From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 16 18:57:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D304016A469 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ekarkkai@pp.htv.fi) Received: from smtp6.pp.htv.fi (smtp6.pp.htv.fi [213.243.153.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E0413C4B2 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ekarkkai@pp.htv.fi) Received: from zero.my.domain (cs181095217.pp.htv.fi [82.181.95.217]) by smtp6.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id F251F5BC376 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:57:15 +0300 (EEST) Received: from thunderbolt.my.domain (thunderbolt.my.domain [10.192.168.30]) by zero.my.domain (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9GIvFs6003913 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:57:15 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ekarkkai@pp.htv.fi) Received: from thunderbolt.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by thunderbolt.my.domain (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l9GIvEGb008385 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:57:14 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ejk@thunderbolt.my.domain) Received: (from ejk@localhost) by thunderbolt.my.domain (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l9GIvECP008384 for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:57:14 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ejk) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 21:57:14 +0300 From: Esa Karkkainen To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071016185714.GB2186@pp.htv.fi> Mail-Followup-To: Esa Karkkainen , stable@freebsd.org References: <20071004165755.GA1049@pp.htv.fi> <47120D83.1010703@FreeBSD.org> <20071015203202.GA17964@pp.htv.fi> <20071016004637.GA79351@cdnetworks.co.kr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071016004637.GA79351@cdnetworks.co.kr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Subject: Re: Reproducable, possibly NFS related, fatal double fault in 6.2-R-p7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 18:57:17 -0000 On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:46:37AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > I remember that nve(4) is NOT stable under heavy network loads. Yup, that seems to correct. Usually this machine, ie. home my orkstation, does not have a load, network wise or in general. > I'd like to say use nfe(4) which is believed to be more stable/fast > than nve(4). nfe(4) is also default NVIDIA NIC driver for > CURRENT/RELENG_7. If you have to use RELENG_6 try nfe(4) at the > following URL. Well, I could use -CURRENT or RELENG_7 in this machine, but I made a decision some time a go to use RELENG_6_2, because it's hassle free. -- "In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move." -- Douglas Adams 1952 - 2001