From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 25 21:54:01 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D41516A41F for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:54:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595EB43D49 for ; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:53:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Received: from [192.168.254.11] (junior.samsco.home [192.168.254.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id jAPLrrJ3053386; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:53:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from scottl@samsco.org) Message-ID: <438787F6.5050306@samsco.org> Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 14:53:58 -0700 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050615 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger Marquis References: <20051119120051.39BE216A41F@hub.freebsd.org> <20051119200222.V2029@roble.com> <43876D0E.6080503@samsco.org> <20051125131721.K11440@roble.com> In-Reply-To: <20051125131721.K11440@roble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=3.8 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on pooker.samsco.org Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hardware RAID support? Which controller best to use? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 21:54:01 -0000 Roger Marquis wrote: > Scott Long wrote: > >>> Sadly, the fast LSI SCSI RAID drivers either don't exist for FreeBSD >>> or are not mature. Adaptec SCSI RAID is also not as well supported >>> as some of the SATA RAID cards. >> >> >> What? Is this some sort of troll? > > > Scott, > > Are you saying that the mpt drivers are no longer "largely > unmaintained" A lot of work was put into making the MPT driver fully capable for 6.0. Unfortunately this doesn't look like it was reflected in the 6.0 release notes, but a simple query to the mailing lists could have provided up to date status. > or that there are management and monitoring tools > for any Adaptec (U320) card? > Adaptec contributed a large update to their RAID driver for 6.0. They are in the process of releasing an updated management tool for it, though the Linux management tools continue to work perfectly, as they have for the past 3 years. Again, a simple query could have provided up to date status. Scott