /usr/src && make cleandir && make cleandir && make buildworld && > make buildkernel && make installkernel && mergemaster -p > 9. (merged required files) > 10. make installworld && mergemaster > 11. reboot. > > Practically everything in ports actually builds. I've installed X, > icewm, windowmaker, firefox36, thunderbird, gimp and a few others. I > think I've eliminated all the cruft from 9.0. However, I can't build > sudo (or screen) and I can't work out why. Here is the error: > > # make distclean clean install > > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Cleaning for sudo-1.8.4 > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Deleting distfiles for sudo-1.8.4 > =3D=3D=3D> =A0License sudo accepted by the user > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Found saved configuration for sudo-1.8.3_2 > =3D> sudo-1.8.4p2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > =3D> Attempting to fetch http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/sudo-1.8.4p2.tar.gz > =3D=3D=3D> =A0License sudo accepted by the user > =3D=3D=3D> =A0Found saved configuration for sudo-1.8.3_2 > =3D> sudo-1.8.4p2.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > =3D> Attempting to fetch http://www.sudo.ws/sudo/dist/sudo-1.8.4p2.tar.gz > > [...] > > cc -c -I../include -I.. -I. -I.. -I. -O2 -pipe -march=3Dcore2 > -I/usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE > -DLOCALEDIR=3D\"/usr/local/share/locale\" ./ttyname.c > cc -c -I../include -I.. -I. -I.. -I. -O2 -pipe -march=3Dcore2 > -I/usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE > -DLOCALEDIR=3D\"/usr/local/share/locale\" ./ttysize.c > cc -c -I../include -I.. -I. -I.. -I. -O2 -pipe -march=3Dcore2 > -I/usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE > -DLOCALEDIR=3D\"/usr/local/share/locale\" ./utmp.c > ./utmp.c: In function 'utmp_settime': > ./utmp.c:132: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c:133: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c: In function 'utmp_fill': > ./utmp.c:151: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c:153: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c:154: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c:157: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c:160: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c:160: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c:161: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c:161: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c:166: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c:170: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type > ./utmp.c: In function 'utmp_login': > ./utmp.c:294: error: storage size of 'utbuf' isn't known > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=3Ddisable-static --mode=3Dcompile cc -c > -I../include -I.. -I. -I.. -I. -O2 -pipe -march=3Dcore2 > -I/usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE > -DLOCALEDIR=3D\"/usr/local/share/locale\" ./sudo_noexec.c > ./utmp.c: In function 'utmp_logout': > ./utmp.c:343: error: storage size of 'utbuf' isn't known > *** Error code 1 > libtool: compile: =A0cc -c -I../include -I.. -I. -I.. -I. -O2 -pipe > -march=3Dcore2 -I/usr/local/include -fno-strict-aliasing -D_BSD_SOURCE > -DLOCALEDIR=3D\"/usr/local/share/locale\" ./sudo_noexec.c =A0-fPIC -DPIC = -o > .libs/sudo_noexec.o > 1 error > *** Error code 2 > 1 error > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/security/sudo. > > Can anyone help please? Stale header files in /usr/include maybe? --=20 -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 12:49:31 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8589B106566C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:49:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B34EA8FC1C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:49:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q23CnQTw096293 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:49:26 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q23CnQTw096293 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330778966; bh=beCoao1rblEzpiXPdFFOImEQXG9tqADMo/19FRxnFLU=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=CtWIib23Hjq5O8M7rLt09mnMfsl/twiXgrSk2ftp8Ghoh6Z6ODAWGvWl8+odwp03d 8TqM0PiGn5PAS7w9Kd8gkFNBkiKr/buXcuuZJe4FT3Vy1eedMNa/z5dt7Ngz38niDo JEzBcBTPhtv97UchMGfWGVxZHgdMRlBIaSzPmPcQ= Message-ID: <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:49:18 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE5EFC7090A9BC86B275D5B53" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:49:31 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE5EFC7090A9BC86B275D5B53 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/03/2012 12:19, Jerry wrote: > On Fri, 02 Mar 2012 23:43:32 +0000 > Matthew Seaman articulated: >=20 >> Stable/9, but this hasn't changed in 9.0-RELEASE: >> >> worm:~:# /usr/bin/openssl version >> OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010 >=20 > Matthew, why does FreeBSD continue to use an older version of OPENSSL > for the base system when a newer version is available? While I could > understand, even if not fully approve the use of an older version in > the same major version, its continues use as the de facto standard in a= n > entirely new major version release is counter productive. There have > been many improvements in the 1.x release of OPENSSL so I fail to see > the logical use of the older version. If anything, they (the FreeBSD > developers) could keep this older version available in the ports system= > and use the newer version as the default in the base system. Unfortunately I can't answer that. I'm not in any position to decide such things. However I can hazard a guess at some of the possible reasons: * openssl API changes between 0.9.x and 1.0.0 mean updating the shlibs is not a trivial operation, and it was judged that the benefits obtained from updating did not justify the effort. * no one had any time to import the new version. There's plenty of security-critical stuff depending on openssl, and making sure all of that didn't suffer from any regressions is not a trivial job. * simply that no one thought of doing the upgrade. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE5EFC7090A9BC86B275D5B53 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9SE1UACgkQ8Mjk52CukIz1vgCfdMI91y2s+VSbFx9xGXeVdSfs esUAn3Me3mnSKN3/HGgFyPPfKd3hlYut =3SRL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE5EFC7090A9BC86B275D5B53-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 12:57:26 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0760B106566B for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:57:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A084A8FC08 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:57:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so1316941yhg.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.185.97 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.185.97; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.185.97 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.185.97]) by 10.236.185.97 with SMTP id t61mr18903740yhm.100.1330779444910 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.185.97 with SMTP id t61mr14945494yhm.100.1330779444798; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k16sm14215156anm.18.2012.03.03.04.57.