From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Jan 5 2:23:10 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA9037B4F0; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 02:23:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net (puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BB243EB2; Sun, 5 Jan 2003 02:23:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from pool0024.cvx21-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net ([209.179.192.24] helo=mindspring.com) by puffin.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18V7vu-0006GK-00; Sun, 05 Jan 2003 02:23:07 -0800 Message-ID: <3E18073C.68182FE4@mindspring.com> Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 02:21:48 -0800 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rahul Siddharthan Cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey , Brett Glass , chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bystander shot by a spam filter References: <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104112015.026a5530@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104201251.029387d0@localhost> <4.3.2.7.2.20030104202908.03c3b100@localhost> <20030105073804.GA72674@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20030105074923.GA4956@papagena.rockefeller.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a4c0d53df701fbfae6fe889384d7c361b0667c3043c0873f7e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > According to the benchmarks I cited earlier, > http://www.coyotegulch.com/reviews/intel_comp/intel_gcc_bench2.html > (look at the SciMark benchmark) > gcc actually beats intel on the sparse matrix multiply on the > Pentium IV (which generally emerges as Intel's strong platform) and > runs it pretty close on LU decomposition. That's about the only place that g++ beat Intel C++; almost all other cases, the Intel averages 20% faster, and that number goes up to 100% faster for some benchmarks on the P4. I guess people should read the referenced page, instead of trusting summaries in mailing list postings. ;^). -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message