Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:50:24 GMT From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/70402: [patch] MNT_SNAPSHOT not documented in mount(2) man page Message-ID: <200408131350.i7DDoOnk097765@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/70402; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: James Raftery <james@now.ie> Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: docs/70402: [patch] MNT_SNAPSHOT not documented in mount(2) man page Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:47:38 +0300 On Fri, Aug 13, 2004 at 10:45:31AM -0000, James Raftery wrote: > > >Number: 70402 > >Category: docs > >Synopsis: [patch] MNT_SNAPSHOT not documented in mount(2) man page > >Description: > The MNT_SNAPSHOT mount option isn't documented in the man page > for mount(2). What do you think about the following patch instead? G'luck, Peter Index: src/lib/libc/sys/mount.2 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libc/sys/mount.2,v retrieving revision 1.39 diff -u -r1.39 mount.2 --- src/lib/libc/sys/mount.2 30 Jun 2004 20:09:10 -0000 1.39 +++ src/lib/libc/sys/mount.2 13 Aug 2004 13:46:00 -0000 @@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ .It Dv MNT_NODEV Do not interpret special files on the file system. This flag is set automatically when the caller is not the super-user. +.It Dv MNT_SNAPSHOT +Create a snapshot of the file system. +This is currently only supported on UFS2 file systems, see +.Xr mksnap_ffs 8 +for more information. .It Dv MNT_SUIDDIR Directories with the SUID bit set chown new files to their own owner. This flag requires the SUIDDIR option to have been compiled into the kernel @@ -358,6 +363,7 @@ mounted. .Sh SEE ALSO .Xr lsvfs 1 , +.Xr mksnap_ffs 8 , .Xr mount 8 , .Xr umount 8 .Sh BUGS -- Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@cnsys.bg roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If there were no counterfactuals, this sentence would not have been paradoxical.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408131350.i7DDoOnk097765>