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 04:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3V0S8L3fY1z2CG44 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 07:57:22 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 07:57:22 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120303075722.1dff6e6a@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <1330776232.16593.YahooMailNeo@web36501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <297511A5-2081-4367-AE6C-9D043371085C@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4F50E946.2090209@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <1330776232.16593.YahooMailNeo@web36501.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk0X6L3N5wt/rjkcqe3/MxnLp0QibyS2tKZjzyYdSsc0lSG52LsYV3xMv6BtAp3bHyiY3d2 Subject: Re: Brother Printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:57:26 -0000 On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 04:03:52 -0800 (PST) Bill Tillman articulated: > I'm just a cheap, lazy hack and when faced with a similar problem > with my Brother Laser printer I opted for the cheap, lazy way out. I > plugged the printer into a USB port, installed Ghostsctipt (free), > made a simple printer filter file which redirected the PS input to > ghostscript, setup the needed spooling directories under /var and > installed lpd with the -w switch so it would take print jobs from > wireless laptops which are running on another router in my home. Then > on each Windows workstation and my son's Mac book, we installed a > simple PS printer, on the Windows machines I had to install Unix > Printing Services, then directed these printers to lpr port on my > FreeBSD server. It works without CUPS, without Samba, it just works. > I don't know if ghostscript would have a compatible driver for your > model of printer but it didn't have one for mine either. I just found > one that was compatible and it's been working now for several years > without any hassles. I had an acquaintance who described something similar to me a few years ago. It is amazing how, if one is willing to do a little investigation, how to bypass FreeBSD's horrific printer support and actually get something printed without pulling you hair out. Although it is certainly not as easy as turning on the printer, having the PC find its wireless IP address and just print to it (I doubt that FBSD will ever achieve that level of sophistication) it beats banging your head against a wall for days trying to achieve a simple level of usability. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/324078 http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb457002.aspx http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb463212.aspx -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 13:01:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4739106566C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from c.kworr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E5A8FC13 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so907631eaa.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:01:39 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of c.kworr@gmail.com designates 10.213.112.195 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.213.112.195; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of c.kworr@gmail.com designates 10.213.112.195 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=c.kworr@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=c.kworr@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.213.112.195]) by 10.213.112.195 with SMTP id x3mr634694ebp.277.1330779699290 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:01:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4jTpc3lFYlYLhKN8aUFMVZK1iQyU1XK+3bCuuRLDn4I=; b=mhIkewXT/cn24lPtWFqppYkPlaOW/jE8cz+We3/oCs9HhCck3bzHRmDc1KMqfquSoq 2ORB5q+SxpwYejgbTzN3fzylCAkxU1zE1HykGwIwoeFxPJOBwSwS7jLD+Ko/GdexBk1s NuGZiTraD5KaqJbvvGcsN/Xnja1hoAO1JZvAQcp/bMXeo+xofp11ISjmf7mxo0vMS20e MSdF2ORd8Gapp0BFmbLz3Z6c/qqn1PX5T2xdqbp/zultZz9oN3nShovuh/R2L7ALH8we 3noLhxsr+TDXq3coqxTOpRScfWAztlqFnihpL8+uYgCpO3R6E4CkT3YzmARqGKpD6A3V Mtsg== Received: by 10.213.112.195 with SMTP id x3mr497898ebp.277.1330779699179; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:01:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from green.tandem.local (73-193-200-46.pool.ukrtel.net. [46.200.193.73]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n17sm33821578eei.3.2012.03.03.05.01.37 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:01:38 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F521630.80108@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:01:36 +0200 From: Volodymyr Kostyrko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120220 Firefox/10.0.2 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:01:40 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: >>> Stable/9, but this hasn't changed in 9.0-RELEASE: >>> >>> worm:~:# /usr/bin/openssl version >>> OpenSSL 0.9.8q 2 Dec 2010 >> >> Matthew, why does FreeBSD continue to use an older version of OPENSSL >> for the base system when a newer version is available? While I could >> understand, even if not fully approve the use of an older version in >> the same major version, its continues use as the de facto standard in an >> entirely new major version release is counter productive. There have >> been many improvements in the 1.x release of OPENSSL so I fail to see >> the logical use of the older version. If anything, they (the FreeBSD >> developers) could keep this older version available in the ports system >> and use the newer version as the default in the base system. > > Unfortunately I can't answer that. I'm not in any position to decide > such things. > > However I can hazard a guess at some of the possible reasons: > > * openssl API changes between 0.9.x and 1.0.0 mean updating the > shlibs is not a trivial operation, and it was judged that the > benefits obtained from updating did not justify the effort. > > * no one had any time to import the new version. There's plenty of > security-critical stuff depending on openssl, and making sure all > of that didn't suffer from any regressions is not a trivial job. > > * simply that no one thought of doing the upgrade. Actually there is something weird about openssl maintenance: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/163951 I asked in the lists, bugged different persons and still can't get clear answer about this vulnerability. You know I'm just not feeling safe with ECDSA keys... -- Sphinx of black quartz judge my vow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 13:31:45 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA956106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E08E8FC15 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:31:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl9 with SMTP id l9so1081242yen.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:31:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.157.10 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.157.10; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.157.10 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.157.10]) by 10.236.157.10 with SMTP id n10mr19028293yhk.41.1330781504014 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:31:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.157.10 with SMTP id n10mr15071558yhk.41.1330781503920; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:31:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o68sm22672799yhk.16.2012.03.03.05.31.