Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 8 Aug 2012 09:19:41 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208080918390.3359@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <5022104D.8070402@infracaninophile.co.uk>
References:  <793d6519ca3648de7634faff1829b9f7@remailer.privacy.at> <5021641E.4030206@une.net.co> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208072309370.1652@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <5022104D.8070402@infracaninophile.co.uk>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> Needing fsck because the drive is failing and not able to store and
> retrieve data reliably any more is a whole different thing.

or bad data stored because of non-disk errors.

> least will discover that this is happening due to the built-in
> checksumming and avoid many instances of silent corruption.  What it
> can't do is take a filesystem containing random errors and reconstruct a
> pristine version from it.  But then what filesystem can?
the question is "how much can".

Anyway ok i will not try anymore to stop you from your ZFS religion.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208080918390.3359>