Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:30:43 +0300 From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: Waldemar Kornewald <Waldemar.Kornewald@web.de> Subject: Re: modularization Message-ID: <41641DB3.2090303@he.iki.fi> In-Reply-To: <200410061628.i96GS3eo046161@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <41640CEE.9070900@web.de> <4164106A.70901@cronyx.ru> <416415DA.9030109@web.de> <200410061628.i96GS3eo046161@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett Wollman wrote: ><<On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 17:57:14 +0200, Waldemar Kornewald <Waldemar.Kornewald@web.de> said: > > > >>Yes, something in that direction, plus: protocols: >>IPv4, IPv6, TCP, UDP, ICMP, IPX, etc. >>Just about everything as modules. >> >> > >It is not generally regarded as a good idea to make artificial >boundaries between (e.g.) IP and TCP. > > > However from the success of the OSI/IP and related (CLNS, TP4, etc) protocols it can said that it's a good way to fail. Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41641DB3.2090303>