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 05:31:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3V0Svx3cCfz2CG44 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:31:41 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:31:41 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnUufBXSDbfbQJv9456KDmzsLzuTG2ClkVvRV9OHrpDhzgdMmRzXZGt50BzMd+/ixS9C7DB Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:31:45 -0000 On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:49:18 +0000 Matthew Seaman articulated: > Unfortunately I can't answer that. I'm not in any position to decide > such things. > > However I can hazard a guess at some of the possible reasons: > > * openssl API changes between 0.9.x and 1.0.0 mean updating the > shlibs is not a trivial operation, and it was judged that the > benefits obtained from updating did not justify the effort. > > * no one had any time to import the new version. There's plenty of > security-critical stuff depending on openssl, and making sure all > of that didn't suffer from any regressions is not a trivial job. > > * simply that no one thought of doing the upgrade. Thanks Matthew. Personally, I have my own take on the matter. Regarding your first two possibility, I believe the problem can be directly traced to "procrastination". At some point in time, there will come the need to update the base system's OPENSSL version. Procrastination only doubles the work you have to do tomorrow. It reminds me of what a college professor once told me, "There is never enough time to do it right, but there is always enough time to do it over." Sad but true. As to your third possibility, the need to update the port has been mentioned several times on this forum over the past year. I find it extremely improbable that no one considered the possibility that the existing application might not be up-to-date. Yet, as has been stated numerous times, if you always expect the worst in people you will never be disappointed. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 15:11:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B121106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 15:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164B58FC13 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 15:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so1503421wib.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rwmaillists@googlemail.com designates 10.180.96.230 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.180.96.230; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rwmaillists@googlemail.com designates 10.180.96.230 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rwmaillists@googlemail.com; dkim=pass header.i=rwmaillists@googlemail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.180.96.230]) by 10.180.96.230 with SMTP id dv6mr4400439wib.11.1330787457854 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:10:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Cx2yKGw4jg+4RhPQ45e6KWMIJl20tlSoNsypkhHgru8=; b=zUZNWn6RkR3bFI3vzqq+cE5Cfk95tQcShHH1BqWPPYLL2koBdcjUB0u3X+/WvAayJR 2vlSCFwukGNJ/qDo4rrlFrVRBkAGBSb4RfvbQgFMVAte8WflB25wXkycUukPLjvAXUYN LANbK0m9Ltdy6ljoKWtsNNanhcFxl2eeZwrWRtYkHK8qSMRhO1eU9/yE2Oh3qDw+UiNA ez0+yT0Rt9ioKmz6Cgowz2/8GH5zh2euZDsxYWwGdSLHb/Yj/Abn4zuujUDdy1PbOW5+ S2BiDsaVtmjAZIZBo4CVfDombaIsrGXrU3Axssj1tK4lNnvjk7lSzlEBr5ulTjPAFWwE VuMQ== Received: by 10.180.96.230 with SMTP id dv6mr3482491wib.11.1330787457811; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:10:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cc3sm28578646wib.7.2012.03.03.07.10.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 07:10:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 15:10:53 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120303151053.6dbe3d68@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:11:04 -0000 On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 08:31:41 -0500 Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:49:18 +0000 > Matthew Seaman articulated: > > > Unfortunately I can't answer that. I'm not in any position to > > decide such things. > > > > However I can hazard a guess at some of the possible reasons: > > > > * openssl API changes between 0.9.x and 1.0.0 mean updating the > > shlibs is not a trivial operation, and it was judged that the > > benefits obtained from updating did not justify the effort. > > > > * no one had any time to import the new version. There's plenty > > of security-critical stuff depending on openssl, and making sure all > > of that didn't suffer from any regressions is not a trivial > > job. > Thanks Matthew. Personally, I have my own take on the matter. > Regarding your first two possibility, I believe the problem can be > directly traced to "procrastination". At some point in time, there > will come the need to update the base system's OPENSSL version. > Procrastination only doubles the work you have to do tomorrow. In general skipping versions and letting the more gung-ho linux distributions knock the bugs out doesn't double the work. > It > reminds me of what a college professor once told me, "There is never > enough time to do it right, but there is always enough time to do it > over." Sad but true. I would interpret this in completely the opposite way. This is an argument for using mature software, keeping it well patched and updating only when the case for updating justifies the effort of doing it properly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 15:38:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B641065749 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 15:38:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net (eastrmfepo102.cox.net [68.230.241.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C208FC25 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 15:38:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo209.cox.net ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120303153804.NNNF26743.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo209.cox.net>; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 10:38:04 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.84.176]) by eastrmimpo209.cox.net with bizsmtp id h3e31i00Q3oG0Ji023e4V0; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 10:38:04 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020208.4F523ADC.00D7,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=ehEAP6//wEmZQj3qdOIars5YDil1juweOAjBHb6jSCQ= c=1 sm=1 a=7qgEHbTkCy8A:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=qwmwShWo9LG1Fa0ONy89vg==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=ZNiPapWXNI2WBKk_FpIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=qwmwShWo9LG1Fa0ONy89vg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q23Fc2VC006525; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 09:38:03 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 09:37:57 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: netroby Message-ID: <20120303093757.0b8b5427@cox.net> In-Reply-To: References: <4F4C7E23.3050404@gmail.com> <4F4C8BCA.1080809@my.gd> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Damien Fleuriot , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Delete files let FreeBSD crashes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:38:16 -0000 On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:55 +0800 netroby wrote: > Thanks . > I had resolved the problem : > > 1. restart FreeBSD to single user mode. > 2. umount all device then run fsck -f > 3. after finished the fsck, restart FreeBSD , return to normal mode. > 4. delete the broken directory, and restore the data from backup. > 5. every thing seems ok now. > > > netroby That's all well and good, but just for future reference, when you boot into single-user mode, the root partition will already be mounted read-only. It's not necessary to mount any other partitions before running fsck, and in fact, it is advised *not* to do so. -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 16:07:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDF5106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:07:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517B38FC0C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:07:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wgbds12 with SMTP id ds12so2243710wgb.31 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:07:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.99.65 with SMTP id eo1mr3693508wib.13.1330790837293; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:07:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (did75-17-88-165-130-96.fbx.proxad.net. [88.165.130.96]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id er8sm29351267wib.1.2012.03.03.08.07.