From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 12 17:00:32 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BFD11065676 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:00:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FA38FC15 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:00:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q2CH0WfD003157 for ; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:00:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q2CH0Wle003155; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:00:32 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:00:32 GMT Message-Id: <201203121700.q2CH0Wle003155@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org From: Jung-uk Kim Cc: Subject: Re: ports/162991: java/openjdk6 fails to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jung-uk Kim List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:00:32 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/162991; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Jung-uk Kim To: Volodymyr Kostyrko Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/162991: java/openjdk6 fails to build Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:50:12 -0400 On Monday 12 March 2012 11:26 am, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Thursday 08 March 2012 02:50 am, Volodymyr Kostyrko wrote: > >> Ok, I found time to investigate it. > >> > >> Everything is about arch guessing. java/openjdk7 substitutes > >> amd64 for x86_64 while java/openjdk6 doesn't. I just added > >> missing bits from correspondent java/openjdk7 patch. > >> > >> Redports build: > >> https://redports.org/buildarchive/20120307160255-45601 > >> > >> Patch attached. > > > > Sorry but it doesn't make any sense. I guess you are patching > > this: > > > > ... > > # Platform settings specific to BSD > > ifeq ($(PLATFORM), bsd) > > OS_VERSION := $(shell uname -r) > > # Arch and OS name/version > > mach := $(shell uname -m) > > archExpr = case "$(mach)" in \ > > i[3-9]86) \ > > echo i586 \ > > ;; \ > > *) \ > > echo $(mach) \ > > ;; \ > > esac > > ARCH := $(shell $(archExpr) ) > > ARCH_FAMILY := $(ARCH) > > ... > > > > Unless "UNAME_m" environment variable is set, there is no way > > that this patch does anything at all. > > > > % uname -r > > 10.0-CURRENT > > % uname -m > > amd64 > > % env UNAME_m=x86_64 uname -m > > x86_64 > > > > I believe OpenJDK7 added it because some BSDs (e.g., > > DragonFlyBSD) return x86_64 for "uname -m". > > So why it ends up in our port and not in DragonFlyBSD's pkgsrc? OpenJDK7 patchset is shared with other BSDs: https://wikis.oracle.com/display/OpenJDK/BSDPort OpenJDK6 patchset was based on early OpenJDK7 patchsets and it may or may not build on other platforms. I am 99% sure it won't build on DragonFlyBSD/x86-64, BTW. > > BTW, does "make DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS=yes" make any difference? > > Actually after successful build I can't reproduce this issue > anymore. I seem to miss some bits of data so I'll try to retest in > clean environment. These parallel build problems are very hard to reproduce. Actually, I was never able to reproduce it myself. Jung-uk Kim