From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 29 11:43:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 524AA16A4CE for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:43:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437FF43FB1 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 11:43:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031029194316.WXX21605.lakemtao07.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Wed, 29 Oct 2003 14:43:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 13:42:31 -0600 To: Kent Stewart References: <20031029042715.57311.qmail@web60301.mail.yahoo.com> <200310290815.36608.kstewart@owt.com> <200310291030.34574.kstewart@owt.com> From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200310291030.34574.kstewart@owt.com> User-Agent: Opera7.21/Linux M2 build 480 cc: Andrew J Caines cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: INDEX-5 is deleted then reconstructed by "make index" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:43:17 -0000 On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 10:30:34 -0800, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Wednesday 29 October 2003 10:10 am, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:15:36 -0800, Kent Stewart >> wrote: >> > On Wednesday 29 October 2003 07:57 am, Andrew J Caines wrote: >> >> Jeremy, > > >> >> > Result: The 'my' way is a winner, easier and quick. :-) >> >> >> >> So what is the major difference between your setup and mine? >> > >> > Wait till a change like the last upgrade to gettext comes along and >> you >> > have >> > to rebuild all of the ports that use it. He will have to rebuild each >> of >> > them >> > manually. You can use portupgrade recursively on gettext and wait for >> it >> > to >> > finish. >> >> Uh? No, I do not have to do it by manual. All I have to do is >> 'portupgrade >> -rf gettext -m BATCH=yes'.. It's about pkg_version and portversion; not >> portupgrade. ;-) Or, maybe I don't understand your point? > > Portupgrade needs a curent version of INDEX[-5] and INDEX.db to do this. Nope, it doesn't need.. I never update the INDEX and it always work. If I edit the one of Makefile in the ports tree without update the INDEX and the portupgrade still will recoginze those change to update. Cheers, Mezz > Kent > >> >> Cheers, >> Mezz >> >> > Kent >> > >> >> > But, I don't know how it will make the difference if I have the >> 9,000 >> >> > packages installed. >> >> >> >> 231 installed on the PII, 188 on the P4, all built from ports. >> >> >> >> >> >> [1] http://halplant.com:88/software/FreeBSD/scripts/update_fbsd >> >> [2] http://halplant.com:88/systems.html >> >> [3] Find disk specs for the Optiplex GX400 on Dell's web site and win >> >> a prize for persistence in the face of crappy design and slow >> >> delivery. >> >> >> >> >> >> -Andrew- -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.