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 08:07:16 -0800 (PST) References: <4F4C7E23.3050404@gmail.com> <4F4C8BCA.1080809@my.gd> <20120303093757.0b8b5427@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20120303093757.0b8b5427@cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8J2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8J2) From: Damien Fleuriot Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:06:29 +0100 To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnlmcYgSGBnVID9Kd8G0kVKxAoJUTNNM9lchPGdVtBuXSMVJijkChJGClB2i6j4HK84C47W Cc: netroby , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Delete files let FreeBSD crashes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:07:18 -0000 On 3 Mar 2012, at 16:37, "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:55 +0800 > netroby wrote: > >> Thanks . >> I had resolved the problem : >> >> 1. restart FreeBSD to single user mode. >> 2. umount all device then run fsck -f >> 3. after finished the fsck, restart FreeBSD , return to normal mode. >> 4. delete the broken directory, and restore the data from backup. >> 5. every thing seems ok now. >> >> >> netroby > > That's all well and good, but just for future reference, when you boot > into single-user mode, the root partition will already be mounted > read-only. It's not necessary to mount any other partitions before > running fsck, and in fact, it is advised *not* to do so. > You misread his message, he said he *u*mounted partitions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 16:20:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757781065670 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:20:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net (eastrmfepo102.cox.net [68.230.241.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1051D8FC08 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eastrmimpo210.cox.net ([68.230.241.225]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.04.00 201-2260-137-20101110) with ESMTP id <20120303162037.PASD26743.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo210.cox.net>; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 11:20:37 -0500 Received: from serene.no-ip.org ([98.164.84.176]) by eastrmimpo210.cox.net with bizsmtp id h4Lc1i00B3oG0Ji024LcWF; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:20:37 -0500 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020207.4F5244D5.0024,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=89ojFi/k2ZlHRud7jr28scsp9AHGqCB/mXlTpF9nqN4= c=1 sm=1 a=7qgEHbTkCy8A:10 a=G8Uczd0VNMoA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=qwmwShWo9LG1Fa0ONy89vg==:17 a=kviXuzpPAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=7gRKdCcg1yjnqKFU2oUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=4vB-4DCPJfMA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=qwmwShWo9LG1Fa0ONy89vg==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Received: from cox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by serene.no-ip.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q23GKaJC001699; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 10:20:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 10:20:31 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Damien Fleuriot Message-ID: <20120303102031.58dd33c3@cox.net> In-Reply-To: References: <4F4C7E23.3050404@gmail.com> <4F4C8BCA.1080809@my.gd> <20120303093757.0b8b5427@cox.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netroby , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Delete files let FreeBSD crashes. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 16:20:43 -0000 On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:06:29 +0100 Damien Fleuriot wrote: > > On 3 Mar 2012, at 16:37, "Conrad J. Sabatier" wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:24:55 +0800 > > netroby wrote: > > > >> Thanks . > >> I had resolved the problem : > >> > >> 1. restart FreeBSD to single user mode. > >> 2. umount all device then run fsck -f > >> 3. after finished the fsck, restart FreeBSD , return to normal > >> mode. 4. delete the broken directory, and restore the data from > >> backup. 5. every thing seems ok now. > >> > >> > >> netroby > > > > That's all well and good, but just for future reference, when you > > boot into single-user mode, the root partition will already be > > mounted read-only. It's not necessary to mount any other > > partitions before running fsck, and in fact, it is advised *not* to > > do so. > > > > You misread his message, he said he *u*mounted partitions. Whoops, he sure did, didn't he? What was I thinking? :-) Conrad, skulking quietly off into a corner, red-faced -- Conrad J. Sabatier conrads@cox.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 19:42:37 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBCC5106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@growveg.net) Received: from smtp1.servage.net (smtp1.servage.net [IPv6:2a01:3b0:1:fb:1::2001]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6289C8FC08 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 19:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from potato.growveg.org (potato.growveg.org [62.49.247.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp1.servage.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 098F332240; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <4F52744D.8060904@growveg.net> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:43:09 +0000 From: FreeBSD Mailing Lists User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120303 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "illoai@gmail.com" References: <4F51232F.8090105@growveg.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make install fails for /usr/ports/security/sudo after downgrade from 9.0-R to 8-STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 19:42:37 -0000 On 03/03/12 12:31, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > Stale header files in /usr/include maybe? Hi, Yes that's it. It seems got changed to between 8.2 and 9.0. Fixed by csup of 9.0-R and doing the buildworld buildkernel etc. thanks, -- freebsd at growveg dot net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 20:07:08 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD45106566B for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidianwalker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA3B8FC12 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:07:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so5056081iah.