Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:34:48 +0100 (BST)
From:      Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bris.ac.uk>
To:        erwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] New mailing pkg-fallout
Message-ID:  <201307180834.r6I8YmSk034177@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20130718080450.GM84587@droso.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:04:52 +0200
>From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org>
>To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
>Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] New mailing pkg-fallout

>On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 11:14:39PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>> The volume unsustainable.
>
>You bet it is!  Know you know what portmgr has been spending its time on
>for all those years and why we keep sining the same old song about
>quality control and pre-commit (and not post-commit testing waiting for
>a "krismail" from me, Martin, or other portmgr members) testing.  If you
>feel the volume is to big, here's your change to make a difference!
>
>Erwin

I want to help, but my commitment and
skills are not even close to yours.
If there is portscluster/portsmon type
failure table, I'll check it periodically
to see if there are any ports I can work on.
And for all maintained ports, the mail
should certainly go to the maintainer.

Anton



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201307180834.r6I8YmSk034177>