Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Oct 2012 12:31:34 -0400
From:      Jim Trigg <jtrigg@spamcop.net>
To:        Timothy Snowberger <tsnow@tabletoptelephone.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Problem upgrading
Message-ID:  <20121018163134.GA28941@spamcop.net>
In-Reply-To: <507F1FA2.7000008@tabletoptelephone.com>
References:  <20121017142733.GJ75370@spamcop.net> <507F1FA2.7000008@tabletoptelephone.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 02:14:10PM -0700, Timothy Snowberger wrote:
> On 10/17/2012 7:27 AM, Jim Trigg wrote:
> > Any suggestions on how to fix this?
> >
> > ---
> > argent(1) /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster# freebsd-update -r 9.0-RELEASE upgrade
> > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y
> > ...
> > Fetching metadata signature for 9.0-RELEASE from update5.FreeBSD.org... done.
> > Fetching metadata index... done.
> > Fetching 1 metadata patches. done.
> > Applying metadata patches... done.
> > Fetching 1 metadata files... done.
> >
> > The update metadata is correctly signed, but
> > failed an integrity check.
> > Cowardly refusing to proceed any further.
> 
> sed -i '' -e 's/=_/=%@_/' /usr/sbin/freebsd-update
> 
> See http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2011-October/064321.html
> 
> "First, a minor change must be made to the freebsd-update code in order
> for it to accept file names appearing in FreeBSD 9.0 which contain the '%'
> and '@' characters; without this change, freebsd-update will error out
> with the message "The update metadata is correctly signed, but failed an
> integrity check". "

This fixed it.

Thanks,
Jim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121018163134.GA28941>