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:07:07 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.43.49.195 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.43.49.195; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of davidianwalker@gmail.com designates 10.43.49.195 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=davidianwalker@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=davidianwalker@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.43.49.195]) by 10.43.49.195 with SMTP id vb3mr3588663icb.33.1330805227829 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:07:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rO9gc/KAv8GCe7NVmOkgNhYdZEeRDJqp0gx82NZ9VxI=; b=erDIiDbBzyxLOacT3xdCSIx7wZY0fPk6mwiE7A4q5vb3nx9xXGRwqjjIFkSCHkDet/ dVK2u1fCbZDpKk2RPRqGT+QrZWMpf6D5/tIioUdN/NrBXqf+3jRDAycOJ6845vomcAGC /YcmRy6/qAYxdVdXmEWsqRaCL6b9SiEadBrOO2jHKqpkohB7vlsrBetzxpmeoaX1JgtR pZ6KEc355b9kyGzKzOWKPqQaIY2ZwgkEgjk/eY0rt+iUATrG4Iz5fUeh/5L8cAn2K3mb kliTEqEvWgDmR7BPgYMnXRPSK5GLQoEkWeQhJT4sNqLdzQclpJN/Kj4TVNPByUrM/Uva iTMA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.49.195 with SMTP id vb3mr2974642icb.33.1330805227732; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:07:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.96.6 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:07:07 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 06:37:07 +1030 Message-ID: From: David Walker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 20:07:08 -0000 So I installed amd64 9.0 tonight and decided against installing "ports". I'm at a point now where I'm thinking about adding it and I see sysinstall: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html Looks easy. For some unknown reason sysinstall spits the following: Warning: The disc currently in the drive is either not a FreeBSD disc or it is an older (pre 1.2.5) FreeBSD CD which does not have a version number on it. Do you wish to use this disc anyway? Like any sane person who burned this CD a few hours previously on the same machine from within FreeBSD and then installed from it shortly afterwards I click "Yes" ... So that doesn't work. I wonder what would have happened if I had elected to install "ports" during the initial install ... I'm here if anyone's bothered and wants more information. Best wishes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 20:19:07 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC48F106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:19:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E7F8FC08 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:19:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q23KJ1lL003183 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:19:01 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk q23KJ1lL003183 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1330805942; bh=ubJmD2bwYd5gHGly6vt0rfIFVLndV/akvbK378ihHjk=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc; b=nxX0oxnuIH26Q8EK7IsUslMOUm8Fgc/GvB4NRpeVo6oDb09NcuKM48pF23osLuxiq I4jiyb/eX6AMze2asAY0wOnEFteCG1cAxnyKaEk35YdvBnvf38D0a1fJHUmFj6/Ql3 TQ3cI7Lael0b6ylMWKm4xiQURypeNim5+VaM3Ank= Message-ID: <4F527CAC.8010803@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 20:18:52 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig1CDBC70DA4DF0EF8876762F3" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 20:19:07 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig1CDBC70DA4DF0EF8876762F3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/03/2012 20:07, David Walker wrote: > So I installed amd64 9.0 tonight and decided against installing "ports"= =2E > I'm at a point now where I'm thinking about adding it and I see sysinst= all: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html > Looks easy. >=20 > For some unknown reason sysinstall spits the following: >=20 > Warning: The disc currently in the drive is either not a FreeBSD > disc or it is an older (pre 1.2.5) FreeBSD CD which does not have a > version number on it. Do you wish to use this disc anyway? >=20 > Like any sane person who burned this CD a few hours previously on the > same machine from within FreeBSD and then installed from it shortly > afterwards I click "Yes" ... >=20 > So that doesn't work. > I wonder what would have happened if I had elected to install "ports" > during the initial install ... >=20 > I'm here if anyone's bothered and wants more information. Once the system is up-and-running, forget about sysinstall. (Or, for those of you that keep up with the latest trends, bsdinstall). The install is done, and its job is over. Instead, choose one of the following two exciting command lines, according to taste: # csup -h cvsup.fr.freebsd.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile= (Choose a cvsup server near you if you don't happen to be anywhere near France) --or-- # portsnap fetch extract Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig1CDBC70DA4DF0EF8876762F3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9SfLQACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxziQCfdyvcIvV+H57e8n4O0lV1glXi iJcAoIsbmvxZO4MHnPMxEeXZbPArGqd9 =Ukq8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig1CDBC70DA4DF0EF8876762F3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 20:51:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99587106566B for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:51:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nzp@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [204.13.164.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEC18FC0C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 20:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fulvetta.riseup.net (fulvetta-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 408F551A0D for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 12:51:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: nzp@fulvetta.riseup.net) with ESMTPSA id 0ECFD298 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:51:01 +0100 From: Nikola =?utf-8?B?UGF2bG92acSH?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120303205101.GA3199@sputnjik.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.3 at mx1 X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 20:51:13 -0000 On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 06:37:07AM +1030, David Walker wrote: > So I installed amd64 9.0 tonight and decided against installing "ports". > I'm at a point now where I'm thinking about adding it and I see sysinstall: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html > Looks easy. > > For some unknown reason sysinstall spits the following: > > Warning: The disc currently in the drive is either not a FreeBSD > disc or it is an older (pre 1.2.5) FreeBSD CD which does not have a > version number on it. Do you wish to use this disc anyway? > It's probably because sysinstall doesn't understand the new distribution format--everything is now in /usr/freebsd-dist/ neatly packed in single archives, instead of the old way in /X.Y-RELENG_TAG/ with floppy-friendly split archives. > Like any sane person who burned this CD a few hours previously on the > same machine from within FreeBSD and then installed from it shortly > afterwards I click "Yes" ... > > So that doesn't work. > I wonder what would have happened if I had elected to install "ports" > during the initial install ... If you did it the normal way with bsdinstall then I guess everything would install correctly. But anyway, you can use the other methods mentioned in the handbook. Doing it with # portsnap fetch extract seems the most straight forward way to me. -- If you can't say anything good about someone, sit right here by me. -- Alice Roosevelt Longworth From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 21:14:24 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F62106566C; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kes-kes@yandex.ru) Received: from forward4.mail.yandex.net (forward4.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:602::4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE73A8FC18; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:14:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp3.mail.yandex.net (smtp3.mail.yandex.net [77.88.46.103]) by forward4.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 5897950154C; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 01:14:21 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1330809261; bh=88a+4nKzt7rPtROY6EiuLCLZU3JIDdKjiFlrhnQI7nY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UW9I3jOfDQtgf8GJppRmfM+9zzvb1oRVVl66Lj1OsvOthShEQlG1UuHcYiTC4x5uP xYvLM+UVjQ7KG1rDmmi7DryQEMlOqDvV0HoTUnp03xTR0wNd72v/fpHbw0uWjSB3pl Vn+nw57T4K+2yaxuuK6cW+oT1IBioo3XwRdFB5OM= Received: from smtp3.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 287021BA0342; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 01:14:21 +0400 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1330809261; bh=88a+4nKzt7rPtROY6EiuLCLZU3JIDdKjiFlrhnQI7nY=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:Message-ID:To:CC:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UW9I3jOfDQtgf8GJppRmfM+9zzvb1oRVVl66Lj1OsvOthShEQlG1UuHcYiTC4x5uP xYvLM+UVjQ7KG1rDmmi7DryQEMlOqDvV0HoTUnp03xTR0wNd72v/fpHbw0uWjSB3pl Vn+nw57T4K+2yaxuuK6cW+oT1IBioo3XwRdFB5OM= Received: from unknown (unknown [77.93.52.20]) by smtp3.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id EKQmS1tc-EKQ0PfaQ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 01:14:20 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 23:14:29 +0200 From: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v4.0.24) Professional Organization: =?windows-1251?B?188gyu7t/Oru4iwgRnJlZUxpbmU=?= X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <755733674.20120303231429@yandex.ru> To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= In-Reply-To: <292119122.20120228212137@yandex.ru> References: <292119122.20120228212137@yandex.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: netisr traffic bad distribution between CPUs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 21:14:24 -0000 Some more statistics http://piccy.info/view3/2703143/058d1f0dfaaa9e69f5d10255257c66b9/orig/ http://piccy.info/view3/2703161/e131f67a5288557cbbc8ac67c36a9be3/orig/ # netstat -Q Configuration: Setting Current Limit Thread count 4 4 Default queue limit 256 10240 Direct dispatch disabled n/a Forced direct dispatch disabled n/a Threads bound to CPUs disabled n/a Protocols: Name Proto QLimit Policy Flags ip 1 1024 flow --- igmp 2 256 source --- rtsock 3 256 source --- arp 7 256 source --- ip6 10 256 flow --- Workstreams: WSID CPU Name Len WMark Disp'd HDisp'd QDrops Queued Handled 0 0 ip 606 1024 0 0 2930711 2377098505 2377097226 0 0 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 rtsock 0 251 0 0 0 108579 108579 0 0 arp 0 17 0 0 0 205271 205271 0 0 ip6 0 1 0 0 0 1111 1111 1 1 ip 16 536 0 0 0 758322101 758322085 1 1 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 rtsock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 arp 0 3 0 0 0 106860 106860 1 1 ip6 0 2 0 0 0 1254 1254 2 2 ip 155 1024 0 0 414966 2378645792 2378645336 2 2 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 rtsock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 arp 0 11 0 0 0 320116 320116 2 2 ip6 0 1 0 0 0 3557 3557 3 3 ip 0 1024 0 0 5774 2108548645 2108548645 3 3 igmp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 rtsock 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 arp 0 12 0 0 0 672284 672284 3 3 ip6 0 3 0 0 0 13870 13870 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 21:33:43 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A41106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:33:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39C18FC0C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:33:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so1387871vcm.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:33:42 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 10.52.72.107 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.72.107; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 10.52.72.107 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rsimmons0@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=rsimmons0@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.72.107]) by 10.52.72.107 with SMTP id c11mr20871512vdv.132.1330810422326 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:33:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=W4aUr7Fnpu7iR+uuDy1Ny3C1jNAouCNxyFyMh83vKKc=; b=lsb7tcpNe1fa4Rla0sSz9QYdbVt1j81/uDKjlwTXPGet9Vgl2+Oc5OL5kBNxD9HhOg 1IdTluR/+M4UtNwJ6aM3hgfvWMM+iGlNEMeLkbKzMMKlHtCbIPMu3CB7AovN9YRC4Ia/ hyYHfy4Lz9GwgW11wEHkxqxcMSJp8YEXt9mU92IMyht+BQ26dj7RBrekiv4jX3z3BYnZ XBUodX6A9TXb/1pmUtqA18KzhAXFfFphNf158mzShLOF7teVt+xMgfQUOS00ZNbffzqB DeWPU7idJMYbHR0QW7Jk369iVX/iniMf7y/bhOpOCkrTqd/gJ/TuncO9QCNciaKElAn2 8T5Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.72.107 with SMTP id c11mr17889916vdv.132.1330810422060; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:33:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.65.114 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:33:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:33:42 -0500 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 21:33:43 -0000 On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:49:18 +0000 > Matthew Seaman articulated: > >> Unfortunately I can't answer that. =A0I'm not in any position to decide >> such things. >> >> However I can hazard a guess at some of the possible reasons: >> >> =A0 =A0* openssl API changes between 0.9.x and 1.0.0 mean updating the >> =A0 =A0 =A0shlibs is not a trivial operation, and it was judged that the >> =A0 =A0 =A0benefits obtained from updating did not justify the effort. >> >> =A0 =A0* no one had any time to import the new version. =A0There's plent= y of >> =A0 =A0 =A0security-critical stuff depending on openssl, and making sure= all >> =A0 =A0 =A0of that didn't suffer from any regressions is not a trivial j= ob. >> >> =A0 =A0* simply that no one thought of doing the upgrade. > > Thanks Matthew. Personally, I have my own take on the matter. Regarding > your first two possibility, I believe the problem can be directly > traced to "procrastination". At some point in time, there will come the > need to update the base system's OPENSSL version. Procrastination only > doubles the work you have to do tomorrow. It reminds me of what a > college professor once told me, "There is never enough time to do it > right, but there is always enough time to do it over." Sad but true. > > As to your third possibility, the need to update the port has been > mentioned several times on this forum over the past year. I find it > extremely improbable that no one considered the possibility that the > existing application might not be up-to-date. Yet, as has been stated > numerous times, if you always expect the worst in people you will > never be disappointed. I'm replying off-list. No need to reply this back onto the list. Please don't accuse a volunteer project of procrastination. If there is not enough manpower to make a change to the operating system, then roll up your sleeves and contribute. Throwing non-constructive insults at the project when you yourself are not contributing to the effort that you're complaining about achieves nothing. I've seen this type of attitude many times over the years in free software projects from users, and it shouldn't continue. Also, please don't feel insulted. We both like FreeBSD. Just make your contributions constructive. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 21:38:28 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FD81065694 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:38:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6258FC1C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:38:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vbmv11 with SMTP id v11so3056587vbm.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:38:25 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 10.52.92.140 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.92.140; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 10.52.92.140 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rsimmons0@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=rsimmons0@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.92.140]) by 10.52.92.140 with SMTP id cm12mr25397888vdb.115.1330810705899 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:38:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zMaVA+Ji8UfjhalnhoZofgsoqOiZyG1h0sAPnY6gv2M=; b=W98kQHM4XQfm1B89MvjBFYifFSBDyrjYjR3XJE3t1l0MUf1lb0ub95rQR1NL0WUEUI zQrMQW0JJ/gHihOENry5TCKKb7xKdMA7Qf0BaRr2iy+iAsrHDxwoegSiTe5EdmWbfidd MyOoSHpSKz+VsphurEzsrE8j0rHYeDUMzNOlXodV9Nm2bsnIKmlmEXDHzGDUZTv0uOZn HCP6DGCYTbzUXWc9JxExIXFAvTKpzfT5EmAwJrpLA9KkhiCVqqXk1gG2y5UkT9RtbeEF v8RzRHc5fDpP1z7MB++ALrHRoptbxPInE47SqtVAZ533IHLgfQO7ThJTBIUFWLOELAjq nfzg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.92.140 with SMTP id cm12mr21747763vdb.115.1330810705776; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:38:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.65.114 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:38:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:38:25 -0500 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 21:38:28 -0000 One more thing. An easy contribution that could be made is to replace the old version of openssl with the new in the src tree of CURRENT. Then build world and see what breaks. Try to fix what has broken. Contribute patches up to the point that you don't understand the next step or you have build world working without errors. Then you will have warm and fuzzies. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 21:41:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1507F106566C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53588FC13 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:41:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so1390957vcm.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 10.52.23.74 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.23.74; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 10.52.23.74 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rsimmons0@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=rsimmons0@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.23.74]) by 10.52.23.74 with SMTP id k10mr25456185vdf.106.1330810874062 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:41:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=X4GyfPGRyICl4UAEpWbGhKZci3vy06oZqYBEF9pHyZM=; b=AoBooAPv+Hv93/qYfpIfG+mwKFododujUFbuBtfbV4o+2K1d+sWetpx1HEJfmYn1i6 r5YXca+PFihEHy387BtOKWbeg28Q72ujbziICJpjrGxPOzdWPqLoDknoFrEOA8eYwqJp OR1NybAWy3XbXnDpFImjoGwxXDMuFAran5Tx9YrJv7WT1U8XW3UVZOwnbD2Xyb2wn91L qzAXbuO+qmoOXp7lPVGzNa884lR5jTcMVKzLDxrxeXJZXeM+RGVQGxZhcyduTaySfCTp /OgS6CLScbjq2mrFGwSdwDvzQVhESymxBKO3OF4Ldumj0oFHCZ068DRIk/e7WqSwVcaz X78g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.23.74 with SMTP id k10mr21753534vdf.106.1330810874019; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:41:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.65.114 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:41:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:41:13 -0500 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 21:41:15 -0000 Oops. Sorry, my mail reader must have recently changed the behavior of the reply button to always reply all. I meant that to be off-list. I apologize. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 21:49:15 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69471106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from davidianwalker@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AE28FC15 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 21:49:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so5150947iah.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:49:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=MxWlDrMyLPdVzCZ2c6vOkfLfOV0k9SI8mqMT1NoLj7E=; b=XYZlYnlEshQnTVyBQbFGBvO1T6QGyvu9jq/A5/MtAKvjBkbvrdpn8Ac+jxCdHoGowJ INTJIA7Al6c670/sd26vCJc9s0z1oOrJ5FwYj6PF6uCQ1AcxJUV07+tTtuVicHKwkbXj RpOuZ+/eHdR2h/25s6/M6L4r/oeElq6HL9BFYcLuNbLZDgX+rrjGvZDfLvxyJqeUhEQ2 2ptYVdaJP5e1th2rNpd+AHmF+6VrnB8QaSvwK62/bR7foS8ok0NKg7YvryUMVOlk1CBx Cf9TFtSQDdVfZQimygo/+ATRSbVwuRNj2iIb+QPQ+I62N+mDHhcRie2iNdbN1+gKl/EI NlyQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.87.229 with SMTP id bb5mr2153289igb.33.1330811354526; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 13:49:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.96.6 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 13:49:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 08:19:13 +1030 Message-ID: From: David Walker To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 21:49:15 -0000 So of course I can't install source using sysinstall either ... No problem, I'll re-install (reverting a few hours of work) and do it on the install. Of course it works perfectly - I am able to install ports and src from the CD that sysinstall fails on ... As I'm getting used to though, there's more facepalming ... I'll do what I'm accustomed to do ... and partition my drive ... this should be easy. / 1GB swap 1GB /root 1GB /tmp /1GB /usr 50GB etcetera ... FreeBSD can't extract root/.profile from base.txz (or similar) avanothergo or exit ... No worries, it's a bit of dust, avanothergo ... Rinse and repeat x times - so I pull the CD out of the drive and rinse. Looks pretty clean ... try again. FreeBSD can't extract etcetera. I installed from this CD a few hours previously on a brand new (a handful of uses) drive. I remember reading somewhere that 2GB is a recommended size for / (don't ask me where, I've looked) but I've taken this into account with a separate /root right? Let's bump all of them anyway. / 2GB swap 2GB /root 2GB /tmp /2GB /usr 50GB etcetera ... FreeBSD can't extract some file from some where ... ... avanothergo and use the default partitioning scheme, it must be the CD but I'll verify that ... So after an hour or so, success. I'm interested in the reason for this. Surely not inodes? Is this considered a bug? Is there at least one reason why a separate /root slice should not be allowed? If so, I think it would be nice to see an error message that describes the situation. On 04/03/2012, David Walker wrote: > So I installed amd64 9.0 tonight and decided against installing "ports". > I'm at a point now where I'm thinking about adding it and I see sysinstall: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/ports-using.html > Looks easy. > > For some unknown reason sysinstall spits the following: > > Warning: The disc currently in the drive is either not a FreeBSD > disc or it is an older (pre 1.2.5) FreeBSD CD which does not have a > version number on it. Do you wish to use this disc anyway? > > Like any sane person who burned this CD a few hours previously on the > same machine from within FreeBSD and then installed from it shortly > afterwards I click "Yes" ... > > So that doesn't work. > I wonder what would have happened if I had elected to install "ports" > during the initial install ... > > I'm here if anyone's bothered and wants more information. > > Best wishes. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 22:11:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82991106564A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 22:11:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213838FC0A for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 22:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yhgm50 with SMTP id m50so1407633yhg.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:11:03 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.9.1 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.236.9.1; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of jerry@seibercom.net designates 10.236.9.1 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=jerry@seibercom.net Received: from mr.google.com ([10.236.9.1]) by 10.236.9.1 with SMTP id 1mr20404563yhs.14.1330812663587 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:11:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.9.1 with SMTP id 1mr16220851yhs.14.1330812663469; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:11:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4sm16325082anm.5.2012.03.03.14.11.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:11:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3V0hR85p8pz2CG44 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:11:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:11:00 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20120303171100.79b0b232@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.0 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2vIay5oN/j9eVTEWu0+arisXFm3fnk6iK2ti9RBiLlICUHQAGS5be9wuQzeEIp2GwZE9P Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 22:11:04 -0000 On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:41:13 -0500 Robert Simmons articulated: > Oops. Sorry, my mail reader must have recently changed the behavior > of the reply button to always reply all. I meant that to be off-list. Thanks Robert, there aren't many things I appreciate more than advice and criticism from someone who cannot figure out how to use an MUA. When you do that, you can come back and talk to me; however, do it on list -- something you are quite good at. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 22:50:48 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28146106566C for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 22:50:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsimmons0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com [209.85.220.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2A988FC15 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 22:50:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vcmm1 with SMTP id m1so1418926vcm.13 for ; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:50:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 10.52.72.107 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.72.107; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rsimmons0@gmail.com designates 10.52.72.107 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rsimmons0@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=rsimmons0@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.52.72.107]) by 10.52.72.107 with SMTP id c11mr21131132vdv.132.1330815047121 (num_hops = 1); Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:50:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RYzeBOulFJI/6932EROFi6wQ3fHDZ+raUyUqZk/5Yy4=; b=g9HZQb+rcs7l04/5SctMM7wPJjHoKnMihY13U+rlb7bgvfuwxvJQIB1mMO1GVXDIue vJ9h/iCieZ7pYuxFXmUa3JClGtCUdo9RkslIRQY2KKzELm6zzPyQwSrQNyXclhDJvomm TkL7RhNPt99IJgKh2bc0MOSF2bFmnUE4KOmVHYIMiXcVsSt6/0/JxhtLezyhwwDbuYRk zyntThGQUF9PugnXM+fa0pcfYq3xoB5sTJ6h9ImV/3FBpi7NNt3KjdG1oE8pHlTzKnIC Z6+mFs6e0Xstr+65/jPnVjmvOUEiGq2MmJ5Bus7B0i5spRfllpFr7uJbiBZ/Poz9QRoL BT8A== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.72.107 with SMTP id c11mr18114054vdv.132.1330815047001; Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:50:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.52.65.114 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 14:50:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120303171100.79b0b232@scorpio> References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> <20120303171100.79b0b232@scorpio> Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 17:50:46 -0500 Message-ID: From: Robert Simmons To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 22:50:48 -0000 On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:41:13 -0500 > Robert Simmons articulated: > >> Oops. =A0Sorry, my mail reader must have recently changed the behavior >> of the reply button to always reply all. =A0I meant that to be off-list. > > Thanks Robert, there aren't many things I appreciate more than advice > and criticism from someone who cannot figure out how to use an MUA. > When you do that, you can come back and talk to me; however, do it on > list -- something you are quite good at. Your insults have no effect on me. Why don't you focus your energy on making valuable contributions to the project rather than hurling insults? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 3 23:06:18 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF451065672 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 23:06:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 826708FC14 for ; Sat, 3 Mar 2012 23:06:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (bell.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.40]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7255C28 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 09:19:41 +1000 (EST) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB05E5C22 for ; Sun, 4 Mar 2012 09:19:40 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4F52A2B3.6080204@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2012 09:01:07 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <86fwdqvf2x.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302171631.775dd715@scorpio> <867gz2vdtg.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> <20120302182156.58c10d82@scorpio> <4F515B24.9050406@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303071958.0c963330@scorpio> <4F52134E.1090408@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20120303083141.1975c60c@scorpio> <20120303171100.79b0b232@scorpio> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: openssl from ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 23:06:19 -0000 On 03/04/12 08:50, Robert Simmons wrote: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Jerry wrote: >> On Sat, 3 Mar 2012 16:41:13 -0500 >> Robert Simmons articulated: >> >>> Oops. Sorry, my mail reader must have recently changed the behavior >>> of the reply button to always reply all. I meant that to be off-list. >> Thanks Robert, there aren't many things I appreciate more than advice >> and criticism from someone who cannot figure out how to use an MUA. >> When you do that, you can come back and talk to me; however, do it on >> list -- something you are quite good at. > Your insults have no effect on me. > > Why don't you focus your energy on making valuable contributions to > the project rather than hurling insults? Actually, Jerry's got this little trick up his sleeve where every reply to him goes straight back to this list: reply-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org So if you want to reply privately you need reply all and delete the other addresses. There's nothing wrong with your use of an MUA, just unexpected behavior is all. Not unusual for him really... :)